Whatever you do avoid Romanians like they're the scum of this Earth. Do not fall for the Romanian. Their woman are nasty in almost every conceived way. Some are women, beauty, until they fuck you. They're the worst fucks, on a scale of every other fuck. I'd rather fuck a nigger than a Romanian. Niggers actually make good fucks. Rather fuck any other nation on this planet than a damn Romanian. Rather fuck a robot than a Romanian. Some have even sworn a pig is better than a Romanian. Because they've been fucked so much, there's nothing in between the posts, nothing in between the posts, terrible at it. Not all, just every damn Romanian immigrant. They're all whores. Except in Romania. There they have a little bit more dignity. No. They're still a bunch of whores. The worst whores, pigs are probably better, a cheese grater is better, somebody has said. Never met a nation of whores that make the worst whores. But that's Romanians. Historically somebody done a number over there, probably Dracula. Turned them into whores, and made them into the worst whores.
It's a swarm tactic. Lots of small missile boats versus battleship. Crappy boats, junks, barges, fishing boats, disguised. It seems. You're talking hundreds, getting orders from the military, and they roll up as not being identified, until they fire on a battleship, or coast guard. It doesn't quite work like that anymore, because the interception, radar, and penetration a Battleship has is much better. But it's an active threat, distinguishing between what's what. Kill them all. War it would be an interesting encounter. It simply paints it all red, as it always has done in conflict. Ah look it's a kaboom. But that is advancing to hide its status. Why, it's not defense. Fishing vessel doesn't need missiles.
The piracy in the South China Sea has been historic.
In Africa huge, but forget which country started doing it. Because it's cheaper than making battleships. Just get the monkeys to sink their own craft. Imagine that firing from a junk. It's gonna burn a hole right through it. Nevermind its muntion store getting covered in fish guts.
Snake Island is obvious. What waters does Ukraine hold? Hold the Islands hold the waters. Waters, rich in oil and gas deposits. Odesa also becomes excluded and redundant if uncaptured, Islands cause what zone around them. It puts a wedge in those waters. Chernobyl, the contamination zone is in both Belarus and Ukraine.
Piracy. I had heard of their fishing fleet being armed. It just makes them all an active threat, and not commercial vessels? In which case shoot it first. There are a few other nations which have adopted similar tactics, an African nation doing the same, using lots of small craft as missile boats, Iran is similar.
But there is often a Miltary distinction instead of pretending to be commercial vessels. However when China claims the South China Sea there might be exceptions in economic zones and territorial waters. The problem in the South China Sea is the obvious fallout of attacking them first.
Isn't it hiding military vessels, and a warcrime. Doesnt it constitute as flying the wrong maritime flags, and is piracy. Of course there are exceptions to smaller arms. But those can attack ships, and aren't defensive? Unclear.
They are a secret, no matter whether or not they're recognised, outside of the soothsayers. Soothsayers profiting off of fiction, and parlour tricks, akin to seances. But the most compelling evidence for them has been historic. It has quickly been turned into conjecture. Today they might as well be cryptids. If they have anything concrete, it's another Moon Landing.
What are they, people, who shit in the woods. Outside of people shitting in the woods, the favourite Alien campsite. They come all the way to Earth because they don't have a toilet built into their disks, and for a takeaway. They are nothing but a nuance.
Or convince us, by doing so, they've lied about everything, our origin, our advancement, our leaders, our planet.
Am I speaking to a monkey? What is so hard to grasp.
They're not factually depopulation if they're the result of overpopulation. More choice.
If there was less choice what happens? The population reproduces. Although with the human species like with mammals it occurs. Because sex is an appetite. Or tell me how you fuck just to birth. It leads to a heap of whatever. Away from reproduction. But less choice can also create similar occurrence.
Because they can't birth, it must be depopulation? Your argument.
Promoting it leads to rights. Rights selling what kind of services for profit. What kind of global laws are selling what services. Consumption. Control occurs as a result of population. It adds more laws and taxes. In any event. The population implodes by the more problems it causes.
Enough of this topic. It's not my choice. I don't care. I hate it everywhere. Their choice. Not mine. I try to watch anything without it, ignoring their choice. But it doesn't make me ignorant.
Nature, same problem. Lack of herd too much herd, hormones, pheromones. Seasonal what happens. Rutting season stag claims entire harem. What do the losers do, get bent? No what. Sometimes, it's simple dominance. But by nature they're BI, same with all mammals.
Sex is an appetite and preferences. Product of environment and experience. Bigger population more choices. In the wild. The dominant claim the herd.
You're talking about conditioning. A simple narrative of control in order to profit off more services by passing laws and regulations to sell stuff. Integration. Lack of rights provoke the liberals into forcing change often for control.
Today they're forcing change to cause control. Perhaps it's depopulation, but it was because of population, it provided more choices. Not because of depopulation. Depopulation is a run off facing every large population. It will tip through nature, human, conflict, or geography, threatening a habitat by consuming it.
Netflix gets taxes, you pay your fee and it has gotten a bunch of free taxation. Sure it pays something tax on its Corp. But it declares that show a loss for tax exemption, and it gets tax breaks and tax subsidies on arts and farts, local productions. But any propaganda has gone and triggered the liberals. Next Iran is protesting the rights. It better or else there will be the sanctions. All so Netflix can get a tax break, no, profit. Then the global authority can tell Iran what to do. Selling it a bunch of American God's.
No? Are you sure.
Today they're triggering the wokism because it runs off to the Ukraine. Or somewhere.
No? Are you sure.
Laws, causing dystopia, a narrative selling services for a global authority. If everybody is buying faggots, what else are they buying. See how that works. No sooner is the global authority telling everybody what to do, making laws and regulations for them. Because it is selling them the buggery of it pays them more. Simple stuff like Netflix is now the Global medium and dominating narrative. How much money has it made its brokers. Rape. They force the rape. Seriously motivate the liberals demanding the rights to control the profit. Next there's the Ukraine or something.
Control for profit. They're a product of population, not depopulation.
No, but seriously? Lol
Economic, political, or simply starving an Island out. Forcing it into submission.
Although there is an urgency today. Because conflict brews, economics tumble, supply lines reshuffle, when it does, nothing is impossible.
Xi also said it would be back under Mainland authority in his tenure.
There are scenarios it could be beat. Plenty in fact. But there would be causality. Conventionally.
No. What do you think EVs do? What about renewables? Have these products and their means got more or less lifetime? How many more products does it take to make them work? How much more consumption are they offering?
This World has become insane. It cannot improve. It simply doesn't know how. It cannot not support more without more dystopia. All it wants to do is profit. It doesn't want to advance anything else.
You seem to have fallen for the Larp of hydrogen, electro-magnets, or God knows, in the other closet of cars can run on water, or ethanol. No. Those millennials are insane, how much more, for less. The freaking hydrogen system has how many more parts, generating much less, costing far more. It's like a dodo invented it. It will not keep up with the demand and it costs far more. Crops made into petrol. Nuts. How many more emissions has that caused? About 3 to 5 times more. Those plants, biomatter, the planet made into a fossil fuel. Suddenly there's this other dumb human, cannot use the planet's recycling, those fossil fuels, hell no, use this other biofuel instead, we recycled it. No it is not green, it has been made for idiots by idiots. Causing more consumption. Some dumb idiot needs the biofuel as another sale, it's sold right alongside the regular fuel. How much more do the EVs need to make them run? The more complicated a system the quicker it fails. Literally there's the weather. But it needs far more parts and services having far less lifetime. A combustion engine lasted decades, you could repair it yourself. A EV last less than a decade and it's replaced. The same with solar and turbines largely fair as bad. More consumption. More energy. More profit. Nothing to do with anything else.
Not really. They layer some dystopia controlling the increased population having more services and choices. Eventually renaissance becomes catastrophe. It did with Sodom and Gamorrah, Pompeii, the Mayans, and so many more. But this is from a growing population expanding, and the technology surpassing it, depleting resources quicker, causing a host of geography and geopolitics.
But technically they're not depopulation, they're a result of increased population. Population eventually tips whatever its sexual appetite. The more it grows the greater its problems. Nature eventually answers back, human, conflict is our nature, we are individuals who make our own choices, or planetary, the greater a species numbers the more they threaten the natural habitat. Increased sexual appetites can bring diseases. A case whatever your fetish. But conceptually you're wrong to assume depopulation. Opposite by fact, a result of population.
An easy assumption because they cannot birth, without more services, adoption, surrogacy, whatever. Why did they need too, when there was that increased population having more choice promoting them? Too control it. Yawn. It would gain no matter what gets fucked. Until it tips, no matter what.
Not promoting them, don't care, dispelling that myth. A result of increased population. Otherwise simple fact, they wouldn't sustain. Imagine it in the Wild. There's Ham sent into the Jungle.
No they're the product of consumption. The cause of population. Not depopulation. Another service buggering your damn ass, costing you more. Choice. Sex is an appetite. Not reproduction. They also add dystopia. They suddenly need a million laws and rights. Policing you into more taxes.
Simple experiment with mammals. Mice is easiest. Add more numbers than the cage can sustain. 4 but add 8. The mice become queer, and even cannibal, but their numbers grow. Grow until they die of disease or starvation.
Yawn. Socialism is globohomoism. There is no community today. It has inserted strangers everywhere causing mass consumption. The few communities remaining are under assault by socialism destroying them. It inserts more consumption and services destroying the community, filling it with a bunch of leftists burning the Bible, stopping fox hunting, making little troons, women football teams, you name it. Community today is going to a foreign football match. Rurally it is under assault by mass immigration. As another estate of tenements fills with strangers. The remaining community traditions left have become unaffordable, and non profitable, eventually threatened by regulations stopping them.
Socialism is globohomoism and the only community and tradition it wants are through services it controls, as it adds greater numbers destroying communities. The TV destroyed communities, the computer has destroyed far more. There hasn't been a single socialist innovation that hasn't achieved anything but dystopia. The left want more bullshit, because all they're is puppets. Take this climate shit. Innovations empowering wealth to control them far more, causing them to be literal slaves. Look at the online communities created. Are you nuts?
But I am sure you can find a little support group in Timbuktu causing you to travel outside of your community and spend far more going to another. Needed to travel to Timbuktu to find the karma, no, just rape. Globohomoism is socialism.
But it doesn't population control. It just makes faggots. Look at Africa. Queerest populations on the planet. But the fastest growing.
Faggots are the result of consumption, not depopulation. They're the result of population, not depopulation. When a population gets larger, it gets queerer. Simple fact with mammals. The greater their numbers the more they fuck everything until they get fucked. Literally nature answers back.
Perhaps they're used as another mechanism of dystopia. But consumption is the result of faggots. They spend far more, unless they're Africans.
It would plunge them into war. War with America and Japan. It would cause a greater war, where everybody else would become involved.
Taiwan isn't Ukraine. Both America's current admin Biden, has promised to defend it, Japan has also confirmed a defense of it. At the same time North Korea would attack. By then it would have spilled into more of Asia, the Middle East, and Europe.
Can China even invade it. It would have a colossal death toll trying to beach on it. It's an Island. It has a huge population. Attacking military targets would destroy population centers. But Taiwan has an airforce, subs, smaller ships, missile offense and defenses. China would get hit, before any potential nukes went off. Think of those losses an invasion force would suffer, attempting invasion. Tens of thousands immediately. Unless it could achieve the impossible. Literally target and destroy before Taiwan could scramble and lock. No. Historically even successful invasions of Islands were catastrophic for Attackers, crippling other defenses prior, to secure a beach head.
We are talking a country here even if China doesn't recognise it. It has a staggering population. Far simpler just to erase it.
Almost like to see it try. Because it cannot be done. Not in the sense of invading. Wouldn't you missile it into oblivion? Anybody left at that point well perhaps you could claim a victory? Swarming with millions, perhaps. Wouldn't it be the Mongol Fleet. Laughable.
Yes but there are international rules. Fairly sure that military ships acting as commercial ships is piracy. A breach of the rules. Except possibly within that nation's waters where they enforce their own rules.
Perhaps this creates a problem, where the South China Sea isn't recognised as Chinese, despite China laying claim to it.