North Sea is limited in full continental capacity. There are new finds. But it's more expensive to pipe. It's actually an oxymoron. It cannot supply Europe indefinitely. It can power businesses. While price rises higher on households.
Haha. These go to contracts outside of their personnel. Contractors. They aren't a Darpa project. What's the audit, build it, they buy it. Who funds it? The person seeking a later sale for X amount of units.
Darpa research is often an oversight committee, or it's through another state institution getting access grants but keeps a separate record often public or scientific.
I don't know enough about it. I am poking on what it means. I answered probably correctly to begin with. Let's suggest it was a completely government funded project for Darpa. Official secrets. Unless it wasn't a public contractor or another dedicated institution using any research or patents publicly.
You see this shit in the films all the time. Easy understanding it conceptually. And you have also had records released on file from grants by Darpa. Where various academics and inventors have claimed they were funded or worked for, because their innovations became public.
Because he's larping how his coin has the special powers. The special powers of geekiness. Perhaps he could've have worked for somebody's shell, proxying something under some other contract. But if he was it was a contractor. Or he's full of it. But you never know, apart from specific research on record. They're denying it. There is that record of direct affiliation.
Darpa is also normally state secrets. Unless specific publicly funded research. I severely doubt treason. He is just advertising it. If there was, why admit from both. Catch 22. But the odds are he is bullshit.
It's war. Any incidents will continue.
Why Russia mobilised, defense, restoration, patrol. Further fighting and supply lines.
But yea infrastructure and utility operations are often the first targets. Easily targeted to cause disruption and loss. Same for all sides. Especially in areas of operation.
Some of the first targets in war, are coms, and utilities. No grid causes disruption to any opponents control.
It goes back historically to daming the Euphrates, poisoning the Wells, and burning and pillaging the crops.
Thorium reactors can still enrich.
As far as the topic is concerned it's a giant hoax. A tech gimmick, fuelling consumption and consumerism. There is nothing clean or green about it. The products are some of the most service intensive in history, requiring more parts, and maintenance, and energy. They are made largely from plastics, acids, and rare earth metals, and they are largely non recyclable. Solar panels are stacking up like rubber tyres, billions and billions of tonnes of their waste. Same with Ewaste. Warehouses and warehouse full of a non perishables. But they perish even more rapidly, having no lifetime. The lie is they don't emit like combustion, or fossil fuels. But they are made out of increasing electronics. Above from fossil fuels.
Electronics break the quickest out of any products ever made in history. Panels batteries and turbines are no exception. Like every other electronic. The entire time they are simply requiring more energy usage, becoming more reliant on the grid, increasing in its demand and costs. At the same time dystopia. More debt from the demand, more monitoring, more services. They emit EMR, cancers, brain diseases, and a heap of pollution. Read about LED lights. Light pollution, electric radiation, cancer masts killing wildlife.
It is such a con. A society hell bent on its needs to consume even more. Not less. Far more use and energy is required, using far more services to get anything to work, using products with no lifetime, changing daily for bigger numbers and another model.
How can anybody be so gullible is their level of attention today.
If the meat is off the menu, vegans are gonna make the prime cut. They're full of nutrients. You'd get real meat cravings, carnivorously. You'd be licking your chops staring at all the grazers and you just need a good stew pot to survive that horror.
The horror of a great reset, and the WW3.
Dinosaurs are a hoax. They are about as real as all other mythology. For centuries there was gargoyles, but gargoyles aren't real. But to the people placing them everywhere they were believed in. Dinosaurs are also a rock carving of an artistic impression of presumed calcification fed into CGI and made into an animal for a narrative that is a theory. It hasn't been proved. They have no idea what that animal matter is. There are no complete fossils outside of extinct animals that have existed. They're a rock carving.
Here https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world-s-oldest-whale-is-found-in-the-himalayas-1193848.html
https://creation.com/giant-oysters-on-the-mountain
https://clickamericana.com/topics/science-technology/fossil-whale-found-on-mountain-top-1899
https://www.christianforums.com/threads/whale-fossils-discovered-high-up-in-andes-mountains.8066989/
On and on and on. Okay so Whales are everywhere. Some have been given exotic names because of dinosaurs. No just whales.
Now
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/sabre-toothed-cat-1.5305505
They have spliced animal parts together stared at the clouds and come up with; Who fucking cares. It sells.
Not how life evolves. There is a system of checks and balances predator prey keeping a perfectly balanced ecosystem.
If there are stupidasaurs. Where is the vegetation. So these big huge animals are eating millions and millions of tonnes of vegetation. Where is it? Look at the great plains with bison. Look at the savannahs of Africa. These herds eat and trample it. Hardly any trees. But fucking dinosaurs on a Pangea, no Continental split, yet, that meteor wiped them out, there would be nothing. Dumbass. Beside they're so fucking stupid they need multiple hearts, that size, and gravity would also make them move slowly. They are the dumbest. Dumbest bullshit to hit science. They sold and sold until how can they manufacture more. Last time we all looked outside, life, animal life, evolves together. Not just reptiles. But they needed a narrative of how fish grew legs sprouting wings and turning into a dinosaur. Then to fully change into mammals again. Because I shit you not. Monkey.
There has been multiple extinction level events but oh know the freaking ocean lost all of them except the blue whale. Fuck off. Sell it to Santa. The poor reptiles never grew again. God damn it.
Sabotage? Umm if it isn't working. Because the gas is off, or it's at decreasingly diminished capacity. Then the pipeline isn't being fully maintained. Therefore it sooner isn't operational. God damn it. Suddenly it's sabotage. And it's all, Latvia's fault?
Tedious propaganda. But reservists serve a function they've had training. And commit to function inside areas of defense. Are they frontline doubtful. It depends on how the entire apparatus operates. You're talking huge lines and supply lines. Restoration, repairs, industry, infrastructure, maintenance, service, and critical defense.
You're a dumb son of a fucking retard. You got dropped on your head. I don't give a crap about about your slogans. They're a buzzword.
It is true next century there will be even less whites at this rate. If they're 8% percent of the global population now. What will they be next century at that rate. It was more than 50% last century, and now it's 8%, a century later.
Except it doesn't completely work like that at all. There is still a huge area of the Global map where white people fundamentally exist. It means they can control any numbers on it. Dumbass.
But you're assuming some big war where if whites genocide, the planet doesn't as well? Because don't worry next evolution the monkeys will all be out of Africa again? In another Planet of the Apes, you dumb cunt.
Yawn. What happens in Europe causes what? If Europe is in recession. What are the migrants doing, what is the rest of the World doing?
White genocide happens because white people run some shit. It happens because white assholes profit globally. So they set up a stupid factory making cheap goods to sell back home cheaper. No thought except profit. It causes a population boom where richer white people selling agriculture, energy, sewage treatment, waterworks, banking profit more. Then other rich white people profit on the services changing back n forth, the immigration, Internet, media, education, medicine, investment, etc. But the entire time they didn't give another shit. Literally more numbers cause more profit. They caused population booms in unregulated countries where there is no control, countries tripling their populations in decades. Next white numbers are rapidly declining. All of 80 to a 100 years ago, the white demographic was the largest demographic on the planet. Now it's the smallest. Liberalism, globalism haven't made the World better, it has as many wars more death, crime, and disease dying daily the more population there is, and it is as violent, despite increasing rights laws and dystopia. But they have successfully created mass consumption because it pays them more. They don't care much what they did or how they've managed it outside of profit. In particular in nations they have no control over, it is what it is. There is no population control. White nations they controlled by adding other population into it. Otherwise there would be poverty versus elite and another communist, socialist, fascist, civil war. But a white nation attacking another white nation means nothing else. Unless all white nations are it again? Then what is the rest of the World doing. I mean they aren't getting all that stuff either. No sooner aren't they also feeding themselves. Let's face it. They cannot, with populations tripling in a few decades. If there is a big recession in white nations, borders get closed, services get disrupted. But the factories making crap, isn't being bought. And if there is that other war it affects the entire planet.
White genocide. No. Just rapidly shrinking white numbers by comparison. A massive offshore operation where wealth has largely funneled out, instead of massively improved inside, until infrastructure, services, and a larger divide has peaked. Inflation and living costs have sky rocketed. What beats inflation, industry not services. Services cause inflation. More debt.
Inflation is like a football club today. It's how they run the economy. Every year more merchandise costing more. Every year more signings costing more. The price keeps rising as debt is passed on to the fans. The shares keep rising as more investment and credit and debt is passed back on the fans. The tax payer. Until you've got a team that can't even play in the nationals. It is so corrupt, it fumbles, or literally plays worse than its leagues. It has sponsored a bunch of other international players foremost. Until that money is faster offshore. The club is owned by stock exchange. Or a foreign billionaire. The shareholders are more investment propping up the inflation. Where look at that ticket cost, subscription cost. What did you even buy. Hell it only costs even more to play it. All those grounds, training, leisure centers, tuition is also through the roof. But don't worry they'll offshore it some more. Until it isn't even played seasonally, it's off somewhere because at least it will give all the protests something to watch. Their own team losing it. Because the fans are a bunch of masochists, they love paying so much more for it. Love paying so much more inflation. Love paying their taxes to a football economy offshoring all their money. But hell there's all that investment it keeps the economy doing something. I cannot think of what today.
Probably. But it doesn't make Saddam any less of a WMD, does it?
Had to make sure the nukes worked first. So they wouldn't be used again. Cough. I don't know nukes work I haven't seen them. Besides they grant all the special powers of radiation, and Hulk. Just need a cobalt bomb to make sure. I mean how else are you going to make sure. You need a live fire exercise. Then was different. There wasn't a UN. There were no human rights. It was a different World.
What were the Japanese doing to the Chinese. Even to the American POWs. The shit they did. Not even telling you. It makes your name look like kindergarten. Same level of brutality impaling. They impaled. They grew bamboo up ass until it sprouted. But that isn't even the half of it. Besides they wouldn't surrender until a nuke, and refused to even accept their lost, sent suicide squads to destroy stuff. Unless the population was hit, it wouldn't have even had their attention.
Different today. Much different. UN and human rights.
But yea the USA aren't no saints either.
No it hasn't, to be fair. It hasn't in this conflict. There is only escalation. Also that doctorine has changed in this conflict to certain extents and reasons.
These new territories are now a part of Russian soil. Except there is a conflict. It hasn't suddenly decreased because Russia has gained a larger protectorate, shouting ohhh it has the nukes. Wait what. Ukraine wants its land back, and is still fighting for it. It has technically escalated. Ukraine might fight even harder for it. It will seek even more arms to get it.
So dumbass this conflict will escalate. As it does the probability of nukes increases.
Not whether or not, Russia remains in conflict, it is and it hasn't stopped. It has escalated. Russia has mobilised. Not what capability Russia has. It was obvious Russia has nukes, and has acquired parts of the former Ukraine. It wasn't that concern. I don't care much. Not Ukrainian. Not Russian. Except I question the larger odds of nukes. They remain probable.
Hahaha, no why don't you. You're obviously really stupid.
You cannot put the probable odds together. I will just spell them out.
The probable odds put Russia as that saboteur. Highest defacto.
Why, because dumbass, they use it as a recruitment drive. Look at you. Also it makes no difference, apart from further pressure. To buy more, or immediate usage of other supplies. The pipeline is largely Russian. They decreased the flow. Why not damage it, seeking further guarantees. If it sells, it sells. Pressuring. Besides it doesn't take too much repairing it. Any costs are placed back on its operation if required. If not it will sit there. If repaired insures usage.
Europe sanctioned again highly suspect. But they are still relying on some demands. If they want it, they'll fund repairing it, or they will seek to use it more. It makes no difference. Unless they don't want it. Placing them with culpability on it being unused. They didn't want it. They broke it. No difference, apart from it being unused.
A third party USA, Britain, or Aliens, or Extinction Rebellion. A lower margin, but not unlikely. Except there is no gain, apart from a narrative to stop use, or seek another supply. But will Europe, if it needs Gas. If Europe needs gas, it will buy more. There aren't many immediate sources. If needed from Russia, Europe will lean where, protecting the pipeline, then demanding increased usage. It makes no difference, on the immediate demands and needs. It furthers them. Away from Russia, perhaps, more costly sources. Europe would anyway, or not. But any pressure from the demands will seek gas. It isn't the only Russian pipeline acquiring it. But you're blaming them for Europe not having gas. Hahaha. Funny guy. Europe will seek gas anyway. From where is still debatable. There is still a pipeline or the means to tanker it. Right there.
No, it is not grounds for WW3. It was a pipeline. A pipeline at diminished capacity. A pipeline under questions. Look it's broken. Give a fuck. It was already.
Buy you know what. I am just gonna blame Latvia, because I really don't like them. Start WW3 now.
That's not the point. The point is it is under immediate attack, inside territories, it has just offered protections.
What does it mean. A nuclear power is under direct attack.
How does it respond. As of yet conventionally. Pressed further, let's suggest a territory now a part of Russia is completely invaded, the population and Russian soldiers are being killed in significant numbers, what happens. Specifically it remains an escalating question?
Yawn. Seriously.
It doesn't matter who did what here. The pipeline pumps gas into Europe. It's a European pipeline, they laid a lot of it, paying for it.
Do they want it on, or not? If they want it on, they might protect it better. I guess before winter they'll get colder.
Or they might fix it, or something like leave it leaking. If they fix, I guess they want the gas? Maybe next time they'll buy better insurance? It offers all the terms and conditions.
No WW3, yet. It's a matter of assurance, oops insurance, and a fully guaranteed pipeline.
But they won't be recognised, by the West, so it means Ukraine can attack them, and because Ukraine is attacking them, the West will continue to arm it.
It changes nothing as far as the present conflict is concerned.
No it changes quite a bit. It means they're a part of Russia, and therefore Russia sets the precedence to defend them by all means necessary.
What happens if a nuke goes off in their defense? A very fine point of debate. Not much debate with nukes. But? Would the West engage into a direct war with Russia? It proves they were always going too. Russia simply had to lose. Lose Crimea, and any other separatist territory seeking Russian protection.
It wouldn't be such an easy international response? But perhaps, otherwise.
Dangerous escalation ahead. Unless another truce foments. But as it stands on not recognising them, this war will only drag for much longer, escalating.
Who cares. It's basically off anyway. Who do you think it pressures. The pipeline wasnt even full laid by Russia. It just means the gas is off. It means the gas is off until Europe insures that continued flow or not.
In that probability who did it. Europe, aliens, the CIA, climate protesters, or Russia?
It doesn't matter. Because if it goes back on, it's off with sabotage and leaks. Europe has to commit to it. Insuring an uninterrupted flow continues. As they aren't buying it at capacity. What do they want?
But is it a conspiracy. Insurance normally is.
That's common policy. She won't undermine it. It's a commitment on a lot of levels you don't understand. Particularly trade, business.
It isn't that. It's whether she changes Italy. Particularly policy. Addressing illegal immigration. Heaps of other national issues regarding business trade energy and inflation.
But the thing with it all is. You can't nationalise in the EU. It's a bloc of nations deciding what laws they, enough. So when somebody proposes tackling immigration. It becomes quite oxymoronic. Italy has been bailed out as well by Europe, running debts. Then they just do another dumb deal. No sooner are the ports a migration center again.
But who knows. When you have enough leaders saying enough. The public demand somebody else instead of charlatans. Then the stupid vote in the EU goes ummm we better change it. But enough. You want to change it. Just give them a finger and change it. Same with the other laws and bullshit.
Status Quo or prove me wrong.
Hahaha, midterms.