2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are incredibly ignorant.

This is what preceeds the mentioning of "Lucifer"

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Isaiah-14-4/

“That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!”

What follows is directed towards the King of Babylon. The context is clearly there.

The idea that the Latin word for Morningstar is a name for the Satan is a Christian invention.

Educate yourself.

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's feednews. You don't know what that is, do you?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

That statement makes no sense. What do you mean?

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are posting AI generated content. Did you read it before posting?

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lucifer

A dead Babylonian king? I am asking because the biblical "Lucifer" is literally that.

Have you actually ever read the bible?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Russia has already trafficked thousands of children out of Ukraine and the Russian shills will defend this.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would you advance medicine by promoting a vaccine whose effect is random, ranging from harmless to killing the recipient? Hardly scientific.

This is where probabilities are important. If it's much more probable to die of the infection than from the vaccine, it's advisable to use the vaccine in case if a highly infectious disease.

Do you understand what I wrote there? Do you find vaccines only acceptable if they are completely harmless?

Can you actually make a point? Can you in your own words summarise the Scientific Method?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have no idea what you are talking about.

According to you, predicting that a dice doesn't always show the same number would be impossible to do in a scientific setting.

You think that probability calculations are impossible or unscientific?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The essence of the scientific method is that it is based on being able to repeat results.

No, it's to verify predictions through experiments.

So if the prediction is "there will be a different result each time", the experiment would then be used to confirm it.

Did yiu seriously think you could just "break" science through an uninformed forum post?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they are not interested in facts but in having their bias confirmed.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://covid19.who.int/

Sort of. There have been over 700 million cases of covid since the beginning of the pandemic.

Now compare that to the flu cases in OP's unsourced image.

Do you see what I mean?

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, blindly believing some unsourced image is what a real skeptic does, right?

Who's the fucking sheep now?

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://covid19.who.int/

There have been over 700 million covid cases since the beginning of the pandemic.

Are you somehow missing 700+ million flu cases over the same period?

With posts like this, there is a reason why OP posts images instead of sources.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is Putin using Bolsheviks to try to conquer Ukraine?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Biden is just a sock puppet, why does his son matter at all?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›