2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks who crawled out of his hole.

How the special military operation coming along?

All still going according to plan?

Months ago you claimed that NATO was already defeated. So what's going on in Ukraine and Russia? Who's fighting in Ukraine and who's bombing Russia?

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too bad you fucked off from this place and cannot tell us why it's a good thing that Prigozhin got offed by Putin.

by DrLeaks
2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

This...this time for realz! 2 more weeks!

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's what I asked:

Explain, in your own words, why this is significant.

You can't even do that. Pathetic.

Maybe you can answer this: in what currency is oil priced?

If you don't understand the question, I can explain it to you.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have been hearing that the USD is about to collapse for 40 years.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you agree that the cited CDC data does not state what you claim?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Covid dashboard shows just 1.7 percent of the 324 Covid deaths registered in the week ending August 19 had the coronavirus as the primary cause of death.

Advice for the next time you plan to embarrass yourself: read past the sensationalist headline.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. What's the distance?

  2. What's the evidence?

2
Eisenhorn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Explain, in your own words, why this is significant.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing of substance. As always. Are you afraid to commit to a testable statement?

3
Eisenhorn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spoiler: they didn't. Putin didn't even show up.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

As predicted you are not giving a distance and you are not providing evidence.

You just make more unsupported claims.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess you will never understand that throwing out claims is not the same as presenting evidence.

That's the problem with you flat earthers. You don't know the first thing about how to present an argument.

Distant light from objects can’t reach you anymore because it is absorbed/diffracted/blocked by the air in the way. The more of that air, the higher the opacity, until it is effectively opaque. Simple, right?

At what distance does the air turn opaque and what evidence do you have for it?

Prediction: You won't answer the question. You might state a distance but you will never provide evidence for it.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, show that air turns opaque beyond a certain distance.

Should be easy. Go ahead, impress me.

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

When did you see that?

1
Eisenhorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just because you want to believe something doesn't make it true.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›