ATTENTION: Calling all Flat Earther FREAKS!!!
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
I guess you will never understand that throwing out claims is not the same as presenting evidence.
That's the problem with you flat earthers. You don't know the first thing about how to present an argument.
At what distance does the air turn opaque and what evidence do you have for it?
Prediction: You won't answer the question. You might state a distance but you will never provide evidence for it.
I have presented evidence, and provided examples and analogies to help you understand. What you don’t understand is that evidence is trivial, and you have no trouble discarding/ignoring it when you want to. Having evidence isn’t nearly as important as being correct, and being able to validate it. Evidence frequently, perhaps most often, leads to incorrect conclusions.
There aren’t any flat earthers, just products and/or agents of a heavily advertised (i.e. heavily funded) psyop. You are not talking to them right now. You are talking to me.
Personally i avoid argument because it is exclusively for and by idiots hoping to manipulate. I don’t want to convince (i.e. manipulate) you. I want you to understand. I want you to discover for yourself, and to know why you must.
From the top of everest looking straight towards the horizon it is a few hundred miles. At sea level, again looking towards the hozion through the densest and most laden air, it is only a few.
When you make long distance observations of things, you will see a haze/distortion on them caused by the air in between. Ultimately this haze becomes impenetrable, and roughly this is one of the primary causes of the horizon line we see.
The evidence comes from observation, scale testing, and scientific principles (notably optics).
You need to understand that in the context of distant objects no longer being visible - full opacity is not required. As i explained already, it just needs to be opaque enough to prevent the distant light from that object from reaching you and/or becoming drowned out by the local luminosity.
You already know that air isn’t completely transparent, and that light doesn’t travel forever through it as a result. You can do an observation with a large field and a small candle if you have doubts.
As predicted you are not giving a distance and you are not providing evidence.
You just make more unsupported claims.
Re-read my answer, if you are able.
You ignoring the evidence i provide is not the same as not providing it. Reasoning, explanation, and observation are also evidence.
I just try to explain, which you ignore and misunderstand. When you don’t understand, the best thing to begin with is to ask questions!
Nothing of substance. As always. Are you afraid to commit to a testable statement?