Notice how they didnt demolish all the (temporary) buildings that were supposedly constructed from papier mache
There's literally evidence of cities underneath current ones buried away
Masonry alcoves and miles of system that are not used for any purpose....sure buddy
Why go thru all that trouble to simply bury it. Its not used for anything but to show off underground....?
Thousands of miles of these tunnels in every city and not possible in the time frame the narrative gives.
I build skyscrapers for a living and understand this wasn't possible in just and couple hundred years.
100% the yahoos that showed up here didnt build these detailed, ornate and impossible structures...some are said to be done in a years time...sure buddy
Yet there's tons of evidence of the orphan trains...
Why would these old photos be doctored up with vanilla sky's and have clear evidence of being photo-shoped?
Who built the hundred of thousands of miles of tunnels system underneath every major city in north America?
How did they do it with limited machinery before hydraulics were invented?
Why does every major city have a great fire during the same time period?
Talking about the fifth element Aether which was discovered by the same man who created the periodic table Dmitri Mendeleev.
Interestingly he put Aether above all the other elements and after his death was quietly removed from the periodic table by u know who...
In economics and industrial design, planned obsolescence (also called built-in obsolescence or premature obsolescence) is the concept of policies planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life or a purposely frail design, so that it becomes obsolete after a certain predetermined period of time upon which it decrementally functions or suddenly ceases to function, or might be perceived as unfashionable.[1] Once regarded as a conspiracy theory, the rationale behind this strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases (referred to as "shortening the replacement cycle").[2] It is the deliberate shortening of the lifespan of a product to force people to purchase functional replacements.[3]
Who couldn't of predicted a Goldman Sachs globalist banker wouldn't be a good Canadian prime minister..?