6
Dorktron4Runner 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’ve seen physical fights over Oreos.

8
Dorktron4Runner 8 points ago +8 / -0

He’s representing the Synagogue of Satan. Prove me wrong.

3
Dorktron4Runner 3 points ago +3 / -0

Neat, I didn’t know he had a recorded lecture. His book helped open some eyes in my inner circle to the dangers of vaccines and how germ theory is fake science.

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s why literal interpretation, when practical, is the safer path. Some non-believers would immediately say, “But the OT law and to literally follow it is horrific!” and I agree and say we are now under the New Law. That’s also why I’m only comfortable saying I’m a “Christian” and nothing else. I’m of the belief that the Word of God, the Bible and the actual words of God and Christ, have endured and presented itself in its form at any given time for the people’s needs. So, as you highlight, I believe word of human mouth and stories helped the people seek God’s salvation even during that period you’ve identified when there was no Bible (recently after Christ’s death to whenever the Gospels were written, and I’m in agreement with you that pre-70AD is certainly possible).

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course others CAN have different interpretations (what’s to stop them?) but that doesn’t make their interpretations relevant or in line with God’s teachings. Some interpretations are blatantly opposed to God’s teachings (by design), in fact. Mormons have vastly different interpretations of God, the Bible, faith, and religion and they are so far out in left field that I consider them heathens and idolatrous worshippers. Have you ever debated a Mormon? There isn’t much common ground there.

We don’t agree that the first Christians were Catholics. I’m not sure what else there is to say about that. I’m getting old and I’ve known many Catholics, some actively speak of the Pope and God interchangeably, which I find blasphemous.

The Gospels meaning Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John? It’s unclear when they were written, but sometime in the late first century wouldn’t surprise me.

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I didn’t say “wholistic”, as you say, but, yes, interpretation is needed to read God’s Word. I’m not sure what point you are trying to make here. I’ve spelled out how the Bible references your questions. And yet, you still haven’t answered any of my questions with verse references. Why’s that?

Where’s the Pope referenced in the Bible? Why are Christians mentioned but not Catholics? Why do you follow a religion that has a clearly heretical leader? Seems strange, mon ami.

6
Dorktron4Runner 6 points ago +6 / -0

I had a small modicum of hope that the vaccine mandates would cause massive upheaval and outrage. It was my last hope for humanity. I was wrong.

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disagree, but what about the aforementioned John 10:30? “I and my Father are one”. Seems pretty clear there.

The Trinity explanation is there too. There is one God (Deut 6:4, 1 Cor 8:4, Galatians 3:20, 1 Tim 2:5). The Trinity consists of three Persons/entities. The entities are distinguished one from another in various passages. Each member of the Trinity is God. The Father is God (John 6:27, Romans 1:7, 1 Peter 1:2). The Son is God (John 1:1, 14, Romans 9:5, Colossians 2:9). The Holy Spirit is God (Acts 5:3-4, 1 Cor 3:16).

You have to take a holistic approach when reading the Scripture. You can’t assume one verse will say, “The Holy Trinity is XYZ”, just as it won’t say, “Don’t eat processed food that kills your body as the Temple of God.”

8
Dorktron4Runner 8 points ago +8 / -0

The author’s tone reeks of, “You’re now having heart palpitations after the vaccine? That’s normal and here’s why.”

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Matthew 3:16-17 ESV references God and Jesus as one. Matthew 28:19 clearly speaks of the Holy Trinity.

What are you trying to get at here?

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are several verses that reference this: Isaiah 48:16 and 61:1, Matt 28:18-20, John 10:30, 2 Corinthians 13:14 to name a few.

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. I cited a verse that says otherwise and you ignored it. Try again.
  2. No, it isn’t.
  3. That’s stupid.
  4. My family, both past and current generations, have never been educated in the public school system, unlike you.
  5. Religions are created by MAN. Why is this hard for you?
2
Dorktron4Runner 2 points ago +2 / -0

You do realize he’s already shipped an untold number of immigrants deeper into the US, right? Why don’t you know what “kabuki theater” means?

I’d appreciate you not wasting my time. Thanks.

5
Dorktron4Runner 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not sure of what? Abbott sending illegal immigrants deeper into the US and THEN saying we need to shore up the border? Him flying to Israel to appease his ZOG leaders and to kiss the wall? Him openly praising Israel’s role in the middle east and the continued rape and murder of Palestinians? What exactly is confusing to you here? He’s ZOG and therefore an enemy of the Republic.

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not Protestant. Why can’t you read? Christianity pre-dates Catholicism, so you have no valid point there. The Bible says “Christians”, not “Catholics”, so you again have no valid point. You should re-read the NT and the Book of Acts, in particular. You follow a false religion, led by a heretical Pope (your words), that doesn’t follow the Bible and uses supplemental interpretations and man-made writings to justify following ungodly practices. Your religion is full of child molesters, too, which should be eye-opening but oftentimes cult followers can’t see the error of their ways.

Why do you think the Bible doesn’t hold all the truths needed for redemption, forgiveness of sins, and eternal salvation? How do you rationalize Revelations 22:18 being in direct conflict with Catholic writings?

1
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

You openly admit your leader is heretical yet you still participate in his church. He’s your leader, right? That’s…something. But yes, I separate your Catholic cult into the same cult bucket as Mormonism, Judaism, Scientology, Seventh Day Adventists, and various other heretical man-made, uninspired religions because they contradict the Bible and Christianity. It’s really that simple.

2
Dorktron4Runner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol good talk.

Your incessant “words have meaning” mantra (which I ultimately agree with) makes your “these Christians were Catholics” statement even more comical. Christians mentioned in the Bible are Christians. That’s it. The end.

Mary has nothing to do with salvation. More ignorance.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›