sigh... but look: the americans invaded Iraq. Did any Americans that I know invade Iraq -- no. The british colonized India. Did any Brit that I know colonize India -- no. The jews are destroying western civilization. Do any jews that I know try to destroy western civilization. Yeah. Obviously. But, to your 'point'... not every single one. Yay! You've discovered that axiomatic logic does not rigorously apply to human beings. Are you proud of yourself?
Books were great before cable/internet. In the 80s/90s, people would, honestly, actually read books! Unfortunately, (((they))) controlled all of the major publishing houses, so the information was (((highly curated))).
Nowadays... books are actually not so useful. Blogs get the core information across much more efficiently. But blogs are super easy to curate via (((search engines))).
Nah, most of the "tabletop" physics is pretty well established. Whether it's understood or not is a different question. But Entanglement etc are massively repeatable, so they obviously exist, at least phenomenologically.
Other things, like red-shifts establishing 'dark energy' are much more suspect.
Ghost: Tone is hard on the internet, so please take this question with all humility: Does what you say really make sense to you?
You have: (a) one virus only (or largely) transmissible through anal sex, because the lining of the anus isn't designed for roughness, so it bleeds easily, and thus allows the virus into the blood stream.
And: (b) a "variant" that somehow transmits through the vagina and the penis, despite neither being particularly susceptible to tears (particularly the penis -- they rarely bleed).
So: somehow a small mutation or "frame shift" or whatever in the DNA of the virus allowed it to completely change its method of operation? Does this really make sense?
Also: consider that AIDS diseases in Africa are basically just diarrhea, TB and things like that, that Africans tend to get because of general insalubriousness. Why would the diseases be almost completely different? People don't really die of Kaposi's Sarcoma in African AIDS; people rarely (never) die of diarrhea in American AIDS. Incidentally, the prevalence of Kaposi's Sarcoma in early AIDS patients effectively proves that AIDS is a hoax -- doctors should have known this, and many of them did... but many just wanted a quick buck.
Another thing to consider: there are now many (say, millions, not tens of millions) sub-Saharan Africans living in the USA/Europe... Do they or their children pick up HIV-2 (hint: no).
AIDS is one of the biggest crimes against humanity. Other than Covid, Smallpox, Heart Disease (etc)
DangerCat
AIDS is real -- it can be caused by bad nutrition, for instance.
HIV, though, doesn't cause AIDS. It's relatively easy to prove... or at least it would be if HIV/AIDS wasn't a multi-billion dollar industry.
For a tiny insight into the proof, consider that... In the USA, with about 40million blacks, HIV/AIDS is almost entirely confined to men who fuck men. In sub-saharan Africa, HIV/AIDS affects men and women almost equally. Why would that be?
Ha, comedy's not dead. Get yourself a sitcom, buddy. Call it "Jews Care!"