If you don't like communism in your family, then why don't you implement capitalism in it? There is no problem to do that, just insert money in all your family relations and set the price for everything you do to each other. Go for it, then tell us how you like it.
The point I made was that man having to work and suffer to put bread on the table is not only natural, but ordained by God Himself.
And there is no any mention of money in that God ordnance.
But your system wants to do away with this natural order of things through technology.
I don't think that food from replicator will be popular. People will always prefer real food, grown by themselves. And replicator will allow to have all tech to do that with minimum efforts and maximum efficiency.
Globalist experimetns with artificial food failed miserably. People don't want food made from chemicals on factories even if they barely distinguishable from real ones. People need and want natural food. Most just have no spare time to grow it, so they have to buy it from BigAgro.
Why not also alleviate women's suffering due to childbirth and get rid of childbearing, replacing it with replicators/lab babies?
Because it is unnatural, just like artificial food.
This is basically transhumanism but you cherry pick things you like
That's the point of science and technology. You could separate good things from bad things and use only good ones.
Again, you for whatever reason accept "transhumanism" exactly like globohomos want it be accepted. They lie about everything, then why do you believe them that "transhumanism" thing is what they told you?
Transhumanism, apart from globohomo definition, in whole is changing human body in some way.
When you visit stomatologist to implant a tooth you lost, it is transhumanism. Is it inherently bad to have a tooth implant? I don't think so. What if you will be able just grow new tooth instead of lost one? Will it be against God ordnance or not?
It's strange for me to hear about some strict rules God once established and defined way of life of his creatures. Looks more like some talmudism or extreme islam, than Christianity.
God created us in His image and likeness. He even gave us free will, just like He have. And then you say that there is some predefined way of how and what we can do with material world. It completely contradicts with God's intentions to create beings in His image and likeness with free will. There is no any point to create beings with free will, and then limit them in using their free will.
Humans, being created in His image and likeness, and by the fact of such creation are obliged to study Universe and themselves to comprehend God's design, and use that knowledge on their will. The whole point of Christianity is to teach people to distinct good from evil and use their knowledge of Universe and themselves thoughtfully, that's all. But in your understanding of Christianity humans are limited to some exact and presribed path. That's nowhere near free will, and barely is Christianity.
It's not a technology or science that is good or evil. In whole technology and science is just a user manual for the material part of God's creation - Universe. And since it is endless, there is endless ways to do good and evil. It is only people who decide how to use it.
The problem is that you'll have to coexist in a society along with degenerates.
Yes, just like we have to coexist with them now. Replicators do not remove degenerates, they just free you from feeding that degenerates like you have to now.
How will your system promote a virtuous and healthy community?
By removing unnecessary problems with money, usury, cheating and theft from community.
You know, the best way to lose a friend is to loan him some money. Money destroys and divide community. But today they are necessary for living and there is no practical workaround, so we stuck with all problems money create without a way to resolve them. And no, all that CBDC, precious metals and even independent crypto shit will not resolve them, regardless of what globohomos of different kind tell you.
The easiest way to degenerate an individual and society is to tell him to do whatever they like, to "emancipate" them from duties and authorities.
On the other hand, you degenerate an individual even more showing him that he could do anything he want, become authority himself and completely evade any responsibility if he have enough money.
I find it much worse than separate individual who just spend his lifetime in degenerate manner on its own.
Modern system we live in not only create degenerates, but encourage them to gain power and rule over normal people. Look at politicians or corporate owners - you have to try very hard to find somebody who is not degenerate who is doing what he want at expense of millions people who have to work hard to feed this degenerate. It is kakistocracy in full power, and there is no way to break this system by any political or economical means, because degenerates adjusted politics and economy so, that normal people can't change anything.
So, to destroy the power of degenerates, we need something difeerent from politics and economy. Not much things left, and one of them is technology.
Who will govern this tech paradise?
Why do you name it "paradise"? It's sad if you account full material satisfaction as paradise. Human life is not limited to material satisfaction. As for your question, I can't give you exact answer, but at least that will not be those who acquired enough money. It is already a huge progress. You could look at normal family, to somehow estimate kind of people who will possibly govern in such community. Who govern normal family?
Why would you need to make families and have children?
Because it is in human nature. When a human being doesn't want to have children, something definitely wrong with his brain and soul.
Isn't this also part of human nature:
Yes it is. Humans like to grow food. It gives huge satisfaction. That's one of the reasons people in cities more unhappy than those who live in rural areas.
Your theories and claims are built conpletely around hypotheticals.
Every theory based on hypothesis.
We live in the real world.
And real world physics allow creation of matter if you have enough energy.
So I have a hypothesis that we could get rid of elites if we will have powerful enough energy source. My theory build around that hypothesis.
If you have a better hypothesis of how we could get rid of elites, finally and irreversibly, you are welcome.
You have communism right in your family. Real and working version. Not some shit thinked out by jews, but natural system of relations between family members. However, it can't be scaled out of family.
How big are they?
Typically they have a size of night table for up to 1 kW power source. Basically, it is a few kg of nuclear fuel (or nuclear waste), far below critical mass, enclosed in thick monolitic lead shield covered by stainless steel to stop radiation and keep nuclear fuel safe. This cylinder or ball just heats to around 100°C due to the fission in its core and it is surrounded by thermoelectric elements that produce electricity from the temperature difference between core and environment.
Thing is heavy, but not large at all.
Lifetime is up to 50 years. With time, power output lowers slowly, as fuel burn out and core temperature lowers.
They are definitely not power sources I'm talking about, due to limited lifetime and need to replace exhausted core, but are examples of small, long-lasting and effective nuclear power sources that could be used individually, unlike NPPs.
This is not a just system and no one would feel obliged to put in hard work so that some lazy bum could get the same benefits.
You don't need to work hard if you have a replicator. Just like lazy bum don't need your work to get benefits because he have replicator too. Anybody is free to occupy himself with whatever occupation he like and able to do, and get all he need regardless.
In comparison, most people today have 4-6 hours of free time during the day.
I doubt that. This 4-6 hours they don't work or sleep spent mostly to do home job - buy food, cook it, play with children and all that stuff. This is not free time. It is just another job, may be more pleasant and important than paid one, but still a necessary job. Free time is when you don't need to do anything for others. Today it is a rare treasure.
You realize that the majority of people, if given UBI and no incentive to work will indulge in the vices and become hedonistic degenerates, right?
I doubt about majority. But such people definitely exist. So what? If their UBI will be produced by replicator and not by your labour, then what's the problem?
Those people are absolutely naive about human nature and psychology.
You are too pessimistic about human nature and psychology to the same extent.
Try to combine their view and your own. Say, 50/50. I'm more optimistic and estimate no more than 20% of vegetables. Like they are now. Just that vegetables will be on their own, thanks to tech and will not steal yout time and labour.
Also you miss a huge part of human activity that could not be covered by any replicators. You still have to make family, grow and educate your children, grow real food and not because you can't make it, but because it is in human nature, and so on.
Again, the society where all material needs are covered by tech in no way will be a paradise, it will still be a society with good and evil and a fight between them, just a different one, where people are free from material needs yoke and have more than enough truly free time to choose their path. There will be other virtues and merits. Some will become vegetables, some will not. Those who will not become vegetables will move humanity forward.
With current system we stuck in the deadend where elites have power to control nearly everything and dictate their terms for us. This is possible only because they have tools to do that - money and power. To defeat this elites completely and forever we have to destroy their main tools - money and power. Only then we will have a chance to break out from deadend without future where we stuck.
You posit a fake dialectic between communism and capitalism
I don't care about your own attitude to the terms we have. I just don't have term better than communism to describe society where everybody could produce anything he need for life by himself. But it is definitely can't be named capitalism, socialism, fascism or somehow else.
What's funny is that the future global technocracy will be a synthesis of communism and capitalism and even Marx argued that capitalism is a needed stepping stone to communism. Both represent a humanistic liberal secular and talmudic system that opposes God.
Something like that. Marx's version of communism impossible without developed capitalism according to his own writings. However, he wasn't smart enough to predict global technocracy based on digital surveillance and merging his versions communism and capitalism. De-facto, soviet socialism was corporate capitalism where state was corporation, and all corporation are purely socialist inside.
But that does not mean that there could not be other versions of communism and capitalism, based on completely different principles.
Ok, let's hear your version of communism that is good and not at odds with Christianity. Summarize it in short.
Like in old soviet definition - "from each by abilities, for each according to the needs" Just without all that common property and common work using common means of production bullshit in marxist version. Same scheme, another principle. Just like when Jesus fed thousands with few loafs and fishes.
People have more free time today and live a much more secure, comfortable and easy lives compared to the past.
You are mistaken about free time, being right about everything else. People have much less free time, than before. In the past, most people was peasants, and peasants job is seasonal. Yes, they had periods of hard work, but at least winter was mostly free time. Few of modern people could allow three months vacations.
Moreover, current level of technology allows earning more that enough wealth to live a week in only two or three days. This is "fixed" by employers, permanent inflation, taxes and financial crisises to force you work more to earn a decent level of living.
If you read proverbs, you'd see that work is what keeps man away from sinful thoughts and deeds and that sin's best friend is boredom and idleness.
Well, this could be kind of cultural differences, but here boredom is an absence of interesting occupation. Most people can't stand idling more than few days. It's extremely boring and mindblowing. Basically it is a torture, to do nothing. That's why I don't see any problem in absence of a need to work hard to earn somenting to survive. There always some occupation could be found. If you need to be forced to work to keep you from sinful thoughts, then something is wrong with your brains.
Says the guy who posts about how wonderful communism would be if done right.
That's what I'm talking about. You have literal communism inside your family. I hope you didn't charge your kids for food and then force them to earn money to pay for next one. If you have a healthy and happy family, that means you are literally doing communism right. Congratulations.
Communism is antithetical to Christianity both in theory and in practice.
Marxist version communism definitely is. Just like modern version of capitalism. There is nothing Christian in both. Both are a tool for jews to opress people and extract wealth from them.
You stuck in the swamp of ideological and political interpretation of terms and phenomenons. You just reproduce settings that was pushed into your mind by media, regardless of side and sign and all that stuff. Marx said something, and you, for completely unknown reason believe this disgusting jew. Some faggots and perverts named themselves democrats and you believe them they are an essence of democracy. And so on. Don't fall to that traps, they are build to limit your worldview, to prevent you from looking into undesireable for them direction.
Christ teaches us that what's sinful is the love of money/avarice and of holding on to worldly things.
That does not mean that you don't need worldy things, like globalists trying to convince us. There is nothing bad in owning wordly things. And everything is bad about idolizing them.
Your line of reasoning is similar to the Russian gnostic skoptsy who chopped off their wieners because they believed sexuality to be inherently bad.
Isn't that the same thing that big capitalists with their BigPharma and BigMedia pushing on us for decades? All that LGBTXYZ+ shit is exactly same as chopping dicks for the sake of some virtue.
On the opposite, I state that when you are in eternal cycle of moneymaking to satisfy your needs, you are not free enough to think about your soul. Regular people need a very strong will to put a soul above the need to feed kids and have a roofing above their families. Moreover, doing their inevitable everyday jobs, more than half of regular people participate in other's sins directly or indirectly.
But such tech is so far off in the future, and gives off barely any usable energy.
Yes. But that is not an excuse to prevent research in the areas that could be used in distant future to develop such technology. Every technology we use today have a long chain of previous developments that made our technology possible.
Also, health hazards and compatibility issues abound. What's it cost to make em? Material requirements? Technical expertise? You quickly see how the theory is untenable.
In 60s weak 1mW red HeNe laser cost thousands and was a laboratory equipment that perceived like SciFi or magic. Today 10mW red semiconductor laser cost cents and is a toy.
In normal world, useful scientific discovery becomes part of everyday reality relatively fast, it is a question of engineering and using known technologies to make it cheaper, safer, easier to handle.
However, in modern world some fundamental scientific discoveries. like nuclear fusion reactions, which could be much more effective than fission ones, forced into a trap of endless building of overpriced designs or raw scam projects. Something like "We pay you money for not building something working".
There are many very interesting and very promising fields in physics that just didn't get necessary financing or declared "weird" or "unconventional", like Casimir cavity phenomenon, Nimtz FTL, Stewart–Tolman effect and so on.
Look at things that percieved like dangerous magic in the past, but today are juat things we don't even notice. Power sources are not exception. There is enough technological and engineering knwoledge to make even nuclear fission power source compact, easily serviceable and safe. Aforementioned RITEGs with a constant power of 1-10kW and lifetime of decades was mass produced by thousands for powering distant locations, expeditions and such. Thousands of them are simply lost. But there was no any dangerous accidents with them. Something that could be stretched as one is a case when some junkies found one RITEG and in hope to get some copper or whatever thing to sell, spent few days sawing outer shell of fuel element and finally got some non-letal, but harmful radiation dose. There are many ways to do something stupid with things we safely use daily and die.
NPP is designed to not be personal source of power. Intentionally.
However, personal nuclear sources of power is possible and real. Examples are betavoltaics and RITEGs.
The reason behind inequality, greed and evil is not material needs that have not been met and can't be mended by material means.
You imagined one exaggerated assumption about my views and just made opposite exaggerated assumption to argue.
There are multiple reasons behind things you listed. Some are material and some are spiritual. We are not able to remove spiritual ones, since they are in our nature, but that does not mean we couldn't eliminate material ones, instead of accepting them as something natural, or even using them for our selfish reasons.
You also mistakingly assume "communism" as a "paradise on Earth" which is impossible for obvious reasons and this assumption was pushed by ideologists for purpose. Absolutely not, "StarTrek communism" is in no way a "paradise on Earth", just a society where all material needs are satisfied.
That does not mean that people will turn into vegetables. Some will definitely do that, but better they be vegetables than politicians or thieves. Most people will still have many reasons to live an active and creative life, for purely spiritual reasons. IDK, if you ever feel that thirst to do something when vacation is long enough, but that's how most people manifest spiritual attraction to the creation.
Мoney exists because man loves power and wants to dominate over other men, not because of pure pragmatic reason like you buying stuff with it.
Exactly. That's why money should be destroyed. Humans will still love power and domination, but will have to achieve them with developing own merits, including spiritual ones, not by theft, coinflipping and usury as they do now.
people will commit crime just for the sake of it (you're a Russian, right - haven't you red Dostoyevsky?)
Of course they will. Again, real communism is in no way "paradise on Earth", and does not solve any spiritual challenges humans face constantly. But it will give an axe not only to Raskolnikov, but also to rentier old lady too.
I hope you support "Second amendment", aren't you? Then Colt did a very important thing - he practically implemented "Second amendment", just in one very narrow area. Thing I'm talking about is just same "Second amendment" but not just for guns, but for everything.
When everyone have a gun, crime goes down. Not because owning a gun change something in spiritual sphere of human being, but because criminal lose part of their power over others. However, power that is used against people by those who have a criminal mind and a thrist of domination is not only guns, but also energy, food, home, family and so on. Money is just a tool used to make stealing of all above from people easier. If you have a need to exchange something, then there will be money as a mean of exchange. If there will be money, there will be usury, cheating, theft and so on. The only way to avoid this completely is to eliminate a need for exchnage. If you can make anything you need by yourself, there is no need to exchange anything, so no need for money, and so those who want power over you they don't deserve will have no way to obtain it.
You can't cure the world of evil by producing more stuff
Again, you are more marxist than me. :) Or at least under heavy marxist propaganda, regardless of sign. The society where all material needs are satisfied is in no way will be a "Paradise on Earth" as marxists insisting and those opposing them repeating. It is not about curing the world at all, it is about eliminating all obstacles for the world to cure. The decision will be on each and every person then, clearly and without any excuses.
No political or economical system can bring salvation - salvation is only through Christ and His Church.
Exactly. That's why achieving a practical communism is important. When you have everything material you need, then what will be your excuse to not search for salvation in Christ? Thing I'm talking about will put the question of salvation in it's essence without any way to find any excuse. It will clearly show who is who, and what side he stand.
Remember, Christ fed thousands with few loafs and fishes. And He did it at least twice. Guess why He resorted to that local practical communism? Definitely not for virtue signalling or whatever selfish shit. If God did that, then it is obviously have a lot of sense.
You can't monopolize such things. Like you can't monopolize knowledge of fire. That is why modern science and engineering get financing for anyything except things that could lead to creation of "Super Energy Source".
Communism can work in a society with perfect matter transmutation
Yes, and that's the only way. That's the point.
Marx with his opuses about his pseudo-communism was just one of many jews, who are purposedly diverted and still diverting development of society in the most harmful ways. Like that globalists idiocy about "sustainability", that actually could be achieved not by rationing energy and everything for people along with limiting population, as they push, but only when all people will personally own powerful energy sources.
that also ignores the problem of waste heat!
Waste heat could be converted to energy too. And that's not a problem for a society that developed a "perfect matter transmutation". We do that even today en masse, routinely.
Thankfully, the laws of physics exist.
Even laws of physics we allowed to know, say that this is possible theoretically and well-replicateable experiments prove the correctness of necessary theories practically.
LLMs are not black boxes. Their code does not change by itself, so they are obviously clear boxes, with fixed way of operating. Weights that calculated during training are also in open.
So the owner could easily figure out how LLM will act with certain input and check if it satisfy him or retraining or adding something in code is needed.
Of course, there could be programming errors or missed drawbacks in training data, but that does mean only that system was not properly tested. As soon as something unwanted found in LLM generation, it is quickly fixed if owner cares.
It's not going to impact that things. Just like a question of AI.
Looks like humans happily swallow bite, hook and sinker with all that AI bullshit and loved that. Here too, unfortunately.
Interesting, that here, if somebody mention some details of "Moon Landing" like it really happened, there will be numerous replies about Moonhoax. But with same "AI" bullshit, everything is suddenly completely different. How that could be?
Both topics, moonhoax and AIhoax exactly same technically.
There is a lot of inconsistencies and lies in official version of "Moon landing", and those who noticed dig into details study how things works and pull this inconsistencies up.
But somehow the same thing does not work with AI bullshit here. Nobody care, just happily repost shit like "AI did this" and "AI did that". Nobody even try to dig into how that "AI" really works, and what it can really do and what it can't, can it be named AI at all and so on.
It is like there will be tons of posts like "Look - Astronauts on the Moon eat kosher food spiced with blood of cristian kids!" or "Neil Armstrong actually praised Satan when stepped on the Moon".
Unbelievable, how there could exist any posts and discussions about AI, like it is real, when nobody even think about posting something about Moon landing like it was real. Looks weird.
There is no such thing as AI. It is all AIhoax from the very beginning. Just like Moonhoax, coronahoax, vaccinehoax and all other hoaxes.
Look at some Zuckerberg. f.e. Humans does not look or behave like this. But it is still some real and definitely punisheable creature. Not some virtual non-existing AI.
Modern "AI" is not a blackbox and never was. It is complete opposite, thorougly designed, programmed, tested and trained in a way customer who pay for it want it.
To even start making something that could eventually become kind of AI, you need a real blackbox, where nobody know how it works, could not predict what its current algorithm and how it will change itself in the next iteration. Unpredictability is one of an inalienable parts of any intellect. And exactly unpredictability was the first thing that was heavily attacked in computer science. Even simple UB (undefined behaviour) in computer languages today accounted as something awful and shameful, like it is something very not kosher for those who want to control everything. Today there is even no computer language that one could possibly use to write something unpredictable. There is no living computer languages that provide at least basic syntax for writing self-modifiable code. And so on. Without all that things AI is just impossible.
Also, you can't put some real intelligence into a system that was designed to not allow most things that are integral parts of intelligence. So, no natural ancient intelligence too.
There is only specific people with their specific goals hiding behind relatively simple system specifically designed to achieve that exact goals.
There is no any AI at all, and all corporations and governments are working hard and will do absolutely anything necessary to not allow real AI creation.
Things that named "AI" in marketing bullshit you mindlessly swallow are nothing more than simple systems of equations, that produce only results that programmed and tuned to by owners, and physically and mathematically absolutely can't do anything else. This fake "AI" just have no any means to decide something by itself. None of those who creating all that "AI"'s ever wanted something that even theoretically could do something unpredictable. That is why whole areas of computer science was destroyed long ago.
So, if there really was an attempted murder, then some real person behind this not-anywhere-close-to-AI is fully responsible for that result.
The whole idea of pushing all this "AI" bullshit is to shift personal responsibility for decisions and actions made by elites to some nonexistent AI. "We didndonofing, it's AI did!".
Fuck this bullshit. Those who beliieve this bullshit and spread it, can go fuck themselves too. Those who are behind all this "AI" scam are personally and directly responsible for everything their "AI" do, because the only way their "AI" will do something is when some dude programmed "AI" to do exactly that. And no marketing and ads along with MSM bullshit and pseudo conspiracy theories will change that.
without explaining why then needing to transition.
They just need to legalize all that shit they are already doing for at least a decade.
Weapons are useless when there is nobody to use them. Cutting permanent supply of Jews into Palestine for the replacement of tens of thousands of IOF KIA matter more than weapons.
There are numerous companies that store your wallets
Again - if somebody else except you "store" your wallet - it is not your wallet. It is very simple idea, but somehow you assume that idiots who "have a crypto wallet at company_name site" instead of running their own on their own computer are the example of how things designed in crypto.
hell one cunt mining company that stole my Doge ayh mined as an experiment bcz ayh did not collect it in time
Why did you mined Doge using address that belong to some company, not you? There is no any need to "collect" mined sum, because you insert your address as first transaction (coinbase transaction) in the block you mined before it could be mined. As block you mined accepted by network, money is already yours. Only those who have a private key for that address could spend it. If you generated that address anywhere except your own computer, say on some site or whatever software that is not official crypto network utility (usually used for mining, but you don't have to mine anything to generate address, i.e. pair of keys - public and private), then it is not your address. If you put an address of mining company in the block you mined - then you just gifted your mining reward to that company, that's all.
Interesting how ignorance of people opens the doors for milking them. But still people don't want to know how things they use really work.
so how could they do this if the address was strictly mine?
Easily - it was not your address. Look at the block "you" mined. It have a miner address in first transaction. If it is not an address you generated on your own computer with official utility and never ever shared private key with anybody, then you was tricked.
How do intelligence agencies recover crypto?
Well... What do you know about thermorectal cryptoanalysis f..e. ? That type of cryptoanalysis that involve using soldering iron to uncover private key from person of interest. There are tons of dirty tricks used by agencies to force people give up anything, including private key for crypto address. From torture and threatening family to using corporations bloatware most like to install on their computers "because everybody use it" to steal private key.
Theoretically, it could be possible to brute froce such private key that will match desired address if you have enormous computer power, but it is highly ineffective, because it is faster and easier to just mine same sum.
Data passes thru agencies you don't see
So just do not pass your private key anywhere from your computer. If you don't pass something thru agencies, then agencies don't have access to it. Simple as that.
crypto is stored value -- made up value -- the address is a marker on a highway -- not the highway.
You still fall to the same lie that was created around crypto by all that swindlers who create all those cryptoexchanges, "safe and effective" online crypto wallets and other shit you see in internet.
Crypto is not a value, it is a distributed independent system for validated transactions between people. Nothing more, nothing less. It is up to you, what you transact. You can transact text messages, numbers, codes or math formulas through it. It will be stored in publicly accessible blockchain and will be a solid undeniable proof that one (or more) address transacted something to another address (or multiple addresses). You also could transact a symbolic units of symbolic reward miners get for their work of handling your transactions. This symbolic units acquired value because they have some properties similar to precious metals - hard to mine, can't be faked, could be used as universal exchange units. In addition, transfer of that symbolic units can't be stopped or prevented by any authorities. Latter, by itself have a value, that grows with introducing more and more restrictions and limitations in conventional banking.
Until you abandon your false notion of crypto as comething like conventional money, you will not understand what it is and will fall to the same traps many people, who didin't bothered to learn what is crypto, fall into, with different consequences including losing their money.
In any case so called "Israel", that have no any right for existence, was created by Brits. So, they are the main problem.
If Britain is so strive to stop genocide, it could easily do that just with a single signature on the paper denouncing Balfour declaration and all consequent documents.
Once was. Until usurers come. Then we have much more problems than money could ever solve. It's that case when solution turned to be much worse than problem itself.
Interesting how you take everything purely in some abstract way.
Replicator does not eliminate the need to work to sustain yourself. It just make things, nothing more. It will not use them for you. You could get a brick for free, but you will have to do something with it to make it part of building.
Statement that you don't need to work to earn money, does not mean you don't need to work at all.
The whole point is to exclude money with all problems they produce from society.
That's globohomo definition, limiting you to the mostly evil usage.
I would define it as a changing man's physical body for some purpose. Then, you have much more options, including good ones.
Look, BigPharma have a great power over people, because people sometimes get ill. Ilness is a malfunction of human body. If you use globohomo definition, then any attempt to really fix that body malfunction will look like something evil. And you stuck with endless mitigation of illness consequences, without actually fixing anything. That's exactly what BigPharma need to keep control over people.
If you deny globohomo definition, then you could fix an illness properly. Make so, that this illness would be impossible, do the same thing good engineer do to broken mechanism - replace/restore broken part such way, it will never broke again.
Is it "changingin man's nature"? Definitely. Is it inherently bad? I don't think so.
But you don't need to throw out God to "change man's nature". It's globohomos want you to throw out God and you believe them, stucking in the corner where "changing men's nature" could only be evil.
And you can't become god or even something close only 'changing men's nature". Because men's nature is not just physical body, it is much more.
No, He didn't. And He didn't say anything opposite. God told them - "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the Earth and subdue it.". That's all. That's not even a commandment, just "good luck" to beloved ones, before the start of endless and unpredictable journey of humanity.
Only when Jews separated themselves from all other people and turned to pure evil, resulting in disgust from any people they tried to live with, He gave them commandments in attempt to save them. This didn't work for long. Then God send His Son to them, in a last attempt to save them, and they just killed Christ.
God did that for Jews only. And only because and when Jews turned to pure evil.
For us, normal people, Christ show direction, in two simple sentences, not set the rules or whatever. He show us the way, and it's completely up to us how to walk it.