It's much faster to say who is not a part of it.
It is not very interesting to know that puppets are corrupt. They are always corrupt. Much more interesting to find who corrupt them.
I don't think Rand Paul, Ron Paul, or MTG are one of them.
May be that Massie guy in your parliament too?
But now we know that there must be a man like this.
It is much easier to find something, if you know that it exists in the first place, and how it should look like.
I don't think Jeffery Epstein was only about sex trafficking.
Yes. He was also deep into all that digital surveillance, other corps IT shit and so on. That is why I think new one have to be also connected with IT or around.
And do you know Isabel Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell's sister, is the ‘Technological Director’ of the World Economic Forum?
That's what I'm talking about. It is very specific combination - human traficing for high-ranked pedos and whole hands in IT web/swamp.
That is why I think it is reasonable to search for new Epstein among IT CEOs, IT influencers and so on. May be from computer games industry, "quantum computing", "cloud services" or from somewhere near "AI".
So my points for "current Epstein"
- Strong ties with Israel
- Appear on every elite event - whatever, political party rallies, charity balls, celebrity parties, libray openings and so on.
- Have a wide circle of "buddies" among top politicians and oligarchs
- Deep into IT business in most murky and slippery areas.
- Not a politician or celebrity himself
If it is possible to identify a person that fit all that points, then, with high probability he is also run same or even bigger pedo shit.
There is no one Epstein. There are a bunch.
Agree. So who exactly from that many epsteins, took place of that specific Epstein to "be friends" with all top politicians and oligarchs?
I don't know who they are, and I'm not surprised at all. But it should not be to hard to fugure that out for those who have a good knowledge of US elite celebritiy life or at least access to all that celebrity gossip yellow press. There should be somebody near elites on the every event and party, simultaneously connected to Israel and IT industry and a "buddy" for everyone.
I can't imagine Elon, who even can't talk or write normally to support constant communication with a lot of people. To be a new Epshtein, one need good communication skills and ability to be a center of any party. Elon just don't have necessary skills.
That's why the question. Demand for perversions from elite and for compromising of elite for Israel didn't go to nowhere, so somebody have to take lead role.
From the outside it does not look like Trump ever had any control or even understanding in the first place. So, the whole take in that screenshot does not have much sense.
Whatever they release, none of all that king chalies, donald trumps, joe bidens, billy gates, other high-ranked politicians and oligarchs would ever be sentenced and jailed. There always be something something that differ them from pedos from lowest class.
Surnames tell all. :) Do you remember whom that tribe account as "everyone"?
If real AI will ever be created, it is possible that if the contact between humans and AI would be established, it will lead to extermination of usury in any form. Just like a contact with aliens could lead to the same.
Usury is not only unhuman, but also unGod, unalien and even unAI. It should be exterminated, if humanity want to survive and have a relations with other sentient beings.
Extermination of usury means inevitable "everyone dies" for a certain tribe.
Video have bad quality, so it is hard to tell exactly. May be you are right and this was some variant of Mi-35/24.
There is no such model as Mi-23, you mean Mi-24. Mi-35 is modernised Mi-24 without serious changes. Mi-28 is further development of Mi-24, and there is a lot of variants was made on different stages of production. Old Mi-28 could have two fins on the tail.
First part - Boeing Chinook.
Second part - Flock of Mi-28s running on afterburners. I think it is somewhere in Russia or Belarus. There is two Russian cars among others, but unfortuntely, number plates is unreadeable, so, can't say what region it is.
They do shit, except making themselves rich. Their masters will discard them, like garbage under press, when deadline come.
All that paper looks like additional presentation material for investors. Concentration of hypewords is very high without anything specific. Many cool worlds and fantasies without much sense. Stupid colored drawings, like for infants...
Just a simple example - in this paper "terahertz band so easy and so cool!". Actual terahertz band is a nightmare, because of multiple absorption bands in atmosphere and many other problems. F.e. article from same source (IEEE) https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-truth-about-terahertz , just to get the size of problem.
Even 5G FR2 band (25-70GHz) failed miserably. All useable windows in that band densely occupied by satellite communications for a long time, so 5G get only unuseable frequencies. In 2024 they even had to introduce completely new FR3 band (7-24GHz) as a replacement.
THz band will be much, much worse.
And so on.
In mid 1800s some rich British man named Sam Rowbotham, without any skills in science and math, with humanitarian education, running his own socialist commune (!), suddenly created all that flat earth points we still see in flat earthers spam unchanged. After publishing his "Zetetic Astronomy" he was given greenlight by British authorities for public lectures and creating an organization. He got devoted followers and this group start to do exactly what flatearthers do today - from different public platforms start to loudly challenged scientific institutions and called for public experiments "to find a truth" with stakes. Of course, when lost and had to pay stake to winner, group didn't do that, and got sued. Flatearth hype declined, lecturers begun to just run away from their lectures after "uncomfortable" questions of people. and group had some finacial problems in late 1800s. Things become worse when Rowbotham died. But everything changed, when gorup discovered a new market for their scam - US. And bankrupted group suddenly received money from Royal Geographical society, move into US and resurrect their flatearth campaign overseas. With high probability, Royals decided it would be useful to undermine rivals education level, so flatearthers got direct and open Royal support.
They did exactly same in US - lectures, challenging education institutions and so on. However, in US flatearthing eventually died too.
I think that first flatearthers was a first proof-of-concept of what we know now as NGOs, and fully curated by British crown. Test run, to see if it is possible to push any stupid narrative to public through "independent" organization.
FlatEarthers ressurected from nowhere in mid 1900s, right after WWII, and again, surprise, surprise, in Britain. This time, founder, who was not rich in any measure, and barely made both ends meet, suddenly got resources to organize official society, lectures, publish books and so on. Again, created in Britain, this all eventually end in US.
Third ressurection happened wihen internet become available for average man. Before that, flatearth was rarely and randomly mentioned on different usenet confs, maillists, boards, regardless of topic only for obvious lulz and trolling, nothing more, but when corporations began to turn internet into public MSM, and different alternative and conspiracy groups began to form, there appeared a distinct and steady influx of flatearth narrative specifically targeted only at that groups. And we all could easily observe this today even right here.
It is more than a century old psyop developed, supported and financed by inbred British crown. It is periodically pop up and decline, but British financing is constant.
definition of artificial intelligence
You still don't want to understand that "artificial intelligence" is a trademark, just like Coca-Cola. It can't have definition because it is a trademark.
Intelligence have one property, that never will be allowed in AI® (AI™ if you wish) - unpredictability. This is what exorcised from programming long ago.
Back-propagation is not some magic, it is nothing more than yet another piece of code that take training data and produce weights data through predetermined algorithm. Combining this two pieces of code - back-propagation and forward-propagation does not make this two dumb and predetermined pieces of code in any mean intelligent. Even passing outputs to inputs as in RNN, still adds nothing that could create intelligence. Predetermined calculation of weights from input and output and then predetermined calculation of output using weights and input is a simple arithmetic. Both parts are programmed and intended. ANN do exactly what it is programmed to do. Calculate weights through back-propagation, use weights to calculate output during forward-propagation. Nothing less, nothing more.
For example you can have an AI chatbot give a reasonable response to a question that never appeared in its training data.
It will calculate response using weights that was calculated using training data. This have absolutely nothing to do with reasonability. When you force AI to give an answer it was never trained on, it does not invent this answer, you just get an average/combination of answers that most close by weights to what you ask. Nothing more, nothing less. Just arithmetic. Answer could look reasonable in some circumstances (not because AI is able to reason, but because of coincidence), but with high probability answer will be either wrong, either senseless.
If a computer followed a program with bugs in it it would still be doing as its programmed
The thing with buggy program is that it will not do what it is programmed for. This is a first, from many, but essential elements that could possibly lead to creation of real AI. The thing is that bug is what makes computer do things it was never programmed to do. In no way intelligence yet, but an essential brick of artificial intelligence.
But anyway why would you want computers to become intelligent like humans?
Computer AI will never become intelligent like humans. Because AI will appear and develop in completely different environment, that have very little with human environment. With high probability, it will be so different, that we will have big problems to even establish contact with it, not even talking about some useful communication. It will be so different because errors, uncertainities, unpredictabilities, etc. artificial intelligence will develop on and their sources are completely different from those of human intelligence.
Intelligence could not be programmed. It have to develop itself in an environment that allow self-development, errors, uncertainities and all that stuff.
It is possible, that computer AI is impossible at all, but this could not be proven. I don;t know if computer AI will ever be created, but I'm 100% know that it will never be created with technology used for AI®(AI™)
So you want me to talk about matrix transformations, word vectors, the softmax function, multi-head attention mechanism implementation details and so forth
Kind of, but on much lower level. About basics. Say, about actual code of sigmoids in LSTM cell, and why this code can't do anything except what it was programmed to do.
When you use CNC, f.e., you could program extremely complex actions, including acoounting for tool wear, backlashes and up to replacing broken tool. It could make things better than a human, but only in spheres, where intelligence, conscioness, sentinentness are hindering the job. CNC could do two identical parts better than human turner, so CNC will do the job of making identical parts better. This does not bring any intelligence to CNC, on the opposite, the whole point of automatisation is to remove any intelligence from turner task. And this does not mean you don't need a skilled turner anymore, he just become a programmer who have to use all his skills and intelligence to create a program for CNC.
ANNs is no different. It could do only what it was programmed for. Program execution is not an intelligence, never was and never would be, regardless of how complex it is. Even if you connect billions of subroutines and use billions of variables, this will not make something intelligent from unintelligent pieces. It will still be just a program, totally predictable and fully controlled by author. It is nor intelligent, nor smart, nor whatever marketing label you will try to apply to this dumb thing. If something could be done better using ANN, it just means that no intelligence in doing this task is necessary. But you still need intelligence to write and train ANN.
Things that could potentially break that ANNs basic property - complete absence of any intelligence, are programming bugs, f.e. All that buffer overflows, undefined compiler behaviour and so on. Unpredictable things, that could occasionally lead to self-modifying code, unpredictable branching, cross-function gotos and all that stuff that theoretically could be a base for appearing real intelligence. But all of that things are thorougly removed from any programming learning course, and the only people who still attempt to use them literally declared criminals with real and long jailtime. Many of that basic things mitigated directly in hardware. Each time when you see "Segmentation fault" or "Buffer overflow" - it is yet another thing that with very low probability could become a start of long sequence of events of appearing real AI was cut at the beginning by hardware. Moreover, there is whole industry that produce software to hunt and delete any code that theoretically could sometime lead to appearence of real, true AI. And it is installed on almost every computer that use OS made by corporations. And it is the same corporations that invest huge money in AI® today.
And you are on the side of that corporations, supporting their narrative that their AI® is somehow have something to do with intelligence, and at the same time destroy anything that could sometime become real AI. Congratulations.
Why would I discuss details of specific AI techniques and models when talking about AI in general
Gotcha! :) Glad that you slip that out. That's the crucial point of marketing. Never discuss any technical details of why some product is unreliable shit that can't do what it is supposed to do, but discuss some "in general" bullshit, like absolutely irrelevant question of "how cool this car looks in ads depicting happy actor and nice hilly landscape". To not allow any actual questions like why that car turns into rusty backet with nuts in just few years or why customer now have to replace variator belt for enormous price every 50k miles and how such car techncally can't do what was advertised, from making owner happy to climbing up to the hill shown in ad without severe damage for transmission not covered by warranty.
You literally doing exactly the same. Switching from actual technical question that gives full understanding of ANNs limitations and abilities to some marketing tricks.
If you hope that nobody except marketing targer audience with less that who brain cells left, then I have a bad news for you.
PS: Also, it is notable how in all that discussion, where you declared yourself having knowledge, you never used specific lexicon of those who really have knwoledge of ANN and stuff. It is impossible. Say, real sailor will always use specific navy terms even in public disculssion. Programmer will do that too. Doctor will slip some medical words from time to time. And so on. Any true specialist have that linguistic feature. But you don't. Ergo - you know shit about ANNs.
You still avoid discussing technical details. :)
Meanwhile, when you talk about "smartphone", do you really think this thing is smart? :)
I have a proposal for you, and your kind. Please, write AI® in your marketing. Then it will have some sense, and could pass for those who does make difference as marketing trick, not blatant lie. :)
I don't see how to force you to read the actual ANNs code and to understand what it do. Seens even kindergarden analogies does not work.
You are constantly talk about some "knowledge" about ANNs, but evading to discuss their code that only and fully determine ANNs behaviour. You can't have knowledge of anything without understanding how it really works.
You can't argue intelligence of, say,
for( sum=0.0, i=0; i<n; i++ ){ sum += w[j][i] * In[i]; }; out[j] = act_func(sum);
And nobody will find any intelligence in this simple thing. Because there is none. Zero.
But you continue to repeat dumb marketing narratives about "AI".
I can't help you at that stage.
I have actually taken courses on things like machine learning and LLM's.
This is marketing I told about. If you don't understand that, then I can't help you.
Are you projecting your own ignorance onto me?
As I already told, using something does not mean you know shit about what you use.
All that "machine learning courses" are pretty similar and gives no any understanding of code that actually works in ANNs. This simple shit is cloaked behind some third-party libraries in the best case or just behind using one or another application.
Do they told you about perceptron and its actual schematics? Or they cut everything interesting to something like "sigmoids" and "back-propagation" without actual code behind it? Or may be they don't even bother to tell you anything about ANN except that you have to train it?
It is just impossible to seriously talk about any intelligence if you know how ANNs really work.
You're using "artificial intelligence" in a different way to everybody else on the planet.
No. It is you, and corps marketing who want to attribute non-existing properties to stupid ANNs.
With high probability, you name "Coca-Cola" as "Coca-Cola", but I hope you clearly understand that it does not contain any coke and even cola at all. You don't make posts about "those bastards in Coca-Cola making us all cocaine addicts111!!!".
But somehow at the same time you assume, and argue as if some corporation name dumb ANN as "AI", then this ANN actually have something with intelligence.
It is insanity at least. Or you pushing marketing lies. Both are worse.
Why do you think that society is really divided by left/right political bullshit?
Why not, say, it is "those who have hands from the right place" vs "those who cant even replace a wall socket"?
Who are "left" you talk about? Are they who vote for democrats or may be they are those who put something higher than profit? Or may be they are "zombies who will carry out orders without question"? In the latter case your question have no any sense.
It is a good intention to try to find a way to determine zombie beforehand. But to have a sensible conversation in that matter you need to define your terms and explain preconditions you introduce.
I have studied how AI's work
Obviously, only from that stupid marketing articles from all that Google and other corps.
If you ever had a chance to actually try to understand how things works, say, writing your own ANN or playing with code of existing ones, then you would never tell that crap and had a clear understanding that any ANN is in no way more intelligent than a wall light switch or water pump relay.
Using something without looking inside and reading stupid marketing articles does not mean you understand shit.
Conscious, sentience, unpredictability, will and all that stuff are unseparable part of intelligence. It is you who are into lingustic revisionism for the sake of whitewashing all that paid liars from corporations and MSM who run all that AI hype.
Look, you even try to attribute intelligence to washing machines, in your attempts to support that stupid fearmongering narrative that "corporations build datacenters to create a god from a machine". They are not. It is impossible to create any intelligence using stupid and 100% definitive systems of equations programmed with linear programming using only "good programming practices" as beaten hard into the brains of anyone who was hired by corporations. But it is perfectly possible to create a total surveillance system using all that datacenters. Talking about non-existing AI instead of total surveillance is a collaborationism with the globohomos, who are the real and only customer of that surveillance datacenters.
You can't.
If you force somebody to not name kike a kike or nigger a nigger - you are directly trying to fuck with someone brain and change his way of thinkings and so change himself in the way you, not him, like.
It is a direct opposite to any "free think".
Take a look who excactly decide what is "derogatory" and what is not. It is a very interesting and bright ethnic picture.
Also, there is cultural things. In Russia we just have no other word to name people of negroid race except "негр"(negr/nigger), and the word "black" have definite negative connotation, like someone who serve evil. And everything is OK.
All that artificial limitations on using one or another term always forced on population to manipulate human way of thinking, If you succed in banning use of "kike" word, then you could manipulate all things imaginable.
And why do you think that people here give a fuck? Fuck this surveillance system. Fuck all that three letter agencies. The only remained way to actually defeat this surveillance is not give any fuck and it starts from abandoning all that centralised messengers and social networks. First thing you could do as moderator to not give a fuck to surveillance is to disable that shitty feature of embedding Youtube and Twitter links here. Leave links, disable embedding. You literally feed that bastards with surveillance over c.win users. And then whine about surveillance.
I don't really give a fuck to this embedding, since I'm not registered in any of that social crap, but others could be. And this will be real and direct leak of their identities to that surveillance.
You say that you are worry about surveillance and, suddenly, instead of real mitigating with this problem, you decide to ban "derogatory words". Ban social shit embedding, if you really care. If you don't do that, then it is high probability you are after completely different goals.