1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are not yet in a world where they can blatantly contradict physical books on known scientific findings

We already are. Climatehoax, at least in "greenhouse" area blatantly contradicts basics of thermodynamics. But that contradiction is absolutely silenced in any literature. Basics of "geenhouse" include not only rise of average temperature, but also unalienable lowering of temperature gradients in time and distance. Show me a single climatehoax article (peer-reviewed or popular) touching "greenhouse" question where lowering of temperature gradients is ever mentioned. And this have huge importance. Rising average temperature from 5°C (with -40°C to +50°C gradients) to 15°C due to greenhouse effect does not mean that we will have -30°C to +60°C hell. It is likely will be something like +5°C to +25°C with average +15°C. Isn't that much better than current -40°C to +50°C range?

Scientific findings does not matter when those who control information have an agenda.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think that something written in MSM is true? Scientific American is a shitty science-like MSM who wrote a lot about climatehoax, vaccinehoax, coonahoax and other hoaxes. Why wouldn't they support einshteinhoax?

If your common sense (if you have any) could be so easily shut down by some shit printed in MSM, you are doomed.

It's fascinating, really. Scientist, who derived some very interesting formula, deny to analyse it in depth for all possible deductions and physical meanings. :) You definitely have to be completely retarded or indoctrinated to believe that crap.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Poincaré, however, failed to connect E with the mass of any real body

Because Einshtein worshippers said that? :) It is absolutely impossible if somebody ended with E=mc² formula and subbenly didn't have any thoughts about connection of mass with energy. On;y complete idiot could believe that having E=mc² Poincare "failed to connect" something. He was not as dumb as Einshtein.

You know headed by that Nazi cunt Wernher von Braun

How interesting, that nearly all of your "Nazi cunts" always eventually ended working for Jews. Werner von Braun who ended working for disgusting Jews in control of USA at that time is not an exception.

Are they really "Nazi cunts"? Does "Nazi" really means antisemitic? Why your "Nazi" never destroyed any Jewish state and never threaten any Jewish business? Why Nazi always work only for Jewish benefits, from Third Reich to modern Ukraine?

In any case it is inevitable that Einshtien cult will be destroyed and all that Jewish science-like cabal will be buried in oblivion. It's just a matter of time. In the best case, Einshtein will be mentioned in one row with Judas and Trotsky, as one of the greatesrt enemies of humanity.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

A wall of

So, you are unable to understand long enough explanations,

astronomers observed

They observed using electromagnetic waves (light) with limited speed and subject to gravitation that causes different distortions in observations.

Distortions in observations that caused by use of relatively slow (in scale of universe) electromagnetic waves (light) for making observations does not mean that Einshtein bullshit is real.

To get rid of all that effects scientists just need to use some other means of observation, with speed many times more than speed of light and less subjected to universe obstacles. But fucking Einshtein worshippers prohibit and cancel any research that does not align with Eihshtein perverted "theory", including research for finding faster than light means to receive and transmit information.

A massive object such as the Sun bends the spacetime blanket with its gravity, such that light no longer travels in a straight line as it passes by the Sun."

There is no any scientific proof that gravity is a spacetime distortion. There is proof that mass bent light (electromagnetic waves). There could be many different theories, including simple ones like that if energy is one of manifestation of mass (or mass is manifestation of energy) so energy should gravitationally interact with mass too. But all other theories just prohibited by Einshtein sect to cancel humanity technological progress, f.e. in development of antigravity devices.

Also, spacetime curvature as gravity is not Einshtein idea at all. It was Henri Poincare who invented that concept (along with E=mc² connection of mass and energy, meanwhile), in attempt to explain gravity. Funny that Einshtein openly acknowledged Poincare contribution in his general relativity writings, but did it only posthumously to esure that Poincare will not rise question of authorship. Fucking jewish thief.

PS: Link to NASA speaks a lot. :)

And they blatantly lie about using Einshtein bullshit in GPS system. GPS was basically designed so that any presumable Einshtein bullshit effects are irrelevant because military didn't want to risk with expensive project if Einshtein was wrong. GPS is differential system, not absolute, so any potential "relativity" effects just cancel itself out. In no way GPS (and other GNSS systems) is using anything from "relativity". Just because it is not necessary.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bro, it appears simultaneous to the observer, but it's not, because it takes a few for the light to travel...

Exactly.

Funny that NTP protocol and correspondent utilities every sigle second ruins that stupid assumption that you could not synchronize two clocks being apart. :)

The world really likes that "eccentric genius" character...

Do they? Or they was just indoctrinated since childhood to picture a "scientist" as "eccentric genius"? And then, all they need is to place prepared puppets.

7
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Eishtein is easily refutable scientifically.

Basically with special relativity he tried to present Lorenz transform used to compensate for effect of using slow electromagnetic waves (light) for observation of objects moving with comparable speed as some fundamental law of nature.

If you will use sound to observe some events, you will get exactly same Lorenz transforms to adjust your observations, but with speed of sound instead of speed of light in formulas. This absolutely does not prove that speed of sound is maximum possible speed, that nothing could move faster that speed of sound and that there will be some casuality paradoxes for objects moving faster speed of sound.

With general relativity he again stretched distortions of observation using electromagnetic waves (light) as fundamental laws of nature.

In both cases it was like somebody will pose distortions observer see through rough glass not to the glass used for observation, but to fundamental laws of nature of how things happen in reality.

He got Nobel prize for photoeffect explanation, not for his relativity garbage. And even in that case, this work was done by his wife. That is why he gave all money from Nobel prize to her, despite being separated for a long time, in the fear that she will be able to prove her authorship.

Whole Einshtein saga was the first strike on the human development in an attempt to stop it in science and technology area. Damage inflicted by Einshtein marketing and his religious sect was devastating. Whole areas of scientific research are still cancelled by Einshtein worshipping crowd and those who try to break through this artificial taboos heavily attacked by character. Well-known examples are Gunter Nimtz with his experimentally proven FTL signal transmission, that guys who are studing Casimir cavity as tool for distorting space and many others. All of them attacked personally, using Einshtein dogmas as absolute argument of that scientists personal evilness and stupidity.

Einshtein relativity bullshit is used as undisputable dogma, which is by itself is a proof that Einshtein is not a genius, but a tool to interfere with scientific process. No research that contradicts Einshtein bullshit will be ever accepted, not even talking about funancing by current science elite crowd. It comes up to political leadership that provide state financing for scientific research too. Einshtein cult could have been prevented, if only scientists at the time had balls to stand against Jewish crowd that organized Einshtein advertising company al all levels, from MSM and governments to schools and universities at the time.

I guarantee you that there will be no any scientific or technological breakthroughs until all Einshtein dogmas along with his cultists will be erased from scientific field entirely and measures taken to prevent alike things in future.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Воистину Воскресе! but it's too early for Orthodox Church. We will celebrate Christ Ressurection at May 5 this year. :)

In any case, if you celebrate today - "He is Risen!". Have a nice celebration.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

What does he really mean with that comparison?

  1. Gaza genocide is the same hoax as Holocaust
  2. Holocaust was as real as current Gasa massacre

Both things does not add respect to that dude.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Orthodox Christians celebrate Jesus Ressurection not Easter or Pesakh. For some reasons this holiday named Easter on the West, but it have only connection to the Easter/Pesakh only by timeline - Ressurection should be celebrated after Jewish Pesakh. This is the main reason Orthodox Church use Julian calendar (Old Style), in that calendar Ressurection is always after Jewish Pesakh and that does have important religious sense - Ressurection replaced and abolish Jewish Pesakh, so those who still celebrate Pesakh arre pagans.

In Orthodox Christianity Ressurection is more important holiday than Christmas, since everybody could be born, but not all could ressurect, and that is the holy gift of Christ to the humanity.

Traditional Ressurection greeting conversation here is "Христос Воскресе!" - "Воистину Воскресе!" i.e. "Christ is risen!" - "Risen indeed!".

Many Christian holidays are coincide with pre-Christian ones and kind of have meaning close to them. One could describe that like replacement or celebrations inheritance of natural cycles holidays.

However, once I met with one interesting and inspirational interpretation one Orthodox priest told me about: Christ Advent and Earth life with following Ressurection was not just regular human historical event, but real God-driven event in time-space continuum. So, that 4-dimensional (as minimun) event manifested itself not only in space, spreading out of small geographical point of Judea in all directions, but equally in time to the past and the future. That is why our ancestors had similar holidays long before they had a chance to know Christ. Not that I insist on that interpretation, but it imspire me a lot, because that is how real manifestation of God in our universe should look like.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You describe demons like some living beings. So it should be perfectly possible to kill a demon.

To kill a demon you obviously should indentify it and target it with some weapon. So, there should be developed ways to find and identify daemons and a weapons to effectively kill them.

This proposals to counter demons with self-development are reasonable, but the problem is in that demonic law of demand-supply. If demons will still be alive, then there will be demand. Where will be demand, there will always be supply.

Denying to buy junk food you will not be able to stop junk food corporations. That way you will save only yourself and may be few fellows around you. This is a honorable goal, but it is not enough for final solution. Corporation will always find another customers.

The problem is complex, so the solution will be complex too. Self-development is only part of solution. Other part should be discussed and researched too.

And of course God gladly will help us to kill demons, but God just unable help us in killing demons if we do nothing to kill the demons.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have spoken to a western Communist who blamed inefficiencies in the Soviet Union on Russian culture, calling it "Byzantine" (an incorrect assumption in my view, but I have no interest in defending Communism or hating Russia like he did). I was simply wondering if there were other tales of encountering this sentiment.

May be I'm amaze you, but he was kind of right. :) From the Western point of view, any implementaion of Russian civilization will be ineffective. That Byzantine thing without quotes also have noticeable influence on that. Western and Russian values are different, so this inefficience. Soviet Union at the times of Cold war was not about GDP or quality of life or opportunities or profits or whatever value he had in mind. It was about providing some meaning and sufficient level of life for every single citizen. And USSR was very efficient on that. Thanks to that USSR approach around 80% of Russians are owners of their own housing f.e. Or have more or less decent education.

Another thing related to this "unefficiency". Western companies had extremely hard times when after USSR fall they tried to open local branches of their business in Russia. And they failed to resolve them. Thing is in the attitude to the labour. Average Westerner work because it is in his list of virtues. If you will work good, you will become wealthy and all that stuff. (at least things was that way in the not so distant past.) Protestant ethics and other things. And now I tell you something that will blow your mind or give some useful clue. Russians never work. You could force Russian to do some job, but this will end pathetically. No money or virtues could force Russian to do a job at same level as Westerner. Russian will always try to find some higher purport in doing something. If there is no purport found, then it will be unefficient immitation of doing job, But if we see some decent sense in something, it still will not be a labour, it will turn into a feat, mission of life or hobby of highest level, but in no way it would be a labour in the western sense. This is the reason why we have spaceships and nuclear icebrakers fleet along with other technological miracles, but can't produce decent cars. There is no any higher purport for us in copying millions of identical things. :)

The way Christianity and other cultural elements were repressed by the governments established after both revolutions, and the blood of innocent French and Russians was too high a price for the ideals implemented, in my opinion.

For a long time I'm trying to explain to my western fellows what Russia is, as historical and societal entity. It is not some leadership that change Russia. It is Russia that eventually always change its leadership. Just like in that "paradoxical" jokes started with "In Soviet Russia NNN do MMM". Russia had and still have a lot of shit, but it always eventually devour shit that doesn't benefit this strange entity. Bolshevik oppression of Christianity was eventually stopped by Bolshevik Stalin when he got enough power to oppose Jewish Bolsheviks. And all those who do that shit was severily punished one way or another. Christianity then existed in USSR kind of unofficially but to the level that most part of Russians born in USSR was baptized into Orthodox Christianity. Including me. Atheist USSR created on the ruins of Russian Empire by insane Jewish Bolsheviks eventually celebrated Christian holidays and keep Orthodox traditions through the times. Even state owned bread factories had government standard for Orthodox Easter cakes that always baked on the eve of Orthodox Easter. Officially they named like "Spring cake", but it was traditional Christian dish.

Meanwhile other civilizations are also different from Western one. But for unknown reason, Western elites sure that everything around should be measured with Western gauges, and if someone doing things in their own way, it is bad and evil inherently and should be defeated at any cost. Such delusion will eventually destroy Western elites, and I hope they will not have time do fuck the world up.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not really personal. I'm more about overall situation with unwinding all that shit. It is perfectly doable even with small amount of people, but it needs some thoughtful groupwork, not that upvoting and self-encouragement.

IDK, when searching some technical info, say NDA datasheet or some algorithm, it is something obvious to look for breadcrumbs dropped by different people and using that breadcrumbs to get closer and closer to the target.

But in the same situation with conspiracies and some weird things, everybody for some unknown reasons want comprehensive list of everything with clear conclusion.

How it is different from consumption of MSM bullshit? Supposedly conspiracy theorists have to be used to coming by breadcrumbs, like engineers and hackers. But unfortunately they are not.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What bothers me, is that when I post shit that is pretty on a surface for me, but nobody mention it, I don't really care to convince anybody in anything. I just think that if somebody really want to know more on the topic will easily find everything by himself. But it is extremely rare thing. IDK, looks like most just wait some carefully pre-chewed revelations about some big things or whatever. I don't really understand what that pre-chewed ready revelations needed for by those who demand them. But certainly not to lift the flag and continue to dig deeper.

There is too little mutual and consecutive support among conspiracy theorists, really. Different people occasionally notice different things, patterns and all that stuff. That's good and that's work. But there is nearly no any further development from those who consume all that stuff. It is extremely rare thing when somebody help to continue investigation started by somebody who noticed something. Everything disconnected. Nearly all threads to some weird things that noticed and posted are separate and ends with nothing. That's pity.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck. That's awfully boring and looks absolutely useles. Why are you guys so uncurious? Is it so hard to use some tips from post and find out all things by yourself? What's the point if I chew everything for you and put in your mouth? Why the fuck you need that stupid teaspoon feeding, and why the fuck you accept it in general? Isn't that a cancer devouring Western civilization? That's sad.

Well, fuck this. Here is your food, chewed and even partially digested. Enjoy.

From that Britannia P&I club own website:

https://britanniapandi.com/about/history/

In April 1947, fire broke out aboard HMS Grandcamp while she was loading a cargo of ammonium nitrate in Texas City. An explosion and fire followed, killing 300 people and injuring more than 3,000. This horrific incident highlighted the potentially catastrophic exposure to risk for P&I clubs. Shortly afterwards, Britannia and the other clubs purchased reinsurance protection from Lloyds of London against any claim exceeding GBP 250,000. The current reinsurance and overspill protection provides up to USD 3 billion of cover to the clubs of the International Group.

It's easy as fuck, only thing you need is curiosity.

Seriously, I'm not even too much interested in the Baltimore disaster and the faith of ship insurance industry. Just thought that this could be interesting as a sign of some undercover bustle between corporations, elites and other bastards. We obviously witnessing some great fuckup inside NWO, so some things that could be or could not be confirmations of that attract my attention. That's all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Name me a single "terrorist act" of killing random civilians in modern human history that benefited anybody except globalist cabal.

Just a single one.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you understand the concept of reinsurance?

Does any of that virtual "clubs" ever had a sum large enough to cover Baltimor disaster?

Why do you constantly trying to divert attention to some pawns, puppets, proxies and other unsignificant things from the larger and more interesting and important actors?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure that all "terrorist acts" was organized and staged by Jews.

Do you know that it was purely Jews who invented killing random civilians as a method for reaching their politcal goals?

Could you name a single "terrorist act" that benefited anybody except Jewish globalist cabal?

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I claim that if you unwind the chain of reinsurances, the final entity will be Lloyd. It is Lloyd who will pay for Baltimor disaster, not some "clubs" who never had such sum.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It should be harbor stuff who guide the ship out, not captain.

And his name is Sergey, not Ivan. :) But your hypotesis looks valid. You could develop it if you like.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aren't all that "clubs" reinsured by some larger company? In no way any such club is able to pay for Blatimor disaster. Hardly they are so dumb to not reinsure themselves for such cases.

Why you never try to look deeper than some pawns, proxies and puppets and ignore those who behind them? Is it a part of your job to never notice an elefant or you just unable to see for more than one step further?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Murder is too broad term, really. It does not specify that it is organized murder of random civilians by some government for the political goals.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you claiming that it wasn't Muslims who massacred the people in Moscow?

How doe it matter who they was? They just a cheap pawns, nothing more. Those who paid them and who organized it really matter. But you are silent about their religion. Why is that?

Something tell me if they were Jews, you would have been silent as a fish on that matter. Meanwhile, remind me, why you are silent about Nuland and Ukrainian government who hired that muslims? Is it because they are Jews? :)

In any case, cry harder, that doesn't help to whitewash your beloved kikes who are inventors of modern day "terrorism".

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

May be from open ship-tracking sites? Did such idea ever come to your mind, or you are too busy to look for imformation in available sources?

7
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

the Soviet Union got away with actions similar to this in its early days.

Because in early days of Soviet Union Bolsheviks was not Russians. It was Jews.

almost wonder if modern leftists hate Russians because they blame them for the failure of Communism in some way.

No, Jews hate Russians beacuse their attempts to take over Russia always fail. Khazarian kaganate destruction, Pale of settlement, Stalin's repressions of "innocent" elite jews ending Jewish rule in Soviet Union, even modern oppression of Jewish oligarchs and imaginary pedoliberal "opposition" in Russia. That is the reason of millenia long Jewish hate toward Russia and Russians.

You also making a mistake separating Soviet Union from Russia. Soviet Union was yet another implementation of Russian state, and modern Russian Federation is yet another implementation of same millenia old country. You will miss a very important things thinking something like "Russian Federation have nothing to do with USSR". No, it have everything to do with USSR, with Russian Empire, with Russian kingdom, with Kevian Rus and so on. USSR was unalienable part of our history, and important one.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cry more, it is your masters attempts to sow Christian-Muslim hate in Russia are just pathetic. Only result is more disgust to the inbreed Western elites and Jewish nazis.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›