It's not a cheap trip
The primary governor is just costs
So you're saying there's no economic motivation for developing space travel technology?
The problem with believing what you just said is that it works against you by making the elephant in the room even larger. Given human ingenuity and drive; given von Braun's dedication; given the extensive research and development of new materials, all meticulously documented: Why, then, have we not been able to go back? How exactly has it gotten more difficult? It's not like NASA exploded to shreds and everything was lost. It's not like all the engineers were executed. There were lessons learned. Advancements made. Modern computer technology is lightyears ahead of what we had back then. We have better materials, better manufacturing standards, and the scientific value of developing that technology has always and will always be infinite.
You would have me believe that all these things you give as proof...these things that convince you that the moon landings happened...that they only existed for a couple of decades of the last century, and formed a perfect storm of ideal conditions to achieve arguably the greatest feat of human kind, but they've become completely unattainable to us in this day and age when almost every facet of technology and engineering has advanced by leaps and bounds since then...my friend, you are going to have to work extra hard to sell me that bridge.
Well yeah, but that still doesn't prove it 100%. What if they tried to build a craft but it didn't really work? It would certainly look real, and there would be dozens of engineers who could testify that they worked on it, and there'd be receipts for the materials used, and manuals and logs and everything else.
That type of approach to evaluating the plausibility of something is riddled with unknown holes, and it's arbitrary to boot i.e. everyone has a different threshold for how much of that type of evidence is enough. That means this type of evidence really isn't conclusive.
My point is that I can't just accept a video/photo as described to me. I can claim to have a video of X event, it doesn't mean that's what you're really looking at. The "video of bigfoot" would look identical to a "video of a guy dressed as bigfoot", so calling it a "video of bigfoot" is already making too many unchallenged assumptions of what that video represents. Same with a video of a guy putting something somewhere.
I believe the Sasquatch video by itself is next to worthless in terms of proving the existence of Sasquatch.
...there's video of a guy putting it there.
There's a video of bigfoot.
There's hardware (at least one retroreflector) Apollo left on the moon that many people around the world have pinged with lasers
That doesn't mean someone went and put it there, necessarily.
When a third of a country is legally retarded, the bar gets set low.
The more time passes, the more clear it becomes that the space race was just more cold war shenanigans. Imagine if you are commander in chief and the Soviets manage to pull off their space hoax. Are you just gonna let them get away with it, knowing it's bs? Or are you going to try to 1up them and stage your own? The only people who could call you out also risk exposing themselves.
You're Welcome, faggots
Here's a fun experiment: Whenever something noteworthy happens in the news that goes against the narrative, try searching for it on google followed by "reddit". A lot of the times you'll get several results at the top of the list, all pointing to the bigger subreddits. But when you click the link you'll find the submission had been removed, but not before it gained enough clicks to be indexed by google.
I did it during the Netflix Cuties scandal, when lots of people were attacking netflix for producing softcore kiddy porn. There were articles explaining the situation and why people were pissed off, but they got removed from all the subreddit. Makes it pretty easy to see their agenda.
You will never be a woman
should affect things equally regardless.
Well here's the thing, it does. The way gravity works according to mainstream scientists totally jives with what you are describing. You're making up your own description about how gravity works, and then complaining that it doesn't match reality. No shit.
Because we are not the size of a fucking trillion ton ocean.
If you were, then you would feel gravity strongly.
Likewise if you took a scoop of ocean about the size of you, it'd be just as easy to lift it as far as you can jump.
So can I come back here and laugh at you a year from now when every crackpot theory you espoused has made itself abundantly clear as such?
Well we had dipshits saying this exact thing when we called out the vax passports. Now they're rolling out the shill articles trying to sell the idea to lemming fucktards like yourself and you're all like "YEAH BUT..."
It's be funnier of August didn't have a 31st
Do you prefer hard shell or soft shell tacos, and why?
Found a video from where that frame was captured. It's an instagram filter. Fucking figures.
Ok I have to ask because I haven't seen anyone mention it: Why the fuck am I seeing an electric arc from Obama's right tit/armpit to the girl's hand?
Got my account permanently suspended yesterday because I made a joke about women drivers. Some shit about hate speech or whatever. Fuck that dump.
"10 reasons why masks are dangerous, #6 will leave you breathless"
This is their version of the "FUCK CAPITALISM - Sent from my iPhone" meme lmao
What's your favorite video game?