▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you provide anything in the way of proof, other than the fact that it fits with the flat earth theory?

The thing I see flat earthers do all the time is that they seem to work backwards from a flat earth conclusion, and then come up with theories to explain away the discrepancies with observable natural phenomena that would be violated by a flat earth model.

The last time a flat earther explained to me why the moon is occluded by a horizon, and I presented follow up scenarios that contradicted the original explanation, he dropped the bomb on me that he didn't even believe the moon to be a physical object as we know it, so my scenarios were not a valid way to disprove the flat earth model.

And that's pretty telling when you get there, because you find out that these people not only think the earth is flat, but they have also adopted god knows how many other beliefs to make the flat earth model work. And they never tell you those beliefs up front. It's never "hey the earth is flat, and the moon is a 38 mile wide ball of plasma, and the sun is a sphere of golden snakes". It's always "the earth is flat and lol at you for not knowing about the golden snakes, take this bitchute link and go educate yourself".

It feels very disingenuous. Usually when people have a hard-to-swallow theory that they're trying to convince me of, they do their best to explain it carefully and methodically, not by finding the quickest way to "gotcha" me out of the conversation.

I get that these things need to be true to make the flat earth model work. But that doesn't mean they are.

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it a physical object thousands of miles away from the surface of the earth?

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound vaccinated

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quick question: have you ever taken a tally of how many of Epsteins pals are democrats vs republicans?

▲ 2 ▼
ChippingToe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure, it's right next to the documentation that's you read to conclude that vaccines were safe and effective.

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

But since there is no evidence of them, it's really weird to insist that they in fact do exist, just because you can imagine it. I will continue to act like nothing happened like a good Democrat

FTFY

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Were you by any chance that one kid who always reminded the teacher to collect homework?

▲ 3 ▼
ChippingToe 3 points ago +3 / -0

That girl who thinks she's a boy is mentally ill? You don't say...

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

the main point is cosmic radiation markers.. they are unique and can be only found in space.. and not earth (since we have a magnetic field protecting us)

Ok but above you said

being bombarded by cosmic rays for billions of years

Doesn't add up. Moon rocks could have been bombarded by cosmic rays for billions of years and then made their way to earth.

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

So just to confirm, there are zero places in the solar system other than the moon where one could obtain moon rocks?

▲ 2 ▼
ChippingToe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stop yelling, nigger

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
ChippingToe 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a consensus factory. Nothing on reddit is real.

▲ 4 ▼
ChippingToe 4 points ago +4 / -0

You gotta be a special kind of retard to drop that many random acronyms like you're writing a thesis

▲ 2 ▼
ChippingToe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you just randomly tapping the suggestion words that appear above the keyboard on your phone?

▲ 1 ▼
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good lord Mr Gates, didn't know you were anti Vax 🤯

▲ 2 ▼
ChippingToe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's twelve

by DrLeaks
▲ 2 ▼
ChippingToe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I expect it being used to distract from something else

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›