A fucking jpg.
So? What's the conspiracy, are krauts not allowed on Twitter?
It's funny, imp's normally all about trashing Trump and his "natalist" supporters, but jumps straight to defense when you criticize Trump's philosemetism. I'm starting to think he might be part of the JIDF's special needs division.
Focusing on the well-being of who that number represents or doing what benefits who that number represents, that's a reasonable interpretation of how it could work without a literal physical mark, sure. But in context of the verses around it, I'd still say it's more likely about doing things beneficial to the Antichrist rather than just self-interest.
You literally said "What gives us the right to say we know, and Netanyahu doesn't, that he couldn't possibly descend from Judah or Jacob in any line, or in fact that he denies Jesus whom he speaks highly of?"
Anyone who says Jesus was only a good man or only a wise teacher or only a prophet is denying the Messiah.
It was a copy of the American Pledge of Allegiance salute, which was based on an 18th century painting of an event in pre-republic Rome. There aren't any surviving writings or carvings of how the Romans saluted, so it's all guesswork.
The Antichrist is said to be fueled by Roman symbolism
citation needed And they're hardly the only group using Roman symbols. Ever been to DC?
And as for the thousand year goal for the 3rd reich, that's likely because the 1st reich lasted that long, until Napoleon dissolved it. Hitler was aiming to follow after Charlemagne and Bismarck, not making obscure biblical references.
The love of money is the root of all evil, sure, but this is talking about something else.
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:"
Nope, not an armband. I'm sure the rest of what you're claiming is equally twisted.
By that logic, no one can deny the claims of the black Hebrew Israelites to be jewish. Or the claim that Christians held for millennia that the Church is the true continuation of Israel. But then a bunch of ashkenazi claimed the name in the late 40s and suddenly supersessionism is a naughty word?
or in fact that he denies Jesus whom he speaks highly of
Post the video of Netanyahu acknowledging the Son of God, then.
Gematria is fake and gay. Scripture is very clear that the number of the beast is a mark of loyalty to a particular man. "Here is wisdome. Let him that hath wytt count the nombre of the beest. For it is the nombre of a man and his nombre is sixe hondred threscore and sixe."
It's not rocket science, dude. You said, "Jesus was jewish" without any acknowledgement in that post of how vastly different the modern people claiming that label are from 1st century Judeans. People who don't know their history are going to see that and think it means Christ is the same as Christ-deniers like Netanyahu.
And here comes the wall of sophistry. Do you keep txt files full of pre-written heathen apologetics ready on your desktop or something?
There you go again conflating modern rabbinic judaism with 2nd temple religious practice. Never mind that there were five main sects then the temple was destroyed, one of which was Christianity, and that the foundational documents of rabbinic judaism were written by pharasees. Nah, keep conflating the Messiah with the people who explicitly reject Him.
90s Clinton is with 2016 Trump and there's a 80s camcorder-style timestamp. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say it's AI.
Hilarious how you keep insisting on preserving women's independence.
If you knew how incompetent the average woman was, you wouldn't want them anywhere near the job market. Plus, after women are shoved back in the kitchen and the labor force halves, guess what happens to men's wages?
Oh, we're going to go back to the 50s
Try 1750s.
They need to be put in a worse position, and that position is pure meritocracy
Impossible. Meritocracy doesn't exist for women; she can simply spread her legs to avoid any need for hard work or talent.
You still aren't answering the question, catamite.
They are in the same position they were before
No, they aren't. Do you not understand the concept of removing rights?
Nice strawman, retard. Now try answering the question. How is removing someone's rights an exoneration? The robber in your example also has rights removed when imprisoned, are you going to call that an exoneration too?
Ironic choice of phrase, since muhammad was a faggot and so were most muzzies through the centuries.
Counterpoint: https://youtu.be/t_Qpy0mXg8Y?si=psRIglyepUibtQCD Muzzies have always been enemies of Whites and of Christians.
How exactly does ending so called women's rights exonerate them?
And never mind that the nation was majority Christian when these songs started getting pushed.