No worries, since you think that reading something and then remembering it later is a brag, I'm sure you'll forget all about this conversation tomorrow.
You might not be old enough to remember, but it used to look yellow through our atmosphere.
You don't have to be any sort of genius to read up on antique armaments and remember what you learned, dude. Not sure why you're interpreting something an average man should be able to do as bragging.
I already know because I already studied that stuff years ago, smartass.
I didn't bother. The headline made it clear it was just stuff I already knew.
So maybe wearing full plate armor was actually no big deal at the time
No, we have surviving examples of plate armor, and wearing armor built to the same specs is no big deal now. Maybe the older generations were stronger, but regardless of if they were, the design distributes the weight of the armor across your body in a way that makes it easy to manage even for modern people.
Lactose tolerance is White supremacy. Delicious, nutritious, supremacy.
I think its more likely for him to take the heat for the crash like Hoover did, then they can push a newer deal in 2028.
No, their biggest lie is the concept of equality.
AKA judeo-oligarchy.
They can kill tens and even hundreds of thousands of Arabs and still have millions left to ship to America and Europe. It's not eiither/or.
The search function has always been trash. Just type "site:communities.win" and your query into your search engine of choice.
You can test this
gets downvoted to oblivion
Almost like being back on reddit.
Negative progress because all the German rocket scientists like Von Braun died off.
So, how would a hylic feel if they didn't have breakfast this morning?
Whatever the cause, faggotry spreads it.
IIRC, weren't parts of the JFK files mentioning people still living redacted?
Not everyone who smokes a pack a day of cigarettes dies from them either, but that doesn't mean they're safe.
So you're fine with 17 year olds fucking 80 year olds, since that would still be legal under that law? Or are you going to stop trying to put words in my mouth?
My point was this is dishonest journalism, the writers know that most people reading, apparently including you, won't read far enough to get to the part I quoted and will come away from this article thinking that child marriage in general is legal without restrictions there, when in reality it's a small window of people five or less years apart that are allowed to marry each other.
Which if you do the math, the current law still meets the standard of half your age plus seven in every case except the absolute edges of that window.
If this passes, the age of legal marriage will be higher than the age of consent in Missouri. So, fornication is ok but marriage isn't? Maybe they didn't think that one through. Also, current law there already bans most child marriage, but you have to scroll down a while in the article to see that:
Missouri law presently states that anyone under 16 can't get married, but that 16 and 17-year-olds may get married to someone who is younger than 21 if they have consent from their parents.
Figureheads don't "allow" anything, that gay mulatto retard was following orders from his handlers and reading whatever they put on his teleprompter.
3.5 hours
How about an executive summary?
Muh sanitation
Found the Indian.
Fun fact: it's named "Vulgate" because when it was translated to Latin, that was the "vulgar", meaning common, language most people used. The translator was given sainthood for the same act later English translators were killed for.
Yep, and even that poorly made replica is lighter than the loads a lot of modern soldiers are given to destroy their knees and spines with.