0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +2 / -2

And what does any of that have to do with the occluded costs of nonUS care?

By the way, if you actually had experience in US health care, youd know how easy it is to get white bread health professionals if you really care about that.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +2 / -2

Nope. Not if you look at spend thats not classified as health care in other countries, but is in the US.

Simple example: All those admins that do random paperwork but dont see a patient? Thats not healthcare, its general administrative in the government. Boom, "cheaper" healthcare as reported to the populace on spending charts.

Theres hundreds of more things like this that arent counted as healthcare in other countries but is in the US because health care facilities have to recoup those costs instead of having a never ending slush fund available to them.

All you have to do is tear apart the UN reports that try to rationalize the spend as healthcare cost per person.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +4 / -2

Everyone pays as much for heathcare. The difference is that the world hides the costs in their governments and Americans drop it on those that use it.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

How large does McDonald's have to be? As a franchiser company (ignore the stores they own) - how many people do the really need at the corporate office?

100? 200?

How many extras were they paid to hire that they are no longer getting paid for?

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +4 / -2

Sooo, the family decided to sell the goat at an auction that specifically says it s for meat, probably realized they werent getting that much money for it and wanted it back. I'm betting they signed a contract that said it was the state fair's, now, and all of this emotional hogwash is trying to manipulate people into thinking she wasnt an actual criminal for stealing property back.

If you replace the goat in this for a $1,000 laptop or whatever, its eye opening how stupid this story is.

As for the warrantless search, that other farm should sue the pants off of the sherriffs and get a multimillion dollar settlement. Although in CA, they wont get it.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

All of the government lackeys got hundreds of billions of dollars per year, but the farmers are too greedy to want to be paid for their labor.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +4 / -1

The weather people actually had more equipment in the past that was left alone for decades in rural areas.

Those stations were 'fixed' to show warming in the data series and then eventually removed.

The number of stations in the US has fallen by something like 60-70% since the 90s.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +3 / -1

A) Those countries are committed to vertical sprawl. The US srawls horizontally. The utility falls considerably in that setup.

B) We would have to exchange airports with trainports - megastructures that go out to other cities. This, unlike airports, would mean huge swathes of land stolen from the property owners to have a high speed rail line.

C) The distances that make it work in Europe are small. NYC to Chicago is farther that London to Berlin.

D) We already have hugely subsidized passenger rail from major city to major city. Its not heavily used.

by pkvi
1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +4 / -3

There is energy loss in every energy system. You just have to engineer around them.

If they want everything to go electric, they should have started installing MSRs at the block level 50 years ago. Then we could have electric cars today.

But, no, nuclear was the boogeyman 50 years ago. Now it's "carbon ".

by DrLeaks
0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

10,000 is stopping you from buying a piece of property for 350,000+?

You can always tell what's made up by people who have no idea what things cost.

by pkvi
4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +5 / -1

The booming job market is because people are kicking the bucket and they can't find replacements that want to get jabbed.

Some co.panies are walking back their requirement to get it just to get people in the door.

-1
Ausernamegoeshere -1 points ago +1 / -2

Isn't it odd how people who post against those that have hope are never the ones who take the advice they give to others?

When will you become a good robot for the establishment, OP? Don't you know it's hopeless?

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure. Right after the UN gives up car and air travel.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

I mean, I'm all for things being a hoax - but if you are going to claim that we have managed a whole lot of rocket thrust in a rarified environment, like to the space station, putting satellites into orbit, and getting to the moon and back, a) without rockets and b) with some sort of fancy technology.....I'm going to need to see your evidence that shows any of those claims to be anywhere close to the truth.

Just screaming into the void that everything is fake doesnt work any better than those that scream into the void that everything is true.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which experiments?

-1
Ausernamegoeshere -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's a non-sequitor. I never stated or implied a unified model - gravity was used as an illustrative device so it could be accessible by those without a grounding in Quantum Mechanics to follow along with my point.

By extension, I also never stated or implied x-rays and/or CT scanners were manifestations of gravity.

-1
Ausernamegoeshere -1 points ago +1 / -2

It's because the models predict accurately.

Take gravity. I can show you the equations that predict what happens with 99% repeatability. These hold true for everything from a dropped ball to the fairly short picture of the cosmos we've been watching for 400 years or so.

So when that same equation, taken to the next step, says there's a ridiculously small object that makes it work, but it's at the edge or beyond our ability to measure it, why would we think that it's some scam?

People pressing ahead like this with magnets gave us CT scanners. X-rays were esoteric and useless u til we accidentally saw a bone through flesh with them.

Fumbling around in the dark is the only way we learn.

by pkvi
0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +2 / -2

Used cars ARE everywhere. But they are covering up for the planned "oops, cars are too expensive for the Hoi polloi because....um...silicon chips!" move they made in 2021.

It's why the used market has vehicles selling for almost MSRP 100k miles later.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +2 / -2

Please share the math on the attractiveness of bugs to food source.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

What holds a bug to flat earth?

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dont take my word for it. You already own all the products you need to experimentally verify everything I've said in your own home.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +3 / -1

We are on Bluetooth 5 point something.

Bluetooth 3 was released...what 10 years ago? As I recall, it was a clusterfuck and everyone jumped to 4 like it was water in a fire.

I'm not even sure 5 is backwards compatible with 3 anymore.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

Uh huh. Everyone can disagree and probably not slash each other's tires. Us vs them is a tool of division and pointless to use on me.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, that's not recent - both wifi and bluetooth pushed off the free spectrum release in the 2.4ghz band 25-30 years ago. And wifi is in the process of moving to 5ghz, which removes the interference they'd cause one another.

4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +6 / -2

These are transmitting at a max of 200millwatts in the 2.4ghz spectrum (bluetooth). 2.4ghz is the heating frequency of water and 200mW can't heat water for shit. It takes 13 megajoules of energy (~3.25 kilowatts) focused for an hour to heat one liter of water. 200 millwatts continuous transmission (which they dont do) for 8 hours wouldn't heat up your ear canal by a quarter of a degree. It also wouldn't magically bypass the water in your cells to twist your DNA and give you cancer.

How many millions of ear buds are worn every single day and for the last at least two decades? They wouldn't have needed a Vax to kill you, they would have taken care of half the US population with no additional effort.

These cause no damage to a mammalian body.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›