This is almost identical to the U.S. entrance into WW2. The American people didn't want to fight, but the people in power wanted a war. They antagonized both Germany and Japan for years, propagandized both of them to get the American people to loathe them. Then, when Japan went to strike Pearl Harbor, the U.S. government knew it was coming, and instead of trying to stop it, they let it happen, letting our own people be slaughtered.
Just like then, we're getting a constant stream of war propaganda aimed at demonizing one side, without the full context. Israeli war crimes are hidden/censored. If you don't agree to the current message, you're a bad American/Christian.
Whenever the hypocrites harp on White people for conquering our own countries, or that violence is wrong, or killing the people responsible for hurting us is wrong, or that collective guilt should only be levied against White people, show them social media posts like this. They're perfectly fine with killing people, even women and children, so long as its the "approved" people. Don't give these anti-White genocidal bastards an inch.
Incompleteness theorem (1st) shows that there is no finite set of axioms that can be used to prove/disprove all true logical statements.
Agreed. That's what mathematicians and philosophers were trying to do before Godel proved they couldn't, through mathematics.
I liked the paper linked, but claiming that it is a mathematical proof of god is just ludicrous.
I don't think God (or infinite anything) can be mathematically proven definitively either. It's a simple philosophical problem for humans, as we're finite, imperfect, mortal creatures. We can't know everything, therefore some things we don't know can change our perceptions, the totality of judgement(s) we've derived through our limited knowledge.
However, I do think that God, or the effects of God, or the will of God, can be seen before reaching infinity. Even finite, imperfect, mortal creatures like us can discern and discover truth, and we can continually build upon it. We can't know everything, but we can continually learn, progressing toward infinite knowledge, without ever being able to reach it.
It's how I came closer to God. The foundational descriptors of God and truth are nearly identical. Truth is infinite, immortal, perfect, and unchanging. Truth is immutable and all powerful. Anyone who goes against truth is harmed or killed, depending on severity and circumstance. Sin is easily described as imperfection, going against truth. While not identical, God is extremely similar, such that truth could be best described as God's will in this universe.
This is how I see truth and God. The more we learn of truth, the more we learn of God and God's will.
I think that's where the disagreement lies. From what I can tell, you see God as an all or nothing thing, either prove infinity/God or not at all.
No.
Because the same people that have lied to us about everything else, don't deserve to be trusted when it comes to history, especially when they've already been caught lying about numerous historical events, wars, wartime opponents, political opponents, and false flags which have harmed us, leading to wars causing the deaths of millions and passage of tyrannical laws infringing on our natural rights, pushing usever closer to hell on earth.
The lesson is very simple, but many still make the mistake. Don't trust liars.
If you're unaware of these lies, these conspiracies, then you're new here and need to listen more, ask questions, and do more resesrch. If you actively deny these lies, to make your current belief more palatable, then you don't belong here. If you know about these lies, but continue to trust known liars, then you're acting like an idiot, and I ask you to stop, as you and everyone around you deserve better.
There's tons of contrary evidence to the "Nazis bad" propaganda. We're not conjurong up this evidence from thin air just to be jerk contrarians and trolls. If you don't know what that evidence is, just ask around.
Apologies for the late reply. Had family in town.
You do realize, that you basically stated what I stated, but in other words?
I dont think so, at least with how you worded it. You said it's impossible to prove God. I said that it's possible to show God's existence through our limited understanding (which is what OP said, and you disagreed with). To repeat, Godel never said it's impossible to figure out truth, only that it's impossible for us to learn infinite truth (completeness of a system) using a limited set of rules.
Gödel's incompleteness theorem proves that no universal truth can be proven (with no assumptions). Only local truths (with assumptions).
Not really. For clarity, I'll post what Godel's incompleteness theorems say. Link:
https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2005-4-page-513.htm
Godel's first incompleteness theorem (as improved by Rosser (1936)) says that for any consistent formalized system F, which contains elementary arithmetic, there exists a sentence GF of the language of the system which is true but unprovable in that system.
Godel's second incompleteness theorem states that no consistent formal system can prove its own consistency.
The only thing Godel's theorems say, is that it's impossible for humans to create a limited/finite set of rules, to define all of reality/infinity. His theorems never say it's impossible to define truth, or figure it out (even as you worded it).
Hence, no math proof of "God has been proven using math".
Just because we can't count to infinity doesn't mean we don't know infinity (the idea) exists. Higher forms of math are impossible without the idea of infinity. In fact, Godel's theorems actually prove the existence of infinity, and the infinite aspect of reality. It shows that no matter how many rules we apply to a system/reality/creation, we're no closer to properly defining it than when we started, because there will always be some function/equation/truth outside of that rule set, which that rule set can't prove, requiring another rule, and another, and another, etc., which is exactly what counting to infinity is like.
Really, go study the Gödel's theorem yourself
I have.
Godel only said that a limited set of rules can't define infinite truth (it's analagous to counting to infinity, no matter how high you count, you're no closer than when you began). Godel didn't say that truth can't be discerned. Suppose God is infinite and exists, that doesn't mean we can't see evidence of God through math, the sciences, philosophy, or creation.
Ban? You're not a mod. Feel free to block me, though. You're a coward, subversive, and liar.
No I didn't.
I've quoted you, several times. You admitted this, in your own words.
You're obviously down voting as well.
I am, yes. You deserve it, for being a subversive, a liar, a hypocrite, using logical fallacies, denying reality, and inverting reality. Someone else is downvoting you, too. Not sure who. From your behavior, you deserve it, though. This is the only user profile I have for this site. I don't use alts. Using alts for manipulating vote counts and conversations is manipulative and dishonest behavior, which I don't do. That's your purview.
Proving you're the stalker. Obviously.
Downvoting comments and users that deserve to be downvoted isn't stalker behavior, no matter how much you want it to be true, no matter how much you claim it to be true. That's not how truth works.
You fucking tranny?
Still clinging onto this false assertion with a death grip, I see. As I asked you before, which you didn't answer (because you can't, honestly): are you suggesting that all language users of languages with gendered words are all trannies, merely for using words belonging to either gender, in the same sentences, paragraphs, or ideas expressed? By your own logic, you'd have to say "yes", which would prove you a moron. Since you can't admit "yes", you have to deny it, which makes you a hypocrite, or ignore it, which makes you an intellectual coward. All options prove who you are.
LOL
You can't separate from arguing things already explained, and which has no bearing on what started this: you admitted to hating this forum, its users, and being a subversive.
You're still a subversive. You still think, speak, and act like a subversive. You're a liar. Liars and subversives offend me, yes. You at least got that right, but in the wrong way, and for the wrong reasons. You also think this gives you fake points in a fake argument through a fake path of discourse.
Yes you've explained you're a stalking stalker with trannish tendencies.
No I didn't. You're trying to claim something without evidence. You want something to be true, to appear superior. You can't just make any claim without evidence.
I didn't attack this forum.
Liar. You called this a "nigger forum", an "echo chamber", and the users "fucking stupid".
Stop lying.
Typical globalist subversive tactic: accuse others of what you're doing, and invert reality.
Although it's quite generic with the Chinese because they're communists.
LOL. Are you accusing me of being Chinese? LOL.
You are attacking me.
I'm describing you based on your own words and behavior. Do you also think describing the bad things that jews believe, say, and do is antisemitic?
What are you talking about.
I've explained myself quite plainly, with easy to understand language. I've also elaborated more than most to fully explain myself and my ideas, which should make my points even easier to understand, if you'd bother to read, but you aren't.
You made it personal.
Wrong. You attacked this forum and its users first. Again, you're trying to invert and/or deny reality.
You're also using a multiple account
Wrong. This is my only account. You do appear to have a stalker with someone else, probably someone you've justifiably pissed off, who downvotes all of your comments. I only have one downvote to give you.
I don't need to refute anything.
Yes, you do. You're not God. You're not the arbiter of truth, as everything you speak is sacrosanct. When in a debate, you have to make logically sound assertions, and defend yourself from refutation.
But you told me what to say.
Nowhere have I told you what to say. In fact, I hope you continue to speak the way you do, and that you're continually open about your admission of being a subversive. It makes everyone else's job easier to spot and ignore you.
Go stalk somebody else.
Thus, again, proving you're not reading anything I'm saying. I could probably put my recipe for banana nut bread in one of my comments and you'd never even see it or comment on it.
Again the purpose of conspiracy is information, not what others say.
Wow, I somewhat agree with something you've said. Well done! However, given that most conspiracies are difficult to prove, much of it is based on hearsay, often correlated with tangentially related material.
You want to police a conspiracy site because you're offended by what others say?
Yes. Gatekeeping is how all communities keep themselves pure, free from trash and subversives. However, everyone here knows that conspiracies is a huge umbrella topic, which requires free speech and open debate, with lots of disagreements and contrarian views, subtle or great, as it has to be for forums like this to operate. However, you just admitted to being a subversive at the start of this.
Conspiracies offend. There you are wanting little rainbows. Say it nicely wahaaaa. Is what you said to me.
If you recall, it was you accusing me of attacking you, to which I responded and refuted, as it was you attacking me. I quoted the initial comments that started this exchange. You admitted to hating this forum and its users. I merely pointed out what you said, and what that makes you. I then pointed out how it was you attacking me in your comments. As I said, I hope you continue to speak and behave exactly as you are. Makes it easy for the rest of us. So, feel free to offend and be as much of an ass as you want.
However, on a connected point, good debate can only occur when both sides are civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth above all else, as the purpose of good debate is the search for truth. You haven't been civil, logical, or prioritize truth above yourself. Given the lies you've told, attempting to invert and distort reality, you're also being dishonest. Given this, you don't prioritize truth, which is supported by all the other lies and inversions you've stated.
You're literally worse. Much worse.
Why? Because I push people in a debate? Tough. Grow up. Rise to the challenge or wither. Or, better yet, if proven wrong, admit to it and change accordingly. Most normal people don't begrudge people for being wrong, they begrudge them for never admitting fault when presented with the truth. That's what you're doing. You're doubling down, over and over, because I dare push you in a debate to challenge you, and myself. If you'd bother to read my previous responses you'd already know why I do this, so you wouldn't keep making these stupid comments.
Hence I am being stalked by a troll.
Thank you for again confirming you're not reading anything I'm saying. I've already refuted this assertion, multiple times. Feel free to respond again, though.
Again you're writing letters to people.
I like to fully explore ideas, don't relent in a debate, I can type fast, and you said a lot of stuff that required full exploration and refutation.
You haven't refuted anything I've said, you've just done more of the same, since the very start of this thread: deflection, changing the subject, focusing on things that I've already explained and that have no bearing on this discussion, inverting reality, use ad hominems, create straw men, project, gaslight, use logically fallacious arguments, and talk strangely.
I wanted to know who the stalker is? I baited.
As I've said, I enjoy pushing people in a debate, to challenge them and their ideas, and to challenge myself and my ideas. You didn't "bait" anything. Refuting your lies and logical fallacies isn't "stalker" behavior. Are you suggesting that merely continuing a conversation/debate online amounts to being a "stalker"? That's a ridiculous and fallacious statement and you know it.
It wasn't me commenting.
You keep making really strange comments like these, with broken grammar and incomplete thoughts, that make your intentions behind them difficult to comprehend, leaving multiple possible explanations, given your behavior thus far. I posited the possibility that you're not a native English speaker, which you didn't answer. The only other possibilities are that you're mentally unhinged (you're denying reality, as it was your first comment that spurred on this entire exchange), or that you're a very poorly programmed chatbot. Given the prolific use of chatbots for well over a decade, especially in subversive circles, the latter explanation is becoming more likely, especially since you're fitting all the other criteria for a globalist subversive, which is what you admitted to being at the very start of this.
You're as bad and worse.
This is objectively not true, and you've presented no sound argument supporting this statement. You do realize that just saying something doesn't make it true? That's not how truth works. You keep making assertions that just aren't true, flinging poo against the wall hoping something sticks. It's a rather shameful display on your part.
You're on a conspiracy site yet you are as dystopian.
What a(nother) strange comment. Conspiracy forums always discuss topics which paint the world heavily dystopian, as the people in power are evil and corrupt, and are in control of most sectors of society, where the ordinary citizenry are subjected to propaganda their entire lives, so the people in power can manipulate us to think, speak, and act the way they want, believing in lies, and abandoning truth. The entire purpose of conspiracy theory forums, and the foundational purpose of language in general, is to pursue truth and share information. Are you denying all of the confirmed conspiracies that paint the world in a dystopic light? This is another indication that you don't belong on this forum, and are a subversive. You're just really, really bad at it. I imagine you just make inane comments to try and frustrate people, to get them to stop using the forums you corrupt. I'm not leaving.
Seeing as how you're not reading anything I'm typing, feel free to make another inane comment. This is getting weirdly funny. You're building a mountain of your own mockery.
You posted in your first reply to me. Read it. A big huge whiny letter like that other idiot Jack.
This was my first reply to you:
Thanks for at least openly admitting that you're a subversive. You're participating in a forum you hate, populated by people you claim are stupid. You're quite active in this forum, but say you hate it. Interesting.
This is what you said, which is what I replied to:
I don't care about your nigger forum. Little echo chamber of otherwise fucking stupid. You shout buzzwords. You're no different to the conspiracies you spew...Where are Jews gay? Provide it in their religion? Like any religion they're not. Oppossed to it. Until today's rights. This has been Western influence. Not Jewish. Liberalism. Globalisation...Threatening me with down votes? It doesn't do shit.
Your understanding of reality is clearly clouded and biased. Do you not remember what you, yourself, wrote?
It wasn't topical. It had nothing to do with the topic. It was an attack on me.
You're right, in that my response was an attack on you. By "attack", it was a well founded argument of what you are (a shill), what you think of this forum ("nigger forum" and "Little echo chamber of otherwise fucking stupid") and its users (implying that anyone who uses this forum supports the above negative positions), by using your own words.
You however are the resident Troon. I mean read your name.
You have this strange fixation on my name. The best assumption to explain why is that you have no defense, and instead try to attack, on the flimsiest of paths. Your behavior is quite transparent. I already told you why I chose my name, and being somehow subversive by including a masculine and feminine word in my username somehow means I'm a "troon" is laughable. Would you also suggest that all users of all gendered languages (like Spanish), where masculine and feminine form words are used in the same sentences, paragraphs, thoughts, and arguments, are all "troons"? Please say yes, as it would be hilarious.
I don't hate anybody.
Your words and behavior speak otherwise. This lends credence to you being a subversive shill. You're hypocritical, try to twist reality, gaslight people, and lie.
Have I down voted anybody? Ever? Not even once. Apart from a topic, ages ago, written by a schizo the entire forum had problems with. I didn't downvote them just their dumb topic. Haven't again.
I don't care what your voting patterns are like, nor does it matter. Strange that you tell me to "stay on topic" and yet you stray off topic. Your voting patterns don't matter, nor does it absolve you one way or another. Why are you trying to use voting patterns to try to prove anything?
I don't stalk people.
Good. Neither do I. This doesn't absolve you of anything, either.
I comment about the fucking topic.
Wrong. You're trying to invert reality and lie, again.
Until somebody dumb.
How original, everyone that you disagree with is "dumb". What an easy position to take.
Until somebody dumb. Look. Pisses me off by talking shit. Either stupid. Or insane. I don't follow them around this site afterwards. It is replied to in the topic about the topic or the relevant conversation.
Given how you write, are you a non English speaker? You don't misspell (which itself is odd within this context), but use very strange broken English and grammar.
You're not this forum.
You're right, that I don't use this forum a lot, or only, but that doesn't mean I don't really like the umbrella topic of conspiracy theories, or that I don't belong here. Furthermore, it's laughable that you accuse me of this, given your own words. My hobby in conspiracies started more as an interest in aliens, paranormal, weird ancient history, and cryptids, but the more time I spent in conspiracy forums the more I learned about political, wartime, and historic conspiracies.
What are you even trying to say? It's ridiculous.
I was initially saying that you're a shill. It's not ridiculous, and it's an incredibly easy assertion to make given what you said. Following that, what I've said has been in argument with your strange ramblings and disconnected tangents, which makes your accusatory "stay on topic" hilarious. Staying in a debate doesn't make me a stalker, it means I understand the purpose of debate, to explore truth. I've also learned that one can learn a lot by pressing people in a debate. When people get frustrated and angry, they admit to things they normally wouldn't, which makes identifying shills, subversives, and liars much easier. But, as I said in my very first reply to you, you just straight out admitted to it, so we could skip the entire process, which is why I said "Thanks for at least openly admitting that you're a subversive." It was said both in irony (subversives are liars by their nature, which makes your tacit admission odd) and genuine thanks.
The only reason I remain in this "debate" is to challenge myself and my ideas. People, like ideas, are honed through challenge. Weak people and weak ideas can't withstand challenge, they wither under scrutiny and react in very predictable ways, by becoming angry, by lashing out, by using logical fallacies, etc. I used "debate" in quotations because nothing is really being solved here other than to test myself in a rather meaningless discussion. Still, it helps me learn about my opponent, which in turn helps to build a repository of knowledge, even if you are a rather laughably weak opponent. I actually rather enjoy being challenged, as it forces me to up my game, and pushes me to do more research, to learn more. You haven't elicited that response.
Language can be separate from masculine and feminine forms. English doesn't have such forms within the language like other European languages do. The gender/sex form of the language have no bearing on what my username means. Trying to intentionally insert it within the meaning of my intent is inherently dishonest.
I had a psycho spew in a huge letter why you're such a whiny bitch.
What do you mean? Are you suggesting that someone else made a long post ("letter") about why "I'm a whiny bitch"? Do you have a link for that? I'd be curious to read it.
Comment on the topic.
I have been. I've been detailing the thing which you brought up, in your own replies. You declared, openly, that you hate this forum and its users. When I pressed you on your own words, you've perpetually tried to move the conversation away from this fact, attacking me, this forum, and its users repeatedly.
You picked the name Veritas from where, something conspiracy? Like an online paper. Then you strung Apex in front of it, because of why? It needed your masculinity?
"Apex" and "veritas" are both Latin, to make the name more official. No other reason. Apex means top. Veritas means truth. It translates to my highest priority. I've been thinking about and studying philosophy since I was 15. I learned that truth must be all good men's highest priority, or we'll fail and die. My username doesn't refer to me.
But there you spewing Flat Earth, God.
I've never advocated for flat earth. As a conspiracy enthusiast, I'll always entertain ideas and give people room to make their case for alternative viewpoints, but I disagree with the flat earth theory. I've even debated with a flat earther in a previous thread about flat earth several months ago, asking him pointed questions I had about the theory, and asking for clarification (if they had it) about severe problems with the theory, which they didn't provide.
As to your other assertions, you're clearly in the wrong, and not well. I'll leave it at that.
SO IT'S YOU. You are the person going around this forum being a faggot nigger tranny stalker.
How so? Be specific.
READ IT. It's not the forum. It's you being a NIGGER, just YOU.
That's not what you said, multiple times. You said this entire forum is that way, and everyone here. Your comments are still up to prove it. Unless, of course, you'd like to redact what you said, as a mistake of grammar, word use, and context.
As to everything else you wrote...are you alright? Truly, I ask in sincerity. You're using some very uncouth language, and the stream of consciousness seems broken, as if you're struggling to elucidate your ideas. The only people I've seen talk like you have mental problems. Claiming I'm something doesn't make it true. Our claims hold no sway over truth. Only that which is true, is true. It's our job to figure it out. Just because you don't like me, as evidence by how you've been talking to me, doesn't mean I'm what you say I am.
No you are.
What a well reasoned argument. Literally the "nuh uh, you are" from childhood.
Illiterate echo chamber. Dumb.
You again cast venom upon a forum you participate in and its users. How transparent.
I am not here for you to tell me what to say or attack me for saying it.
I never said otherwise. I merely pointed out how transparent you were being, admitted to what you were. By all means, continue to be open and honest about your dishonest intentions. You're free to give your opinions. Others are free to criticize you and your opinions. That's how free speech works.
I am unbiased.
LOL
Am I down voting anyone.
That doesn't change what you just admitted to.
There you are being a nigger, attacking people over their opinion, in a place we are discussing opinions?
Do you not know how hypocritical that sentence is, in reference to itself, the rest of your comment, and to the other comments you made? You just said it's bad to attack someone for their opinion, but just attacked me for my opinion, in the very same sentence. You called me "nigger", "dumb", implying I'm upholding an echo chamber, and that I attack anyone that offers a contrary opinion. I, on the other hand, criticized your behavior and words, describing them for what they were, to better characterize what you are, by your own hands. Relative to how you've been wording your comments, mine was quite tame.
Furthermore, just because free speech enables people to share opinions doesn't mean they're free from criticism. You seem to think your opinions should be free from criticism, but are just fine criticizing others for theirs, using much more uncivil language in the process than those you accuse.
There you are also telling people what to say. Ignorantly.
Well, yes. I believe my positions are superior and closer to truth, which is why I hold the positions I do. That's the opposite of ignorance. Why would I not espouse what I think is right to others, especially when they voice opinions contrary to truth? If I actually care about people I would tell them the truth, regardless of how they feel about it. Most people respond negatively to any criticism of their beliefs, and many respond violently to criticism of their core beliefs, as if they were personally attacked. It happens all the time.
I am not. I asked you to think.
What did you ask me to think? Be specific, please, because I don't recall previous comments from you where you expanded on this.
It seems you're far too fucking ignorant.
Why? Because I explained what your behavior and words said about you? Tough. I love conspiracy theories precisely because I'm able to entertain weird ideas. Just because I entertain weird ideas doesn't mean I have to accept all of them. I'm willing to give any idea a shot at being proven. How could I not? I'm only human after all. Even if everything I knew was true, that doesn't mean I know everything. I always seek to learn. Being curious is a requirement for learning, which I am. It's also why I actively challenge my own ideas, by arguing with people, to challenge their ideas and my own, to see if I'm actually right, or to see if I can learn something.
It seems that you're not curious, though. You just denigrate anyone that criticizes you. You don't participate in constructive debate, which requires civility, honesty, logic, and prioritization of truth. It appears that you're somewhat honest, but you're not civil, logical, or prioritize truth. You prioritize yourself, claiming to know better, crowning yourself God, that you can never be wrong. Again, this is common in debate. People are loathe to change their minds, and act venomously to anyone challenging their beliefs. It seems few people are capable of constructive debate any more. The only examples of "debate" people are given are wholly destructive. We're not taught how to debate in school, or even what logic or logical fallacies are. It's rather sad, and speaks highly of the corruption of our society. Why teach people the best method of spotting lies and liars, the people in power?
I don't care about your nigger forum. Little echo chamber of otherwise fucking stupid.
Thanks for at least openly admitting that you're a subversive. You're participating in a forum you hate, populated by people you claim are stupid. You're quite active in this forum, but say you hate it. Interesting.
Pretty sure the military mandated it, and hospitals mandated it for specific surgeries, like transplant recipients.
I've been in a similar debate with what appeared to be an extremely patriotic Polish guy, who refused any wrongdoing of his country, back on TheDonald before I got banned. Don't remember the anon's name, though. I'd have to dig into my comment history.
You're comparing ancient practices of slavery to the modern evil of jews, in an attempt to suggest that White people are slaves to the people in power, and to jews, and that therefore we must do as they say?
I assume, since you're quoting the Bible, that you know that modern jews are Edomites, descendants of Esau who race mixed with Canaanites, a people cursed by God, and that Jesus was at odds with those Edomites, who infiltrated Judea and took positions of power in politics and religion, especially after King Herod (an Edomite) took the throne.
A Red Ice link. Nice.
However, I do appreciate that the Borderess doc helped to show that globalist NGOs have an entire fleet of ships that run from Africa and the Middle East to Europe, 24/7, all year, transporting non-whites into Europe. They're doing the same to the U.S. and Canada.
I don't mean to deflect from probable terrorism/false flags committed by our own governments, globalists, or their useful idiots. However, I want to bring up something connected to this topic.
Randall Carlson, on his Kosmographia podcasts, has discussed horrific wildfires where it seems probable that some past fires have been caused by comets depositing flammable gasses in our atmosphere, where multiple separate wildfires, separated by large distances, all start at the exact same time, and the fires seems to emanate from the sky itself. He specifically talks about the great conflagrations of 1871 in Chicago and the surrounding areas of Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The first hand accounts are the most harrowing stories I've ever heard. Specifically, check out Phineas' account on episode 83 at the 1:07:41 mark. If you've never heard of this, I highly recommend checking out these podcasts.
Randall talks about these wildfires on episodes 78 through 83. Links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYpuW6UMjXU&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=83&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elmDoYvqpV4&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=84&t=3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuVIiFe_pG8&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=85&t=5361s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRQ-KB4i150&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=86
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o31Rpfc0iwM&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=87&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kTdmWDN1rM&list=PLHY4t-R0YADjCkxB0PVYPqoSGrspbryHg&index=88&t=5092s
The fact that this, and many other inconvenient truths about the Holocaust, isn't widely known or taught, is a huge indication of who rules the world, who writes the history books, who runs the schools, and who owns the media.
As the world slides toward collapse, and the evil people in power fall back on their destructive philosophies and behaviors, they're going to oppress the people more and more, in the failing hope of trying to retain power that they'll quickly lose. More people will become aware of the blatantly obvious truths that they should've seen years and decades prior, but were prevented by the deluge of propaganda they were subjected to since childhood, and by the comforts of Western civilization, which is quickly disappearing as we slide toward collapse.
Complex, well support structures and systems take time to fully degrade and collapse. However, when small systems collapse and small problems fester, it builds upon itself, causing bigger systems to collapse and cause bigger problems. Unless problems are corrected, the slide toward collapse accelerates. Since globalists are doubling down on their stupidity, pushing us faster toward the cliff, more people are noticing, exfiltrating from the systems that are oppressing us, and accelerating us faster toward the nexus.
Most people who are prepared for what's coming inevitably get impatient, but it's definitely going to happen in our lifetimes. There's no way out now. Every vector is pointing in one direction, downward, and it's causing more problems causing further downward vectors.