You posted in your first reply to me. Read it. A big huge whiny letter like that other idiot Jack.
This was my first reply to you:
Thanks for at least openly admitting that you're a subversive. You're participating in a forum you hate, populated by people you claim are stupid. You're quite active in this forum, but say you hate it. Interesting.
This is what you said, which is what I replied to:
I don't care about your nigger forum. Little echo chamber of otherwise fucking stupid. You shout buzzwords. You're no different to the conspiracies you spew...Where are Jews gay? Provide it in their religion? Like any religion they're not. Oppossed to it. Until today's rights. This has been Western influence. Not Jewish. Liberalism. Globalisation...Threatening me with down votes? It doesn't do shit.
Your understanding of reality is clearly clouded and biased. Do you not remember what you, yourself, wrote?
It wasn't topical. It had nothing to do with the topic. It was an attack on me.
You're right, in that my response was an attack on you. By "attack", it was a well founded argument of what you are (a shill), what you think of this forum ("nigger forum" and "Little echo chamber of otherwise fucking stupid") and its users (implying that anyone who uses this forum supports the above negative positions), by using your own words.
You however are the resident Troon. I mean read your name.
You have this strange fixation on my name. The best assumption to explain why is that you have no defense, and instead try to attack, on the flimsiest of paths. Your behavior is quite transparent. I already told you why I chose my name, and being somehow subversive by including a masculine and feminine word in my username somehow means I'm a "troon" is laughable. Would you also suggest that all users of all gendered languages (like Spanish), where masculine and feminine form words are used in the same sentences, paragraphs, thoughts, and arguments, are all "troons"? Please say yes, as it would be hilarious.
I don't hate anybody.
Your words and behavior speak otherwise. This lends credence to you being a subversive shill. You're hypocritical, try to twist reality, gaslight people, and lie.
Have I down voted anybody? Ever? Not even once. Apart from a topic, ages ago, written by a schizo the entire forum had problems with. I didn't downvote them just their dumb topic. Haven't again.
I don't care what your voting patterns are like, nor does it matter. Strange that you tell me to "stay on topic" and yet you stray off topic. Your voting patterns don't matter, nor does it absolve you one way or another. Why are you trying to use voting patterns to try to prove anything?
I don't stalk people.
Good. Neither do I. This doesn't absolve you of anything, either.
I comment about the fucking topic.
Wrong. You're trying to invert reality and lie, again.
Until somebody dumb.
How original, everyone that you disagree with is "dumb". What an easy position to take.
Until somebody dumb. Look. Pisses me off by talking shit. Either stupid. Or insane. I don't follow them around this site afterwards. It is replied to in the topic about the topic or the relevant conversation.
Given how you write, are you a non English speaker? You don't misspell (which itself is odd within this context), but use very strange broken English and grammar.
You're not this forum.
You're right, that I don't use this forum a lot, or only, but that doesn't mean I don't really like the umbrella topic of conspiracy theories, or that I don't belong here. Furthermore, it's laughable that you accuse me of this, given your own words. My hobby in conspiracies started more as an interest in aliens, paranormal, weird ancient history, and cryptids, but the more time I spent in conspiracy forums the more I learned about political, wartime, and historic conspiracies.
What are you even trying to say? It's ridiculous.
I was initially saying that you're a shill. It's not ridiculous, and it's an incredibly easy assertion to make given what you said. Following that, what I've said has been in argument with your strange ramblings and disconnected tangents, which makes your accusatory "stay on topic" hilarious. Staying in a debate doesn't make me a stalker, it means I understand the purpose of debate, to explore truth. I've also learned that one can learn a lot by pressing people in a debate. When people get frustrated and angry, they admit to things they normally wouldn't, which makes identifying shills, subversives, and liars much easier. But, as I said in my very first reply to you, you just straight out admitted to it, so we could skip the entire process, which is why I said "Thanks for at least openly admitting that you're a subversive." It was said both in irony (subversives are liars by their nature, which makes your tacit admission odd) and genuine thanks.
The only reason I remain in this "debate" is to challenge myself and my ideas. People, like ideas, are honed through challenge. Weak people and weak ideas can't withstand challenge, they wither under scrutiny and react in very predictable ways, by becoming angry, by lashing out, by using logical fallacies, etc. I used "debate" in quotations because nothing is really being solved here other than to test myself in a rather meaningless discussion. Still, it helps me learn about my opponent, which in turn helps to build a repository of knowledge, even if you are a rather laughably weak opponent. I actually rather enjoy being challenged, as it forces me to up my game, and pushes me to do more research, to learn more. You haven't elicited that response.
Again you're writing letters to people. Because you're a Troon. What the fuck is that?
Who does that. I mean seriously? A stalker. Fuck off. A nigger stalker obviously. Wahaa he said nigger. Look at that. Here comes somebody offended. So offensive? Why? Are you a nigger? I mean you're stalking people. Because they said nigger. There you are wahaaa, letters to people. Telling them what they should say, because you're offended. Why is that, seriously? Then your name, it's an oxymoron.
As far as being uneducated went, this forum is full of it. Read your name.
Takes offense
Stalks people
Trolls people with bullshit. It has nothing to do with the topic. The Jewish religion being gay or not.
Has a LGBTQ name
God damn. Somebody else make a psychological profile for this person. Profile apexveritas. They are clearly what? Tell me? Delusional. Look at those symptoms. It's no wonder why they're such.
You made it personal. I wanted to know who the stalker is? I baited. In response, here comes the problem. Are you that stalker. Look at your checklist. It wasn't me commenting. I am still being attacked. Every post. By. Obviously somebody attacking me because wahaa I should being saying things like them, thinking like them. An echo chamber? Of dumb little monkeys? No what? Tell me you dumbass? You're as bad and worse. You're on a conspiracy site yet you are as dystopian. Worse. You believe in more fiction than fact.
I like to fully explore ideas, don't relent in a debate, I can type fast, and you said a lot of stuff that required full exploration and refutation.
You haven't refuted anything I've said, you've just done more of the same, since the very start of this thread: deflection, changing the subject, focusing on things that I've already explained and that have no bearing on this discussion, inverting reality, use ad hominems, create straw men, project, gaslight, use logically fallacious arguments, and talk strangely.
I wanted to know who the stalker is? I baited.
As I've said, I enjoy pushing people in a debate, to challenge them and their ideas, and to challenge myself and my ideas. You didn't "bait" anything. Refuting your lies and logical fallacies isn't "stalker" behavior. Are you suggesting that merely continuing a conversation/debate online amounts to being a "stalker"? That's a ridiculous and fallacious statement and you know it.
It wasn't me commenting.
You keep making really strange comments like these, with broken grammar and incomplete thoughts, that make your intentions behind them difficult to comprehend, leaving multiple possible explanations, given your behavior thus far. I posited the possibility that you're not a native English speaker, which you didn't answer. The only other possibilities are that you're mentally unhinged (you're denying reality, as it was your first comment that spurred on this entire exchange), or that you're a very poorly programmed chatbot. Given the prolific use of chatbots for well over a decade, especially in subversive circles, the latter explanation is becoming more likely, especially since you're fitting all the other criteria for a globalist subversive, which is what you admitted to being at the very start of this.
You're as bad and worse.
This is objectively not true, and you've presented no sound argument supporting this statement. You do realize that just saying something doesn't make it true? That's not how truth works. You keep making assertions that just aren't true, flinging poo against the wall hoping something sticks. It's a rather shameful display on your part.
You're on a conspiracy site yet you are as dystopian.
What a(nother) strange comment. Conspiracy forums always discuss topics which paint the world heavily dystopian, as the people in power are evil and corrupt, and are in control of most sectors of society, where the ordinary citizenry are subjected to propaganda their entire lives, so the people in power can manipulate us to think, speak, and act the way they want, believing in lies, and abandoning truth. The entire purpose of conspiracy theory forums, and the foundational purpose of language in general, is to pursue truth and share information. Are you denying all of the confirmed conspiracies that paint the world in a dystopic light? This is another indication that you don't belong on this forum, and are a subversive. You're just really, really bad at it. I imagine you just make inane comments to try and frustrate people, to get them to stop using the forums you corrupt. I'm not leaving.
Seeing as how you're not reading anything I'm typing, feel free to make another inane comment. This is getting weirdly funny. You're building a mountain of your own mockery.
What are you talking about. You've written another stalker letter. Refuted what? You need to refute why you're like that. I don't. What did I do? Nothing. You made it personal. Have I. Do you see me writing big dumb bullshit letters to people. Do you see me speculating on their context, rearranging their sentences. I'll jump right in making an argument subjectively, sometimes sure I might call somebody a dumbasses. Most people are. Especially in their dumb comments.
I don't need to refute anything. What did I do wrong. Nothing. You made it personal.
I baited. I had done it previously, read my comments, a number of times. Where I was tactically trying to draw the stalker out. Look who came knocking.
You have a stalker profile.
Writes bullshit to people.
Takes offense at what other people say. Not subjectively or regarding the topic. Personally wahaa he said a bad word. It's so wahaa offended.
You've called yourself a troon
You're also using a multiple account
Why are you like that. Nobody else is they don't care. It was nothing to do with you. Until look at that. You made it personal. It was nothing to do with you, nothing at all. The topic sure let's debate it. But you told me what to say. Look what we've proved about yourself? Above.
Inane argument is that big dumb fucking letter. You're still trying to prove something to me about yourself. By telling me what to say. Go stalk somebody else.
Again the purpose of conspiracy is information, not what others say. Especially if it isn't topical. Topically let's talk about it. Impossible with most of these clowns. They're as brainwashed. You want to police a conspiracy site because you're offended by what others say? The epitome of dystopia. Conspiracies offend. There you are wanting little rainbows. Say it nicely wahaaaa. Is what you said to me. Say it so nicely, Hollywood are satanic pedophile adreno cannibals. See how dumb you are taking offense, telling me what to say? You're literally worse. Much worse. You want a dumb little echo chamber of monkeys believing whatever bullshit you imagine. I was problematic when I didn't.
I've explained myself quite plainly, with easy to understand language. I've also elaborated more than most to fully explain myself and my ideas, which should make my points even easier to understand, if you'd bother to read, but you aren't.
You made it personal.
Wrong. You attacked this forum and its users first. Again, you're trying to invert and/or deny reality.
You're also using a multiple account
Wrong. This is my only account. You do appear to have a stalker with someone else, probably someone you've justifiably pissed off, who downvotes all of your comments. I only have one downvote to give you.
I don't need to refute anything.
Yes, you do. You're not God. You're not the arbiter of truth, as everything you speak is sacrosanct. When in a debate, you have to make logically sound assertions, and defend yourself from refutation.
But you told me what to say.
Nowhere have I told you what to say. In fact, I hope you continue to speak the way you do, and that you're continually open about your admission of being a subversive. It makes everyone else's job easier to spot and ignore you.
Go stalk somebody else.
Thus, again, proving you're not reading anything I'm saying. I could probably put my recipe for banana nut bread in one of my comments and you'd never even see it or comment on it.
Again the purpose of conspiracy is information, not what others say.
Wow, I somewhat agree with something you've said. Well done! However, given that most conspiracies are difficult to prove, much of it is based on hearsay, often correlated with tangentially related material.
You want to police a conspiracy site because you're offended by what others say?
Yes. Gatekeeping is how all communities keep themselves pure, free from trash and subversives. However, everyone here knows that conspiracies is a huge umbrella topic, which requires free speech and open debate, with lots of disagreements and contrarian views, subtle or great, as it has to be for forums like this to operate. However, you just admitted to being a subversive at the start of this.
Conspiracies offend. There you are wanting little rainbows. Say it nicely wahaaaa. Is what you said to me.
If you recall, it was you accusing me of attacking you, to which I responded and refuted, as it was you attacking me. I quoted the initial comments that started this exchange. You admitted to hating this forum and its users. I merely pointed out what you said, and what that makes you. I then pointed out how it was you attacking me in your comments. As I said, I hope you continue to speak and behave exactly as you are. Makes it easy for the rest of us. So, feel free to offend and be as much of an ass as you want.
However, on a connected point, good debate can only occur when both sides are civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth above all else, as the purpose of good debate is the search for truth. You haven't been civil, logical, or prioritize truth above yourself. Given the lies you've told, attempting to invert and distort reality, you're also being dishonest. Given this, you don't prioritize truth, which is supported by all the other lies and inversions you've stated.
You're literally worse. Much worse.
Why? Because I push people in a debate? Tough. Grow up. Rise to the challenge or wither. Or, better yet, if proven wrong, admit to it and change accordingly. Most normal people don't begrudge people for being wrong, they begrudge them for never admitting fault when presented with the truth. That's what you're doing. You're doubling down, over and over, because I dare push you in a debate to challenge you, and myself. If you'd bother to read my previous responses you'd already know why I do this, so you wouldn't keep making these stupid comments.
Hence I am being stalked by a troll.
Thank you for again confirming you're not reading anything I'm saying. I've already refuted this assertion, multiple times. Feel free to respond again, though.
This was my first reply to you:
This is what you said, which is what I replied to:
Your understanding of reality is clearly clouded and biased. Do you not remember what you, yourself, wrote?
You're right, in that my response was an attack on you. By "attack", it was a well founded argument of what you are (a shill), what you think of this forum ("nigger forum" and "Little echo chamber of otherwise fucking stupid") and its users (implying that anyone who uses this forum supports the above negative positions), by using your own words.
You have this strange fixation on my name. The best assumption to explain why is that you have no defense, and instead try to attack, on the flimsiest of paths. Your behavior is quite transparent. I already told you why I chose my name, and being somehow subversive by including a masculine and feminine word in my username somehow means I'm a "troon" is laughable. Would you also suggest that all users of all gendered languages (like Spanish), where masculine and feminine form words are used in the same sentences, paragraphs, thoughts, and arguments, are all "troons"? Please say yes, as it would be hilarious.
Your words and behavior speak otherwise. This lends credence to you being a subversive shill. You're hypocritical, try to twist reality, gaslight people, and lie.
I don't care what your voting patterns are like, nor does it matter. Strange that you tell me to "stay on topic" and yet you stray off topic. Your voting patterns don't matter, nor does it absolve you one way or another. Why are you trying to use voting patterns to try to prove anything?
Good. Neither do I. This doesn't absolve you of anything, either.
Wrong. You're trying to invert reality and lie, again.
How original, everyone that you disagree with is "dumb". What an easy position to take.
Given how you write, are you a non English speaker? You don't misspell (which itself is odd within this context), but use very strange broken English and grammar.
You're right, that I don't use this forum a lot, or only, but that doesn't mean I don't really like the umbrella topic of conspiracy theories, or that I don't belong here. Furthermore, it's laughable that you accuse me of this, given your own words. My hobby in conspiracies started more as an interest in aliens, paranormal, weird ancient history, and cryptids, but the more time I spent in conspiracy forums the more I learned about political, wartime, and historic conspiracies.
I was initially saying that you're a shill. It's not ridiculous, and it's an incredibly easy assertion to make given what you said. Following that, what I've said has been in argument with your strange ramblings and disconnected tangents, which makes your accusatory "stay on topic" hilarious. Staying in a debate doesn't make me a stalker, it means I understand the purpose of debate, to explore truth. I've also learned that one can learn a lot by pressing people in a debate. When people get frustrated and angry, they admit to things they normally wouldn't, which makes identifying shills, subversives, and liars much easier. But, as I said in my very first reply to you, you just straight out admitted to it, so we could skip the entire process, which is why I said "Thanks for at least openly admitting that you're a subversive." It was said both in irony (subversives are liars by their nature, which makes your tacit admission odd) and genuine thanks.
The only reason I remain in this "debate" is to challenge myself and my ideas. People, like ideas, are honed through challenge. Weak people and weak ideas can't withstand challenge, they wither under scrutiny and react in very predictable ways, by becoming angry, by lashing out, by using logical fallacies, etc. I used "debate" in quotations because nothing is really being solved here other than to test myself in a rather meaningless discussion. Still, it helps me learn about my opponent, which in turn helps to build a repository of knowledge, even if you are a rather laughably weak opponent. I actually rather enjoy being challenged, as it forces me to up my game, and pushes me to do more research, to learn more. You haven't elicited that response.
Again you're writing letters to people. Because you're a Troon. What the fuck is that?
Who does that. I mean seriously? A stalker. Fuck off. A nigger stalker obviously. Wahaa he said nigger. Look at that. Here comes somebody offended. So offensive? Why? Are you a nigger? I mean you're stalking people. Because they said nigger. There you are wahaaa, letters to people. Telling them what they should say, because you're offended. Why is that, seriously? Then your name, it's an oxymoron.
As far as being uneducated went, this forum is full of it. Read your name.
Takes offense
Stalks people
Trolls people with bullshit. It has nothing to do with the topic. The Jewish religion being gay or not.
Has a LGBTQ name
God damn. Somebody else make a psychological profile for this person. Profile apexveritas. They are clearly what? Tell me? Delusional. Look at those symptoms. It's no wonder why they're such.
You made it personal. I wanted to know who the stalker is? I baited. In response, here comes the problem. Are you that stalker. Look at your checklist. It wasn't me commenting. I am still being attacked. Every post. By. Obviously somebody attacking me because wahaa I should being saying things like them, thinking like them. An echo chamber? Of dumb little monkeys? No what? Tell me you dumbass? You're as bad and worse. You're on a conspiracy site yet you are as dystopian. Worse. You believe in more fiction than fact.
I like to fully explore ideas, don't relent in a debate, I can type fast, and you said a lot of stuff that required full exploration and refutation.
You haven't refuted anything I've said, you've just done more of the same, since the very start of this thread: deflection, changing the subject, focusing on things that I've already explained and that have no bearing on this discussion, inverting reality, use ad hominems, create straw men, project, gaslight, use logically fallacious arguments, and talk strangely.
As I've said, I enjoy pushing people in a debate, to challenge them and their ideas, and to challenge myself and my ideas. You didn't "bait" anything. Refuting your lies and logical fallacies isn't "stalker" behavior. Are you suggesting that merely continuing a conversation/debate online amounts to being a "stalker"? That's a ridiculous and fallacious statement and you know it.
You keep making really strange comments like these, with broken grammar and incomplete thoughts, that make your intentions behind them difficult to comprehend, leaving multiple possible explanations, given your behavior thus far. I posited the possibility that you're not a native English speaker, which you didn't answer. The only other possibilities are that you're mentally unhinged (you're denying reality, as it was your first comment that spurred on this entire exchange), or that you're a very poorly programmed chatbot. Given the prolific use of chatbots for well over a decade, especially in subversive circles, the latter explanation is becoming more likely, especially since you're fitting all the other criteria for a globalist subversive, which is what you admitted to being at the very start of this.
This is objectively not true, and you've presented no sound argument supporting this statement. You do realize that just saying something doesn't make it true? That's not how truth works. You keep making assertions that just aren't true, flinging poo against the wall hoping something sticks. It's a rather shameful display on your part.
What a(nother) strange comment. Conspiracy forums always discuss topics which paint the world heavily dystopian, as the people in power are evil and corrupt, and are in control of most sectors of society, where the ordinary citizenry are subjected to propaganda their entire lives, so the people in power can manipulate us to think, speak, and act the way they want, believing in lies, and abandoning truth. The entire purpose of conspiracy theory forums, and the foundational purpose of language in general, is to pursue truth and share information. Are you denying all of the confirmed conspiracies that paint the world in a dystopic light? This is another indication that you don't belong on this forum, and are a subversive. You're just really, really bad at it. I imagine you just make inane comments to try and frustrate people, to get them to stop using the forums you corrupt. I'm not leaving.
Seeing as how you're not reading anything I'm typing, feel free to make another inane comment. This is getting weirdly funny. You're building a mountain of your own mockery.
What are you talking about. You've written another stalker letter. Refuted what? You need to refute why you're like that. I don't. What did I do? Nothing. You made it personal. Have I. Do you see me writing big dumb bullshit letters to people. Do you see me speculating on their context, rearranging their sentences. I'll jump right in making an argument subjectively, sometimes sure I might call somebody a dumbasses. Most people are. Especially in their dumb comments.
I don't need to refute anything. What did I do wrong. Nothing. You made it personal.
I baited. I had done it previously, read my comments, a number of times. Where I was tactically trying to draw the stalker out. Look who came knocking.
You have a stalker profile.
Writes bullshit to people.
Takes offense at what other people say. Not subjectively or regarding the topic. Personally wahaa he said a bad word. It's so wahaa offended.
You've called yourself a troon
You're also using a multiple account
Why are you like that. Nobody else is they don't care. It was nothing to do with you. Until look at that. You made it personal. It was nothing to do with you, nothing at all. The topic sure let's debate it. But you told me what to say. Look what we've proved about yourself? Above.
Inane argument is that big dumb fucking letter. You're still trying to prove something to me about yourself. By telling me what to say. Go stalk somebody else.
Again the purpose of conspiracy is information, not what others say. Especially if it isn't topical. Topically let's talk about it. Impossible with most of these clowns. They're as brainwashed. You want to police a conspiracy site because you're offended by what others say? The epitome of dystopia. Conspiracies offend. There you are wanting little rainbows. Say it nicely wahaaaa. Is what you said to me. Say it so nicely, Hollywood are satanic pedophile adreno cannibals. See how dumb you are taking offense, telling me what to say? You're literally worse. Much worse. You want a dumb little echo chamber of monkeys believing whatever bullshit you imagine. I was problematic when I didn't.
Hence I am being stalked by a troll.
I've explained myself quite plainly, with easy to understand language. I've also elaborated more than most to fully explain myself and my ideas, which should make my points even easier to understand, if you'd bother to read, but you aren't.
Wrong. You attacked this forum and its users first. Again, you're trying to invert and/or deny reality.
Wrong. This is my only account. You do appear to have a stalker with someone else, probably someone you've justifiably pissed off, who downvotes all of your comments. I only have one downvote to give you.
Yes, you do. You're not God. You're not the arbiter of truth, as everything you speak is sacrosanct. When in a debate, you have to make logically sound assertions, and defend yourself from refutation.
Nowhere have I told you what to say. In fact, I hope you continue to speak the way you do, and that you're continually open about your admission of being a subversive. It makes everyone else's job easier to spot and ignore you.
Thus, again, proving you're not reading anything I'm saying. I could probably put my recipe for banana nut bread in one of my comments and you'd never even see it or comment on it.
Wow, I somewhat agree with something you've said. Well done! However, given that most conspiracies are difficult to prove, much of it is based on hearsay, often correlated with tangentially related material.
Yes. Gatekeeping is how all communities keep themselves pure, free from trash and subversives. However, everyone here knows that conspiracies is a huge umbrella topic, which requires free speech and open debate, with lots of disagreements and contrarian views, subtle or great, as it has to be for forums like this to operate. However, you just admitted to being a subversive at the start of this.
If you recall, it was you accusing me of attacking you, to which I responded and refuted, as it was you attacking me. I quoted the initial comments that started this exchange. You admitted to hating this forum and its users. I merely pointed out what you said, and what that makes you. I then pointed out how it was you attacking me in your comments. As I said, I hope you continue to speak and behave exactly as you are. Makes it easy for the rest of us. So, feel free to offend and be as much of an ass as you want.
However, on a connected point, good debate can only occur when both sides are civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth above all else, as the purpose of good debate is the search for truth. You haven't been civil, logical, or prioritize truth above yourself. Given the lies you've told, attempting to invert and distort reality, you're also being dishonest. Given this, you don't prioritize truth, which is supported by all the other lies and inversions you've stated.
Why? Because I push people in a debate? Tough. Grow up. Rise to the challenge or wither. Or, better yet, if proven wrong, admit to it and change accordingly. Most normal people don't begrudge people for being wrong, they begrudge them for never admitting fault when presented with the truth. That's what you're doing. You're doubling down, over and over, because I dare push you in a debate to challenge you, and myself. If you'd bother to read my previous responses you'd already know why I do this, so you wouldn't keep making these stupid comments.
Thank you for again confirming you're not reading anything I'm saying. I've already refuted this assertion, multiple times. Feel free to respond again, though.