I'm not a feminist
Then why are you acting exactly like a feminist?
I only follow God's law of egalitarianism
Nowhere in the Bible does it say egalitarianism is God's law. God did not equate or equalize men and women, individuals, races, peoples, cities, animals, judgments, sins, crimes, or punishments. Differentiations is rife all over the Bible, and in creation itself.
You are asserting a huge heresy that's spread throughout the West, and the Christian church, since the Enlightenment. Egalitarianism is the false belief (and for Christians a sin), that unequal things are equal. This false belief and sin has exploded since the 1900s, beginning with race blindness and feminism, progressing to new falsities ever since, even into the LGBTQ movement (equalizing different forms of sexual sin to the normative/good kind, between one man and one woman in marriage), into transgenderism (a progression of the thought that there is no difference between men and women), and now into pedophilia (the equalization of age).
In every regard, egalitarianism is a lie. At the very core, is the concept of trying to equalize different things. It's the philosophical concept of trying to argue that 1 and 2 are equal. The moment that Satan can convince you of that, he can convince you of anything, and get you to perform every sin imaginable, because all differentiation disappears.
in that all humans were made in His image.
False. Man (Adam) was made in God's image. Woman (Eve) was made from Adam. Even if we assumed this specific statement as correct, it still doesn't negate the fact that differentiation exists, among almost every variable imaginable.
I have been thinking very seriously on your accusations. I've tried talking through our differences in understanding and I'm not sure how to further proceed.
I hope the Holy Spirit can convict you where I've been unable to.
Dusting feet is indeed a very serious thing to say and do.
It is, and I mean it with all severity that it warrants. I must give dire warning when a fellow Christian continues to live in unrepentant sin, especially after I've pointed it out, explained it, and rebuked it in numerous ways. You are gambling your soul every day you live in unrepentant sin, hoping that today you won't die, and on your day of judgment, God gives leniency to you, when He's not required. Can your unrepentant sins be forgiven on your day of judgment? That I don't know. All I do know, is that it's best to not test it, when the worst outcome is eternal torment in Hell.
Just because you call Jesus Lord, just because you are a professed Christian, doesn't mean you will be forgiven and welcomed into Heaven. In Matthew 7:21-22, Jesus says:
"Not everyone who says to me, βLord, Lord,β will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, βLord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?β And then will I declare to them, βI never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness."
You must abide by God. That means you must accept and try to live by scripture, and by the truth God inlaid into creation. we, of course, are sinners, so we will fail, but we must strive to do so, and accept God and His word (truth), and we must not reject it and defend our own falsities and sins. If your interpretation of scripture doesn't align with the truth of creation, it means its false. If your interpretation of scripture doesn't align with the last few thousand years of Christian doctrine, but instead aligns with the modern corruptions and perversions, which have overseen the church dwindle and be corrupted, described as the great falling away in 2 Thessalonians 2, Matthew 24:10β12, and 1 Timothy 4:1.
Why would you abide by interpretations of scripture that have clearly seen the destruction and corruption of the church, the explosion and acceptance of sin and death? These are poisonous fruits of the poisonous tree. We are explicitly warned to reject them. And yet, you accept and defend them? Even a small morsel of acceptance of these poisonous fruits, is still defense of sin, and defense of your own sin, as you are currently in practice of it.
Again, you have been warned.
Remember, that we are commanded to love our neighbor. How could I, if I truly loved you, let you be damned in your behavior and sin? If I truly loved you, would I not try to warn and stop you, to correct your path, so that you could be saved?
I am not spitting in the face of God or serving idols.
Yes, you are. Just because you say you aren't, doesn't make it true.
You are actively picking and choosing what scripture to follow so you can worship false idols. You're using exceptions in a futile attempt to disprove the clear and unambiguous rule. You are actively denying the creation and purpose of men and women (by the way, creation is the greater work of God, as that's what God points to when showing His own divinity; see Job 38 and onward as proof). You're actively denying the logic, biology, and philosophical priorities of men and women. You're worshipping at the feet of feminism and egalitarianism, some of the worst ideologies of the modern age, which has led to the deaths of millions, through things like open borders, mass immigration, race blindness, and abortion (which by itself has led to the murder of hundreds of millions of babies worldwide since Roe v Wade in 1973).
If you're truly Christian, then you must repent of your sins and abdicate this moderator position to a man. I'm doing my duty as a Christian to point to your sins, in the hopes that you stop. If you refuse, that's on you. If you refuse, I must shake the dust off my feet and walk away, hoping that the Holy Spirit bonks you on the head hard enough to wake you up before it's too late, before you meet God's wrathful judgment.
Also of importance, since you linked to it:
Christianity.com is corrupt. It's owned by Salem Media Group, which is thoroughly jewish and zionist. Jews actively deny the divinity of Christ, spit on Christians, and are the single most vociferous anti-Christians in history. You should probably know this, since you're attempting to moderate a conspiracy forum.
You're deflecting and defending your sins. You're pointing to exceptions, in a futile attempt to disprove the rule. The rule is that woman is subservient to man, and man is subservient to God. That is the proper hierarchy. You're worshipping at the feet of false idols, which are feminism and egalitarianism. You are spitting in the face of God. You are in sin.
False.
1 Corinthians 11:3:
"But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God."
The term "wife" here is translated from Greek "gunΔ", which means either wife or woman.
Ephesians 5:22β24
"Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands."
1 Timothy 2:11-14
"Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor."
1 Corinthians 14:34β35
"the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church."
God made Adam first. Woman was made from Adam's rib, to serve him as a helper. Man is the head of the woman, and Christ is the head of man. That is the proper order of things. Women are not permitted to hold authority or headship over men, in any regard, except through child rearing. Any other interpretation is feminist egalitarian corruption, idolatry, and sin.
You are exercising authority, power, and headship over men even by moderating this forum, by controlling what is said by men, by censoring what men say that you don't like. You are literally in control of what men are saying, which is the exact definition of what authority, headship, power, and control means, with regard to speech. You are not permitted to do this, in God's own words through the Bible, which is supported by the logic instilled in creation (i.e. how men and women are biologically designed, both physically and mentally), and the philosophical priorities that men and women have (men prioritize truth/logic foremost, and women prioritize life/love/empathy foremost). In all regards, man does and should hold proper hierarchy over women.
By ignoring this, you are rejecting God's word through scripture, rejecting God's creation of men and women, and rejecting the truth/logic God instilled in creation of proper hierarchy. You are currently in unrepentant sin, a very bad place for a Christian to be. May the Holy Spirit convict you of your sin and point you to the right path, so you can repent of this sin and be forgiven.
I don't run on anyone's orders but Jesus Christ, and my husband.
Then, in reverence to Christ and God and the Holy Spirit, you should step down and abdicate this responsibility to a man. To do otherwise is to disagree with and sin against God, how He made men and women, the differences among us, the varied responsibilities and headship, and the proper divinely created hierarchy.
Nice botting. Getting 3 upvotes in a buried thread. Fuck off you disingenuous shill. I've been in and seen enough debates and conversations with you to know you're a subversive.
I'm talking about how it used to be a few years ago. This forum is "dead" comparatively. There were shills that would come here and either argue in favor of state sponsored conspiracies (like flat earth, to make conspiracy theorists look idiotic), they'd completely deny all conspiracies and argue with people (like on r/conspiracy), or just come here to defend jews whenever they were mentioned (like TheImp and now DresdenFirebomber). It pushed a lot of people away, including me, who used to use this forum frequently. Instead, most of us went to other forums to talk about conspiracy related stuff.
The only reason you've seen an uptick in use lately is because JG5 began using it several months ago, which attracted TheImp/DresdenFirebomber, and JG5 would argue and mess with Dresden, who's a bad faith troll who always defends jews, and deflects toward "woman bad", natalism, and "Nazis bad". Then, you became a mod, which stirred up the historical animosities, attracting people back to see what was going on (like me). However, that "flourishing" is going to go away, because no genuine conspiracy user will want to frequent a conspiracy forum that's moderated by people who censor stuff on behalf of the people in power. It's antithetical to the purpose of a free speech forum, and the topic of conspiracies in general.
Thanks. I'm used to going on long rants when most people don't see them.
Out of curiosity, to see how the new mod is exercising her powers, I perused the mod logs, and it's obvious that this forum is done. This forum has already been mostly dead for the last few years, due to shills pushing out genuine users, and this site losing most of its steam and general users due to the admins supporting Israel first censorship all over the site.
I'm sorry sir, but "conspiracy" is banned for use on this forum, because it's attacking the user and not the argument, and the AI overlords track its use, so I'm going to automatically censor anyone who says the wrongthink, on behalf of those in power, because I know better than you!
I'm being sarcastic here, but unfortunately these are the exact arguments the new mod is using to censor people here.
You're not understanding. Upon reading the other comments, I didn't realize you're a woman, and your position now makes sense. Please don't mistake what I'm saying. I don't hate you because you're a woman, nor do I hate you, it's just that you're in a position you shouldn't be in, because your feminine nature gets in the way of the responsibilities necessary here, which is leading to severe mistakes in how you're carrying out those responsibilities.
Women shouldn't be in positions of authority, even with regard to moderating free speech forums. Women, by their nature, prioritize the feminine ideals. Feminine ideals are things like life, empathy, and peace. Masculine ideals are truth and logic, no matter how dangerous or uncomfortable they are. Men and women are hardcoded to these ideals, such that it's shaped our bodies and ways of thinking. Men are bigger and stronger, and capable of espousing dangerous truths which can get us ostracized from society, and we can physically fight and enforce our will upon others. Women are incapable of this violence, and thus abdicate to those with power over them, and in group dynamics always seek to promote peace and harmony over conflict, even though conflict is sometimes necessary.
Philosophically, and practically, truth must hold a higher priority over life, because if you prioritize life over truth, the first casualty is truth, and then inevitably life. Examples abound to prove this, currently and historically.
This is why all stable groups, regardless of size or purpose, are naturally patriarchal, because men embody the necessary priorities to the natural order of existence (truth over life). Women invert the natural order when placed into positions of power (by insisting on life over truth), which is why women are almost universally bad leaders, and why feminism is so destructive.
Look at your arguments under this post. You want us to self censor our own speech so we're not "tracked by the system/AI", and if not, you'll censor it for us, to "protect us", in an attempt to create a peaceful and harmonious space. You're appealing to safety, an inherently feminine virtue, which itself prioritizes life over truth. You don't want us to get hurt. Your maternal instincts are overriding the clear truth of the matter. You're censoring a (supposedly) free speech forum under false pretenses and bad arguments, enforcing censorial dictates by extremely evil and corrupt rulers by proxy, in a forum who's very purpose is to reveal and discuss those people, their evil, their behavior, their lies, their censorship, and their manipulation.
The explosion in red pilling of people the last several years wasn't because truth tells self censored. It's because we refuse to self censor or be censored. We speak the truth, regardless of how uncomfortable it makes people, regardless of how dangerous it is, regardless of how ingrained and propagandized people are to reject it and think it "hateful".
Truth over life.
Any other direction or argument is fallacious, destructive, and serves the interests of the people in power.
I say this earnestly: if you truly valued this community and its purpose, you should step down as moderator, because your own feminine nature (which isn't inherently wrong, when properly ordered) is getting in the way. You're not a bad person, or a bad woman, you're just not suited to properly moderate a free speech forum.
This is one of the exact arguments Redditors use to ban wrongthink. You should not be a mod on this site, much less this forum, which oversees conspiracies, a topic which delves heavily into censorship, tyranny, propaganda, manipulation, and control of information sharing. If you can't get the basics right, you don't belong here, and you shouldn't moderate this place.
See what I mean. He twists absolutely everything. He ties everything bad to Nazism. He calls us Nazis if we disagree with him in the slightest. He advocates for our censorship and death. Anyone that disagrees is a secret "alt" of someone else. He tries to claim we're the thing that he is. He actively and vociferously defends jews anywhere he can, even with regard to Epstein.
Then your interactions with him have been extremely limited. Just because there's "hatred on both sides", doesn't mean both sides are equal. That's a fallacious argument, and easily disproven by even a small amount of experience with this user. Just ask around other forums, like on his old stomping grounds, KiA2. See what the people there say about him.
He tries to bring every single conversation to natalism, Nazis, and women. If you disagree with him in the slightest, he calls you a Nazi or other derogatory name, and advocates for your censorship and death. The hatred he gets from other users here is rightfully deserved.
Uhhhhh, what? TheImp is "reasonable" only in that he's calm in his abject evil and hatred of us. Just look through his profile. Every single time he interacts with "Nazis" (i.e. us), he derails conversations, denies obvious truths, and says he wants to kill us. He's been doing this in numerous forums, not just here. I have no idea how you could legitimately think him to be reasonable.
If you really want to enforce rule 1, and the spirit/purpose of rule 1 (not just the legalese wording of it), shouldn't you just ban DresdenFirebomber then? He's never here to discuss conspiracy theories. He only comments to call all of us Nazis, and wants to kill us. He's said so repeatedly, in almost every single comment thread he's made for months. He doesn't provide any useful discussion to any forum he's a part of. He's so toxic that he's been banned off almost every forum on this site, through his main (TheImp), and his alts. Why even tolerate such a toxic user?
I'm following most of this, but I have two questions.
Is the character that kills John Wick's dog named Jesus, or look like Jesus? I don't recall that in the movie.
Is the BSG stuff referencing the original show? Because, in the remake there are 12 cylon models seen in the show, with 5 of the original/unique ones, and 7 that the original 5 mass produced. There was another mass produced cylon human model that was mass produced (making it 13 total), but it was destroyed by a jealous Cavill model. Who are the 72 lesser types?
Especially since there was an Israeli jet in the area that turned off its transponder and took off an hour after the assassination. Then there's what Charlie said about fears of being killed by jews, because of his shift in stance about defending jews, to meekly criticizing them. Then there's the fact that the first world leader who commented on the assassination being Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ben Shapiro of all people buying TPUSA.
This might be a jewish blood sacrifice combined with a false flag patsy, with those psychos thinking this would help stem the tide of the growing red pilling on jews.
You're right. I haven't pulled myself up from my bootstraps enough, or went uphill both ways enough.
Wages haven't kept up with inflation since 1971.
For those that woke up to the Trump false savior lie, we tried to warn the rest of the MAGA crowd, and we were widely attacked, mocked, censored, and banned. Those idiots didn't want another war on behalf of Israel, but they voted for a man thoroughly in bed with jews and Israel, so they're getting one anyway. They were lied to and manipulated, but they're still culpable in their vote and support, as much as voting matters any more on the federal level.
Here's an article from a jewish newspaper in 1984, which says:
"Iran is in the final stages of making a nuclear bomb."
I've given you every opportunity to repent, and since you've repeatedly professed confusion over your own position, I asked you direct questions to definitively prove what your beliefs are, to show you how wrong your position is, and now you refuse to answer.
Answer the questions, or remain an obfuscating manipulative hypocritical subversive only wanting to defend jews.
Sure thing. We all have to start somewhere.
None of us were born red pilled. We had to learn, and read, a lot. Most of us had to overcome a mountain of propaganda along the way, too. That propaganda is the main barrier preventing so many people from believing this stuff, because the near complete control of information sharing, via government schools, curated textbooks and curriculums, funding of goodthink researchers, historians, and professors, Hollywood TV shows and movies, the news media (left and right), government policies and politicians, and even stuff like video games, all put out a unified propaganda campaign, to brainwash and indoctrinate everyone. Fortunately, the internet has given people the ability to exchange information freely, skirting around the monopolistic control of the people in power.
I'll link a lot of the stuff I've archived and bookmarked over the years, but it's not extensive to everything I've listed here. Some of my links no longer work, and I haven't been diligent in archiving everything I read. If you want to research this stuff yourself, Yandex is the best search engine I've found, as it's based in Russia, and all Western search engines (even the better ones, like Brave) all censor this stuff. You can also ask around, as a few communities here, like c/ConsumeProduct, actively discuss this stuff. That forum isn't as active as it used to be, but there are still a few people there that will help you and should be able to provide links. Some links I can't even post on this website, because the global filter removes the comment if I post it (however, I can manually approve it in ConsumeProduct).
Here's some links to some of the stuff I mentioned (a lot of reading, if you're up for it, but take your time):
https://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=128165
https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=251194
https://counter-currents.com/2015/07/solzhenitsyn-on-the-jews-and-soviet-russia/
https://ihr.org/journal/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
https://www.geni.com/projects/German-Jewry-in-the-Weimar-Republic-1918-1933/17042
https://fitzinfo.net/2021/07/19/how-jews-took-over-china-an-created-chinese-communism/
https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=1845
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7b9Asjs1_E
https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html
https://files.catbox.moe/out1pj.mp4
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-%E2%80%9Cstar-of-Remphan%E2%80%9D-mentioned-in-the-Bible
You keep deflecting and ignoring the entirety of the issue. Repent of your sins, and be saved. Repentance doesn't just mean being "sorry" that you sinned. It means changing your mindset and behaviors, to no longer accept your sin, to hate it and try to avoid it as much as possible. Repentance DOES NOT mean defending and justifying your sins.
Also, SwampRangers is manipulating votes again, as he's been doing this for years in long dead posts and threads.