That's just one of those things that both true on a ball and a plane

The floor/ground/water appears to rise up as you look more distant while the top comes down until they meet at the vanishing line of the horizon

Place a camera on the ground of a football field then record yourself walking away in a straight line

You'll disappear bottom first

We know the football field is level

For me, it’s largely about the lack of curvature as seen across the stretch of water, as explained above

Radius 3959 miles, surface must curve at a certain rate, and we observe that it doesn’t

I had seen many videos of others doing the same online and I was open to the idea so i went to see for myself and confirmed that yep the math doesn’t check out

Also, in these years since I started following the topic, the moon missions we’ve seen and any other space project has only confirmed my suspicion that nasa and the rest of them are one hundred percent lying about what they’re doing

I’d go off further but I’m short on time and really they’re not the smoking gun

If you do live near a large body of water, keep it in mind and go test it for yourself

The earth is smoother than a cue ball, relatively speaking

We’re observing across a span of water so your mountains and valleys doesn’t factor anyways

perspective and ocular resolution to answer your comment above about the sun disappearing

Mmmhmmm

Bumblebeetuna, fren

Be well

❤️

I just don’t care anymore to take the time for people who don’t take the time themselves

I’ve had many a discussion on the various dot win communities about it, and elsewhere

Your question was boring and uninformed

Eric Dubay has more than enough material on the subject if you care to earnestly explore someday

@Witsitgetsit is doing a flat earth debate on infowars in two days, maybe check that out or see his “Maskeraid tour” video which is a quick crash course and warm up to the subject

To answer your question about rate of curvature, it’s 8 inches per mile, squared

Square the mile not the 8, so it’s 8 inches of drop for the first mile then 32, 72, 128, 200, 288, 392, 512, 648, then 800 inches of drop at ten miles

We can do long distance observations across a span of water that far exceed ten miles they show zero drop

Distant buildings that should be fully obscured by the earth itself due to supposed curvature, in view, whether it be a hot summer day or a frozen winter day

If you live near a large body of water, I always recommend that one go see this for themselves

I can send you videos of others doing the same but it really hammers it home if you go see and test for yourself

Be well

❤️

You have the power of the interwebz in your hands

Plenty of info on our dot win communities if you actually care to look into it

All that proves is that I’m denser than air

Already been done

Prove gravity

We demonstrate that the surface does not curve at the rate it must, given the dimensions we are given

How do you reconcile that

Exactly what I came here looking for

My Easter tradition in recent years is revisiting the real story about this time of the year

Thanks for sharing

♥

Haven't watched more than a 3 min clip when he talks about Baphomet and rituals and the dress wearing

Heard he also talks about pyramids being built on hot springs and harnessing energy

Also that he said ancient Egypt had electricity and wifi

Idk if I'll do this long listen, but came to the dot wins to check if we have any threads about it

(((Twitter))) poll asking the question

https://x.com/Realafks/status/1763004942816588199?s=20

Nah, this place is a fed honeypot, obviously

Just been banging out on Twitter lately but it’s missing the small community feel that the dot win communities bring

This still feels more like home

I check in on gab too but idk

I already have the info I need

Don’t need to keep beating the JQ and flat earth horses

Bought mine on Amazon

150 Canadian for 100g of the powder but I think daily recommended dose is only like 1g

Only took a little bit a couple of times; maybe 400mg when taking it

Yet you’ve provided zero of them

You don’t play on my level, retard

Stick to the kiddie table

(((some books)))

Whoosh, savman

Bumblebeetuna

🤜🤛

Earth spins in one direction only

Hot air balloons, helicopters, birds, insects

All fly any and all directions during the same flights

You think that’s inertia? Read your linked definition again

Or don’t, because you’re a shill

Savman the globe shill shows up on every flat earth mention and drops some double digit iq shit with condescending tone and ad hom sprinkled on top

Be better, savman

❤️

Rent free

Tis the season for treason

Okay so basic trig and spatial recognition

We agree on the formula to calculate the rate at which the surface should curve; there’s no disagreement there, as there’s plenty of calculators online available to do exactly that

So my big issue with it is I can go see for myself with my own eyes that I can see distant objects that are too far

I’ve seen the videos of the refraction due to temperature and it does distort the image to the observer, matching up with my decades of lived experience, but despite the minor refractions it isn’t remotely close enough to explain the observed evidence

Lines of perspective on a planar surface

Inverse square law

We use “their own math” to disprove the existence of surface curvature and this is where I’m struggling to figure out how this part is difficult

People say “check the math” and so we did, and that made us flat earthers

I hope it's at least clear that I'm earnestly looking for the truth and that maintaining the integrity of our communities is important to me, and I wouldn't want to deter people with well poisoning nonsense on purpose

Man, I can answer these for you, but are you sure you don’t want to edit this first and remove the non sense double digit iq ones first?

Was your account taken over lol

Normally a piece of evidence comes along with this

As far as I’m concerned, we’ve falsified the radius and have shown that our surface does not curve at the rate it must for a globe with a 3959 mile radius

Not only that, we aren’t observing ANY surface curve

Haven’t been around much at all lately but just saw the pinned FE ban post, so I assume you only have the one particular mod in mind or are there others?

I’m not yet convinced that removing u/clemaneuvers based off one screw up is warranted, but also not completely off the table, as it’s quite a major red flag and sort of a deal breaker for the position of community moderator, but you have to keep in mind, 925, that as strongly as you and I are certain that this world is the planar non rotating world we know it to be, they believe the spinning globe and can only conclude that people like you and I know it’s a globe and are trying to negatively effect the integrity of the community

u/clemaneuvers made a pinned post about it, described in great detail their position, and left it up to the community to decide

That still sounds to me like someone who has the best interests of our dot win communities in mind, taking the above into consideration

Be well, fren

❤️

You’ve been the biggest disappointment, TS

it’s disappointing when I see anyone defend the spinning globe because I’m so set in my planar earth belief, but it’s just different when you defend it the way you do because I don’t think you’re a shill and that you must genuinely think it’s still the Big Bang spinning globe after having earnestly considered all sides of the argument

I know you’ve been around for years like I have and I guess I just want to say, if you can prove the surface is curving as described on a ball with a radius of 3959 miles which is approximately 8 inches per mile squared (accurate enough for at least a few hundred miles; more than enough for the purposes of this discussion) then I’d really appreciate the breakdown

It’s been a couple years now for me living with flat earth and my research and experience since first going down this particular rabbit hole has only further confirmed my planar and non rotating beliefs

Anytime flat earth comes up in our communities it’s met with the same old character attacks, distractions, and invalid rebuttals passed off as proofs

If flat earth is that dumb, then why is it so hard to prove the spinning globe?

I don’t expect you’ll have interest in re-examining what the globe skeptics have to say, but I wish you and your loved ones well no matter what shape our world is

Be well, fren

❤️

They say planes would have to travel across thousands of miles of harsh Antarctic lands and if there was an emergency there would be nowhere to land

It’s equally surprising, disappointing, and pathetic that people anywhere let alone here ON A CONSPIRACY forum, don’t question this

Zero polar circumnavigationa completed and when you point that out, they’ll say “it’s been done tons of times… a five second google search could have answered that for you… is this how stupid all flat earthers are?!!”

And it’ll be a link to a 2 hour “documentary” that hardly has any flight footage whatsoever and what little is there isn’t unique to Antarctica

Also, the production company’s website is 404d and anyone who takes a critical look at this should only come to the same conclusion that it doesn’t remotely come close to passing the sniff test

Yet flat earthers are the ones who believe in nonsense

Sorry for asking for any evidence of a globe whatsoever that can stand up to the slightest scrutiny

Nothing gets shilled like flat earth

It’s pretty obvious when you talk flat earth on Twitter, as I can see who these shills follow, etc

Weird how the same accounts pop up and cruising through their history they only seem to care to interact with flat earth topic posts, shilling for the spinning globe fairy tale

Wonder why that could be…

The same faggots come out here on the dot wins, too