I just don’t care anymore to take the time for people who don’t take the time themselves
I’ve had many a discussion on the various dot win communities about it, and elsewhere
Your question was boring and uninformed
Eric Dubay has more than enough material on the subject if you care to earnestly explore someday
@Witsitgetsit is doing a flat earth debate on infowars in two days, maybe check that out or see his “Maskeraid tour” video which is a quick crash course and warm up to the subject
To answer your question about rate of curvature, it’s 8 inches per mile, squared
Square the mile not the 8, so it’s 8 inches of drop for the first mile then 32, 72, 128, 200, 288, 392, 512, 648, then 800 inches of drop at ten miles
We can do long distance observations across a span of water that far exceed ten miles they show zero drop
Distant buildings that should be fully obscured by the earth itself due to supposed curvature, in view, whether it be a hot summer day or a frozen winter day
If you live near a large body of water, I always recommend that one go see this for themselves
I can send you videos of others doing the same but it really hammers it home if you go see and test for yourself
Why does the sun sink below the horizon at sea? On a flat plane where the sun orbits a central point, it would never set like that - only shrink to a distant point in the sky.
Yes, you can use a digital camera to see boats out at see that have disappeared to the human eye. What you leave out is that if you keep watching through the camera, the ship continues to disappear from the bottom up. What would cause that?
Edit: And as already discussed, 8 meters per square mile is a calculation for a smooth ball and not an oblate spheroid with many variations in elevation.
Our of curiosity, what would you need to see in order for your view to change?
I'll tell you mine. I would need to personally see either the ice wall from an elevation that makes it possible to see that it is not simply an iceberg or a continental shelf cliff, or I would need to see the armature that holds and moves the sun or moon.
For me, it’s largely about the lack of curvature as seen across the stretch of water, as explained above
Radius 3959 miles, surface must curve at a certain rate, and we observe that it doesn’t
I had seen many videos of others doing the same online and I was open to the idea so i went to see for myself and confirmed that yep the math doesn’t check out
Also, in these years since I started following the topic, the moon missions we’ve seen and any other space project has only confirmed my suspicion that nasa and the rest of them are one hundred percent lying about what they’re doing
I’d go off further but I’m short on time and really they’re not the smoking gun
If you do live near a large body of water, keep it in mind and go test it for yourself
I just don’t care anymore to take the time for people who don’t take the time themselves
I’ve had many a discussion on the various dot win communities about it, and elsewhere
Your question was boring and uninformed
Eric Dubay has more than enough material on the subject if you care to earnestly explore someday
@Witsitgetsit is doing a flat earth debate on infowars in two days, maybe check that out or see his “Maskeraid tour” video which is a quick crash course and warm up to the subject
To answer your question about rate of curvature, it’s 8 inches per mile, squared
Square the mile not the 8, so it’s 8 inches of drop for the first mile then 32, 72, 128, 200, 288, 392, 512, 648, then 800 inches of drop at ten miles
We can do long distance observations across a span of water that far exceed ten miles they show zero drop
Distant buildings that should be fully obscured by the earth itself due to supposed curvature, in view, whether it be a hot summer day or a frozen winter day
If you live near a large body of water, I always recommend that one go see this for themselves
I can send you videos of others doing the same but it really hammers it home if you go see and test for yourself
Be well
❤️
Why does the sun sink below the horizon at sea? On a flat plane where the sun orbits a central point, it would never set like that - only shrink to a distant point in the sky.
Yes, you can use a digital camera to see boats out at see that have disappeared to the human eye. What you leave out is that if you keep watching through the camera, the ship continues to disappear from the bottom up. What would cause that?
Edit: And as already discussed, 8 meters per square mile is a calculation for a smooth ball and not an oblate spheroid with many variations in elevation.
The earth is smoother than a cue ball, relatively speaking
We’re observing across a span of water so your mountains and valleys doesn’t factor anyways
perspective and ocular resolution to answer your comment above about the sun disappearing
Our of curiosity, what would you need to see in order for your view to change?
I'll tell you mine. I would need to personally see either the ice wall from an elevation that makes it possible to see that it is not simply an iceberg or a continental shelf cliff, or I would need to see the armature that holds and moves the sun or moon.
For me, it’s largely about the lack of curvature as seen across the stretch of water, as explained above
Radius 3959 miles, surface must curve at a certain rate, and we observe that it doesn’t
I had seen many videos of others doing the same online and I was open to the idea so i went to see for myself and confirmed that yep the math doesn’t check out
Also, in these years since I started following the topic, the moon missions we’ve seen and any other space project has only confirmed my suspicion that nasa and the rest of them are one hundred percent lying about what they’re doing
I’d go off further but I’m short on time and really they’re not the smoking gun
If you do live near a large body of water, keep it in mind and go test it for yourself