I honestly don’t understand how you can be so reasonable about everything except this–a proven falsehood, a psychotic nonsense, and an obvious federal agent campaign. I never have. I’ve ignored it before, but it’s relevant now, so here we are, I guess.
It’s basic trigonometry and spatial recognition. The former you learn by 6th grade, the latter you learn as a 6 month old infant. Those alone disprove this nonsense, on a human scale, every single day. And night, come to think of it, since both hemispheres see the same stars (per hemisphere) rotate around a single fixed point, which isn’t possible in the psychosis of the flatties.
We agree on the formula to calculate the rate at which the surface should curve; there’s no disagreement there, as there’s plenty of calculators online available to do exactly that
So my big issue with it is I can go see for myself with my own eyes that I can see distant objects that are too far
I’ve seen the videos of the refraction due to temperature and it does distort the image to the observer, matching up with my decades of lived experience, but despite the minor refractions it isn’t remotely close enough to explain the observed evidence
Lines of perspective on a planar surface
Inverse square law
We use “their own math” to disprove the existence of surface curvature and this is where I’m struggling to figure out how this part is difficult
People say “check the math” and so we did, and that made us flat earthers
I hope it's at least clear that I'm earnestly looking for the truth and that maintaining the integrity of our communities is important to me, and I wouldn't want to deter people with well poisoning nonsense on purpose
Man, I can answer these for you, but are you sure you don’t want to edit this first and remove the non sense double digit iq ones first?
Was your account taken over lol
I honestly don’t understand how you can be so reasonable about everything except this–a proven falsehood, a psychotic nonsense, and an obvious federal agent campaign. I never have. I’ve ignored it before, but it’s relevant now, so here we are, I guess.
It’s basic trigonometry and spatial recognition. The former you learn by 6th grade, the latter you learn as a 6 month old infant. Those alone disprove this nonsense, on a human scale, every single day. And night, come to think of it, since both hemispheres see the same stars (per hemisphere) rotate around a single fixed point, which isn’t possible in the psychosis of the flatties.
Okay so basic trig and spatial recognition
We agree on the formula to calculate the rate at which the surface should curve; there’s no disagreement there, as there’s plenty of calculators online available to do exactly that
So my big issue with it is I can go see for myself with my own eyes that I can see distant objects that are too far
I’ve seen the videos of the refraction due to temperature and it does distort the image to the observer, matching up with my decades of lived experience, but despite the minor refractions it isn’t remotely close enough to explain the observed evidence
Lines of perspective on a planar surface
Inverse square law
We use “their own math” to disprove the existence of surface curvature and this is where I’m struggling to figure out how this part is difficult
People say “check the math” and so we did, and that made us flat earthers
I hope it's at least clear that I'm earnestly looking for the truth and that maintaining the integrity of our communities is important to me, and I wouldn't want to deter people with well poisoning nonsense on purpose