You can see the civil war within FOX. The graphics to stories often counter the point of the story, shift it towards the opposite optic or repeat it over and over. Psychic driving technique where your eyes don't believe what they're hearing, but what they see. The graphics, camera crew, makeup, and scriptwriters are more Hollywood than news. It's Hollywood's reality show.
Good dig. I'd also guess that Farrell is 'Preston NIchols'.
One can see a similar use of composite names in the Dune character named Duncan Idaho. Duncan being from the name Duncan Cameron of Montauk infamy.
Another standout name is Carr. As in Lucien Carr - "Lou was the glue."
Re Trump/Harvard: Yes, accademia is the cauldron.
So That's why all asteroids are pyramid shaped. And why the moon and sun give a triangular glow. Now that I think of it, circles are just triangles without the points. We should probably use rounded tetrahedron-shaped tires to take advantage of their natural shape due to spin. ....wait.
Crowley's letter to Parsons about being a misguided literalist knucklehead for attempting to bring about a literal Red Whore of Babylon is pretty revealing. His demon 'blew him up real good.'
See 'Blood and Rockets' on Youtube by Julian Lennon/Les Claypool
The universe is programmed to operate in a spiral motion which creates spin in material objects which cause spheroid formation.
Another word for an attempt to re-program of 'de-program' is 'hack' depending on the motive and/or ability of the hacker.
The meaning of the word daemon is negative force/energy.
Each positive force has a corresponding negative. Like angles to a circle....the positive ones are angels, the 'counterclockwise' opposing forces, the daemons.
If this force moves a body, then yes, one could say the body is 'possessed' with the force. But one who posits the force as a separate material entity misunderstands and resorts to an anthropromorphic explanation. This serves to absolve the one who accepts this negativity as a victim. Unfortunately. To understand this difference is the good news aka 'gospel'......you can now 'command' these forces with understanding. The Luciferian and the sage/saint both understand this 'high place' and the Luciferian decides his own will is the only judge because he never actually 'wrestled with' (understood the spirit behind) the angels successfully.
This word 'unlearn'. It's fascinating to imagine what it could mean.
I might as well undevelop my braincells. Maybe you can get a judge to order them back to wherever they came from and you can be right.
I have an invisible frog on my head. Prove me wrong.
Burden of proof isn't to disprove a lie. It's on the liar, and simply repeating the lie isn't proof. That's called a lying psyop.
If authority is truth then adherence is a good thing. Bad religion is blindly following false teachings. Bad science is also.
There are limitations to science because it describes a finite (limited) material world.
Knowing what those limitations are and why is the key to understanding science instead of fearing and hating it. I consider it a 'left-handed' knowledge and can be useful even though I'm naturally right-handed. To 'balance' the two forms of knowledge is key.
How old is this battle? Science and religion come from the same source.
See "The Guide For the Perplexed" by Moses Maimonides for the definitive book on the perplexing subject.
Aether isn't an element, but was considered the medium in which elements exist, as we do now with the word 'space', so it was removed. Space as empty vacuum or 'nothing' as opposed to aether as field of potential for those elements.
One is more accurate than the other. Space loses the debate when discussed by higher intellects with an accurate understanding of the historic debate coupled with modern discoveries.
The deception is deep and photos have been manipulated since the invention of the camera. Photoshop is real. They are vampires in that they are multi-generational dynastic families and have a history of blood letting.
Why would he have to create a temp light-emitting object? Why not make the sun on the first day? Why does he need light anyway? To see? See what? These questions are moot when the creation story is seen as the analogy it is. If not, those questions can't be answered with understanding or authority. Authority and understanding are one and the same. I gave a short answer to what the 'Light' was/is. You reject it out of hand without understanding the point. So let's just move on.
Well, we use the earth and sun and moon to determine day from night.......so what does 'the fourth day' mean if there was no sun yet? And what was 'The Light' if not the sun?
A: Ideation
I don't 'believe' in ideation or bring it into existence. In fact the opposite is true.
The story is generations deep and connects with other historic names of interest...to say the least.
The names Goodman and Lincoln for example.
https://www.amazon.com/AILENE-GOODMAN-LINCOLN-STORY-record/dp/B00Q519Z1I
The bible says that the light was created on the first day and separated from the dark. Then on the 4th day, the sun and moon and stars.
Literal explanation fails.
The true explanation involves, as always, esoteric meaning, showing the hierarchy of principles behind material objects. Ideation precedes all material things.
Hence Light as Logos/Son comes before its creation of forms.
It began as supposed extended particle accelerator. It's largely a money soak to create a 'science' backdrop to the future psyop.
Think of Howard Hughes who had the Spruce Goose that wouldn't fly to cover his blackop/secret satellite operation. The Goose was a money soak. I could tell you the full story of Howard Hughes and you.....yes even you....would freak.
Bringing what light he's found. Taking his position on the 'high place', the lightbringer as Lucifer flexes his knowledge over the flock. Who will open their eyes to a yet higher place, if they refuse to discern the material answers. let alone the spiritual source?
God helps those who help their selves.
Re: "fib-o-nacci...a fib (lie) of a nazi (ashkenazi).."
Really? It doesn't mean filius Bonacci or 'Son of Bonacci', his father?
You mean two numbers in sequence added together don't produce the next number in the sequence? That's amazing.
And now we learn that the formula is a lie perpetrated by a group who didn't even exist when the principle was re-discovered. Amazing how mathematicians in India came to the same hallucination in 200 B.C. They must have been secret nazis before their time. Is that what Bonacci means and he was a prophet?
Holy cow..............can't wait for that decode too.
Your definitions de-fine the point.