Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
I could respond with more words to counter your words, huh?
Now do 'The ineffability that is Zen'.
Are you able to shut the words off? Why not?
No, don't answer.
There cannot be more than sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all". Counting sound starts and ends at one.
So zero means nothing to you then.
kek
a) https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/zero + https://www.etymonline.com/word/zero + https://www.etymonline.com/word/cipher
b) Meaning implies one taking measurement, while ignoring all given.
c) Nothing implies the inversion of everything; established by ones consent to suggested nihilism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of all perceivable.
Ones consent to a suggestion by another one implies 1+1 aka a binary (twofold) code for ones (1) denial (0), and code/coda/codex refers to statutory law.
That's how a jew forms statutory law out of a gentiles denial of natural law flowing.
And of course the art of computation is called arithmetic; formerly tælcræft (tale-craft)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arithmetic which combines numerology and spell-craft.