Answer ANY of my (or our) qestions, rebut ANY of my rebuttals, cite ANY sources of his claims, defend ANY of his assertions when questioned. Basically he is like a DEMOCRAT: Make claims and double down instead of supporting.
If this guy can question God's Word, I can certainly question his STRANGE TEACHINGS.
Address the facts, LBF. Do your ideas stand a chance???
What if... "In the beginning was sound, and sound was with God, and sound was God."
The earliest cosmologies state that the universe was 'sang into existence'.
Harmony as Love
Again...singing and speaking imply articulation of natural sound. Only within sound can one utter/utera - "outer, exterior, external", as in...sound impresses; singing and speaking expresses, hence ex-istence.
Being within sound implies instrument aka mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in)...hence INTO EX-istence.
Whole separating into partial aka cause into effect aka all into one implies internal expression.
Word
How about this...verb/verbal/verbum - "word", hence "dealing with words, concerned with words only"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verbal
Then think about that..."When the agent and object change places, and the agent is considered as the instrument by which the object is affected, the verb is called passive".
If the word/verb implies passive; then sound implies active. Nature activates being (life) by passing (inception towards death).