Paine's royalist detractors took his staying at a couple's residence while in Paris as opportunity to slander him. You fall prey to their machinations. Have you read his personal letters to his wife? No you have not.
You were stumping for kings last post, and now you praise emancipation, a word that Paine popularized, you 'wide shut' oxymoron. Propaganda is a helluva drug.
The cabal toppled some royals and not others to usurp the power as their own. It was a cabalist who told me they were monarchists, not that I needed him to say it.
Napolean toppled the monarchy and yesterday's jewel theft was an attempt to steal his legacy, just to keep you up with current events and how they pertain to TRUE history you don't get from your propagandists.
I'm of the line of VonHaderschot, who were orignators of the so-called Bavarian Illuminatti (Home base for the cabal of the past) nd know its history well.
Blow it out your ass.
Sounds like you missed the information about this posited by numerous Q posts and confirmed by a cursory view of the current situation. How's Lynn Rothschild doing these days, do you know? Do you know who she is? Thanks for playing.
btw: Who is 'P' (Payseur)? Yeah, you don't know everything or Lucifer would bring you the light.
Interesting how the GOSPEL of Thomas, considered scripture was CUT OUT of the canon used by the Roman Church for the reason that it expounded esoteric understanding, a threat to the control of the Roman extrapolators. "It was never meant to be in Scripture is a statement showing ignorance of the process and history of the formation of the modern hyperdispensational church who has yet again become the whore. There is no 'authentic first-century gospel' as the canon was not yet established. All 'gospels' (good news) are AD forgeries of earlier poorly edited works. Thomas precedes Mark, Luke, Mathew which were written in the 3rd century. All claims of disciples being by the authors of said texts are false as you would know if you truly knew the historical and textual context.
And thusly the Church became the Whore (false imitation of truth/love that we experience today. You identify with this unfortunately.
Take the higher road and Praise God instead by learning what God is and your relative position.
That same Roman Catholic Church cut out the Gospel of Thomas. Pray tell why.
Thomas 113: His disciples said to him: On what day will the kingdom come? <Jesus said:> It will not come while people watch for it; they will not say: Look, here it is, or: Look, there it is; but the kingdom of the father is spread out over the earth, and men do not see it.
What is the disambiguation between son of god, and son of man?
The man of law is above the man of lawlessness. Who is above the 'people of the law'?
Gnosis is waiting for those who seek understanding with pure heart and mind.
I'll save time and wasted effort and refer you to the writings of America's most patriotic writer, Thomas Paine, as well as nearly every founding father to this country, who established the legacy and constitution for a democratic republic of, for, and by the people, contrary to inbred tyrants with no check or balance outside of violent removal which history has proven time and again, speaking of aging like milk.
How about Nancy Pelosi as your king? How about King Biden, drooling on the throne? What a joke.
Had Prince Albert become king, England would have been dominated and ruined by a serial killing psycho. But you'd be okay with that. Tell us who is to remove the despotic monarch. We the people that you don't believe in, or someone else?
The cabal are monarchists. You're obviously simp-pathetic to their cause and are a glow-worm who doesn't belong here.
The Hapsburgian of the Old World Order empire had the dual eagled monarchy as it's symbol and monarchy as its way.
I spoke with an individual who wrote books for academia and was considered the premiere authority on the Balkans. He considered Germany/Austria his true homeland. He confided to me that he was a dyed in the wool monarchist an opinion shared secretly by many of his colleagues. A monarchist will nearly always find a need to control the church and religions or vice-versa, as occurred in both world wars, as well as countless times in prior history. Our founding fathers knew better than to attempt to weld two powers that were impossible to remove, hence the 'separation of church and state' and 'freedom of religion' that stipulates a ban on both oppression of religion and the establishing of a state religion. The founding fathers had an array of beliefs, many considered 'deist', rather than given a specific denomination for reasons that need to be investigated to understand. Sharia law or an equivalent is the very thing we as a democracy now fight. Interesting that the Christian hero, Jesus, was accused of breaking both religious and political laws. The fleur-dis-leurs of the monarchy adds the military as a three-pronged weapon (spearhead)....against whom exactly? An unremovable principality is absolute power and complete power corrupts absolutely. Look at the churches divide and fight today. If free speech isn't allowed for free minds to find they the people's solution to their problems, then you didn't learn from history, nor understand the solution posited by the founding fathers, and are doomed to repeat.
Re: So the question is.. why would they have their kids, be these counter-culture, "hippies"
The Catchers in the Rye used their own offspring as weapon in the propaganda war rather than let them ruin the dynasty in their own lifeplans. 'They thought you'd follow the stars," said Q who knew that it already happened. Most were naval or airforce scions due to those branches controlling psyops which is what the movement largely was. See John Tate, father of Sharon Tate, from Presidio Air Force base, with Michael Aquino. Google him.
I had correspondence with McGowen while he was writing his series, giving him additional insight and tips. He was the first I'd seen who had done the research it takes to see the 40 ft view.
Within buddhist tradition there is the saying, "If you see the buddha on the road, kill him."
The meaning is that the buddha is NOT a man but an understanding. Only literalists believe in buddha as person, and to do so is to misrepresent and will accomplish nothing.
Another story has a monk and a priest sharing a cabin in the woods in the winter and freezing. To survive, the priest takes a statue of the buddha and throws it into the fireplace, making a fire. The ignorant monk yells, 'You can't do that!' in protest. When the fire is done, the priest takes a poker and stirs the ashes, causing the monk to ask, "Why are you doing that?" The priest replies, to find the ashes of the buddha." That was meant as a lesson to the monk about the difference between literalist thinking and the use of symbols vs understanding the reality.
Exoteric vs esoteric understanding. What is the difference? It's lost on the literalist.
You don't get to misrepresent something you misunderstand and then critique it from that misrepresentation. The same is true with gnostic vs orthodox christianity. One is a lesser literalistic perversion of the deepest tenets.
Now do Zen.
Can't wait to see the sophomoric slant given to that with half understanding.
He didn't say he's going to Hell did he? He said he didn't know if he's going to 'heaven'. There are layers to this you won't get, as well as what the term 'Saving Israel for last' denotes for the future of literalist religion including the modern orthodox Christianity of Rome.
The longest canal in the United States, the State of Indiana's Wabash and Erie, was financed by selling State Bonds.
The Morris Canal and Banking Company, handled Indiana's financial funding of said canal. Indiana received very little from the 'gassets' (as they were called for reasons too lengthy to discuss here), which its bond issues had "purchased".
The second mortgage on the Morris Canal was as worthless also, having Indiana acquire worthless railroad stock.
Also as worthless as the paper it was printed on. As was the idea of a canal. This consideration was correct for a railroad which hauled only 11 tons of coal to the Lehigh Canal before its 12 miles of T-rail were sold for scrap.
It gets worse. Morris wasn't punished for the scam that bancrupted the state, but rewarded with 1,000,000 acres of land given when claim was made falsely that he/they had 'saved Indiana from their debt' that Morris had actually caused. They continue to exist as a banking operation to this day. What's in a name?
Interesting aside: When I copied and pasted this story from a 'historic site' and edited it, I discovered many, multiple mis-spellings that WERE NOT PRESENT IN THE ORIGINAL digital file. ????? I know why....but how is this done? Interdasting.
Thanks for the reply and answer to my question. As you might assume, I also monitored MM's site and had suspicions of different sorts. I myself am both educated and/didactic in my approach to learning. Psychology is one lifelong study subject for me and at one time my major at university until moving on. Saying that, I discovered that the name Parker was a dominant one in the field of hypnosis. I would venture that the actual 'beginnings' of psychology start with the power of the ancient priest, and continues in the practices of Habban I' Sabbah and in the historic story of making of golem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasan-i_Sabbah
For fun, see Betty Boop the gola/victim in "Old Man of the Mountain" and 'The Penthouse' ...which also even shows the making/consumption of adrenochrome.....wink, wink.
One of Hollyweird's (Holly being the wood that a magician's staff was made from), first movies and still the most 'progressive' and avante gard was 'The Somnambulist' or 'Sleeper' showing the professor as carnival hypnotist, creating a gola assassin. Interdasting how important that was to Hollywood, huh.
Strangely enough I saw beginnings of the digital mapping of the mind in psych labs with monkeys, met Mr. Delgado's son who is in the field, and also grew up next to a farmer who had been a hypnotist in a traveling circus. No, really, and he demonstrated it on my cousin once, turning her into a 'chicken' to amuse us.
Miles seemed like a real person to me as he exhibited points of light that suggested a developed genius of insight into some properties of light, Yet his proofs were his own and he took liberties there. The couple of times I attempted to join in with question, critique or correction, I was suddenly 'from Langely' (lol) because I apparently had too much inside info to be a regular detractor.
He definitely had a team to do the gruntwork and feed data into his site. A lifetime of studying what I call 'The Name Game' was first fueled by pouring over 'Who's Who' books where they would brag on their family and business connections right there in print. A detailing of their web so to speak. The mother's name as middle name was an apparent technique of clandestine recognition of these connections as well as a brag. MM took that ball and ran it, going on and off the field as he ran, making many 'connections' that actually were more coincidental than he gave them. I myself have a quite amazing family history record on both sides of both sides of my names. It's deeply ingrained in my family history, so to tell me that The Magnum Opus doesn't exist and/or is unorganized negates my whole family histories that prove otherwise. I won't dox myself by mentioning that one wing was VonHaydershot (var. spelling), one of the originators of the OTO in Bavaria. We could have an incredible conversation about the leather bound gold leaf book that detailed the family history and purpose found in the book that I discovered in my grandmother's attic. She was a relative to Lestor Hendershot.(the later anglo version of Von Hader(schot). Google that name. My families have several high profile assassins of important people of history. Another was treasurer to Charlemagne and that name was borrowed and used as the name of the treasurer family in the tv show 'Game of Thrones'. Because that's what it is.
I chose to remain alive rather than to go public with what I know. Only now can such subjects be breached with hard truths without punishment. ( maybe ).
I asked about your possible connect to MM, because yes, I recognized the styling as I say that when I read something, I'm also reading the author. I suspected you might be one of several people who were doing research on histories and names for him, and had borrowed his style as a result. I didn't think you were Miles himself unless he'd gone into a different mode. Where I suspected MM the most was his attention to his 'White Stone' club which was an allusion to Lewis Carroll's diary entries when he masturbated to the thought of Alice. He denied all that of course and blocked me. Funny he wasn't ready to do the Carroll/Dodson/Liddell name game when it counted. See 'Liddel Adam Shift'...per Q.......gee what could it mean? lol
The 'Salem Witch' story is also upside down in many ways, and yes, it's all multi-generational as a movement. They intermarry and continue to weave larger balls of yarn..........that same ball that when discovered, helps as 'bread' as CLEWS to the nature of the Labyrinth. The ultimate labyrinth of control is the mind itself. They now become the Minotaur for King Midas.
Myth was the ancient study, and expression of the 'three world' aspect of cognition and identity with self and universe. The tarot is a later extrapolation of same.
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I hope it means we can be frens in Truth. It's always good to meet a deep diver looking for quality pearls.
Speaking of witch......the world's first intel were pirates....globalist traffickers who discovered shared memes in varied peoples and their religions and beliefs and found ways to 'parlay' control by them. See Pirates of the Carribean in their brag of a movie. The pirate families are still bon ami to each other and have usurped even the throne who used them to do their dirty work.
Good job. Carry on, soldier.
Do a search using the terms hypnosis or hypnotism and Parker to find how that name seems to dominate the field. 'Colonel Parker' as Elvis' handler was trained by a Parker in hypnosis in a circus and took his name. It was said that Elvis was under when he signed his lopsided contract. Parker Bros. Games (Game Theory) logo is the hypnotic swirl. They created the popular version of the Ouija board.
As a side dish, search Harris/Voodoo for similar results. 'They wrote the book'.
I get a Miles Mathis vibe here. :) You know him?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_B._Hinckley
A relative of the mk'd assassination patsy John Hinkley.
The Hinkleys entered into a six generation business/family relationship with the Bush family.
Re: "The "Speaking Head":
Allow me to help. On my grandmother's side is Von Haderschot, one of whom was one of the 12 original founders of the Ordo Templi Orientis of Bavaria, aka 'The Bavarian Illuminatti'. A provable claim. A lifelong study of the tenets and history of this organization, along with it associates and affiliations was an eye opening experience, pun intended.
From that, I can advise you that it can be shown that every ritual used by secret societies, the OTO notwithstanding, is material signal towards a spiritual principle. This principle is lost upon 'The Profane', and so a physical example performed as routine until the principle is discovered.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places"
Good principles. Bad principles. Good powers. Bad powers. Good teachers. Bad teachers. And then there are preachers.
Those who either don't understand or misuse, intentionally or not, use the bad/dark, generally will rule by force, exerting their half-understood principles by force of will. This has been the case throughout most of history, with the principles profaned by this half or misunderstanding, with the result becoming 'Do what thou wilt is the entirety of the law.' As expounded by one of it's poobah's Aleister Crowley. Crowley rewarded himself with a title after doing extensive work in his life, attempting to find order in the chaos. Yet they seem to prefer chaos as the field to work in, do they not? Their sayings all about 'the light' and illumination and yet they hide in dark places and do dark things. Interdasting.
I say this 'Darkness' is of course an ignor-ance of higher principles that even the large segment of their 'elite' have not successfully worked to solve. An interesting fact is that Crowley gained prominence largely due to his assertion that he'd discovered that the Tarot deck of cards had been shuffled to confuse 'the profane' as 'Tsaddi is not The Star'. Of Sephira, 16 is not 17.
17 is 17. It's gematria equivalent Q. The Star ( A new outpouring...or shall we say, great awakening).
So there are two who know things.....are on a 'high place' of understanding of the principles which move the physical object on the lower plain (field). One of them continues to look 'upwards' to the highest possible Source. The One Source. The other stops that, and looks down...to use as power. De-evolution is a dark force, gravitating into 'self' and selfishness with will to power over others. Do what THOU WILT. I find it a tell that Crowley felt it necessary to add the qualifier '...is the entirety of the law.' I say that is true but missing a principle. Of course. 'The Law' is for those who need it. A lower level of operation made necessary by misunderstanding and evil will as result. These misunderstandings become bad 'principaliTIES'... existing as political/militant movements
The spirit IS the principle behind the thing. Repeat that. What does it mean?
Q/17/The Star are principles that conjoin for example. You've probably heard of gematria. This is its foundation. Have you discovered 'Divine Geometry'?
Divine Geometry is a rarified subject. Few find it. Fewer understand.
These principles are eternal and so their discovery by those with both good and evil intent became an issue of life or death in times when any variation from the norm was considered politically incorrect. Interesting that one's punishment was usually either death or exile, or perhaps becoming a consultant to the King. One of my ancestors did just that in the reign of Charlemagne. Was this due to the quality difference of the information? Some of it was. But all, used in power, become dark.
What is the Higher Principle then, that one gnostic knows, but not the other? The one that the dark one ignores?
Re: The 'Talking Head'.
The body exhibits principles by its nature. Proportions are principles.
Why? Discover it if you haven't.
The Al-khem. Al chemist Alchemy. Was an attempt to discover all possible combinations of material things, breaking apart and conjoining or 'sewing and tearing', becoming the father of science. Like science (and Scientologists) it is about 'laws' again. Good medicine/ bad medicine. But medicine is for the sick.
The head, in comparison to the body is of a certain proportion which exhibits a principle. The skilled artist knows this. How is he skilled? By this knowing. The head is the 'highest' and connected to mind/conciousnous which receives the principles, so this is used as the example. Alchemists dabbled in transmutation of metals and so brass was used to fashion the head, as again, proof of the understanding of what creates brass or bronze. (Yes other material is historic, including crystal skulls, but that's a separate but related story as is the mention of brass and bronze being used for ark and throne. Not understanding the principle of electricity, one would be shocked what they'd find in attempt to 'take the bull by the horns'.
So being both high learning and needing to be Clandestine (think of that word)....the art school needed to teach principles to its subject if it were to be successful. The proportions between certain segments of the body correspond to the proportions of the face. So as brass and bronze was being casted...into proper proportions as proof to the students of its principles...in THIS way, the head was said to 'talk to' the student. The public could only be told that this was art..and it was....sculpture in the making.....but misunderstanding, once again rears its ugly head. The public found many villains and scapegoats in the secrecy and during trials, every imaginable explanation was posited. There were the magi, and there are magicians. Some say both black and white, but that's up for debate.
One who knows does, knowing why and how, and the result is 'good'. No magic required. The Spirit as force.....positive angles/angels and negative ones ....daemons..... are forces that move things.
Why is man said to be made 'a little higher' than the angles, yet is material? The magician attempts to FIGURE that out, working withing the material (looking downward upon the plain).
So finally, I'd like to add that the Great Awakening its to be a 'taking back' of the true understanding of the principles, with a new outpouring of spirit aka Q/17/The Star.
The Talking Head. It says one thing to the profane, and another to the one who looks to the Divine.
It's our place and choice to understand. The Source.
Sauce for the Source: https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
A single instance of transposing to similar names would be understandable in any case whether it happened or not. I know the fucking difference peabrain. YOU. DON'T. Understand how they correspond by principle, shit for brains.
You assume I assume and I understand you to be a literalist assumer rather than a knower. You 'know' that I transposed two names inadvertantly and so you win a stupid prize right?
What do you win when you GET the point made because you haven't and won't.
Pan represented the head of the hierachy of pantheism, ....dude. In other words, he was the Zeus to the region and their lesser 'gods' also corresponded to the principles shared by other ancient religions, now lost on morons like yourself. The very KEY to understanding how all religions are deviations and can be brought back together over the actual principles they misrepresent to the detriment of all souls. This will be the Great Awakening, not a lulling back to sleep with idolatry.
How does this lame history lesson advance the would-be discussion on gnosis of principles? It sure doesn't. And your argument is dependent on your faulty view.
Have some bread and ichthys and be on your way. I'll provide, you can deny. That way we're in our proper place.
I espouse their ideas?
I haven't espoused my ideas or the cabal's. I espouse opposition to the wrongheaded ideas posited by you....idiot. Putting words into the mouths of your upbraider to make yourself right won't work here. If an enlightened democratic republic was their idea, who opposed that, and why was secrecy necessary?
Jacobins: The english translation of 'ladder' demeans the orignial essence of the original writing's meaning of the word 'ladder' to mean a 'means by which to raise to a higher level' which the original word meant, and lost in the translation to 'a ladder' for the profane to understand on their lower level. Hence 'Jacobins'. The Great Awakening would be a literal ladder to 'the profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. You offer erroneous sophomoric assumptions. Raise Up.
These groups were all co-opted and made into systems of black magic. But you'd know that if you'd done a deeper dive. You use a snorkel to see the bottom and hold your breath.
You're the one who has no fucking idea and I've been doing this since before you were born, chump. Ivy league profs are the cabal, idiot. So you refer to one as a defender of YOUR wrong opinion, while feigning distance.
The Great Awakening is exactly the attempt to RAISE UP the consciousness of the informed voter in order to make it a truly democratic republic that works of, for and by the people, you royalist scumbag. Why do you come to the land of Trump and Q to shit on the floor of the temple? I knew you were a snake when I first 'met' your lying words.
'Close to Bonneville'.....
He wrote two books on the subject, the "Jesuits Expelled from Masonry", now tell me why......and "Dagger Shattered by the Masons", both in 1788, in which he accuses the Jesuits of having introduced into the symbolic degrees of freemasonry, the myths of the Templars and their doctrine of revenge, based on the "crime" of their destruction, and the four vows of the Templars included in their higher degrees. Earlier, in 1787, the leading Bavarian illuminist and freemason, Johann Joachim Christoph Bode, is said to have converted the German-speaking Bonneville to a faith that combined esoteric symbolism with radical ideas of popular sovereignty bordering on direct democracy.
You mistake the co-opting royalist Jesuits for the cabal. But you're stupid that way.
Now go look at one of my most recent replies concerning ESOTERIC symbolism and how it differs from the profane sophomoric ramblings of oxymorons like yourself.
You project your ignorance onto me. Won't work. You're words are like spittle from a fish stranded on dry land.