There was a time when Christians fought gentleman wars against each other. Napolean and his Jewish bankers really shut that down, and we have more Jewish bankers continuing to push barbarism on the West.
Look at each culture's martial arts. Americans went from boxing to mixed martial arts. But they still ban Krav Maga, which is Israeli martial arts.
Israeli martial arts teaches the combatant to cheat at every turn and to brutalize your opponent in victory. Why didn't the geniuses in the US think of this? They actually did, but they considered it morally wrong. Christians and former Christians believed it to be a pointless victory if you became evil in order to win.
The Israeli innovation is to base their culture on Satanic morality. The Jewish bankers got the state they were seeking for centuries. And they now have former Christian countries joining in on barbarism, too.
There was a time when Christians fought gentleman wars against each other.
There is no such thing as a war crime.
By which I mean that war itself is the crime, and that when someone is trying to kill you, you need ask no permission to do whatever is necessary to stop this. That whites collectively got together and agreed on global rules of engagement to prevent themselves from having to lose their souls in defense of themselves and their kind is now IRRELEVANT in the face of nonwhites being literally everywhere and doing anything they want to us.
When the whole world is white, then we can talk about a new Geneva Convention.
Christianity values whether you swear fealty to Jesus Christ. Judaism is all about bloodline.
I don't think you would be part of the Christian West, or if you were, you would be relegated to a Jewish enclave and you would generally not be allowed to do business with Christians.
Ethiopia has one of the oldest Christian traditions of all time. And now Europe is anti-Christian. So white and Christian are not the same. Paul said that there is no Greek or Hebrew and that we are one in Christ.
So it sounds like you became Jewish at some point and you still don't realize it.
Jesus casted a demon out of a man at the synagogue. It's very possible for you to go to church and yet be Jewish or demonic in your heart. Get to know the fruits of the Spirit and inspect yourself if you really think you are Christian.
The pagan Romans went to war with Carthage because the Carthaginians sacrificed children to the Greco-Roman god Chronos/Saturn. Same religion, radically different behavior, because behavior is genetic. When Rome converted to Christianity, they continued being White, so Christianity was imbued with their values. Hernando Cortez would've conquered the human-sacrificing Aztecs even if he was pagan.
The jews are a race. Their religion teaches the things it does because that is what people of that ethnicity naturally think is "morally right."
So, what is the killing of schoolgirls in the 2026 Minab school attack in Iran classified as? if not a war crime...
This attack killed at least 170 people, primarily girls aged 7 to 12. International law strictly protects schools and children and deliberate attacks on civilian educational institutions are listed as war crimes under Article 8 of the Rome Statute.
The ICC's definition of genocide in Article 6 of the Rome Statute differs from the UN Genocide Convention's definition since the ICC is concerned with "individual criminal liability", e.g. ICC prosecutes individuals, whereas the Genocide Convention primarily addresses state obligations. According to the ICC definition, the United States and Israel have definitely committed "genocidal war crimes", as the OP puts it, by deliberating targeting and killing children in bombings in Iran.
Genocide is legally defined as acts committed with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. It depends how you interpret this, but I could argue deliberately killing children (schoolkids), members of the group, identified by the Epstein coalition as Persians, could be classified as a "crime of crimes".
Now, if you are an Israeli, or an American working for Israel, a genocide is never a genocide if the killing is done on Iranians or Palestinians.
Rather than us having a debate on the definition of words and their meaning, how about you clarify your position on this. What are you really trying to say with "No genocidal war crimes…"?
The ICC's definition of genocide in Article 6 of the Rome Statute differs from the UN Genocide Convention's definition since the ICC is concerned with "individual criminal liability", e.g. ICC prosecutes individuals, whereas the Genocide Convention primarily addresses state obligations. According to the ICC definition, the United States and Israel have definitely committed "genocidal war crimes", as you put it, by deliberating targeting and killing children in bombings in Iran.
I hope we at least can agree on this, there is no question the killing of the school-children in Minab was a war crime. A former diplomat and spokesperson for the U.S. Department of
State admitted that: "As a former diplomat and someone who is quite familiar with counter-terrorism operations and targeted strikes, I can tell you the following: I have no doubt that we knew exactly what we were doing. We knew exactly that we were striking that school, and we knew exactly that we were killing those children." - Khala Harritt, former spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State
Furthermore the UN has officially accused the United States of committed war crimes in two strikes in Iran where many children were killed.
there have been no "genocidal" war crimes on either side
Either side? Iran was not even considered a threat to United States prior to February 2026. Joe Kent stated in his March 17, 2026 resignation letter that "Iran posed no imminent threat" to the United States.
So, again I don't know what you're talking about. But, it doesn't matter, just as Bob Harris had to say: things get "Lost in Translation".
War crimes are defined by the victor.
There was a time when Christians fought gentleman wars against each other. Napolean and his Jewish bankers really shut that down, and we have more Jewish bankers continuing to push barbarism on the West.
Look at each culture's martial arts. Americans went from boxing to mixed martial arts. But they still ban Krav Maga, which is Israeli martial arts.
Israeli martial arts teaches the combatant to cheat at every turn and to brutalize your opponent in victory. Why didn't the geniuses in the US think of this? They actually did, but they considered it morally wrong. Christians and former Christians believed it to be a pointless victory if you became evil in order to win.
The Israeli innovation is to base their culture on Satanic morality. The Jewish bankers got the state they were seeking for centuries. And they now have former Christian countries joining in on barbarism, too.
By which I mean that war itself is the crime, and that when someone is trying to kill you, you need ask no permission to do whatever is necessary to stop this. That whites collectively got together and agreed on global rules of engagement to prevent themselves from having to lose their souls in defense of themselves and their kind is now IRRELEVANT in the face of nonwhites being literally everywhere and doing anything they want to us.
When the whole world is white, then we can talk about a new Geneva Convention.
Based. Those rules are for white kingdoms. We ash entire Japan cities' civilians, not the same.
I said Christian empires. You said white empires.
Christianity values whether you swear fealty to Jesus Christ. Judaism is all about bloodline.
I don't think you would be part of the Christian West, or if you were, you would be relegated to a Jewish enclave and you would generally not be allowed to do business with Christians.
Operationally identical.
Good thing your personal opinions aren’t relevant to objective reality.
Okay. Please give me automatic weapons, then. I’ll solve the problem.
Why, because I hurt your feelings with truth? That’s what the Bible is all about. You’ve never read it.
Edited with this extra text. You are not the fucking arbiter of speech. Get the fuck out of our conversations.
Ethiopia has one of the oldest Christian traditions of all time. And now Europe is anti-Christian. So white and Christian are not the same. Paul said that there is no Greek or Hebrew and that we are one in Christ.
So it sounds like you became Jewish at some point and you still don't realize it.
Jesus casted a demon out of a man at the synagogue. It's very possible for you to go to church and yet be Jewish or demonic in your heart. Get to know the fruits of the Spirit and inspect yourself if you really think you are Christian.
Neat. Are you getting it yet?
Europe isn’t white. Could you at least pretend to comprehend what’s being said?
Very interesting edit.
Sounds like you’re just inventing bullshit and thinking people are going to play your game.
Maybe He needs to cast yours out next.
Right, because church doesnt mean anything to salvation or Christianity as a concept. Church is just a gathering.
Yep, did that. Your behavior caused the collapse of human civilization. Mine preserves it.
Kill your enemies or you’ve already lost the fucking war.
Jesus's behavior caused Him to die on a cross, and He says that we are to follow that path.
You think that Jesus calls us to preserve our own lives?
The pagan Romans went to war with Carthage because the Carthaginians sacrificed children to the Greco-Roman god Chronos/Saturn. Same religion, radically different behavior, because behavior is genetic. When Rome converted to Christianity, they continued being White, so Christianity was imbued with their values. Hernando Cortez would've conquered the human-sacrificing Aztecs even if he was pagan.
The jews are a race. Their religion teaches the things it does because that is what people of that ethnicity naturally think is "morally right."
So Ethiopia never became Christian? You think Ethiopian Christianity is a conspiracy?
So then why couldn't Europeans ever colonialize Ethiopia?
Removed. It's an actual curse not just profanity (edit: and attack). You wanna talk like that you'll have to take it elsewhere.
Removed. Can be approved upon edit.
United States of Israel has committed many war crimes.
There is word before the word war that is a qualifier.
So, what is the killing of schoolgirls in the 2026 Minab school attack in Iran classified as? if not a war crime...
This attack killed at least 170 people, primarily girls aged 7 to 12. International law strictly protects schools and children and deliberate attacks on civilian educational institutions are listed as war crimes under Article 8 of the Rome Statute.
okay?
The ICC's definition of genocide in Article 6 of the Rome Statute differs from the UN Genocide Convention's definition since the ICC is concerned with "individual criminal liability", e.g. ICC prosecutes individuals, whereas the Genocide Convention primarily addresses state obligations. According to the ICC definition, the United States and Israel have definitely committed "genocidal war crimes", as the OP puts it, by deliberating targeting and killing children in bombings in Iran.
There is word before the word war that is a qualifier.
Genocide is legally defined as acts committed with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. It depends how you interpret this, but I could argue deliberately killing children (schoolkids), members of the group, identified by the Epstein coalition as Persians, could be classified as a "crime of crimes".
Now, if you are an Israeli, or an American working for Israel, a genocide is never a genocide if the killing is done on Iranians or Palestinians.
I don’t think you understand what the word genocide means, despite your use of words that make it appear that you do.
Rather than us having a debate on the definition of words and their meaning, how about you clarify your position on this. What are you really trying to say with "No genocidal war crimes…"?
The ICC's definition of genocide in Article 6 of the Rome Statute differs from the UN Genocide Convention's definition since the ICC is concerned with "individual criminal liability", e.g. ICC prosecutes individuals, whereas the Genocide Convention primarily addresses state obligations. According to the ICC definition, the United States and Israel have definitely committed "genocidal war crimes", as you put it, by deliberating targeting and killing children in bombings in Iran.
I hope we at least can agree on this, there is no question the killing of the school-children in Minab was a war crime. A former diplomat and spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State admitted that: "As a former diplomat and someone who is quite familiar with counter-terrorism operations and targeted strikes, I can tell you the following: I have no doubt that we knew exactly what we were doing. We knew exactly that we were striking that school, and we knew exactly that we were killing those children." - Khala Harritt, former spokesperson for the U.S. Department of State
Furthermore the UN has officially accused the United States of committed war crimes in two strikes in Iran where many children were killed.
What do you think I'm trying to say? What I'm saying is just what I'm saying...there have been no "genocidal" war crimes on either side.
Take what implications from that you will.
Either side? Iran was not even considered a threat to United States prior to February 2026. Joe Kent stated in his March 17, 2026 resignation letter that "Iran posed no imminent threat" to the United States.
So, again I don't know what you're talking about. But, it doesn't matter, just as Bob Harris had to say: things get "Lost in Translation".
That's because it's all a script and show. Are you not entertained?
Maybe. Could be human decency. Could be avoiding escalation. Any number of reasons.