outside of a few very specific examples, i call bullshit on "lost technology" from any point in the modern era.
that we don't know how ancient civilization X managed to build thing Y thousands of years ago: sure.
that we can't figure out how to go to the moon from scratch in the 21st century when allegedly NASA did it in just 9 years back in the 20th century? lmao even.
Sending humans to the moon (and arguably space at all) has almost no value.
I hear this repeated all the time with zero supporting evidence. Can you tell us how you arrived at the conclusion that there's "almost no value"? Can you tell us which things you considered along the way? In the next sentence you mention "geopolitical imagery" so are you implying that this is no longer a thing and never will be?
I just want to understand how you are thinking about this. A lot of debunkers just repeat the official "no economic incentive, no scientific research potential, no public interest" statement by the government without explaining how those conclusions were reached. Can you help shed light on any of this? And I'm curious if you can do it from memory or if you're going to google it before responding.
that we can't figure out how to go to the moon from scratch in the 21st century when allegedly NASA did it in just 9 years back in the 20th century? lmao even.
You can't anymore when the UN starts declaring everyone with even a brain cell to be a sinner unfit for the real world and is thus only fit for the concentration camp. At one point humanity will even forget how to use electricity and create plastic.
Also if the only reverse image search that works is google (mind you, SauceNAO used to work but now it just stopped updating or whatever), you have a problem.
the technology is just sitting there. implement it in any one of it's dozens of forms that have been fully detailed for you and anyone else who cares to look.
what you need is a database of images to actually run the comparison against. that's the limiting factor.
Reminder that the Roman Empire is famous for its aqueducts but after the Christians destroyed it from the inside, most people don't even know what an aqueduct is anymore before it got reinvented in the 19th century.
outside of a few very specific examples, i call bullshit on "lost technology" from any point in the modern era.
that we don't know how ancient civilization X managed to build thing Y thousands of years ago: sure.
that we can't figure out how to go to the moon from scratch in the 21st century when allegedly NASA did it in just 9 years back in the 20th century? lmao even.
going to the Moon is the story of White excellence.
so they won't let it be told again.
no one else is smart enough to put a manned team together.
anyways.. NASAs always been a breeding ground for occult weirdos and straight up satanists.. their designs for humanity have never been pure.
The only white excellence during the fake Apollo missions was Kubrick's film making genius..
What can I say to someone on a conspiracy site defending the moon landings as real....
This emoji sums it up....🤣
Ok i'll bite.
I hear this repeated all the time with zero supporting evidence. Can you tell us how you arrived at the conclusion that there's "almost no value"? Can you tell us which things you considered along the way? In the next sentence you mention "geopolitical imagery" so are you implying that this is no longer a thing and never will be?
I just want to understand how you are thinking about this. A lot of debunkers just repeat the official "no economic incentive, no scientific research potential, no public interest" statement by the government without explaining how those conclusions were reached. Can you help shed light on any of this? And I'm curious if you can do it from memory or if you're going to google it before responding.
You can't anymore when the UN starts declaring everyone with even a brain cell to be a sinner unfit for the real world and is thus only fit for the concentration camp. At one point humanity will even forget how to use electricity and create plastic.
We absolutely did not lose the technology for reverse image search.
At worst, laypeople lost access to reverse image search. The technology is still very extant.
What do you think stable diffusion, Blip, and Clip are?
AI generation tools are not reverse image search.
Also if the only reverse image search that works is google (mind you, SauceNAO used to work but now it just stopped updating or whatever), you have a problem.
dude.. use arxiv.. find the papers.
the technology is just sitting there. implement it in any one of it's dozens of forms that have been fully detailed for you and anyone else who cares to look.
what you need is a database of images to actually run the comparison against. that's the limiting factor.
no one ever landed on the fckng moon.
that's first lesson in reality school.
Ikr 😆...they're all talking in here like it actually happened..
Am I on reddit right now?
"rettard it."
and this site is for langley interns.
Reminder that the Roman Empire is famous for its aqueducts but after the Christians destroyed it from the inside, most people don't even know what an aqueduct is anymore before it got reinvented in the 19th century.
History repeats.
The Eastern Roman Empire was Christian.
The use of techno (artifice) + logy (logic) tempts one to ignore loss aka the flow of nature allowing one to form growth.
Forget implies "getting forwarded"...that's the loss (inception towards death) of growth (life) one forgets when using technology.
A specific can only come into being inside...few suggest examples to tempt many to imitate outside (suggestion), while ignoring inside (perception).
Ignoring perception for suggestion transforms a specific into a common.
EVERYONE implies the UNITING of each NATION into every...a collectivization aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
If you view humanity as "everyone"; then you are holding the UN together.
??? Its literally available on google right now