Sending humans to the moon (and arguably space at all) has almost no value.
I hear this repeated all the time with zero supporting evidence. Can you tell us how you arrived at the conclusion that there's "almost no value"? Can you tell us which things you considered along the way? In the next sentence you mention "geopolitical imagery" so are you implying that this is no longer a thing and never will be?
I just want to understand how you are thinking about this. A lot of debunkers just repeat the official "no economic incentive, no scientific research potential, no public interest" statement by the government without explaining how those conclusions were reached. Can you help shed light on any of this? And I'm curious if you can do it from memory or if you're going to google it before responding.
Ok i'll bite.
I hear this repeated all the time with zero supporting evidence. Can you tell us how you arrived at the conclusion that there's "almost no value"? Can you tell us which things you considered along the way? In the next sentence you mention "geopolitical imagery" so are you implying that this is no longer a thing and never will be?
I just want to understand how you are thinking about this. A lot of debunkers just repeat the official "no economic incentive, no scientific research potential, no public interest" statement by the government without explaining how those conclusions were reached. Can you help shed light on any of this? And I'm curious if you can do it from memory or if you're going to google it before responding.