Signs of the incoming dark ages: lost technology
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
outside of a few very specific examples, i call bullshit on "lost technology" from any point in the modern era.
that we don't know how ancient civilization X managed to build thing Y thousands of years ago: sure.
that we can't figure out how to go to the moon from scratch in the 21st century when allegedly NASA did it in just 9 years back in the 20th century? lmao even.
going to the Moon is the story of White excellence.
so they won't let it be told again.
no one else is smart enough to put a manned team together.
anyways.. NASAs always been a breeding ground for occult weirdos and straight up satanists.. their designs for humanity have never been pure.
I am doubtful of the moon hoax and similar NASA conspiracies, but I don't doubt for a minute it has been a cesspit of some of the weirdest degenerates in our society. Especially post Apollo and double especially in the more contemporary era.
Contrary to the conspiracy documentaries (at least the pre-10/7 ones), I have zero reservations for Werner von Braun and his band of Aerospace Aryans. Honestly, the last time I would consider NASA a semi trustworthy organization was when Werner was running the technical matters there.
I don't know if the reason we haven't gone back is due to their aversion to White excellence, though. I think they would love nothing more than to plant a large squad of diversity on the moon and "correct" the history. Honestly, as I said below, I think the issue really just comes down to the difficulty and cost of going to the moon. When you couple that with how incompetent the US is now due to the larger social agenda, I don't think they could get it together. Now that China will soon be there, their hand has been forced and they are trying to go back ASAP.
The only white excellence during the fake Apollo missions was Kubrick's film making genius..
I've always found it hilarious that the people who call every image from space fake will cite that one grainy video with some guy who doesn't even really look or sound like Kubrik for eternity. I mean, maybe that video is fake? Is that unthinkable to you people?
I am personally open to hearing out moon hoax theories, but unfortunately most of them are full of dumb bullshit. Obviously the majority are on flat earth videos, so that is expected.
What can I say to someone on a conspiracy site defending the moon landings as real....
This emoji sums it up....🤣
I know it won't be very popular to say here, but it is entirely understandable that we never went back to the moon after Apollo. Sending humans to the moon (and arguably space at all) has almost no value. The purpose of the moon landing was about geopolitical imagery. The USA and USSR were competing for dominance in the new field of space travel. Once the moon landing was complete, it was just a very expensive (and dangerous) boondoggle and the political will for it largely died out. It should not be lost on anyone that after 50 years of bullshit excuses we are now likely going back. The reason for that is that the Chinese will soon be there, and if not for that we would not be going.
There is a difference between "lost technology" (like we somehow forgot the basic principles) and just no longer making a really complicated machine that has almost no other use. The Saturn V still holds the record for the largest payload delivered to LEO. Unless you are a full "space is fake" person, we have been sending payload to LEO continually since Apollo. There is just no reason to use something like Saturn V when we can launch twice if we have that much to send up.
Again, I know I will get a lot of flack for this, but the reality is that the moon landing is one of the most pointless things imaginable. This is why we stopped going and very quickly all the "institutional knowledge" that was learned during Apollo was lost. Within 25 years, half the people who worked on Apollo had likely retired.
Unless you think Artemis II was a complicated CGI hoax that went on for a week, then we have been back to the moon. In fact, Artemis II broke the distance record that had been in place since Apollo 13. Not landing the first time is not some big tell, it is normal. Apollo 8 did not land either.
Ok i'll bite.
I hear this repeated all the time with zero supporting evidence. Can you tell us how you arrived at the conclusion that there's "almost no value"? Can you tell us which things you considered along the way? In the next sentence you mention "geopolitical imagery" so are you implying that this is no longer a thing and never will be?
I just want to understand how you are thinking about this. A lot of debunkers just repeat the official "no economic incentive, no scientific research potential, no public interest" statement by the government without explaining how those conclusions were reached. Can you help shed light on any of this? And I'm curious if you can do it from memory or if you're going to google it before responding.
You can't anymore when the UN starts declaring everyone with even a brain cell to be a sinner unfit for the real world and is thus only fit for the concentration camp. At one point humanity will even forget how to use electricity and create plastic.