There's only one thing in-between left and right...free will of choice. Choosing either establishes conflict among both. There's no conflict in-between left and right within nature...only balance for choice to adapt to.
Para (besides) digm (to show)...another shows a being sides to tempt choice off-balance.
There is a conspiracy here...
Nature dominates, which gives being free will of choice...that's free-dom aka freely choosing within a dominating balance. A child choosing to stand up and walk represents balancing; others tempting a child to choose one side over another (yes over no; good over bad; true over false; do over don't etc.)...that's the domestication of free will of choice into imbalance.
Choosing any side over another, instead of balancing in-between...binds free will of choice into a lifelong conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason).
To use conspiratorial terms...age of technology + age of reason.
Edit: Left vs right represents a superimposed division (jewish) tempting those within (gentiles) to want to unite (tikkun olam)...
Yep, I never really thought about it until I seen someone point it out, in a reddit thread of all places.
Its a huge money making scheme. They are getting paid per head, so it doesnt matter if who they are catching is legal or not.
Illegally detain them, hold them for months at a time, all the while charging tax payers exorbitant amounts of money.
It would be one thing if it were gangbangers but they are snatching kids, old ladies, moms/dads, etc. Its kinda evil and the amount of people on this site defending it make me sick.
Also rip Neo1(whos next, could be any one of us), he shouldnt have been permabanned, he was a member of this community for a long time and has a right to be upset about the coup d'état. Merging his topics would have been more appropriate.
Year ban is not permaban. I'm sure that a user like u/NeoOne could fit into this community without making it all about meta material. Also, his post is still live so there was no loss of material and I don't know what could be intended by merging it.
u/Foletadoo, Neo1 (a separate account that has asked me not to ping it) first raised the question of restarting roundtables by a mod, which led to about 10 days of discussing 6 names as potential mods, after which admin told u/Thisisnotanexit that she could become mod in time, which happened after another 2 months of community vetting of that idea. Since nobody demonstrated a strong consensus result in favor of any outcome, admin stepping in could be considered a coup, but if the community could demonstrate some consensus result I'm sure admin would accept that.
Neo1 got the year ban for rule 3, which was about unnecessary meta posts (now called subversion), and it appears his several attacks were also rule 1 violations. I don't know why he hasn't contributed to the several new roundtable threads that he wanted restored.
Respected. I only see the one meta from Neo1 and the one from NeoOne. Also, I should note publicly, since you approved the one from Neo1 as an exception to meta and then you banned him for rule 3 later, I'm presuming my interpretation is correct that up to 7 subsequent comments were also violative of rule 1 and/or rule 3.
I always tell mods, including myself, beware of reacting disciplinarily when part of the user's objection is about you rather than about something else. Reasons for discipline must be straightforward and transparent and separable from what the user says about the mod personally. Verbum sat.
The ban was for rule 3. The last straw was calling this place an ashtray, they are not here in good faith but rather to cause division where ever they can, literally the definition of subversion.
The 1 meta post was given a warning that it would be the only one approved and there is a ban history on that topic.
Neo1 and NeoOne have proved they are only here to disrupt, feel free to check the history available.
Previous mods (edit: Clem) also banned that user and then the user mocked them in modmail thinking they (Neo) were reason Axo left. This is not a good faith user.
Now they are ban evading with more meta posts and I'm willing to be open to questions with good faith users only.
Do you really feel coup'd?
What about my long time user status and almost constant involvement? Does it say anything for my intents? Have I not proved I care for the community?
Also rip Neo1(whos next, could be any one of us), he shouldnt have been permabanned, he was a member of this community for a long time and has a right to be upset about the coup d'état.
What coup d'état? Why was he banned?
I tried asking in a direct message and it seems to have failed. I wonder if my account is set to a limited state. If I write some words I get censored on TheDonald, unlike many others.
I never really thought about it until I seen someone point it out, in a reddit thread of all places.
Aka the use of scripture by few to shape the thoughts of many who read it (reddit)...
Its a huge money making scheme
Scheme/segh - "to hold"...aka few tempting many to hold onto a suggested value called "money", which has no value outside ones evaluation thereof.
They are getting paid per head, so it doesn't matter if who they are catching
It's about training order followers with worthless incentives to turn against anyone deemed outside the order. During the Bolshevik revolution order followers alike would head-hunt based on nothing but statistics and labels.
There is a conspiracy here, I wonder what would break the left/right paradigm..
There's only one thing in-between left and right...free will of choice. Choosing either establishes conflict among both. There's no conflict in-between left and right within nature...only balance for choice to adapt to.
Para (besides) digm (to show)...another shows a being sides to tempt choice off-balance.
Nature dominates, which gives being free will of choice...that's free-dom aka freely choosing within a dominating balance. A child choosing to stand up and walk represents balancing; others tempting a child to choose one side over another (yes over no; good over bad; true over false; do over don't etc.)...that's the domestication of free will of choice into imbalance.
Choosing any side over another, instead of balancing in-between...binds free will of choice into a lifelong conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason).
To use conspiratorial terms...age of technology + age of reason.
Edit: Left vs right represents a superimposed division (jewish) tempting those within (gentiles) to want to unite (tikkun olam)...
Yep, I never really thought about it until I seen someone point it out, in a reddit thread of all places.
Its a huge money making scheme. They are getting paid per head, so it doesnt matter if who they are catching is legal or not.
Illegally detain them, hold them for months at a time, all the while charging tax payers exorbitant amounts of money.
It would be one thing if it were gangbangers but they are snatching kids, old ladies, moms/dads, etc. Its kinda evil and the amount of people on this site defending it make me sick.
Also rip Neo1(whos next, could be any one of us), he shouldnt have been permabanned, he was a member of this community for a long time and has a right to be upset about the coup d'état. Merging his topics would have been more appropriate.
Year ban is not permaban. I'm sure that a user like u/NeoOne could fit into this community without making it all about meta material. Also, his post is still live so there was no loss of material and I don't know what could be intended by merging it.
u/Foletadoo, Neo1 (a separate account that has asked me not to ping it) first raised the question of restarting roundtables by a mod, which led to about 10 days of discussing 6 names as potential mods, after which admin told u/Thisisnotanexit that she could become mod in time, which happened after another 2 months of community vetting of that idea. Since nobody demonstrated a strong consensus result in favor of any outcome, admin stepping in could be considered a coup, but if the community could demonstrate some consensus result I'm sure admin would accept that.
Neo1 got the year ban for rule 3, which was about unnecessary meta posts (now called subversion), and it appears his several attacks were also rule 1 violations. I don't know why he hasn't contributed to the several new roundtable threads that he wanted restored.
I'm not sure they can..
Filter blocked more meta posts and I'm in no need to allow their disruption to continue.
Respected. I only see the one meta from Neo1 and the one from NeoOne. Also, I should note publicly, since you approved the one from Neo1 as an exception to meta and then you banned him for rule 3 later, I'm presuming my interpretation is correct that up to 7 subsequent comments were also violative of rule 1 and/or rule 3.
I always tell mods, including myself, beware of reacting disciplinarily when part of the user's objection is about you rather than about something else. Reasons for discipline must be straightforward and transparent and separable from what the user says about the mod personally. Verbum sat.
The ban was for rule 3. The last straw was calling this place an ashtray, they are not here in good faith but rather to cause division where ever they can, literally the definition of subversion.
The 1 meta post was given a warning that it would be the only one approved and there is a ban history on that topic.
Neo1 and NeoOne have proved they are only here to disrupt, feel free to check the history available.
Previous mods (edit: Clem) also banned that user and then the user mocked them in modmail thinking they (Neo) were reason Axo left. This is not a good faith user.
Now they are ban evading with more meta posts and I'm willing to be open to questions with good faith users only.
Do you really feel coup'd?
What about my long time user status and almost constant involvement? Does it say anything for my intents? Have I not proved I care for the community?
What coup d'état? Why was he banned?
I tried asking in a direct message and it seems to have failed. I wonder if my account is set to a limited state. If I write some words I get censored on TheDonald, unlike many others.
Aka the use of scripture by few to shape the thoughts of many who read it (reddit)...
Scheme/segh - "to hold"...aka few tempting many to hold onto a suggested value called "money", which has no value outside ones evaluation thereof.
It's about training order followers with worthless incentives to turn against anyone deemed outside the order. During the Bolshevik revolution order followers alike would head-hunt based on nothing but statistics and labels.