I called out SwampRangers in the past for squatting over a bunch of forums and trying to flex his moderator powers over me because he didn't like some of the things I said.
Most of my beef with him was at the Christianity forum. I cited scripture and he didn't like my very literal interpretation of scripture because it didn't align with the satanic zionist jew lies taught in too many Christian churches today.
Like i said before. The people who want to be moderators so badly are probably the worst people you can have as moderators. The best people to be moderators are probably some of the most active commentators who don't really want to be moderators. And even then, they have to be more willing to just debate things out rather than reach for ban hammer. I think a moderator should MODERATE debate/argument, not ban people for not agreeing with the majority. So if one person starts resorting too much to ad hominem then a moderator should come in and say hey just debate the points the guy made or address the evidence he presented. No one cares if the guy lives in his mom's basement or is debating you from his skyrise office suite. Just address the topic at hand.
Moderation is a thankless job that probably doesn't pay much if anything at all. But these influencers and bot farms may have found a way to profit from hustling their influence or controlling social interaction online to engineer public opinion.
Wait wait wait, you're saying things can be engineered? But muh evolution! But design isn't needed! Things can just form on their own and do things on their own! Do what they willt! There iz no God!!!11!
You charged us with that, but all the u/Christianity mods responded to all your appeals and pointed out that we don't delete for content, only for behavior. The record shows that you were banned 21 then 30 days and lost 90 comments and 3 posts (13 by autofilter) due to racism, collectivism, profanity, obscenity, illogic, nonsupport, attack, namecalling, misrepresentation, inconsideration, and off-topic. Behaviors. Sounds like we gave you a lot of leeway to provide content rather than to permaban you.
You can continue the Scripture debate anytime. Your characterization of what I didn't like is, however, mistaken.
You're right that a moderator should encourage people to self-moderate when possible, which you may have noticed us implementing at Christianity. You're right that it's thankless and doesn't pay in earthly rewards. I'm glad we have some agreement that a community of conspiracists have a hard time building that delegated power without some agreement on morality.
I save DDOS for those with experience. My call is to build community based on standards of civility (accepted by white people and all people of good will) that are generally agreed by the 2021 PDW community that formed c/Christianity. You don't like those standards for Christian communities, you are free to propose whiter standards, but banging your head against a Christian community isn't the best use of your time.
Add: You're free to appeal individual cases if the charges had been bogus: you could appeal to the board en banc, the community, the platform community, or the admins.
Most of my beef with him was at the Christianity forum. I cited scripture and he didn't like my very literal interpretation of scripture because it didn't align with the satanic zionist jew lies taught in too many Christian churches today.
I was also in this fake Christianity forum. They never commit themselves to group prayers, or any common action to do anything. Just sharing some picture of the scripture is all they do - nothing Christian at all.
I was also hated there for exposing the lies in the Talmud and for sharing videos of how jews hate Christians. It's rigged, it's controlled, it's definitely a shill ground. That's why I made a page - c/TrueChristianity. It's all I could do.
So if one person starts resorting too much to ad hominem then a moderator should come in and say hey just debate the points the guy made or address the evidence he presented.
I definitely agree with that. I saw recently one of TallestShill alts wishing for someone to k*ll himself... Again... It's beyond hate with this guy.
Excellent research. I like this Neo1 guy
Careful with those words... You will get the heat that I'm getting just from that comment...
If you're serious about becoming a mod, I'd like to help you, if I can.
Christianity Community has weekly prayers (formerly daily) and we pray with those who post individual prayers too. We've often taken action to help each other, though that is harder to do as anons. We read Christian books together and engage Bible studies whenever someone has a continuing study to present, and we share music (that too is less often than the past).
I'm sad to hear you felt hated, I thought discussions like this were pretty genial. You were not disciplined for any content, and videos showing that some Jews hate Christians are permitted, but I've pointed out that many people see "lies" in the Talmud without recognizing how its context works or what is taken as the accurate quotation of jokes or nonauthoritative statements. We can debate the truth of your characterizations in any forum, if you think it didn't work in that one.
And if you look at him and several others, they all pretend to be radical pro-Rabbi christcucks if you mention the truth that EVERY SINGLE MISERY THE JEWS INFLICTED TO THIS POINT trace directly back to Christianity aka the forced Baal-El worship across Europe.
Forced? You need to study more history, bro. The Germanic tribes all converted willingly. The Vandals and various Gothics were already Christianized well before they started migrating into Rome. The northern Germanics had a slower process of conversion that was ongoing even as they were still raiding against the rest of Europe.
Slow conversion while being persecuted for refusing to worship the official imperial cult? Eventually destroying the old outdated alters after most of the Empire converted?
Since 2021-01-01 Swamp Rangers is a confederation of individuals who are monitoring the swamp and working for the removal of swamp creatures from having power. I'm just one of the more vocal ones.
I have no association with anyone else on Conspiracies. I'm not trolling, my content is positive, as you acknowledged earlier this month with your effusive praise of me. You turned on at least one other user who, like me, pointed out he was here much longer than you and who has the community's interests at heart, and who doesn't make what the last mod called bullying meta posts.
Nobody is talking about electing me as mod except you; I stopped talking about it three weeks ago, and I documented that I only talked about it because of your encouragement that if we don't fix the lack of mods, who will.
I will add to this comment about the specifics in your graphic.
Yes, I created forums for discussing all views on various topics when there was a landrush of names in 2022-02, and I accepted the risks of misunderstanding about my choice to claim controversial names for evangelistic purposes. Yes, that same post announced that I might use an alt for counterpoint purposes, which always admits being a doppelganger of myself and is never used for manipulation, which is in accord with policy on doppelgangers.
Yes, u/MaryMagicPie offered me the moderation of two communities she had started when she decided to leave Scored. I did not immediately delete the Progress Pride Flag from the one site because I understood her intent for it, but when it was pointed out that her intent was not clear I deleted it. I explained the mistakes in your link here, explained the reasons for first retaining and then deleting the flag here, and explained how Mary's rules were to be interpreted here.
Yes, I appreciate the earned media for the Swamp Rangers organization. You are free to sign up there.
I have a few communities, but didn't create one for conspiracies specifically because of this one. My taking the names c/FlatEarth, c/Nazi, and c/Holocaust has not resulted in much. Right now the new c/4thHorsemanNews by u/Tetartos_Ippeas is having a great debut for conspiracies and we could cross-pollinate in either direction.
You say you made 3 but you give up on your ego and promote a 4th one - not done by you... Respect for that! Honestly! I will visit them all, we need to expand! Hope others visit them too! ...
You see collaboration and you work for it. I cast my vote for you as moderator of c/Conspiracies! To me, you have proven that you left your ego behind and you want to accomplish the goal of the community. That does come with challenges from shills that would want to break you, but I know you're better than me, so I cast my vote firmly towards a person that is able to defend his position and leave his ego - you! You didn't have to prove your worth, but you did it anyway, for the best of this community. I really hope you can help us forward!
I hope we can vote for a moderator from this point on, so we can finalize it in a week. Anyone can cast their own votes. It's fine, if you vote for yourself even.
As your post shows, if you want to become an active Swamp Ranger you will have the right to nominate candidates for listing as Swamp Creatures with evidence, which leads to focus on their removal from positions of power. We've never had a call from a Ranger to list another Ranger, which would be silly.
I didn't remove the Swamp Oath from the site, it's still public on the front page of SwampRangers.com, which is a redirect to https://www.scottlively.net/swamp-rangers/swamp-rangers-recruiting-office/ and contains the oath. There's nothing wrong with the Oath either. Wait till Scott hears about this.
I don't have the member numbers right now. You can become a Ranger by qualifying, paying the membership fee at that page, and swearing the oath. Scott might allow membership by other routes via personal relationship. You can become a Swamp Friend by any show of support and by asking to be put on our Friends list. I don't mind helping you with reading comprehension on your own links.
But I say to you, make no oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God,
James 5:12
But above all, my brethren, do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or with any other oath; but your yes is to be yes, and your no, no, so that you may not fall under judgment.
You just might as well go into the hellfire right now.
That sounds like a esoteric society based on freemasonry. Especially considering your supposed "methods" which include promotion of pron and skittles. You check all the boxes of a secret society.
Without acknowledging your characterization, I wonder what you propose we do instead, Guy? If nothing, that's already being done, so there's no need to pile on.
When I adopted the Unspoil strategy, by announcing it was risky I was accepting the probability that people would fail to understand and attempt to join together to narrate it as something it isn't. I prepared for that and dealt with it and continue to deal with it as part of the strategy. Nothing is failing and people are being pre-evangelized, even though you don't see it.
If you mean I responded to another member here differently when he started responding to me differently, that did happen, that's not part of a Swamp Rangers or Unspoil strategy but part of human relations. (I won't mention his name because he hasn't replied to me since I offered him a ceasefire.) But please review the conversation. Somebody suggests we restart roundtables and I naturally check on the current mod and announce there is none. That somebody considers and rejects himself for mod and starts talking about modding in general and I finally bite and say I could mod as well. That somebody then ravingly endorses me for mod and I demur and say it would require community support and I would go to Meta about it. Shortly afterward, that somebody discovers he doesn't like my strategy and disacknowledges the whole conversation, and so I back off from self-promotion while still seeking, like any contributor, to gage the community's interest.
If you think my making public a discussion about lack of mods, or my describing my ability to mod after another person described his, or my promoting myself after another person promoted me, are a strategy of some sort, you must be inferring that I had a goal in mind and failed to meet that goal. But I don't set longterm goals like that, I just take the step fitting to the moment. God reveals what's in the longterm, one step at a time. I get what I need. The Unspoil strategy describes itself as irrespective of whether I mod a community or not, modship is not part of it at all. I'm disappointed that you're joining in the voices that are shocked, shocked that I'm not what they wanted me to be, but always being what I am is fine for me.
Well, I'd tentatively agree with that. But to define sliding requires knowing what's being slid from. I've been affirming and objectifying the sidebar rules so I'm not sliding from that and I don't know what else I'd be accused of sliding from. I posted a couple posts from a Christian perspective (not obsessively like some); that is one of the perspectives here, and they're faring well. When I pointed out there were no mods, I apologized for my announcement tempting forum sliders out of the woodwork, but that would've happened anyway sooner or later, and we're accommodating the influx pretty well as unmoderated communities go. So if you think I'm sliding I appreciate your saying directly what to stop.
No, everyone he disagrees with is a "nazi". Your personal opinion on national socialism doesn't matter here, "nazi" is simply the label lefties stick on anyone they disagree with. See also Charlie Kirk, about as far from NSDAP as you can get, who they smeared with that label before they killed him.
Aren't you the alt account for some guy who wants to lower the age of consent for young girls? Nazis were the best group of guys to go after a pedo pajeet like you
The age of consent in most of USA in 1885 was 10 years old
The age of consent was set at 14 by Section 176 of the Criminal Code for the German Empire in 1872. This has remained in force under all successor regimes, including the Third Reich.
By 1920 the USA has risen the age consent in most states to 16
In 1885, the age of consent in Delaware was 7 years old.
LMAO, I had that WTF moment about 2 years ago, when I saw the communities he modded.
Excellent research. I like this Neo1 guy
I called out SwampRangers in the past for squatting over a bunch of forums and trying to flex his moderator powers over me because he didn't like some of the things I said.
Most of my beef with him was at the Christianity forum. I cited scripture and he didn't like my very literal interpretation of scripture because it didn't align with the satanic zionist jew lies taught in too many Christian churches today.
Like i said before. The people who want to be moderators so badly are probably the worst people you can have as moderators. The best people to be moderators are probably some of the most active commentators who don't really want to be moderators. And even then, they have to be more willing to just debate things out rather than reach for ban hammer. I think a moderator should MODERATE debate/argument, not ban people for not agreeing with the majority. So if one person starts resorting too much to ad hominem then a moderator should come in and say hey just debate the points the guy made or address the evidence he presented. No one cares if the guy lives in his mom's basement or is debating you from his skyrise office suite. Just address the topic at hand.
Moderation is a thankless job that probably doesn't pay much if anything at all. But these influencers and bot farms may have found a way to profit from hustling their influence or controlling social interaction online to engineer public opinion.
Wait wait wait, you're saying things can be engineered? But muh evolution! But design isn't needed! Things can just form on their own and do things on their own! Do what they willt! There iz no God!!!11!
I'm not sure what argument you're trying to start with me. Also i'm not a proponent of evolution.
Oh don't get me wrong lol. It's just that evolution is such a problem, and I was satirizing evilLotion.
You charged us with that, but all the u/Christianity mods responded to all your appeals and pointed out that we don't delete for content, only for behavior. The record shows that you were banned 21 then 30 days and lost 90 comments and 3 posts (13 by autofilter) due to racism, collectivism, profanity, obscenity, illogic, nonsupport, attack, namecalling, misrepresentation, inconsideration, and off-topic. Behaviors. Sounds like we gave you a lot of leeway to provide content rather than to permaban you.
You can continue the Scripture debate anytime. Your characterization of what I didn't like is, however, mistaken.
You're right that a moderator should encourage people to self-moderate when possible, which you may have noticed us implementing at Christianity. You're right that it's thankless and doesn't pay in earthly rewards. I'm glad we have some agreement that a community of conspiracists have a hard time building that delegated power without some agreement on morality.
Sounds like some Trumped up, bogus charges.
jews are Whoring White women on Onlyfans and Pornhub but you're busy spending your days scrubbing 90 of my fucking comments.
Can't you better allocate your time and resources? Let's do some DDoS attacks on jew websites or something useful.
Trust the c/Porno mod to judge your behavior
The ephebophile is suspended, looks like my report and then yours did the trick.
I save DDOS for those with experience. My call is to build community based on standards of civility (accepted by white people and all people of good will) that are generally agreed by the 2021 PDW community that formed c/Christianity. You don't like those standards for Christian communities, you are free to propose whiter standards, but banging your head against a Christian community isn't the best use of your time.
Add: You're free to appeal individual cases if the charges had been bogus: you could appeal to the board en banc, the community, the platform community, or the admins.
When Moses freed the hebrews from slavery in Egypt, why did he leave the black slaves behind?
LOL
WHY DID HE LEAVE THE BLACK SLAVES BEHIND?!?!?
Moses: "I distracted the pharoah with some porn. This is our chance"
Hebrew Slave: "But what about the black slaves?"
Moses: "Fuck those niggers. Let's get out of here!"
And the children of Israel journeyed ... and a mixed multitude went up also with them (Ex. 12:37-38).
So Israel was settled by a mixed multitude?
Doesn't sound like it belongs to a particular race then.
jews can never get their stories straight.
I was also in this fake Christianity forum. They never commit themselves to group prayers, or any common action to do anything. Just sharing some picture of the scripture is all they do - nothing Christian at all.
I was also hated there for exposing the lies in the Talmud and for sharing videos of how jews hate Christians. It's rigged, it's controlled, it's definitely a shill ground. That's why I made a page - c/TrueChristianity. It's all I could do.
I definitely agree with that. I saw recently one of TallestShill alts wishing for someone to k*ll himself... Again... It's beyond hate with this guy.
Careful with those words... You will get the heat that I'm getting just from that comment...
If you're serious about becoming a mod, I'd like to help you, if I can.
Can you please review this is detail and let me know what would you change, add/remove, agree to, etc. - https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARcz7uyoT/is-there-a-real-chance-for-this-/ (You can do that in a personal message to me)
The true people in here would like to know what a person brings if they are selected to be a mod.
Christianity Community has weekly prayers (formerly daily) and we pray with those who post individual prayers too. We've often taken action to help each other, though that is harder to do as anons. We read Christian books together and engage Bible studies whenever someone has a continuing study to present, and we share music (that too is less often than the past).
I'm sad to hear you felt hated, I thought discussions like this were pretty genial. You were not disciplined for any content, and videos showing that some Jews hate Christians are permitted, but I've pointed out that many people see "lies" in the Talmud without recognizing how its context works or what is taken as the accurate quotation of jokes or nonauthoritative statements. We can debate the truth of your characterizations in any forum, if you think it didn't work in that one.
What do you pray for in your satanic forums, which you created?
They're not satanic, they're to direct discussion about satan. No prayers have been offered there, maybe you'd like to say a covering prayer.
That's literally what satanic means:
satanic /sə-tăn′ĭk, sā-/
adjective
Relating to or suggestive of Satan or evil.
Profoundly cruel or evil; fiendish.
Of or pertaining to Satan; having the qualities of Satan; resembling Satan; extremely malicious or wicked; devilish; infernal.
And if you look at him and several others, they all pretend to be radical pro-Rabbi christcucks if you mention the truth that EVERY SINGLE MISERY THE JEWS INFLICTED TO THIS POINT trace directly back to Christianity aka the forced Baal-El worship across Europe.
Forced? You need to study more history, bro. The Germanic tribes all converted willingly. The Vandals and various Gothics were already Christianized well before they started migrating into Rome. The northern Germanics had a slower process of conversion that was ongoing even as they were still raiding against the rest of Europe.
Look at what they did to the Romans and Egyptians first.
Slow conversion while being persecuted for refusing to worship the official imperial cult? Eventually destroying the old outdated alters after most of the Empire converted?
It's "if you do not bow down, you will die".
That was Charlemagne, and only after the Saxon pagans revolted against him.
Why do you always flee upon scrutiny? Athiesm doesn't have enough evidence for you to supply us with?
Since 2021-01-01 Swamp Rangers is a confederation of individuals who are monitoring the swamp and working for the removal of swamp creatures from having power. I'm just one of the more vocal ones.
I have no association with anyone else on Conspiracies. I'm not trolling, my content is positive, as you acknowledged earlier this month with your effusive praise of me. You turned on at least one other user who, like me, pointed out he was here much longer than you and who has the community's interests at heart, and who doesn't make what the last mod called bullying meta posts.
Nobody is talking about electing me as mod except you; I stopped talking about it three weeks ago, and I documented that I only talked about it because of your encouragement that if we don't fix the lack of mods, who will.
I will add to this comment about the specifics in your graphic.
Yes, I created forums for discussing all views on various topics when there was a landrush of names in 2022-02, and I accepted the risks of misunderstanding about my choice to claim controversial names for evangelistic purposes. Yes, that same post announced that I might use an alt for counterpoint purposes, which always admits being a doppelganger of myself and is never used for manipulation, which is in accord with policy on doppelgangers.
Yes, u/MaryMagicPie offered me the moderation of two communities she had started when she decided to leave Scored. I did not immediately delete the Progress Pride Flag from the one site because I understood her intent for it, but when it was pointed out that her intent was not clear I deleted it. I explained the mistakes in your link here, explained the reasons for first retaining and then deleting the flag here, and explained how Mary's rules were to be interpreted here.
Yes, I appreciate the earned media for the Swamp Rangers organization. You are free to sign up there.
Aside from your backing out of your raving endorsement of me as mod of Conspiracies and your forgetting that I told you all this already and everyone who clicks my name knows it, nobody cares.
https://imgur.com/a/B7mPHrf
Then please remove yourself.
As your post shows, if you want to become an active Swamp Ranger you will have the right to nominate candidates for listing as Swamp Creatures with evidence, which leads to focus on their removal from positions of power. We've never had a call from a Ranger to list another Ranger, which would be silly.
I thought it would be hard to admit that you're behind this...
Look at your Swamp Oath right at the bottom of this picture - https://conspiracies.win/p/1ARd3k2vVT/wow-seems-like-swamprangers-is-a/c/
Why did you remove it from the site? Are you afraid of something? :D
I didn't remove the Swamp Oath from the site, it's still public on the front page of SwampRangers.com, which is a redirect to https://www.scottlively.net/swamp-rangers/swamp-rangers-recruiting-office/ and contains the oath. There's nothing wrong with the Oath either. Wait till Scott hears about this.
Thank you!
I even made you to share that publicly! :D :D :D
So, how does one join your organization? And how many people do you have so far?
I don't have the member numbers right now. You can become a Ranger by qualifying, paying the membership fee at that page, and swearing the oath. Scott might allow membership by other routes via personal relationship. You can become a Swamp Friend by any show of support and by asking to be put on our Friends list. I don't mind helping you with reading comprehension on your own links.
You just might as well go into the hellfire right now.
That sounds like a esoteric society based on freemasonry. Especially considering your supposed "methods" which include promotion of pron and skittles. You check all the boxes of a secret society.
Obviously your begging for it on a site who was previously pretty united and doing well has done
N O T H I N G
except cause DIVISIO and INFIGHTING.
HINDENBURG BLIMP STRATEGY Blows Up in your Face!!
Hope you like the ashes on your face like this guy!: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.cbrimages.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F04%2Fwileecoyote-cropped.jpg
Without acknowledging your characterization, I wonder what you propose we do instead, Guy? If nothing, that's already being done, so there's no need to pile on.
Mabye stick to destroying fake beliefs without making any mentions of mods, modding, or anything related.
Been doing that for 3 weeks at Conspiracies, pretty much, except for playing catchup with others who are making mention wrongly.
Say it with me: "My Hindenburg Blimp strategy failed so I'll use a different one."
When I adopted the Unspoil strategy, by announcing it was risky I was accepting the probability that people would fail to understand and attempt to join together to narrate it as something it isn't. I prepared for that and dealt with it and continue to deal with it as part of the strategy. Nothing is failing and people are being pre-evangelized, even though you don't see it.
If you mean I responded to another member here differently when he started responding to me differently, that did happen, that's not part of a Swamp Rangers or Unspoil strategy but part of human relations. (I won't mention his name because he hasn't replied to me since I offered him a ceasefire.) But please review the conversation. Somebody suggests we restart roundtables and I naturally check on the current mod and announce there is none. That somebody considers and rejects himself for mod and starts talking about modding in general and I finally bite and say I could mod as well. That somebody then ravingly endorses me for mod and I demur and say it would require community support and I would go to Meta about it. Shortly afterward, that somebody discovers he doesn't like my strategy and disacknowledges the whole conversation, and so I back off from self-promotion while still seeking, like any contributor, to gage the community's interest.
If you think my making public a discussion about lack of mods, or my describing my ability to mod after another person described his, or my promoting myself after another person promoted me, are a strategy of some sort, you must be inferring that I had a goal in mind and failed to meet that goal. But I don't set longterm goals like that, I just take the step fitting to the moment. God reveals what's in the longterm, one step at a time. I get what I need. The Unspoil strategy describes itself as irrespective of whether I mod a community or not, modship is not part of it at all. I'm disappointed that you're joining in the voices that are shocked, shocked that I'm not what they wanted me to be, but always being what I am is fine for me.
There's always a need to pile on forum sliders, that's the only way to survive without mods for any amount of time.
Well, I'd tentatively agree with that. But to define sliding requires knowing what's being slid from. I've been affirming and objectifying the sidebar rules so I'm not sliding from that and I don't know what else I'd be accused of sliding from. I posted a couple posts from a Christian perspective (not obsessively like some); that is one of the perspectives here, and they're faring well. When I pointed out there were no mods, I apologized for my announcement tempting forum sliders out of the woodwork, but that would've happened anyway sooner or later, and we're accommodating the influx pretty well as unmoderated communities go. So if you think I'm sliding I appreciate your saying directly what to stop.
A stormfaggot calling out shills...the call is coming from inside the house.
Isn't everyone in your universe a "stormfaggot"?
This is what i think of when someone calls me stormfaggot https://communities.win/c/Funny/p/1ARcuVnsGO/-muh-nobel-price-of-pieces-/c
Just the Nazis.
You got weak as of late. I'd even go so far as to say you're boring now.
A crushing critique from one so interesting.
Do I need the sarcasm tag or is your equivalent of a constantly beeping smoke alarm posting genuinely something you think is interesting?
beep JEWS
beep JEWS
beep JEWS
ad infinitum
yawn I miss the old Imp who would actually put up a fight.
beep WIMMIN
beep WIMMIN
beep WIMMIN
ad infinitum
So that excludes me.
And I doubt you'll find anyone but JG5, or his alts in here, as a nazi...
Correct your initial comment to not include your insult towards me then.
No, everyone he disagrees with is a "nazi". Your personal opinion on national socialism doesn't matter here, "nazi" is simply the label lefties stick on anyone they disagree with. See also Charlie Kirk, about as far from NSDAP as you can get, who they smeared with that label before they killed him.
The age of consent in most of USA in 1885 was 10 years old.
In 1885, the age of consent in Delaware was 7 years old.
Attack both nsdap and America then, Imp, you've already ceded to the Left in other arenas. So why not one more, bashing America?
Aren't you the alt account for some guy who wants to lower the age of consent for young girls? Nazis were the best group of guys to go after a pedo pajeet like you
He keeps claiming nazis had a low age of consent. Big if true.
The age of consent in most of USA in 1885 was 10 years old
By 1920 the USA has risen the age consent in most states to 16
In 1885, the age of consent in Delaware was 7 years old.