Comet 3I/ATLAS is not expected to get very close to Earth; the closest it will come is approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 170 million miles or 270 million kilometers)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3I_ATLAS_animation3.gif
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Quote?
Logical conclusion. Like if a lib said "2020 was stolen is a fallacy".
So "he posts too much for my tastes, hes a shill" he barely posts "uh but guys hes still a shill" is this goalpost moving or no?
He rebutted evolution, he says there's evidence Exodus happened, and he argued with the SeverelyBranDamaged guy who believes really odd things.
Iron sharpens iron. Why, do you want to be waste metal in a scrap heap? Or an effective sword/tank?
So the sword/tank?
Everything I say ties back to what I actually believe and is stated accurately, with a little allowance for blustery exaggeration because that's what the forum likes and calls for. It always ties back to truths I can point out to. Your own forum called for certain allowance of contradiction and extreme restriction on talking with me directly or by alt, so I sought to compensate. Anytime you want plain speech, speak plainly and without contradiction and you'll get it in return. I will be happy to be all things to all men in order that some might be saved.
Don’t be fucking glib. Pretending you don’t know what’s happening is a humiliation.
Literally a fallacy. Don’t do it again.
Irrelevant. His “theology” directly contradicts the Bible.
"I believe js control wikipedia! This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans is a wiki editor or some paid person!!" < proceeds to cite a WIKI ARTICLE>
"JayEyDeeEff exists therefore that somehow means that SR is part of that org!!!!" That sauce is so weak it's basically water.
How far do I have to scroll to see the quote(s)?
Massively hypocritical, given you JUST used that EXACT fallacy by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid". Again, you have Zero sauce, you can only assume in blind faith those apply to him.
It is good to see that you know that beliefs contradicting the Bible are objectively false and weak and a bad thing.
Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”
First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.
You have no idea what the fallacy even is.
Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns
Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why would he be paid, why not free? People shill for free too.
"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR
Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)
So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?
The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".
The origin of SwampRangers.com is public, and our goals in Christian apologetics are clear there, and we are all volunteers. When I came to Scored I decided to contribute to the mission of deep research and dismissal of easily falsified narratives to assist in focusing on true community-building research. I had a lot to say about politics and creeds at the start. Lo and behold, it turned out that the most common falsified narrative, easiest debunked, was one about the Jews, so I ended up specializing in accurate research about them. It's because of the environment, not because of some predisposition. But, funny thing, whenever I name Jews for real or criticize the Talmud on valid grounds or express hesitation about Israel's politics, nobody gives me credit. It appears that unless I subscribe to some undefinable whitism I am not regarded by this segment as a truth-teller. But truth will always out. So if you actually wanted to indicate how I'm "identical" to known campaigns I'd be happy to listen and see what adjustments I should make as a truth-seeker.
u/guywholikesDjtof2024
Hi Skil, I'm getting paid double for this comment because twice nothing is still nothing.
You may be pleased to know that I'm a little closer to finding your "replacement" theology in the Bible after looking all over for it. I had to stop looking for literal "replacement" where one whole is removed and another whole is put in its place, and instead I focused on "replacement" where portions are transplanted to the same whole, and I was able to find some of that. Somehow I suspect it still won't satisfy your proposed Bible interpretation that has been presented as if you have the only truth. But I wanted you to know I was trying.
There is only one covenant people, you are right that the covenant people has been effectively Gentile for nearly 2,000 years, and since it goes all the way back then before Judah was born the covenant people was also all goyim (nations) for over 2,000 years. You seem to have a covenant people that is too small because it excludes all those Hebrews 11 covenanters who wrote the Hebrew part of the Bible. If you were to speak positively about how people got saved from sin before Jesus came, that might advance the discussion, unless it's beyond your pay grade.
u/guywholikesDjtof2024
Yes, you’ve never read the Bible. You’ve admitted that dozens of times.
Supersessionism is the foundation of Christianity. It is itself Christianity. Nothing exists outside of it and never has. Your subhuman dispensationalist heresy—funded by zionists at the start of the 20th century—spits in the face of millennia of written proof of Christian doctrine.
Eat shit, you fucking kike heretic.
Funny how the Bible never uses the words "supersede", "supersession", but a theory that tends to exclude one race of humans from Christian salvation begins to use those words in the last couple hundred years.
Funny how you call me dispensationalist when I reject dispensationalism as usually taught. (Paul did use a word translated "dispensation" for the present age and for the age to come, but that's not dispensationalism it's covenantalism.) You seem to think that because I believe in one covenant I must believe in dispensationalism. No, I believe in what R. C. Sproul called Christian salvation by works, namely, he says, by the works of someone other than me. I grew up with covenant of works and covenant of grace like the back of my hand, and then I realized they were the same thing.
The reason the old covenant is fading is described in Jer. 31:31-34, namely that people broke it. The reason the new covenant lasts is that one man kept it perfectly and shares that obedience with all who will receive it whether they came before or after him. This is not about one superseding another, because they are the same covenant made with different parties, those in Adam, and those in Christ.
Like I said, I agree that in that one covenant olive tree there are many Gentiles "replacing" many Jews. But the tree itself is not replaced, and that's what you seem to mean by "supersession", so as long as people get can that idea from you I simply throw Romans 11 backatcha.
But since you appear incapable of defining supersession or of expositing Scripture, I don't think this off-topic convo will go far.