Comet 3I/ATLAS is not expected to get very close to Earth; the closest it will come is approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 170 million miles or 270 million kilometers)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3I_ATLAS_animation3.gif
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
"I believe js control wikipedia! This somehow proves that SR out of BILLIONS of humans is a wiki editor or some paid person!!" < proceeds to cite a WIKI ARTICLE>
"JayEyDeeEff exists therefore that somehow means that SR is part of that org!!!!" That sauce is so weak it's basically water.
How far do I have to scroll to see the quote(s)?
Massively hypocritical, given you JUST used that EXACT fallacy by linking articles that in no way prove SR out of BILLIONS is "paid". Again, you have Zero sauce, you can only assume in blind faith those apply to him.
It is good to see that you know that beliefs contradicting the Bible are objectively false and weak and a bad thing.
Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns. That’s the “somehow.”
First paragraph. Entire page. You were wrong. Take it gracefully.
You have no idea what the fallacy even is.
Behaves identical to the known paid shilling campaigns
Mmmm yes, because people are paid to shill for the True Worldview. Sorry, but the world HATES Christianity, sinful man would rather go down rather than pay people to spread the Word. And, not identical at all. Why would he be paid, why not free? People shill for free too.
"Because it's only the third intergalactic object ever discovered and because it's going so close to Mars while behind the sun that it could swing suddenly (but won't) so there's hypeability. The real conspiracy is that intergalactics prove young universe simply by their low count. Nobody's talking about that! Everyone's trying instead to get ahead of how intergalactics can prove a crazy Oort cloud or dark matter or other invented gods to patch gaps in the astrophysical model." ~SR
Wow, much conspiracy. Such evidence. (dogememe.jpg)
So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?
The way you present it is as if it names SR by name in the article. Nobody will ever, organically, get the conclusion "oh behavior".
He’s shilling against it.
Yes, which is why he lies about it.
Because I need at least some semblance of order and culture left in the world.
Great job not even pretending to construct a believable strawman. Get fucked. You didn’t even TRY to reply to what I said.
So you beat your wife? Not playing your game. Try the fuck again with something someone actually said.
No, that’s not how I present it.
People with triple digit IQs naturally make these conclusions. They’re called context clues. If it walks like a duck, fucking shoot it during duck season.
On what aspects? Is he claiming the Trinity is false? That Jesus didn't exist?
He would do a better job by promoting evolution and gorillion year old earth-ism. Worst. Shill. EVERRRRR!!
That would mean he makes fact statements that contradict what he believes.
No grand conspiracy behind the quote.
I do hope I never get [TERM UNUSABLE DUE TO EPHESIANS 4:29]'ed by "Karmelo Braagabillus Onni-krung" or "Muhammad Mustafa Ali Khamed Hassan the 50 billionth".
Again, there's no graaaand conspiracy in the comment of his that I quoted.
So you believe that begging the question and circular reasoning are two different fallacies?
The two aren't even comparable or in the same category.
Well that's what others will believe you presented it as. Case study: this exchange.
After how long? And people are unique, you know. Some may or may not.
The origin of SwampRangers.com is public, and our goals in Christian apologetics are clear there, and we are all volunteers. When I came to Scored I decided to contribute to the mission of deep research and dismissal of easily falsified narratives to assist in focusing on true community-building research. I had a lot to say about politics and creeds at the start. Lo and behold, it turned out that the most common falsified narrative, easiest debunked, was one about the Jews, so I ended up specializing in accurate research about them. It's because of the environment, not because of some predisposition. But, funny thing, whenever I name Jews for real or criticize the Talmud on valid grounds or express hesitation about Israel's politics, nobody gives me credit. It appears that unless I subscribe to some undefinable whitism I am not regarded by this segment as a truth-teller. But truth will always out. So if you actually wanted to indicate how I'm "identical" to known campaigns I'd be happy to listen and see what adjustments I should make as a truth-seeker.
u/guywholikesDjtof2024