This seems so very random, but I think it is not. I've long thought Trump was a "closet truther" and knows or has been told much more than he could possibly admit publicly.
In this case, the crucial factor is that her husband was George P. Putnam, of the--you got it--Salem Witch Putnams.
Of all the shit Trump could have possibly declassified, I don't think this was chosen randomly.
I'm just speculating here, but I think has to do with the actual way human consciousness works, specifically how it decides what to accept as the "truth".
For the vast majority of people, the truth comes from their authorities. In practical terms, for them something is true merely because the authority said it. They never consciously think of it that way, of course, so it's always, "they're the experts" and "do you think they're all lying/stupid" etc etc etc.
If we compare the Earhart case to, say, the Moon landing case, some significant differences are apparent. For the Moon landing, we know what "the answer" is, without doubt. For Earhart, they have left the mystery open.
The Moon landing is tied up in all this other supporting worldview: free world vs commies, the march of discovery, USA #1, the technical/scientific/academic establishment. All that is in turn tied up in emotional investment. It just has to be true. Earhart doesn't have much at all of that same context, just maybe "grrrl power".
So maybe she was picked out as a way to begin to expose the truth because it's relatively trivial. You break the seal on "smart people you trust have kept secrets from you, have lied to you, and could not figure out things they should have."
IOW, if the public can't internalize the truth about whatever Amelia was up to, there is absolutely no point telling them about the Moon landings. They can just draw a line through it on their list.
Do they know these things as explicitly as I've just laid out, or are they operating on instinct? There's no evidence one way or the other. But then, I figured it out so I would gamble that others in that orbit could too.
BTW, I'm going off the theory that she was a spying for the US military before the war. She crashed doing it and they kept silent to avoid exposure. The Japanese captured her and eventually beheaded her. That's a pretty gross story, and if the truth is revealed to be anything like that, people are going to have to alter their worldview to a more realistic one.
A popular theory at the time of her death was that she was shot down by Japanese a couple years before Pearl Harbor. If true, It is possible there would be things involved that the US would want kept secret.
So, this is you in deep thought about the central banks is it? I'm fairly certain you've spent more time debating the Dave Chappelle show, and porn links then you have the central banks or the "demise of humanity". γ €ΜΜ
I have waited for the release of these files for close to 40 years. My quest will now be done. Good luck with your UFO thingy, flat earth and pizzas. So long suckas. I'm outta here
b) Circumnavigation implies driving in a circle aka logical thinking.
c) Besides being an agent for the jewish suffrage movement, and setting up the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920...his/her daddy; Samuel Otis, was a Brahmin/bαΉαΉhati/berΗ΅ - "to become high, rise, elevate" aka a (((berg)))
d) Amelia Earhart was an Aerosmith, cause "shes got it; she's got it...that, that dude looks like a lady". Look also at the Aerosmith logo...from Boston, like the BOSTON BRAHMINS.
The chatbot "free-will-of-choice" commented twice under your post, so you're obviously wrong about the "hard time for bot farms"...
Naaah, you were aiming for visibility and it worked with the normies. Don't be mad because I said it. I even said that it's a point for you. You used a different font and got visibility - that's success, I don't blame you.
It just draws quantity over quality tho. I guess that was my point in essense.
That's exactly what I was saying in the first place. I even gave you a point for that because you got more people talking than the rest of the posts I checked on top.
So the different font worked. That was the only point I made. It is for visibility and it worked. Keep doing it!
Her flight plath makes a perfect circle around the flat earth model...just saying.
People: we want the Epstein files
Trump: best I can do
This seems so very random, but I think it is not. I've long thought Trump was a "closet truther" and knows or has been told much more than he could possibly admit publicly.
In this case, the crucial factor is that her husband was George P. Putnam, of the--you got it--Salem Witch Putnams.
Of all the shit Trump could have possibly declassified, I don't think this was chosen randomly.
Look into her father...a Boston Brahmin.
I agree, now the "why? ' though.
I'm just speculating here, but I think has to do with the actual way human consciousness works, specifically how it decides what to accept as the "truth".
For the vast majority of people, the truth comes from their authorities. In practical terms, for them something is true merely because the authority said it. They never consciously think of it that way, of course, so it's always, "they're the experts" and "do you think they're all lying/stupid" etc etc etc.
If we compare the Earhart case to, say, the Moon landing case, some significant differences are apparent. For the Moon landing, we know what "the answer" is, without doubt. For Earhart, they have left the mystery open.
The Moon landing is tied up in all this other supporting worldview: free world vs commies, the march of discovery, USA #1, the technical/scientific/academic establishment. All that is in turn tied up in emotional investment. It just has to be true. Earhart doesn't have much at all of that same context, just maybe "grrrl power".
So maybe she was picked out as a way to begin to expose the truth because it's relatively trivial. You break the seal on "smart people you trust have kept secrets from you, have lied to you, and could not figure out things they should have."
IOW, if the public can't internalize the truth about whatever Amelia was up to, there is absolutely no point telling them about the Moon landings. They can just draw a line through it on their list.
Do they know these things as explicitly as I've just laid out, or are they operating on instinct? There's no evidence one way or the other. But then, I figured it out so I would gamble that others in that orbit could too.
BTW, I'm going off the theory that she was a spying for the US military before the war. She crashed doing it and they kept silent to avoid exposure. The Japanese captured her and eventually beheaded her. That's a pretty gross story, and if the truth is revealed to be anything like that, people are going to have to alter their worldview to a more realistic one.
Why on earth does the government have classified records of this? Why keep them secret for this long? Did they shoot her down?
Those Questions are exactly why I thought people here would take interest in this story. As of this time, we do not know.
A popular theory at the time of her death was that she was shot down by Japanese a couple years before Pearl Harbor. If true, It is possible there would be things involved that the US would want kept secret.
Thank god I can stop thinking about central banks and the demise of humanity and finally get to the bottom of this one.
So, this is you in deep thought about the central banks is it? I'm fairly certain you've spent more time debating the Dave Chappelle show, and porn links then you have the central banks or the "demise of humanity". γ €ΜΜ
I'm sure my sarcasm wasn't lost on you, so I'm not sure why trying to smear me or discredit my own snarky comment was on your to-do list.
Try this.
What would you like me to submit.
I have waited for the release of these files for close to 40 years. My quest will now be done. Good luck with your UFO thingy, flat earth and pizzas. So long suckas. I'm outta here
a) Amelia/ama "to trouble"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Amelia hence troubling (amelia) those hard (hart) of hearing (ear).
b) Circumnavigation implies driving in a circle aka logical thinking.
c) Besides being an agent for the jewish suffrage movement, and setting up the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920...his/her daddy; Samuel Otis, was a Brahmin/bαΉαΉhati/berΗ΅ - "to become high, rise, elevate" aka a (((berg)))
d) Amelia Earhart was an Aerosmith, cause "shes got it; she's got it...that, that dude looks like a lady". Look also at the Aerosmith logo...from Boston, like the BOSTON BRAHMINS.
Wow, different font really works on the normies...
Well, point for you then.
I assume it gives bot farms a hard time. But who could say really.
What? How?
The chatbot "free-will-of-choice" commented twice under your post, so you're obviously wrong about the "hard time for bot farms"...
Naaah, you were aiming for visibility and it worked with the normies. Don't be mad because I said it. I even said that it's a point for you. You used a different font and got visibility - that's success, I don't blame you.
It just draws quantity over quality tho. I guess that was my point in essense.
Beyond pure speculation on my part, after veiled threats of bans by several shills. take a look at the url: "/------/"
You saying I can't hit two birds with one stone? Hold my beer.
That's exactly what I was saying in the first place. I even gave you a point for that because you got more people talking than the rest of the posts I checked on top.
So the different font worked. That was the only point I made. It is for visibility and it worked. Keep doing it!