Not a disinfo agent, but he sometimes gets bought to a degree.
He was briefly shilling for Parler when he was working for Kanye and they were trying to buy it.
When at supper with Trump, Kanye, and Milo, Donald Trump told him to tell Kanye that he didn't have a chance to beat Donald in the run for presidency. Nick kept silent, I guess because he was being paid by Kanye to help his presidential campaign. Ending the presidential campaign meant end of paycheck from Kanye.
Soon after he made an abrupt change to staunchly endorsing Christian nationalism, he reported a lot of his money was seized -- a lot of money. I guess most of that came from his new Christian donors.
Nick fuentes is a dis-info agent, he is made to make the right-wing look hateful to steer people away from the right and also make the hate against the right justified. Him attacking his other right-wing podcasters is just a ploy to make the right seem unappealing and more extremist to draw people to the left.
All 3 people that he mentioned revealed some critical information about Charlie Kirk that would lead one to believe that the Jews were behind the murder.
I can't stand the people all over claiming this, that, whatever about people over the Kirk situation. We really don't even know that much yet, why jump to conclusions. If everytime something happens you just shout jew you look dumb.
Totally. It's all circumstantial and though I lean towards believing the Israel theory, all I can really say is that it definitely seems like a big conspiracy with the strange texts, unexplainable photographs, illogical rifle transport, etc. There's really nothing solid to pin it on Israel other than motivations and the overall influence.
Every time someone make a big claim and has to roll it back, it kills so much credibility. Im rooting for all the influencers to keep on pushing for the truth, though.
Tim Pool said that he believes that he was selected by YouTube to be the new right. They kick everyone else out and leave him sanctioned. He stays within the bounds of what YouTube permits. For example, he did not expose anything about the 2020 election fraud.
I indexed video evidence and more about the 2020 election fraud. YouTube deleted > half the videos. There is a thread I made from my account which TheDonald banned due to my opinions on Epstein|Maxwell operation.
I think there are very few actual "disinformation agents" as they are universally conceptualized. That is, some variation of someone on payroll receiving specific instructions on what content to disseminate.
All the others--all these "influencer" types that are constantly pushed in our faces --are legitimate people, but are themselves influenced and manipulated behind the scenes.
A close associate hooks them up with appearances and sponsorships. Another friend offers advice from time to time about how well it's all going over from an outsider perspective. Farther behind the scenes, social media campaigns promote and them. These dipshits, of course, just consider themselves talented and lucky with important things to say.
They fully believe they are good people doing the right thing, so loyalty is never a problem. As long as they do the right things, good things keep happening. If they do the wrong things, those good things dry up and they get "help from a friend" with how to fix things.
They operate within guardrails, some of them very strict. For example, try to find someone who you suspect is a disinfo agent who is also a firm Trump supporter. They do not exist, which is very odd if it's just a coincidence. Rogan is as close as you'll get, but he used to be anti-Trump and still wavers all around from issue to issue.
What this all boils down to is that anyone with a platform--anyone whose name you recognize and who you are supposed to follow--is being manipulated to some extent.
Except for someone like Trump, where the attacks on him are numerous, varied, open, and nearly universal.
If you know their names, if they're promoted by all the media no matter where you look, if they're talking about each other, they're a character
Not a disinfo agent, but he sometimes gets bought to a degree. He was briefly shilling for Parler when he was working for Kanye and they were trying to buy it. When at supper with Trump, Kanye, and Milo, Donald Trump told him to tell Kanye that he didn't have a chance to beat Donald in the run for presidency. Nick kept silent, I guess because he was being paid by Kanye to help his presidential campaign. Ending the presidential campaign meant end of paycheck from Kanye. Soon after he made an abrupt change to staunchly endorsing Christian nationalism, he reported a lot of his money was seized -- a lot of money. I guess most of that came from his new Christian donors.
He did a blurb about his issue with a large bit-coin transfer from a suicidal man.
Nick fuentes is a dis-info agent, he is made to make the right-wing look hateful to steer people away from the right and also make the hate against the right justified. Him attacking his other right-wing podcasters is just a ploy to make the right seem unappealing and more extremist to draw people to the left.
He's definitely getting paid by the Jews.
All 3 people that he mentioned revealed some critical information about Charlie Kirk that would lead one to believe that the Jews were behind the murder.
groyper
goy roper
Rope in the goys to the corral. Keep them in line.
Nick Fuentes steelmanned both theories, he just wants evidence. The "crazy" antisemite has nothing to gain from jumping onto the train at this stage.
I can't stand the people all over claiming this, that, whatever about people over the Kirk situation. We really don't even know that much yet, why jump to conclusions. If everytime something happens you just shout jew you look dumb.
Totally. It's all circumstantial and though I lean towards believing the Israel theory, all I can really say is that it definitely seems like a big conspiracy with the strange texts, unexplainable photographs, illogical rifle transport, etc. There's really nothing solid to pin it on Israel other than motivations and the overall influence.
Every time someone make a big claim and has to roll it back, it kills so much credibility. Im rooting for all the influencers to keep on pushing for the truth, though.
Controlled Op at the edge of the window. He's allowed to notice, but not to Notice.
Here is another clip https://x.com/Timcast/status/1968434586054013305
Tim Pool said that he believes that he was selected by YouTube to be the new right. They kick everyone else out and leave him sanctioned. He stays within the bounds of what YouTube permits. For example, he did not expose anything about the 2020 election fraud.
I indexed video evidence and more about the 2020 election fraud. YouTube deleted > half the videos. There is a thread I made from my account which TheDonald banned due to my opinions on Epstein|Maxwell operation.
c/TheDonald/p/11PpU0dOR0
Talk about self sabotage. Maybe he is just there to stir shit up and they won't use him for a leader. "Candace is dumb, Max has a silly face".
I lost IQ points listening to that.
I think there are very few actual "disinformation agents" as they are universally conceptualized. That is, some variation of someone on payroll receiving specific instructions on what content to disseminate.
All the others--all these "influencer" types that are constantly pushed in our faces --are legitimate people, but are themselves influenced and manipulated behind the scenes.
A close associate hooks them up with appearances and sponsorships. Another friend offers advice from time to time about how well it's all going over from an outsider perspective. Farther behind the scenes, social media campaigns promote and them. These dipshits, of course, just consider themselves talented and lucky with important things to say.
They fully believe they are good people doing the right thing, so loyalty is never a problem. As long as they do the right things, good things keep happening. If they do the wrong things, those good things dry up and they get "help from a friend" with how to fix things.
They operate within guardrails, some of them very strict. For example, try to find someone who you suspect is a disinfo agent who is also a firm Trump supporter. They do not exist, which is very odd if it's just a coincidence. Rogan is as close as you'll get, but he used to be anti-Trump and still wavers all around from issue to issue.
What this all boils down to is that anyone with a platform--anyone whose name you recognize and who you are supposed to follow--is being manipulated to some extent.
Except for someone like Trump, where the attacks on him are numerous, varied, open, and nearly universal.
Long term players have to change the direction of their flag at least some, according to how the wind blows.