Cervical Cancer ‘Nearly 100% Preventable’ With Regular Screenings — But Media Push Vaccines
Some researchers and media outlets suggest vaccination is the best way to prevent cervical cancer. But Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist and expert in molecular diagnostics, told The Defender, “the most important risk factor for developing cervical cancer … ...
I recall clearly the huge push for Gardasil on NPR's Science Friday show. As a show supposedly about science, they felt so strongly about it they openly condemned anyone who resisted or objected. We've come a long way since then in how low the bar is for open condemnation.
Another reference with numerous outgoing links on what bullshit it was all along:
CDC Confesses: No Scientific Basis for “HPV” Narrative… No Virus, No Contagion, No Genome… Just Bogus Tests (Global Research 10/17/2024)
An FOIA request is not proof of anything...you present this as though it is proof, it is nothing but misinformation. You say that Virology is pseudoscience....why?
Virology and mass vaccination are both dogmatic religions with no real scientific backing at this point. There’s plenty of literature out there today that challenge virology and germ THEORY in particular. I’d list them here but you won’t read them because you’re a vax zealot.
You aren’t actually defending Gardasil, right?
In brief, the six principal plays in the denialist playbook are:
Doubt the Science
Question Scientists’ Motives and Integrity
Magnify Disagreements among Scientists and Cite Gadflies as Authorities
Exaggerate Potential Harm
Appeal to Personal Freedom
Reject Whatever Would Repudiate A Key Philosophy
Denialism isn’t the correct term, it’s skepticism. Denialism is ignoring proof or strong evidence, which does not include dogmatic pseudo-science theories such as virology, germ theory and vaccine efficacy. You shouldn’t be surprised that skepticism exists on a CONSPIRACY forum, right? Skepticism used to be a part of scientific methodology but that’s no longer true.
Are you defending Gardasil as a safe and effective vaccine for use in youths? Yes or no.
What you are doing is denialism. To call theories and vaccines pseudo-science and dogmatism is ridiculous. Look up the story of Sarah Nelms and the buddhist nurse who practiced variolation.
You BELIEVE that skepticism is not part of the scientific method, you are wrong, you are the dogmatist.
And what does it matter whether or not i defend Gardasil, you have made up your mind despite evidence to the contrary. You are no better than people who think we did not land on the moon, or that the earth is flat. Go ahead, live in your luddite fantasy land. I don't care.
Yet here you are parroting medical establishment talking points like a good little pharma zealot. I’m going to cough on you if our paths ever cross. Do you live in constant fear of spooky, invisible viruses?
Nope. Because I believe in actual researched scientific evidence. And I still don't care what you think. And viruses are not invisible, we have photos.
https://www.utmb.edu/virusimages/the-virus-images
I sure you have some stupid ass reason why this isn't real.
Found the CDC jew.
Wow...such great rhetorical skills.
Here is the genome by the way....
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/K02718
It is available all over the place, along with the carcinogenic mechanism by which it mutates the human dna. You won't believe it anyway...why do I even try?
Men do not get screened, yet they carry the virus that cause the genital warts that can cause the cervical cells to mutate.
We have a vaccine against cancer. Why would we not use every tool we have?
Also...infowars? really?
Lol. Vaccine.
LAMO even.
Fucking retard.
Explain rather than call names. Vaccines are real. RFK Jr. just touted the benefits of the MMR vaccine because of the two deaths in Texas.
Vaccines are poison. Period.
No....no they are not Andrew Wakefield
Gay
You showed me.
Quick question :
If they told you being addicted to crack was the "vaccine" to autism, would you smoke crack? This "vaccine" would work exactly as well as every other vaccine out there. None.
Why or why not? Serious question because there is no REAL undeniable science that proves the effectiveness of any vaccine. It's all just "trust us bro, safe and effective for whatever ails ya!" and a bunch of charts and numbers that can be twisted into whatever you want them to be saying, meanwhile things that actually work are demonized and even fucking illegalized.
Not sure I understand why you love vaccines so much.
They kept parroting "safe and effective" even as they, in the EXACT SAME BREATH, said it had disappointingly shitty efficacy. (paraphrased of course so don't bother)
Yet here we are.
Just wondering why?
You're a pro-vaxx cunt with a name for the devil. You deserve no respect.