If they told you being addicted to crack was the "vaccine" to
autism, would you smoke crack? This "vaccine" would work exactly as well as every other vaccine out there. None.
Why or why not? Serious question because there is no REAL undeniable science that proves the effectiveness of any vaccine. It's all just "trust us bro, safe and effective for whatever ails ya!" and a bunch of charts and numbers that can be twisted into whatever you want them to be saying, meanwhile things that actually work are demonized and even fucking illegalized.
Not sure I understand why you love vaccines so much.
They kept parroting "safe and effective" even as they, in the EXACT SAME BREATH, said it had disappointingly shitty efficacy. (paraphrased of course so don't bother)
To say that I "love vaccines" is ridiculous. And if crack cocaine cured something, and there was scientific proof of such a claim, why wouldn't you support it? (You don't have to, as you say "smoke crack", to gain beneficial side effects, you are just muddying the water with your terminology)
The MMR vaccine works, before 1957 most children were exposed and contracted the highly virulent virus, with millions dying every year worldwide. 48,000 hospitalizations a year in the US alone, with over 1000 cases of brain damaging encephalitis. After the introduction of the vaccine in 1963, annual cases dropped dramatically. In 2000 measles was declared eliminated from the US because there had not been an outbreak in over 12 mos, but of course it comes roaring back because people travel and don't get their children vaccinated because of lies and mistrust.
I think what you want is a cure, there is no definitive cure for any virus, but the reduction in cases and herd immunity is the goal. There is way way more evidence than "trust us, bro" and whatever other diminutive status helps your pitiful argument.
And by the way. what "actually works" . Be specific.
No....no they are not Andrew Wakefield
Gay
You showed me.
Quick question :
If they told you being addicted to crack was the "vaccine" to autism, would you smoke crack? This "vaccine" would work exactly as well as every other vaccine out there. None.
Why or why not? Serious question because there is no REAL undeniable science that proves the effectiveness of any vaccine. It's all just "trust us bro, safe and effective for whatever ails ya!" and a bunch of charts and numbers that can be twisted into whatever you want them to be saying, meanwhile things that actually work are demonized and even fucking illegalized.
Not sure I understand why you love vaccines so much.
They kept parroting "safe and effective" even as they, in the EXACT SAME BREATH, said it had disappointingly shitty efficacy. (paraphrased of course so don't bother)
Yet here we are.
Just wondering why?
To say that I "love vaccines" is ridiculous. And if crack cocaine cured something, and there was scientific proof of such a claim, why wouldn't you support it? (You don't have to, as you say "smoke crack", to gain beneficial side effects, you are just muddying the water with your terminology)
The MMR vaccine works, before 1957 most children were exposed and contracted the highly virulent virus, with millions dying every year worldwide. 48,000 hospitalizations a year in the US alone, with over 1000 cases of brain damaging encephalitis. After the introduction of the vaccine in 1963, annual cases dropped dramatically. In 2000 measles was declared eliminated from the US because there had not been an outbreak in over 12 mos, but of course it comes roaring back because people travel and don't get their children vaccinated because of lies and mistrust.
I think what you want is a cure, there is no definitive cure for any virus, but the reduction in cases and herd immunity is the goal. There is way way more evidence than "trust us, bro" and whatever other diminutive status helps your pitiful argument.
And by the way. what "actually works" . Be specific.