I recall clearly the huge push for Gardasil on NPR's Science Friday show. As a show supposedly about science, they felt so strongly about it they openly condemned anyone who resisted or objected. We've come a long way since then in how low the bar is for open condemnation.
Another reference with numerous outgoing links on what bullshit it was all along:
An FOIA request is not proof of anything...you present this as though it is proof, it is nothing but misinformation. You say that Virology is pseudoscience....why?
Virology and mass vaccination are both dogmatic religions with no real scientific backing at this point. There’s plenty of literature out there today that challenge virology and germ THEORY in particular. I’d list them here but you won’t read them because you’re a vax zealot.
Denialism isn’t the correct term, it’s skepticism. Denialism is ignoring proof or strong evidence, which does not include dogmatic pseudo-science theories such as virology, germ theory and vaccine efficacy. You shouldn’t be surprised that skepticism exists on a CONSPIRACY forum, right? Skepticism used to be a part of scientific methodology but that’s no longer true.
Are you defending Gardasil as a safe and effective vaccine for use in youths? Yes or no.
It is available all over the place, along with the carcinogenic mechanism by which it mutates the human dna. You won't believe it anyway...why do I even try?
I recall clearly the huge push for Gardasil on NPR's Science Friday show. As a show supposedly about science, they felt so strongly about it they openly condemned anyone who resisted or objected. We've come a long way since then in how low the bar is for open condemnation.
Another reference with numerous outgoing links on what bullshit it was all along:
CDC Confesses: No Scientific Basis for “HPV” Narrative… No Virus, No Contagion, No Genome… Just Bogus Tests (Global Research 10/17/2024)
An FOIA request is not proof of anything...you present this as though it is proof, it is nothing but misinformation. You say that Virology is pseudoscience....why?
Virology and mass vaccination are both dogmatic religions with no real scientific backing at this point. There’s plenty of literature out there today that challenge virology and germ THEORY in particular. I’d list them here but you won’t read them because you’re a vax zealot.
You aren’t actually defending Gardasil, right?
In brief, the six principal plays in the denialist playbook are:
Doubt the Science
Question Scientists’ Motives and Integrity
Magnify Disagreements among Scientists and Cite Gadflies as Authorities
Exaggerate Potential Harm
Appeal to Personal Freedom
Reject Whatever Would Repudiate A Key Philosophy
Denialism isn’t the correct term, it’s skepticism. Denialism is ignoring proof or strong evidence, which does not include dogmatic pseudo-science theories such as virology, germ theory and vaccine efficacy. You shouldn’t be surprised that skepticism exists on a CONSPIRACY forum, right? Skepticism used to be a part of scientific methodology but that’s no longer true.
Are you defending Gardasil as a safe and effective vaccine for use in youths? Yes or no.
Found the CDC jew.
Wow...such great rhetorical skills.
Here is the genome by the way....
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/K02718
It is available all over the place, along with the carcinogenic mechanism by which it mutates the human dna. You won't believe it anyway...why do I even try?