what if the media is being manipulated?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
And it's been known since the 70s, when the Church Committee congressional hearings publicly revealed Operation Mockingbird and various other illegal programs the CIA was running.
If/then implies given (need) moving towards taking (want) medium ...suggested "media" tempts ones consent to ignore given, while taking a seat in Plato's allegory of the cave.
Only during given (perceivable) can one (perception) take (consent) from another (suggestion)...hence others suggesting media to invert medium.
The media has been broken for decades lol.
No, it works as intended. It's always been a propaganda tool forming public opinion and pushing narratives.
Comparatively, from when in the '70s through the '90s the National Media Conglomerates were battling each other for rattings. So what they did to capture the ratings was expose Government and Corporate Collusion and make up extended stories for the citizens to get to know the plight of their system(s).
That couldnt continue if the billionaires that were trying to take this place over and enslave us and the world, if the news was telling us of their crimes, and the focus of them. So in short of Three Decades, the Media in the United States shrunk from 26 National Media Groups, to 6. National Expose' regarding News of Government and Corporate Collusion dropped out of the Media sharply in 2001. Since then, the major National Media groups have primarily kept the really important, country shaping topics, out of the public ear.
It's the other way around - we have access to much more information today compared to the boomer era. Media back then was consolidated and centralized and there was almost no alternative outlets. They only played the fake dialectic which fooled people there's free speech and criticism of the system and that corrupt entities including the government won't get away with egregious shit because there's free investigative journalism that would expose them (as if those journalists weren't on a payroll and weren't CIA Mockingbird implants).
Media control is one of the pillars of any regime, especially fabian socialists who got the reigns before and after the war and turned this country (and the rest of the world for that matter) to shit.
Nowhere is the essence of media at the time better presented than in this scene from Network: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35DSdw7dHjs
Do you even read?
Everything I wrote can be easily looked up in US Media market statistics.
Your presupposition that there was a time when the media wasn't owned by a small elite group of people is wrong. Just because the consolidation wasn't official doesn't mean they didn't have a hold on the media. My point still stands - we have access to much more information about what's going on than in previous times.
Your point stands, but it's WRONG, in regards to the number of media conglomerates and the multitude of owners going back to the late 70's. And, if you don't want to look into it to know it, IDGAF.
Dude, the government had full control of the media back in the time you talk about. There are countless books written on this about OSS war propaganda and Tavistock and later CIA involvement through Mockingbird and MK Ultra. This model was exported to the US from the British empire, namely the Milner-Rhodes-Rotschild circle of fabian socialists who ran Britain in the early 20th century.
These people create the news narratives, opinion pieces, psy ops, fake polls, etc and feed them to the mainstream media outlets. I know what I'm talking about and have the receipts. This is how they handle business for more than a century now.
Because the people have not made it realize the detriment of the lie and responded in kind.
The opposite has happened. They show us what they are going to do. Do it. Then we sit on our hands while the criminals in Government plan up another scheme they know they will get away with...
I would like to say "not this time" with Trump, but I have my reservations based on 40 years of watching the billionaires shit on us using our system(s).
The fuck do you mean, if.
It's not just the "left wing", all the media is a perception management machine
Are you seriously asking this question? All media is just a propaganda tool. Especially the big ones. Be it left wing, right wing or any other wing. It doesn't matter. Safe assumption would be that there is no such thing as objective news out there. We should take all information with a pinch of salt and we should never trust any authority, just because it is supposed to be an authority.
Action forces reactions to let go (push), while tempting to hold onto (pull). Ones free will of choice can only operate in-between push (need) and pull (want).
Do you manually push (life) action (inception towards death)...or do you allow yourself to be pulled into it?
Choice at the center of balance (push/pull) implies the media/medium/medius - "middle" of all streaming motion.
Others suggest media to pull the medium (ones perception) out of stream (all perceivable).