Lack of imagination among those who allowed to be script writers for Hollywood.
There is more interesting question - there is an endless list of interesting, unique and original stories written by SciFi writers, that could be scripts for really interesting and entertaining movies. But even if Hollywood decide to film something, it removes everything interesting and mindblowing from the SciFi story and add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script. None of such stories was ever filmed as they are and there is always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story, inserting this completely unneeded "feelings and relations" stuff and removing as much SciFi as possible.
Also, even franchises that was rare exceptions from that rule (TV series, mostly) always eventually was castrated down from SciFi story about miracles of Universe to that fucking "feelings and relations" shit.
The plots you tell about have the same pattern - minimum SciFi stuff and maximum "feelings and relations". That's why they are popular in Hollywood.
There's no lack of anything within ATION (action) only the rise of reactions. Few suggest IMAGES to tempt many to hold onto within their imagination. A reaction cannot hold onto action...yet imagination distracts from that.
Therefore...ignoring motion, while holding onto matter, tricks one to believe in lacking aka lagging - "fail to keep pace".
add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script
Those who ignore motion for fiction are a) relating to fiction by holding onto it and b) feeling emotion/emotio/emoveo/meue - "to push back".
In other words...a jew suggests a movie to draw consenting gentiles to relate, which results into their emotions pushing back.
always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story
Origin cannot be stored...the cause (inception towards death) of being (life) moves.
The perverted distortion of reality implies ones choice to store fiction within self, while ignoring change.
Incorrect. Firstly, these two characters, though syncretized by worshippers of evil spirits, have almost nothing in common; while the Abrahamic character of the former name is said to have fallen (unlike the original Roman deity of the light reflected from the planet Venus in the morning, whose name they stole to infect the Western imagination with evil), the latter was chained up and tortured (until freed by Hercules). Secondly they did not experience amnesia.
Instead, all these films are an allegory about You. You fell, You experience amnesia, You once had awesome powers. You preceded this matter-energy-space-time construct, and will continue to exist after its collapse.
I haven't seen the others but The Man Who Fell to Earth is actually a great movie which inspired Philip K. Dick, he has a subplot in VALIS about some mysterious film, the inspiration for that came after he saw that film. And it's an archetypal story about the soul which dates back to the third century, in fact. There's a Gnostic myth called the Hymn of the Pearl which in turn inspired The Man who Fell to Earth. It's the story of the soul which has lost itself in this fallen world, but which will find its true home in the afterlife. Of course, one can draw the connection between the illuminati who are identified with the Gnostics as the original heretics, and now they're in Hollywood influencing all the movies with their predictive programming and what not. Maybe they had a hand in it but in my experience that film is an honest expression of the author's feelings and is worth a watch regardless.
Lack of imagination among those who allowed to be script writers for Hollywood.
There is more interesting question - there is an endless list of interesting, unique and original stories written by SciFi writers, that could be scripts for really interesting and entertaining movies. But even if Hollywood decide to film something, it removes everything interesting and mindblowing from the SciFi story and add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script. None of such stories was ever filmed as they are and there is always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story, inserting this completely unneeded "feelings and relations" stuff and removing as much SciFi as possible.
Also, even franchises that was rare exceptions from that rule (TV series, mostly) always eventually was castrated down from SciFi story about miracles of Universe to that fucking "feelings and relations" shit.
The plots you tell about have the same pattern - minimum SciFi stuff and maximum "feelings and relations". That's why they are popular in Hollywood.
Can you recommend some interesting fiction books to read?
I will recommend authors - Clifford Saimak, Stanislav Lem, Harry Harrison, Martin Gardner, Henry Kuttner f.e.
Thank you
There's no lack of anything within ATION (action) only the rise of reactions. Few suggest IMAGES to tempt many to hold onto within their imagination. A reaction cannot hold onto action...yet imagination distracts from that.
Therefore...ignoring motion, while holding onto matter, tricks one to believe in lacking aka lagging - "fail to keep pace".
Those who ignore motion for fiction are a) relating to fiction by holding onto it and b) feeling emotion/emotio/emoveo/meue - "to push back".
In other words...a jew suggests a movie to draw consenting gentiles to relate, which results into their emotions pushing back.
Origin cannot be stored...the cause (inception towards death) of being (life) moves.
The perverted distortion of reality implies ones choice to store fiction within self, while ignoring change.
Same (all perceivable) generates differences (each ones perception)...suggested patterns tempt "alike" consent, hence equalizing differences.
Superman.
Amnesia?
He didn't have amnesia per se, but his adoptive parents never told him the truth about his origins. He was just regular old Clark, son of the Kents.
see: The Seven Basic Plots
It's the story of Lucifer and Prometheus. There are no new stories.
Incorrect. Firstly, these two characters, though syncretized by worshippers of evil spirits, have almost nothing in common; while the Abrahamic character of the former name is said to have fallen (unlike the original Roman deity of the light reflected from the planet Venus in the morning, whose name they stole to infect the Western imagination with evil), the latter was chained up and tortured (until freed by Hercules). Secondly they did not experience amnesia.
Instead, all these films are an allegory about You. You fell, You experience amnesia, You once had awesome powers. You preceded this matter-energy-space-time construct, and will continue to exist after its collapse.
The fall of Adam was preceded by the fall of Lucifer, so yes they are about the fall of man too.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17txjvg0UG/a-magical-noncorporeal-man-float/c/
I have not seen Puma Man but.
There is no time in the astral realm.
The knowledge presents itself when you seek it.
Maybe a link between requesting future knowledge?
If I was some Faggot new Hire at the Majestic 12 this would be a good way to drop hits to all my mason bros so they dont forget how to tap in.
I haven't seen the others but The Man Who Fell to Earth is actually a great movie which inspired Philip K. Dick, he has a subplot in VALIS about some mysterious film, the inspiration for that came after he saw that film. And it's an archetypal story about the soul which dates back to the third century, in fact. There's a Gnostic myth called the Hymn of the Pearl which in turn inspired The Man who Fell to Earth. It's the story of the soul which has lost itself in this fallen world, but which will find its true home in the afterlife. Of course, one can draw the connection between the illuminati who are identified with the Gnostics as the original heretics, and now they're in Hollywood influencing all the movies with their predictive programming and what not. Maybe they had a hand in it but in my experience that film is an honest expression of the author's feelings and is worth a watch regardless.
Fall (inception towards death) generating rise (life) aka ongoing energy generating temporal powers within memory.
That's the deception...power within memory cannot be stored without ignoring the nature of energy.
That's how the deception comes into being...creed/belief/faith aka holding onto within memory, while ignoring motion.
I'm sorry, can you explain to the viewing public, what your native languages is, and how it allows you to think like a spoon?