Lack of imagination among those who allowed to be script writers for Hollywood.
There is more interesting question - there is an endless list of interesting, unique and original stories written by SciFi writers, that could be scripts for really interesting and entertaining movies. But even if Hollywood decide to film something, it removes everything interesting and mindblowing from the SciFi story and add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script. None of such stories was ever filmed as they are and there is always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story, inserting this completely unneeded "feelings and relations" stuff and removing as much SciFi as possible.
Also, even franchises that was rare exceptions from that rule (TV series, mostly) always eventually was castrated down from SciFi story about miracles of Universe to that fucking "feelings and relations" shit.
The plots you tell about have the same pattern - minimum SciFi stuff and maximum "feelings and relations". That's why they are popular in Hollywood.
There's no lack of anything within ATION (action) only the rise of reactions. Few suggest IMAGES to tempt many to hold onto within their imagination. A reaction cannot hold onto action...yet imagination distracts from that.
Therefore...ignoring motion, while holding onto matter, tricks one to believe in lacking aka lagging - "fail to keep pace".
add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script
Those who ignore motion for fiction are a) relating to fiction by holding onto it and b) feeling emotion/emotio/emoveo/meue - "to push back".
In other words...a jew suggests a movie to draw consenting gentiles to relate, which results into their emotions pushing back.
always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story
Origin cannot be stored...the cause (inception towards death) of being (life) moves.
The perverted distortion of reality implies ones choice to store fiction within self, while ignoring change.
Lack of imagination among those who allowed to be script writers for Hollywood.
There is more interesting question - there is an endless list of interesting, unique and original stories written by SciFi writers, that could be scripts for really interesting and entertaining movies. But even if Hollywood decide to film something, it removes everything interesting and mindblowing from the SciFi story and add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script. None of such stories was ever filmed as they are and there is always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story, inserting this completely unneeded "feelings and relations" stuff and removing as much SciFi as possible.
Also, even franchises that was rare exceptions from that rule (TV series, mostly) always eventually was castrated down from SciFi story about miracles of Universe to that fucking "feelings and relations" shit.
The plots you tell about have the same pattern - minimum SciFi stuff and maximum "feelings and relations". That's why they are popular in Hollywood.
Can you recommend some interesting fiction books to read?
I will recommend authors - Clifford Saimak, Stanislav Lem, Harry Harrison, Martin Gardner, Henry Kuttner f.e.
Thank you
There's no lack of anything within ATION (action) only the rise of reactions. Few suggest IMAGES to tempt many to hold onto within their imagination. A reaction cannot hold onto action...yet imagination distracts from that.
Therefore...ignoring motion, while holding onto matter, tricks one to believe in lacking aka lagging - "fail to keep pace".
Those who ignore motion for fiction are a) relating to fiction by holding onto it and b) feeling emotion/emotio/emoveo/meue - "to push back".
In other words...a jew suggests a movie to draw consenting gentiles to relate, which results into their emotions pushing back.
Origin cannot be stored...the cause (inception towards death) of being (life) moves.
The perverted distortion of reality implies ones choice to store fiction within self, while ignoring change.
Same (all perceivable) generates differences (each ones perception)...suggested patterns tempt "alike" consent, hence equalizing differences.