Nigga got rich off stealing ideas and companies from other people, rewriting history so that they were always his ideas and companies, and using government grants and subsidies to enrich himself and market his products.
Of course he’s a socialist.
Or like smithw1984 says here,
A fascist, aka Socialism + nationalism.
Mussolini’s definition of fascism:
Perfect marriage between corporation and state.
Ya’ll know about Larry McDonald? The congressman that warned about the nwo and how it will be a blend of the worse parts of socialism and the worst parts of capitalism?
Yeah, nigga died in one of them small airplane crashes that happen when you speak out on that level…
He is a socialist the same way H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russel, Rockefeller and the international banking elite are socialists. Not all socialists are commies. It's called fabianism and they seek to bring about the NWO which is a socialist corporate technocracy (more like a synthesis between socialism and monopoly capitalism where the border between private and public has been transcended).
If everything is owned and ran by a private corporation like Blackrock or the Fed, what's the difference between this and a socialist authoritarian government? This is where the libertarian brain melts. If they bite the bullet they have to admit they believe "government bad, Blackrock good".
Good thing Elon knows what's the greatest good for me personally, and everyone else, and can acheive it all simultaneously. Otherwise, this would come off as pretty tyranical.
The United States, of it's many tools for shaping the Republic, one of such tools is Socialism.
We take the bits that worked, integrate them into capitalism. Then regulate capitalism to not become totalitarian.
However, due to the US citizens ability to memory hole on command, we will continue to pay for a membership to a club that we dont want, that is being forced upon us, while it works to destroy our local and regional economic stability.
a) -ist (socialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (socialism)... Elon Musk as an influencer tempts gentiles with suggested -isms, while pretending to be an -ist.
Elon Musk is directed to play a leader for gentile followers. He isn't social, but the opposite...private; exclusive; special; selected.
c) Shifting resource implies turning (shift) the responses (re) of gentiles against each other and away from origin (source). Following another implies ignoring source.
d) Most vs least implies a conflict of reason among gentiles about a jewish suggestion. Both sides mutually destroy each other.
There's no most vs least conflict in nature...only each one being (partial) within all (whole) of nature.
e) Nature generates beings, which implies a being to be the product of nature. Only nature produces products...each jew tempts gentiles to ignore that by utilizing suggestion (fiction) to sell perceivable (reality) for the price of gentiles selling themselves out, when buying into it.
Example for lack of production among beings...only set apart from one another can there be intercourse in-between one another, which leads to a further separation of being aka each OFF-SPRING.
In short...a partial within whole cannot add anything to whole. Production implies from whole into partials, hence a separation/differentiation...apartheid.
“He’s not a socialist despite openly saying he’s a socialist and behaving as only socialists behave!”
Seek psychiatric help for your mental illness immediately. You’re clinically insane and incapable of replying to things real people have actually said.
Nigga got rich off stealing ideas and companies from other people, rewriting history so that they were always his ideas and companies, and using government grants and subsidies to enrich himself and market his products.
Of course he’s a socialist.
Or like smithw1984 says here, A fascist, aka Socialism + nationalism. Mussolini’s definition of fascism: Perfect marriage between corporation and state.
Ya’ll know about Larry McDonald? The congressman that warned about the nwo and how it will be a blend of the worse parts of socialism and the worst parts of capitalism? Yeah, nigga died in one of them small airplane crashes that happen when you speak out on that level…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BPhYEFGaGM
Fabianist, not fascist. There’s absolutely nothing nationalistic about Musk.
All the talk about Elon and H1-B, when he entered the country on a HB-5, "Immigrant Investors Program".
He bought his way in. And that is even downplayed by his critics on other platforms. It's not obvious, but it's noticeable.
Sure there is.
Just not for america.
Nationalism ain't gonna matter anyway. He's still a tool and we're all still fuct as hard as always
He is a socialist the same way H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russel, Rockefeller and the international banking elite are socialists. Not all socialists are commies. It's called fabianism and they seek to bring about the NWO which is a socialist corporate technocracy (more like a synthesis between socialism and monopoly capitalism where the border between private and public has been transcended).
If everything is owned and ran by a private corporation like Blackrock or the Fed, what's the difference between this and a socialist authoritarian government? This is where the libertarian brain melts. If they bite the bullet they have to admit they believe "government bad, Blackrock good".
Tweet is from 2018.
I mistook it as something he tweeted today/yesterday because I didn’t check the date.
I doubt he’s changed his beliefs, only the veneer.
So he is not a socialist in his own understanding. :)
Why do elite puppets like to make such illogical, senseless and completely unnecessary statements?
Looks like virtue signalling, but to whom?
Good thing Elon knows what's the greatest good for me personally, and everyone else, and can acheive it all simultaneously. Otherwise, this would come off as pretty tyranical.
Do you like Hospitals? Then you might support socialisms.
Do you like Legal processes to discover innocents? Then you might support socialisms.
Not centrally planned, technocratic, state-run socialisms.
Your hood, community, church, county, co-op, whatever wants to do a socialism, i have no qualms.
White people with barns pay insurance. That’s a socialism. Barn burns down, they pay out (but will argue with you for every penny.)
Amish people with barns have a community. Barn burns down, your homeys stop what they’re doing and raise a new barn in 2 days. That’s a socialism.
One should be able to opt out of it. If you want a Costco card, pay the membership. Don’t tax me bro.
Thanks for the downvote, whoever did that...
The United States, of it's many tools for shaping the Republic, one of such tools is Socialism.
We take the bits that worked, integrate them into capitalism. Then regulate capitalism to not become totalitarian.
However, due to the US citizens ability to memory hole on command, we will continue to pay for a membership to a club that we dont want, that is being forced upon us, while it works to destroy our local and regional economic stability.
There is no such thing as socialism. It's never been achieved
An -ism tempts an -ist to follow. If an -ism could be achieved; then an -ist would have no incentive to continue following.
What -ism was ever achieved?
Noneisms. It's a fucking hoax
None-ism aka nihil (Latin nihilo; nothing) -ism...consenting to nihil-ism makes one a nihil-ist, while de-nying perceivable for suggested.
It's your question. My answer is still 0
a) -ist (socialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (socialism)... Elon Musk as an influencer tempts gentiles with suggested -isms, while pretending to be an -ist.
b) Social/socius/sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/social#etymonline_v_23811
Elon Musk is directed to play a leader for gentile followers. He isn't social, but the opposite...private; exclusive; special; selected.
c) Shifting resource implies turning (shift) the responses (re) of gentiles against each other and away from origin (source). Following another implies ignoring source.
d) Most vs least implies a conflict of reason among gentiles about a jewish suggestion. Both sides mutually destroy each other.
There's no most vs least conflict in nature...only each one being (partial) within all (whole) of nature.
e) Nature generates beings, which implies a being to be the product of nature. Only nature produces products...each jew tempts gentiles to ignore that by utilizing suggestion (fiction) to sell perceivable (reality) for the price of gentiles selling themselves out, when buying into it.
Example for lack of production among beings...only set apart from one another can there be intercourse in-between one another, which leads to a further separation of being aka each OFF-SPRING.
In short...a partial within whole cannot add anything to whole. Production implies from whole into partials, hence a separation/differentiation...apartheid.
He´s a socialist because he says so!
Are you stupid or just naive?
Thanks for admitting that he’s a socialist and supports white genocide. Fuck off, commie.
To be fair, he did say this back when you were required to be a socialist (at least) if you wanted that blue check.
I'd classify him more as an opportunist.
Now for the fun question: Do we shoot ideologues or opportunists first?
No, he's an authoritarian.
He's a piece of shit but he isn't a socialist.
How's the three day special operation coming along, Russkie?
“He’s not a socialist despite openly saying he’s a socialist and behaving as only socialists behave!”
Seek psychiatric help for your mental illness immediately. You’re clinically insane and incapable of replying to things real people have actually said.