Toxic, Metallic Compounds Found in All COVID Vaccine Samples Analyzed by German Scientists - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/toxic-metallic-compounds-covid-vaccines-german-scientists/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=f7cf9f90-f6de-447f-8b4c-3b94cd5f6219
Japanese study proves Pfizer and Moderna shots contain entities that assemble themselves in complex structures - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/19957kg1BP/nanobots-in-covid-shots-that-ass/c
German scientists reveal what's in the shots with Raman spectroscopy - https://odysee.com/@ildrzaius:6/German_Scientists_Show_Magnified_Images_Of_Massive_Vaccine_Damage_and_Unnatural_Contaminants_In_Vaccines:5
Spanish scientists exposed the Graphene Oxide in covid shots using Raman spectroscopy. La Quinta Columna has over 1000 scientists, who have collaborated for this information with over 1000 hours of research combined. - https://odysee.com/@ekab:2/VID_20220326_082809_583:f
Spanish scientists discover that the vaccinated and the tested for covid emit unknown bluetooth signals - BlueTruth documentary full - https://odysee.com/@ARGONAUT:d/CC_2022_06_11_DocBluetruth_English:10?src=embed
Graphene oxide discovered in covid shots using optical microscopy - Greg Reese report - https://odysee.com/@InfoNews:f/What-Graphene-does-in-your-body:5
Surveillance Under The Skin - Dr. Yuval Noah Harari - A tiny gae joo, who's WEF's right hand man. "The thing that people would remember from the covid crisis is that this was the moment when everything became monitored" - https://odysee.com/Surveillance-Under-The-Skin---Dr.-Yuval-Noah-Harari:1?src=embed
This guy didn't die from sugar - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/1995H03Swm/covid-strikes-again-at-a-person-/c
This guy also didn't die from sugar - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/1995CQBlf3/those-of-you-who-think-the-vacci/c
These athletes didn't have heart complications and didn't die from sugar. Jwilderness - https://www.youtube.com/@JWilderness/search?query=what%27s%20going%20on
"In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established." - 2 Corinthians 13:1
Not by a comment from a redditor, who can't distinguish SUGAR from Graphene oxide, and his whole theory (which is promoted on Reddit, and here) is - "Look the other way, people. Nothing to see here... Ignore all these reports from scientists all over the world..."
I don't care if it's sugar, graphine oxide, snake venom or saline, I'm not going to get it and it's too late for those that did. Let the jabbed figure it out for themselves because it doesn't matter once the crap is in your blood.
Now aka this perceivable MOMENT implies the MOMENT-um (inception towards death) of ongoing motion for each temporary matter (life) within.
Matter needs to resist motion, while being tempted by motion to want to ignore resisting.
Origin (inception) and outcome (death) imply the same momentum of motion for each different matter (life) in-between, and only in-between cause (motion) can there be effects (matter).
As for sugar...
Temptation implies absorption, hence getting sucked in, while resistance implies emission, hence giving out.
The trick...only nature gives out aka all perceivable to each ones perception. Few utilize suggestion to tempt ones consent to suck in, hold in, and resist giving out, which tempts other suckers to respond alike.
Feeling aka emotio implies to move from, which inverts being (life) moved by (inception towards death)...the suggestions by others tempt ones emotions to move from ones position.
Saying implies uttering artifice (suggested words) within reality (perceivable sound) aka making noise.
Few utilize alchemy to mix feelings and noise together; like for example "Cum On Feel the Noize"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78ezU7x3jfE
More alchemy about sugar...
Daddy implies sugar (motion); mommy implies oil (momentum); child implies salt (matter)...
a) Few suggest CHEM-ism (uniting substances to form compounds) to tempt many to ignore AL (all dividing into each one).
A being isn't compounded (mixed together) put set apart from one another. This process implies transmutation of partials (matter) within whole (motion).
b) Another layer of deception...nature doesn't brand anything with a label. Few within nature tempt many to attach artificial labels (words) onto a natural process (sound). This implies spell-craft.
a) Interest implies internal (inter) cessation of motion (rest)...no such thing within motion, unless one chooses to ignore being moved.
b) Black implies absence of light...being implies send by light, while having sense.
Few suggest black (absence of light) and white (pure light) to distract many from being in-between the visible spectrum of light with the free will of choice to abstain sense through ignorance.
In short...light implies ones discernment; black implies ones ignorance.
Sleight of hand: Exit light (discernment) Enter night (ignorance) Take my hand (consent to my suggestion) We're off to never-neverland (bye bye potential)... https://genius.com/Metallica-enter-sandman-lyrics
c) Mirror/mirare - "to look at" implies looking/locking onto a suggestion hence reflecting perceivable with suggested aka choosing ignorance (black) over discernment (white).
d) Only ALL gives each ONE within access by transmutation aka internal separation aka differentiation of action (inception towards death) into reactions (life).
Being moved from inception towards death implies an "all access pass", and since inception implies import and death export...life implies VIP aka very imported per-sonos (by sound).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt mass consent, which in return permits few to withdraw access to many, while offering VIP access to few in return for a price of admission.
e) Technology aka techno/tekhnē - "artifice" and logy/logic - "reason"...suggestion shaped within perception implies artifice and ones consent to it established a conflict of reason against others and circular logic within self.
Technology (artificial reason) inverts natural implication (if/then). There's no conflict in implication and no circulatory shape within straight motion...unless one chooses to ignore that.
a) Symbol aka syn (together) bole (throwing)...nature doesn't throw together, it sets each one within apart from one another.
b) Electric and Magnetic aka ELECT (ones choice) MAG (to knead; fashion; fit)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-#etymonline_v_52644
Few utilize mag/magic/masonry to make suggestions, which tempts ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion. Magnetic suggestion drawing in; electric consent empowering...
c) ALL (perceivable) differentiates ONE (perception), hence each one having a different perspective within the same origin (blind men and an elephant parable).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt mass consent, hence equalizing differences, while making similarity aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
d) Before suggested CHEM-ism tempts the compounding of matter together, AL (all) perceivable sets each (one) matter apart through motion...which one ignores when consenting to another ones suggested -ism.
ALL uses; each ONE re-uses (perception) what all offers (perceivable). Ignoring this for the suggestions of each other permits others to ab-use one.
https://genius.com/Eurythmics-sweet-dreams-are-made-of-this-lyrics
Con-sider implies "siding together", hence each com-ment (minding together) suggesting an upvote vs downvote conflict of reason as a side to choose from.
Instead of reason (upvote vs downvote) based on ones consent to suggested information, ones free will of choice can utilize implication (if/then) to draw from perceivable inspiration...which implies the natural process of "knowledge".
Notice that your sentence starts with "can't", which implies a conflict of reason (can vs can't)...hence making the foundation of your response a conflict against others.
Thank you very much! I really appreciate it!
And first time watching this video - 1:57 - the lead singer with the eye in the triangle on his forehead. "Who would believe you..." That's spot on... Really... Spot on predictive programming... That's indeed relevant 100%.
I don't know why it occured to me, but this video seems similar to the topic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFqjDXy9s5A [Metallica: All Nightmare Long], could you please take a look at it?
If you just remove for a second, for mainstream artists, the idea their words are theirs but they are just mouth lenders for people that wanna rule over us, a lot of messages make more sense.
Some people have so succumb to denial that they require extraordinary proof. Even if Pfizer admitted it, I suspect they'd deny its role in any side effects or argue that it wasn't in every jab so it's irrelevant etc
Even Stefan Oelrich (Bayer) admited that the covid jab is "gene therapy" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qowDwaYx7vI
Even these examples should make people suspicious as to why are these "famous" people are faking getting the shot - https://9gag.com/gag/aRB0xBB
Or just research about Optogenetics - Controlling genes with light, which was the "Method of the year" for the year 2010... They literally can make zombie mice - https://9gag.com/gag/avyzpmM
I just thought people would excel in a conspiracy forum, not return to square one and call it "Nothing to see in covid jabs, people... It was just sugar..."
This community is full of compromised spammers but also with extreme skeptics. It can be hard to tell the difference sometimes and i think that speaks to the most recent tactic. It's no longer fight the person or the community but attempt to discredit the method of discovery and to sow doubt around every corner to reduce the value and impact
We know from Pfizer filings that their Comirnaty variations were manufactured in at least 12 different subcontractor factories
From the same we know that graphene is used in the post incubation purification phase of the injection manufacturing process
We also know that some countries manufactured batches did NOT contain any signals for any known GBMs (graphene).
However we also know that some other batches in some other countries injections (diff manufacturer?) did show signal that closely resembles that signature of GO under Raman spectroscopy.
So, some likely did , but not all did did.
What's reddit?
I found very strange that there is still no any independent full chemical analysis results of any mRNA vaccine ever done.
To make such analysis you need mass-spectrometer to find out existence and concentrations of basic elements and chromatograph to determine actual chemical composition. Not a very simple task, and not very cheap financially and in time, but it is routinely done every day in thousands of scientific and research labs.
Eventually you get exact and full list of actual ingritients of studied specimen.
Why nobody still did that is a greatest mistery with those who declare themselves as coronahoax and vaccinehoax enemies. Seems they are not really, and even more - they work to defile public questioning this hoaxes.
At the time, I had a conversation with one biochemist who was very critical about coronahoax and vaccinehoax. When talk come to the question why he didn't make an full chemical analysis of mRNA vaccine, he told that he can't obtain a sample legally, so paper he would wrote will not be accepted by any peer-reviewed journal. Later I come to conclusion that modern scientists don't care about science and research at all, they care only about fucking publications in official journals and citations.
All those who mentioned in your posts do have the ability to make straight full chemical analysis of vaccine and obtain its full and exact composition with every ingridient concentration and exact formula. And publish that list. However none of them ever did that. They only mumble something about some overhyped ingridient even without any quantative data about it. That's absolute nonsense in science. When you study something unknown you don't limit yourself with single ingridient with most popular name and you absolutely want to know exact concentrations and full composition.
It is like you care only about amount of salt in a dish and suddenly have no any interest about sugar, vinegar, pepper, antioxidants, thinners and other stuff which could not only interfere with effect of salt, but also be more harmful and bad than what you stick to.
Weird.
Also in this paper they mention generic spectroscopy wouldn't be able to differentiate graphene (since you'd just see carbon and whatever else) so they used micro raman spectroscopy https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES
Raman spectometry does not detect graphene. It detects bonds in molecules. Every bond have specific frequency, so you could differentiate them. Graphene basically is just carbon rings assembly. But a lot of substances have same carbon rings with same bonds.
So, Raman spectrometry alone is nowere enough to make any exact conclusion about composition. But it could be very useful as additional study to determine specific isomeres of substances with already known chemical formula.
You will get similar spectrums for graphite, graphene, benzene, any other cyclic hydrocarbons including even sugar that have two carbon rings.
Raman spectrometer is cheaper and simplier than quadrupole mass-spectrometer. There even successfull DIY projects of Raman spectrometers. But they are only supplement tools in figuring out unknown substance composition.
") shows the measured Raman spectrum of benzene, where the peaks at 3,063, 2,950, 1,586, 1,177, 992 and 606 cm −1 represent its characteristic features. " https://www.researchgate.net/figure/b-shows-the-measured-Raman-spectrum-of-benzene-where-the-peaks-at-3-063-2-950-1-586_fig4_221749919
Compare that to the spectrum obtained in figs 4 and 6 here, which shows peaks at different locations: https://www.graphene.cam.ac.uk/files/518.pdf
In general it looks like you wouldn't be able to distinguish graphene from graphite with just raman spec but you should be able to distinguish it from other hydrocarbons.
Here we go. 1,586 G-peak in benzene ring is the same G-peak in graphene/graphite ring.
However, benzene have only one ring, there are no connections with other rings. So it does not have 2D peak. But if you take naphtalene, made from two benzene rings, you suddenly get that 2D Raman peak around 3000 cm-1.
When you go to more benzenes connected together, like in anthracene or phenalene you get raman spectras with peaks also specific to graphite. Meanwhile some polycyclic hydrocarbons are coagulants and could be a reason for blood clots. Unlike graphene.
Doing raman spectrometry with complex unknown substance, you get a lot of peaks everywhere, you don't get that nice two-peak picture from pure graphite/graphene even if graphite/graphene present in specimen. And they would not be that sharp and visible as on pictures you look at in a paper about pure graphene. You will obviously have peaks from all bonds of all substances at once. Including water. It will be a complete mess.
To make Raman spectrometry useful you have to find composition first. Then, thoroughly separate ingridiens and do a raman spectrometry on them separately to find out bonds you have. Then, using chemical formula and what bonds used to connect atoms in it you finally could determine what exact substance you have.
Raman spectrometry don't give you composition, it gives you what bonds you have. In case of simple compounds, you will be able to figure out that, say, there is water, table salt and some organic. But with such thing as vaccine where lot of stuff mixed, it is impossible to do any conclusions from Raman spectra you get. Well, in best case you will be able to tell that there is a lot of water in it. May be salt will be also obvious.
To clearly find out graphene among other organic and inorganic substances in water with Raman spectrometry you will need a suspension where graphene overhelmingly prevail over all other stuff, so G and 2D peaks will be comparable to peaks from water and salt. It will be grey or even black liquid, not that clear solution we see,
Strange indeed.
Mass spectrometry requires accelerators which are only going to be available at large institutions. For example, a national lab in the USA. I am not familiar with the European institutions but I'm guessing it is a similar situation there. This means that these researchers would have to send their sample off to the equivalent of a national lab in order to get the type of analysis you are speaking of done. Of course all the major institutions that would be available for this type of work are government funded and controlled, so none of them would touch an illegally obtained sample. However, the researchers can certainly perform their own analysis of the sample with the tools they have available to them, thus the different microscopy analyses (and other smaller scale analyses) we see.
It does-not. Typical quadrupole mass-spectrometer is a tabletop device with a size of a good office printer. It is not even very expensive in comparison with other lab equipment.
You could even find used ones for the price affordable to a small private business or a middle-class enthusiast.
Yes, they work from regular wall outlet and consume around 1kW.
Mass-spectrometer does have particle accelerator, just like CRT monitor or home air ionizer. "Particle accelerator" does not mandatory mean some giant cyclotrone or LHC. Any device that accelerate particles is particle accelerator, be it electron gun in CRT tube or very similar assembly of few electrodes in mass-spectrometer.
You are correct, there are table top devices. I was doing some more digging and it looks like a combination of time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy is used to study graphene. Although its not clear to me how one would use that to study graphene suspended in a liquid. In principal though, I think you are correct that one could devise a means to do so in a medium sized lab.
The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc. How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?
Exactly. This gives the first and basic clue about composition of substance on atomic and submolecular level. It allow you to get preliminary information for chromatography and chemical tests for specific substances. If you have carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, lead and iron, you don't need to look for arsenic compounds or cesium. But force you to look for cyanides and lead compounds.
You will have high relative amount of carbon, much higher than for hydrocarbons or carbonates.
Also, just think why they so stick to that graphene stuff. Graphene is one of greatest nothingburger of science. It is known for around century, but still we don't have any more or less useful use of that substanse other than fill MSM articles and empty scientific papers.
Of course, talking about some polyhexamethylene guanidine in vaccines or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate will not create attention from regular public, but overhyped graphene will.
Also, graphene narrative as microblades in vaccine that cut everything in bloodstream directly contradicts blood clots facts. You can't create a clot with something that cut objects in pieces. But some uninterestin calcium hydrocarboaluminate (widely used coagulant) or other complex calcium compounds or, say, synthesized thrombines, easily could be the reason.
And, suddenly, you need mass-spectrometer to detect calcium in specimen to get a clue where to look for if you want to find a reason of blood clots.
Don't you understand that whole anti-vaccinehoax publications just does not fit together and with known facts about not-a-vaccine. It is just insane - "who cares why blood clots is a main consequence of not-a-vaccine, look, GRAPHENE!!!!".
Unscientific, non-systematic, self-contradictory "studies" floating around on non-official side with all that overhyped "nano", "graphene", "aluminium" and other keywords just make things worse.
Yeah that makes sense. It does seem like the graphene that was detected was probably from contamination from their preparatory steps that got into some batches, and was likely unrelated to the issues people were seeing. Which, to your point, could be part of a disinfo campaign. I think what got alot of people looking at the graphene angle was the guy talking about graphene razor blades (which seemed like some science fiction to me) who suddenly died after his discovery. Pretty suspicious timing. I'm forgetting the guy's name...
I'm in doubt they detected anything. It is unlikely that you will notice any peaks from contamination. Raman spectra itself is very dim, it is a great challenge to detect Raman scattering even from pure substances, say water or salt crystal. And brighness of Raman scattering obviously proportional to the amount of substance studied. If it is some weak water solution, then water lines will be magnitude orders brighter than from dissolved substance.
With Raman you have to separate light source line from very dim scattering lines. It is like trying to make a photo of a stars in daylight. And moreover you have to do the same again to separate dissolved substance scattering from O-H water bonds scattering f.e.
If you have a mix of numerous substances dissolved in water, then you get a lot of tiny peaks at the noise level mixed alltogether.
Raman spectrometer is not some magic device that print out exact composition of scanned specimen. It is a very useful device that could give you some clue in some circumstances. But to make it useful you have to know how to use it properly and how to correctly interpret results.
Even with that X-ray (or laser) gun that show composition of alloy as a list of elements found in measured metal object things are not that simple. You could get high zinc amount just because the thing is zinc-plated. And it does not show you crystal structure of ally. It is hard to distinguish martencite from austenite stainless steel f.e. It gives you a clue, and then you have to use your brain and knowledge to get some real result.
As I see proper study of not-a-vaccine:
Eventually we will have exact composition of not-a-vaccine specimen with all substances found and their concentrations.
Such independent research is perfectly possible for any more or less equipped biochemical lab. It will take some time and money for spendables, but it is absolutely doable and could have been done in passed years easily. It hardly will be accepted by "official" science due to "legal" issues from obtaining samples to non-granted use of lab equipment, but if the goal is truth and not grant money, h-index or publication in famous journal that does not matter.
a) -ist (scientism) implies ones consent to an -ism (scientism), hence ones submission to another. What discovery could be made by submitting?
b) A cover overspreads a surface, so dis-cover implies the division of those above and below the cover, like...those who suggest scientism from above and those consenting scientists below.
c) Nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...by di-vision of all into each one. Nature doesn't cover by spreading something over the surface...it implies all above (sur) for each one (face) within.
There can be (life) only one way (inception towards death) and looking/locking ignores the motion thereof.
Instead of looking try presence aka sensing (sence) what comes before (pre)...
Instead of posting links to some anti vaxx blogs, just link to a study that shows that the vaxx contains graphene.
You won´t because no such study exists.
The same studies that said it was safe and effective?
All of them coming from pay for play md's.
Such as?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES
Top
Kek
Campra himself admits that he has no idea where the sample comes from. It was sent to him anonymously. Which means, nobody knows if was a real vial of covid vaccine.
He also admits that the results are inconclusive.
Try again, retard.
I would expect this given that its illegal to obtain the specimens.
Here I'll quote the article for anyone reading this shill's comments:
:)
So how do you know that he tested the covid vaccine when he himself doesn´t know it?
Science, how does it work?