Space is what we can see. We can determine without doubt (Aireys failure) that the stars move, not us, thus, to move that fast (celestial day) they have little or no mass. They are far away, but not light years or something even like that. More like thousands of miles.
It is not Galaxy or planets and mega fusion bombs. Black holes, all that shit is visible, but it's not that far away. This, it's not what they tell you it is, it's something else. What exactly? I don't know. But it's not Galaxies of planets
Directionally accurate , except for Hillary, she's a tool, not a shot-caller, and Epstein/Diddy rings are run by intelligence agencies and they are an all-purpose blackmail/enforcement/playground tool to control the elites, not to service them.
No one gives a single flying fuck about thumbsy-uppies on this website unless they’re a confirmed paid shill. Have you ever noticed that? The accounts that say things only paid jewish shills have ever said are the only ones that whine about voting.
Roast in hell, flat earther. Your well poisoning won’t work.
a) What is one already attending (perceivable) before others can draw (suggested) ones attention from it?
b) What if few utilize suggestion to tempt many to withdraw from nature drawing a line (inception towards death)?
c) If a drawing draws towards, then why are drawings tempting one to keep looking back...like museums filled with artificial drawings to draw in generations of onlookers?
the point
a) Death. Any suggested point implies end of sentence (life)...
b) Can you give me an example of a point being made without the dialogue aka dia (two) log (logic; conflict of reason) continuing?
c) Religion; -isms; suggested information; definitions; consent; temptations...what's the point?
You wipe a stinky fish across the trail so people can't follow
a) Why would FREE will of choice suggest others to follow trails? Following implies binding self to another, hence being drawn by suggested directions...
b) People implies ones singular consent to a suggested pluralism. Nature doesn't shape people...it generates each person.
Few suggest e pluribus unum (out of many, one) to collectivize many together to establish "united states"...as opposed to nature setting units apart from one another.
c) What if ones choice to hold onto suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) by writing CAN'T represents the stinking fish rotting within self, which corrupts ones senses to blame anything from outside for the smell?
Consider being a fish (life) within an ocean (inception towards death)...a state of decomposition.
It's not helpful
Help implies support/supportare - "bring forward" aka flow (inception towards death) bringing forward form (life)....not form helping each other, while burdening self within flow.
FREE will of choice implies being FREE of burden...unless chosen to put burden onto self by helping others. Meanwhile...the fruits of ones less burdened labors, within the work of nature, permit others to draw support from.
it's not....as you think
I think about nihil-ism whenever others suggest "nothing" to me, and the implied de-nial of everything perceivable for it. Why? Because that helps me to be less ignorant than before.
And this is why you believe if anyone says we aren't in space, or on a planet, is immediately labeled a stupid flat earther. A lod of FE content is false leads, especially speculation and bible as history talk. It's to hide the truth whis is in plane sight
he said, without irony, on an extremely niche internet forum posted from his state of the art device
Wow, so deep. Maybe you should permanently log off.
The thought makes me hard
Yet another "in your face" aggressive meme with a simple, every day word misspelled.
Calling card? Canary? Who knows. Who. Knows.
What word?
Mail in ballots were used to steal an election.
Not "and."
Right off the bat. You need to define what 'space' is, and is not.
Space is what we can see. We can determine without doubt (Aireys failure) that the stars move, not us, thus, to move that fast (celestial day) they have little or no mass. They are far away, but not light years or something even like that. More like thousands of miles.
It is not Galaxy or planets and mega fusion bombs. Black holes, all that shit is visible, but it's not that far away. This, it's not what they tell you it is, it's something else. What exactly? I don't know. But it's not Galaxies of planets
Now square that with your original statement that prompted my Question:
See the problem here?
Good job, paid jewish shill. But you failed since everyone here isn’t mentally defective. Back to Reddit with you.
Directionally accurate , except for Hillary, she's a tool, not a shot-caller, and Epstein/Diddy rings are run by intelligence agencies and they are an all-purpose blackmail/enforcement/playground tool to control the elites, not to service them.
Ya, that's more refined.
Still trying to find evidence elites drink blood. I agree with it but can't find more than circumstantial evidence.
If anyone has anything tag me
Wild meat only
Nah.
Lots of downvotes, look like my evil plan for information dominance isn't working. Ohhhh
No one gives a single flying fuck about thumbsy-uppies on this website unless they’re a confirmed paid shill. Have you ever noticed that? The accounts that say things only paid jewish shills have ever said are the only ones that whine about voting.
Roast in hell, flat earther. Your well poisoning won’t work.
Fuck off loser.
Earth not flat. Scream.
Measuring curtails the extension of ones mind to the suggested measurements of others.
All implies one in energy...no measuring required for each one (fractal) within all (entire) to discern self.
Suggested tech/tekhno - "artifice" tempts one to ignore science/scio - "to know" aka ones perception of all perceivable reality.
The trick...suggested scient-ism tempts one to consent to artifice.
You know what a red herring is?
All perceivable is offered to each ones perception at any moment...others utilize suggestion to draw ones attention away.
The red herring isn't the issue...taking the bait by ones free will of choice is.
Ya, to draw the attention to something....the point. You wipe a stinky fish across the trail so people can't follow. It's not helpful as u think
a) What is one already attending (perceivable) before others can draw (suggested) ones attention from it?
b) What if few utilize suggestion to tempt many to withdraw from nature drawing a line (inception towards death)?
c) If a drawing draws towards, then why are drawings tempting one to keep looking back...like museums filled with artificial drawings to draw in generations of onlookers?
a) Death. Any suggested point implies end of sentence (life)...
b) Can you give me an example of a point being made without the dialogue aka dia (two) log (logic; conflict of reason) continuing?
c) Religion; -isms; suggested information; definitions; consent; temptations...what's the point?
a) Why would FREE will of choice suggest others to follow trails? Following implies binding self to another, hence being drawn by suggested directions...
b) People implies ones singular consent to a suggested pluralism. Nature doesn't shape people...it generates each person.
Few suggest e pluribus unum (out of many, one) to collectivize many together to establish "united states"...as opposed to nature setting units apart from one another.
c) What if ones choice to hold onto suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) by writing CAN'T represents the stinking fish rotting within self, which corrupts ones senses to blame anything from outside for the smell?
Consider being a fish (life) within an ocean (inception towards death)...a state of decomposition.
Help implies support/supportare - "bring forward" aka flow (inception towards death) bringing forward form (life)....not form helping each other, while burdening self within flow.
FREE will of choice implies being FREE of burden...unless chosen to put burden onto self by helping others. Meanwhile...the fruits of ones less burdened labors, within the work of nature, permit others to draw support from.
I think about nihil-ism whenever others suggest "nothing" to me, and the implied de-nial of everything perceivable for it. Why? Because that helps me to be less ignorant than before.
preach brother!
Tired of political conspiracy rejects. Obsessed with voting. It's all too insane. I need to stay off the phone
And this is why you believe if anyone says we aren't in space, or on a planet, is immediately labeled a stupid flat earther. A lod of FE content is false leads, especially speculation and bible as history talk. It's to hide the truth whis is in plane sight
Great post.