I just browsed through reddit garbage, and it's pretty clear they're giving up. But what I noticed, that is odd, is they're trying to frame Trumpers as inciting voter fraud. (WTF???)
So what if the plan is to lean into that???
Makes a lot of sense....
They create like a false flag voter fraud event, but in Trump's favor, then blame it on him.... It's a win because he's going to win anyway, it's less work than stealing it for Kamala, they can use this to incite rioting or have him disqualified, or simply taint his term, and it also negates the 2020 story, while reinforcing the Hilary "Russian Interference" 2016 story (bonus: Neocon narrative building via false origin)..🤔
This would be the move...
No doubt... They really calibrated the "perception-reality" machine during coof. They can drive giant square pegs through tiny round holes.
But I feel like they've recently turned off the Kamala push. Kinda like letting her fail.
They're coming at us with something else.
Plot twist: They're both puppets. Who cares who wins?
95% of the population can't cite a rule, law, policy, executive order, etc... which they oppose unless they're (the public) emotionally invested or they're parroting propapanda.
The mob wants their candidate to win. Beyond that -- they have no fucking clue.
Perhaps, but what difference does it make.
They choose the candidates.
They choose who gets elected.
The candidate is there to carry out their job in the future.
Figure out what the job will be.
That's where the attention should be.
The job is commie money handout to keep these decrepit countries from defaulting... That's why Trump is going in.
He gets the biggest pass on being the "free money" guy.
But they still need these stories.
This creates a Neocon lense for everyone to judge him against: "If he doesn't hate Russia, then it's proof they helped him win"
Thats a good plan. Anything that causes uncertainty in the election results will be the basis for the msm narrative that the election is not official and to keep Kamala in there.
I will be vigilant and express my concerns of election fraud regardless of the winner.
The Move would be if some independent candidate (if any) suddenly win. :)
From the outside there is really no any significant difference between two main candidates. In addition, it looks like wrestling show where rivals throw and hit each other hard, but it is all in pretence, for public. Looks very unnatural, really.
I thought about this possibility, but there's just no way they can let Trump retake the presidency. He's got a much better idea what he's up against and he's going to go to work right away with a chainsaw and a sledgehammer. He's had four years to make plans and shape the battlespace.
You can see that this is understood implicitly by many, underlying certain statements they make, as if he will take power on Election Day instead of in January. That's when the Rubicon will be either be crossed or it will not, with this exception....
So Kamala is going to lose bigly even though there's going to be rigging in her favor bigly. Given all the foregoing, the only way to play that is to expose the rigging but leave out who it was in favor of. Then they just wave their hands around about having to redo the whole thing next year because "the American people deserve a fair and honest election and will settle for no less".
That will buy them time for something to break their way, like a nuclear war or some such. You can't lose as long as the game continues, can you?
I think They must look back and realize this is the gambit They should have run back in 2016. Given the controversy, a lot of people would have went along with it. It's way more obviously lopsided now than it was then. Few will be inclined towards accepting it or even putting up with anyone else that does.
EDIT: I came across this variant gambit right after posting:
Martin Armstrong: Can Biden Declare Martial Law To Suspend the Election? (10/23/2024)
Lots of detailed legal history with the conclusion:
Some variation of "colluded with Russia to steal the election"?
Totally plausible.
a) ELEC (life) within TION (inception towards death) aka ones reaction to nature enacted upon one.
b) Ones free will of choice cannot be stolen...only ignored, when consenting to suggested choices by another.
Obvious/obviam - "in the way"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/obvious aka being (life) in the way (inception towards death). Any other way suggested makes one oblivious to it.
Consenting to suggested pluralism (they) gives up ones singular autonomy to others.
Trump or Kamala...either side tempts ones choice to lean away from center and into a conflict against the other side.
Few suggest voting to tempt many to defraud ones "free will of choice" by shirking it onto another. Temptation incites ignorance.
A lot confines ones share of sensing. Few casts lots (lottery; lotto) to tempt many to risk a share on chance aka gambling.
How could storage be negated from outside?