I do. It's an old known fact, several old books written about it.
He was one of those shepardic jews who fake converted to Christianism, stole and cheated with multiple identities and was financed by the wealth of his time to do his plunder.
Several old Spanish books written about Cristóbal Colón ages ago.
And no, they are not pretty reading. He's not the mythical founder of Amreica taught in school.
Here's what a jew named David wrote in the book reviews..."She (Jane Frances Amler) fails to understand the complex nature of pre-modern fluid identities..."
a) Fluid implies form within flow...flow implies before form came into being.
b) Reasoning (right vs wrong) implies form ignoring flow by holding onto an opinion.
c) Being implies different form (life) within same flow (inception towards death)...drawing comparisons for each other inverts sameness with likeness, which mentally confuses differences.
It's something with little meaning, and "They" can simply reverse themselves after another 20-year study. I think "They" like to throw these things out from time to time to keep the masses in thrall to their own egos.
That is, those that fancy themselves "aware of the JQ" or whatever get to congratulate themselves that they "were right about the Jews all along". On the flip side, the normies get to say, "Everyone who comments on this is an anti-Semite, which of course makes me a better person than them for pointing this out." The cycle continues because none of these people can raise their consciousness to leave that cycle.
As far as the factoid itself, I can't say it makes sense but what I do see is that no one actually tries to make any sense of it. The Catholic Isabella I of Castile sends out a Jew on this important mission? Oh well, maybe she's a crypto, right? At precisely the same time, Torquemada is running around and they clean house (like pronto) with the Alhambra Decree giving all the Jews the boot.
Does anyone attempt to bring these basic things together under a sensible thesis? Perhaps one that points us towards a deeper understanding of our real history? Nope, just Jews = bad or Jews = good (choose one).
As I see it, this type of divisive diversion keeps people away from the really sensitive issues. For example, was America really named after Chris's buddy Amerigo Vespucci? No, it's ridiculous upon any examination. America turns out to be named after Satan. That's a sensitive issue pointing at real history, but a story for another day.
Ones consent to believe suggested information shapes a double helix aka a spiral turning (circular logic) around a fixed center (consent).
Nature turns whole (oneness) into partials (one), hence no two-folded (double) anything...unless one ignores perceivable nature for another ones suggestion, which implies a dual-ism aka a double; a duplicate; a fictitious turn into the opposite direction of reality.
If one resists to believe, then the contradiction within DNA...TWO... becomes apparent to ONE-self.
I do. It's an old known fact, several old books written about it.
He was one of those shepardic jews who fake converted to Christianism, stole and cheated with multiple identities and was financed by the wealth of his time to do his plunder.
Several old Spanish books written about Cristóbal Colón ages ago.
And no, they are not pretty reading. He's not the mythical founder of Amreica taught in school.
Christofer Columbus was a Catholic explorer.
Here's what a jew named David wrote in the book reviews..."She (Jane Frances Amler) fails to understand the complex nature of pre-modern fluid identities..."
What kind of weird name is Amler and why are all her books glorifying jews?
Could be the usual de-judaizing of "Adler" or Jane/John/Jehovah + Francis/Frank/free + Amler/amble/ambi /around aka Yahweh free around.
Reading a book binds ones focus to a chosen one, hence glorifying suggested over perceivable.
On the other hand...what else is there to write about?
Fluid=flow, right?
a) Fluid implies form within flow...flow implies before form came into being.
b) Reasoning (right vs wrong) implies form ignoring flow by holding onto an opinion.
c) Being implies different form (life) within same flow (inception towards death)...drawing comparisons for each other inverts sameness with likeness, which mentally confuses differences.
maybe, the oldest engraving of him was drawn that year and it depicts him as a Jewish-ottoman type of person. its within the realm of possibility
It's something with little meaning, and "They" can simply reverse themselves after another 20-year study. I think "They" like to throw these things out from time to time to keep the masses in thrall to their own egos.
That is, those that fancy themselves "aware of the JQ" or whatever get to congratulate themselves that they "were right about the Jews all along". On the flip side, the normies get to say, "Everyone who comments on this is an anti-Semite, which of course makes me a better person than them for pointing this out." The cycle continues because none of these people can raise their consciousness to leave that cycle.
As far as the factoid itself, I can't say it makes sense but what I do see is that no one actually tries to make any sense of it. The Catholic Isabella I of Castile sends out a Jew on this important mission? Oh well, maybe she's a crypto, right? At precisely the same time, Torquemada is running around and they clean house (like pronto) with the Alhambra Decree giving all the Jews the boot.
Does anyone attempt to bring these basic things together under a sensible thesis? Perhaps one that points us towards a deeper understanding of our real history? Nope, just Jews = bad or Jews = good (choose one).
As I see it, this type of divisive diversion keeps people away from the really sensitive issues. For example, was America really named after Chris's buddy Amerigo Vespucci? No, it's ridiculous upon any examination. America turns out to be named after Satan. That's a sensitive issue pointing at real history, but a story for another day.
Hahaha How fucking retarded.
Ones consent to believe suggested information shapes a double helix aka a spiral turning (circular logic) around a fixed center (consent).
Nature turns whole (oneness) into partials (one), hence no two-folded (double) anything...unless one ignores perceivable nature for another ones suggestion, which implies a dual-ism aka a double; a duplicate; a fictitious turn into the opposite direction of reality.
If one resists to believe, then the contradiction within DNA...TWO... becomes apparent to ONE-self.
Se-phar aka seafarer or seeing far...
sephardic to seeing far connection, is it your deduction or is it the true etymology of tge words?