Ones consent to believe suggested information shapes a double helix aka a spiral turning (circular logic) around a fixed center (consent).
Nature turns whole (oneness) into partials (one), hence no two-folded (double) anything...unless one ignores perceivable nature for another ones suggestion, which implies a dual-ism aka a double; a duplicate; a fictitious turn into the opposite direction of reality.
If one resists to believe, then the contradiction within DNA...TWO... becomes apparent to ONE-self.
True vs false implies logy aka logic/a conflict of reason, which is a fictitious conflict tempting one to ignore etymos aka actual reality.
Logy contradicts etymos. Suggested "etymology" implies a spell crafted together, which I try to take apart by reverse engineering it.
words
Suggested words can only be shaped within perceivable sound...the latter moves, while the former tempt one to hold onto true or false meanings, while fighting each other about them within conflicts of reason (true vs false).
deduction
a) Nature induces (inception) and deduces (death) life...a jew induces (suggestion) deductions (consent) to tempt gentiles to destroy life.
Being alive implies an ongoing sentence towards point of death...choosing to hold onto a conclusion (deduction) tempts one to ignore ones life sentence.
sephardic to seeing far connection
a) Not connection...drawn from moving inspiration, hence by seeing far; instead of narrowing ones sight by connecting (focusing) on anything.
b) Notice phonetician from phonic (sound), then apply sound to word....se-phar aka seeing far.
Those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are called DEAF PHONETICIANS aka definitions.
c) From a different angle...Sephardic aka Yehudei Sfarad (jew of Spain)...Spain/span - "drawing distance between objects" aka seeing far.
Ones consent to believe suggested information shapes a double helix aka a spiral turning (circular logic) around a fixed center (consent).
Nature turns whole (oneness) into partials (one), hence no two-folded (double) anything...unless one ignores perceivable nature for another ones suggestion, which implies a dual-ism aka a double; a duplicate; a fictitious turn into the opposite direction of reality.
If one resists to believe, then the contradiction within DNA...TWO... becomes apparent to ONE-self.
Se-phar aka seafarer or seeing far...
sephardic to seeing far connection, is it your deduction or is it the true etymology of tge words?
True vs false implies logy aka logic/a conflict of reason, which is a fictitious conflict tempting one to ignore etymos aka actual reality.
Logy contradicts etymos. Suggested "etymology" implies a spell crafted together, which I try to take apart by reverse engineering it.
Suggested words can only be shaped within perceivable sound...the latter moves, while the former tempt one to hold onto true or false meanings, while fighting each other about them within conflicts of reason (true vs false).
a) Nature induces (inception) and deduces (death) life...a jew induces (suggestion) deductions (consent) to tempt gentiles to destroy life.
b) Deduction; noun - "derivation as a result from a known principle, an inference, conclusion"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/deduction
Being alive implies an ongoing sentence towards point of death...choosing to hold onto a conclusion (deduction) tempts one to ignore ones life sentence.
a) Not connection...drawn from moving inspiration, hence by seeing far; instead of narrowing ones sight by connecting (focusing) on anything.
b) Notice phonetician from phonic (sound), then apply sound to word....se-phar aka seeing far.
Those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are called DEAF PHONETICIANS aka definitions.
c) From a different angle...Sephardic aka Yehudei Sfarad (jew of Spain)...Spain/span - "drawing distance between objects" aka seeing far.