this is a jewish post trying to demoralize an useful account base on "muh feelings"
thats gay as shit. dozens of pedos and kikes and commies and liberals, literal degens posting absurds and you wanna ban the guy who teaches the hidden meaning of words?
You're in a dead forum that no one really looks at. The billions of people on this world and you see a few comments here.
It doesn't matter. Free will of choice is probably algorithm, language model, it depends who is controlling the account. This is a world of deception. Of course those shitheads are watch you and this site, corralling us and keeping you from going father
Thats kinda my thoughts about it, hes not hurting anyone. I used to think it was a bot, but I do think its a real person. You dont need to register a account to scrape this website lol.
If were gonna ban him, might as well ban me. He regurgitates definitions and I regurgitate my drama, just words in the end. Im not gonna lie though, im sure how most have filtered me out, I dont really devote mindpower to read his definitions. The odd time he actually writes a thought I will read it though.
About this site, specifically this sub being dead, yeah things are quiet. All the normies have moved on and blocked all the bullshit they did out. Legit feels like mindwashing.
Its not just this site, the other couple sites I visit are much in the same boat. Under attack by bad actors and a dwindling userbase.
Freecanada brought up a good point, people really only seek these kind of bastions when there are huge attempts at suppression. Things have been fairly quiet on the reddit front but I do often see people say that they wonder what happened to all the conversation. Everyone with a different point of view either got banned or left. Insane how people were acting during the epidemic, damn shameful.
Saidit is being spammed by bad actors and has been for a while, theres the bad actors here as well, many. The one trying to spread his pedo nonsense is spamming kotakuinaction ever night with a new account lmao. Then all the nonsense about jews and flat earth.
I dont help bitching about the government spying on me even though it turned out I was retarded and wrong LMAO. Im sure we are all being spied on, but they wouldnt make it so easy to figure out haha. Man the low phosphorous was giving me some crazy thoughts, easier to manage now that I know why, but ive always been a passionate person about what I believe in. That everyone is equals and we can create a society that everyone can benefit from, not the just the rich/elite.
Someone on freecanada mentioned recently about how I took my ball and went home. Shit man I figured everyone just hates me anyway, I dont do this to be liked.I do this because I just wanted to read different opinions from other minded people. But thats not what we do here, all we do is point fingers and bitch about each other.
Thats the same shit I had to leave freecanada over. I dont know why the native indian thing gets me fired up, but it does. The mass graves were overblown for sure, but its just crazy how they look at natives.
They even get a couple indian members and what do they do? Just rip into them about how their race is a piece of shit, lmao we are not going to win this game with hate.
Nothing would make the canadian government shit their pants more than if canadians actually started looking at native indians as equals and not degenerate pieces of shit. As an appalachian I feel that sterotype all the fucking time. I do miss the odd conversation over there, but what is the point.
Its damn near the same here now too.
You cant even post shit about aliens or anything or you get half a dozen users calling you retarded ^^.
Also the mute function has been broken for years, if it ever worked at all, you could trying posting in c/meta but there have been lots of posts about it before.
I don'i really can't figure out free will. I've talked to him on various accounts for years. These days he is easier to understand. Sometimes though....it's so much that it feels like a strangly trained GPT, lately I don't see that as much
You tend to make some long comments, but they are thoughtful enough to read. Please stick around and continue to comment because you're obviously one of the real people around here. I do think the number of legitimate accounts with real people are few. I get a good read on what is happening in Canada from your comments. I'm in the Denver Colorado area BTW and I travel to South/central states fairly often. I try to give honest and unbiased observations as I can in the hopes of providing legitimate information from this region. I pay special attention to several users around here because they appear to provide legitimate information from the areas they are in. Lots of disinformation to parse through for sure. Have a nice day
I don't really devote mind power to read his definitions. The odd time he actually writes a thought I will read it though.
Do you think in definitions? Who defined the words you use to think? If to define implies to AFFIX, then how could thinking SOLVE any problems?
Im not gonna lie
a) How is "not; nothing" a truth?
b) What about "I AM" is true? If one doesn't suggest "I AM" to another, then is one true or false?
c) “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am” ~John 8:58
What came before...WAS or IS?
feels like mindwashing
If nature moves; then those who follow are being washed out...
everyone is equals...everyone with a different point of view...got banned...
What if it's the opposite? What if each one is different from one another, hence each having a different point of view...unless ignored by following the same line of thinking?
all we do is point fingers and bitch about each other.
Free will of choice is probably algorithm, language model, it depends who is controlling the account
a) Can you show me an algorithm or language model that can adapt to perceivable inspiration over suggested information? What if only ones free will of choice can do that?
b) If FREE WILL OF CHOICE depends on who is in control, then...?
This is a world of deception.
a) How does all perceivable deceive (mislead by false appearance or statement) ones perception?
b) How does nature generate a false appearance or suggest a statement?
Maybe sometimes, you respond and you are just on a different level. Some of it just rambles and doesn't make sense. I guess I can't show you any language model that would talk so wierd, but who knows what's possible.
A. the All Precievable cannot be deceived, but my perception can be. I am not all Precievable.
B. Nature doesn't. Mans interpretation and observation search for what nature might tell us, but it's not nature's fault for making a false statement.
Still world of deception. Massively and to almost no end, practically everything most people believe is science is actually programing.
the All Precievable cannot be deceived, but my perception can be. I am not all Precievable.
a) "the all" contradicts itself, because THE implies a specification like for example "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly". ALL implies whole for each particular/species/specific within.
Few suggest THE-ism to distract many from discerning self within all perceivable.
b) "cannot be" implies suggested NOT (nihil-ism; nihilo; nothing) tempting one to ignore CAN (to be able) BE (being), hence ones perception being enabled by all perceivable.
One cannot discern self as long as NOT contradicts CAN...others suggest NOT to corrupt what one CAN do.
c) "my perception" implies one claiming self as MY, while being moved within all perceivable. Motion cannot be held onto...those within can be tricked to hold onto self (my) and each other (ours), while ignoring motion.
Being implies temporary unit (life) during ongoing procession (inception towards death) aka a current to draw from, not a currency to hold onto...
d) "i am" implies to define/diffinire/finis (bind) ones FREE will of choice by trying to affix a solid unit (life) during liquid procession (inception towards death).
Doing that implies ones lack of self discernment, while ignoring that all moves each one.
Few suggest definitions (deaf phoneticians) to tempt many to hold onto affix brands/idols/beliefs/information/words etc. while ignoring perceivable sound (phonic).
Suggested words (spell-craft) contradict perceivable sound IF one chooses to hold onto them.
you are just on a different level
a) Just (balance) generates odds (choice). Consenting to the suggested choices by others tempts ones choice at odds against others.
b) Same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception)...consenting to suggested tempts many on a level under few. It's called a "pyramid scheme"...
Nature doesn't.
Nature DOES (action); each one within RE-DOES (reaction). Few suggest NOT to tempt consenting many into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't) against each other, while ignoring everything natural (perception) for artificial nothing (suggestion).
what nature might tell us
a) Nature doesn't TELL; verb - "speak, talk, say; count, reckon"...nature moves sound. Few within tempt many with spell-craft; talk shows; soothsaying; accountability and estimations/accounting/reckoning to ignore nature.
b) Nature differentiates all (whole) into each one (partial)...few suggest pluralism (us) to tempt many together, which in return permits few to remain apart.
For example "e pluribus unum" (out of many;one) aka United States aka US...few suggest US to equalize differences among many.
c) Nature implies an ongoing flow of perceivable inspiration for each ones formed perception to draw from. Few within nature utilize suggested information to tempt many to hold onto artificial form, while ignoring natural flow.
If you say that I'm on a different level, then that implies me drawing from perceivable inspiration, while you hold onto suggested information....that's a burden upon you, that I don't carry.
nature's fault
Fault implies fall...being implies rising (life) during fall (inception towards death) of nature.
Few distract many from FALLING with FAILING...the former implies status quo of being enabled to rise, while the latter tempts being to blame self or each other for faults.
Ones ignorance becomes the foundation for finding faults among others...
a false statement
Reason (true vs false) implies a state of mind (statement) in perpetual conflict/imbalance/ignorance...
Nature generates implication (if/then) aka balance for choice to draw from.
Ones consent to HOLD onto any suggestion implies stillness within self aka self deception.
Massively and to almost no end
a) Only one (life) can experience beginning (inception) and end (death)....all implies foundation (motion) for beginning and end (momentum) of each one (matter).
Few suggest CONTINUE aka CON (together) TENET (to hold) to trick many to hold onto anything suggested as to escape everything perceivable moving towards death.
b) The deception isn't massive...the masses deceive each other to view all perceivable through the narrow lens of suggestions by few.
In "They Live" a fight breaks out about putting on the glasses to see. In reality...the glasses (suggested information) establish the conflict (reason/logic) which prevents one from seeing (perceivable inspiration).
most people believe is science is actually programing
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable. Suggested scientism tempts ones consent to hold onto the suggestions by another, while ignoring perceivable.
I cannot suggest what IS without tempting you to ignore what WAS perceivable...it's on you to discern self within WAS by resisting the temptation of IS aka adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resting the temptation to hold onto suggested information.
Sound was before word is...the former cannot be held onto; while the latter is perpetuated by mercantilism aka selling (suggestion) and buying (consent) aka a binding contract.
Tldnr, but, I think, in writing and English sentence, the subject, All, in this case should have a nessesary preposition or the word All could he misunderstood in the context.
What could ALL be subject to? What if all implies auxiliary cause for each subjected effect within?
in this case should have a necessary preposition
How is encasing/confining/restricting something a necessity? How could ALL be encased/confined/restricted by anyone within?
the word All could he misunderstood
What if all implies sound...within which one can shape words? What if few suggest the word "all" to distract many from the implication of being within all sound?
in this case...in the context
Who put the word "all" into a case or a context? How could ALL be put into anything?
I think you read into stuff too much.
a) If one exists within all of nature, then one can handle all offered...
b) What if few tempt many into a conflict of reason (too little vs too much) to distract from ones potential within all offered?
c) Could your choice to think in CASES and CONTEXTS restrict your thinking capacity?
d) To read implies ones consent to suggested writing, while ignoring that all perceivable doesn't write anything for ones perception.
Nature doesn't shape words by putting letters together...it moves sound by setting waves apart from one another.
I think they're a pos tactically cluttering up the comment section with garbage; forum sliding by filling it with junk which deters new readers.
See a new post and open it to find a few insightful comments buried under free will's four paragraphs of fucking etymological nonsense that has nothing to do with the post itself.
and WHY DO I STILL SEE THEIR COMMENTS AFTER BLOCKING THEM FFS? Why can't they be muted?
Every once in a while he posts a prosaic comment that shows it’s not… always running others’ comments through chatGPT and posting the linguistic deconstruction answer it spits out.
Take any comment I responded to and try to get a response from any AI tool that resembles what I wrote...ain't gonna work. AI can't adapt to inspiration, only parse information.
linguistic deconstruction
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
See, this is the kind of thing that makes you a valid addition to boards. Lateral thinking is desperately needed. It doesn’t have to go anywhere on its own; it gets the reader thinking in a direction that he can then apply elsewhere.
I trolled it with pages from the Bible that never connected to the conversation. The AI bot doesn't follow the conversation, it only produces these etymological vague statements. But it's learning, as you can see the bot's comments in here.
If the mods don't recognize an actual bot with no actual contribution, but only spamming in the comments useless stuff... this forum is hopeless.
And look at the downvotes of the post - so many shills are running free, no moderation whatsoever to stop that.
It's a honeypot for conspiracy researchers.
It has no actual discussions because the shills attack anyone going against the narrative.
It is not a community, people in here are isolated to the point that they only post their own stuff, and upvote only the stuff they agree with.
My solution is to create your own place, where you can immediately remove the bots and shills, instead of hoping that someone else would do that. I reported this AI chatbot twice recently because he spammed my posts... again... And there's no action from the mods... as usual...
I am just sorry for the real people, who post in here, hoping for the truth to reach someone else...
I don’t mind him because, despite being weird, he understand the importance of using correct words in the correct manner to convey concepts. One trick pony? Sure. But so is Ducktales with his baked beans and his safety camps. He serves a purpose, too.
Also, free will names the jew (when pressed), so he at least has his head on straight.
I don't agree with everything you write, but I damn well like your style of saying exactly what's on your mind. It's rare to find someone with principles and not afraid to speak up.
this is a jewish post trying to demoralize an useful account base on "muh feelings"
thats gay as shit. dozens of pedos and kikes and commies and liberals, literal degens posting absurds and you wanna ban the guy who teaches the hidden meaning of words?
get the fuck out
Guys, just check this user - redkrab posts in here - 0.
Do you wonder why his contribution is to defend a bot?
You're in a dead forum that no one really looks at. The billions of people on this world and you see a few comments here.
It doesn't matter. Free will of choice is probably algorithm, language model, it depends who is controlling the account. This is a world of deception. Of course those shitheads are watch you and this site, corralling us and keeping you from going father
Thats kinda my thoughts about it, hes not hurting anyone. I used to think it was a bot, but I do think its a real person. You dont need to register a account to scrape this website lol.
If were gonna ban him, might as well ban me. He regurgitates definitions and I regurgitate my drama, just words in the end. Im not gonna lie though, im sure how most have filtered me out, I dont really devote mindpower to read his definitions. The odd time he actually writes a thought I will read it though.
About this site, specifically this sub being dead, yeah things are quiet. All the normies have moved on and blocked all the bullshit they did out. Legit feels like mindwashing.
Its not just this site, the other couple sites I visit are much in the same boat. Under attack by bad actors and a dwindling userbase.
Freecanada brought up a good point, people really only seek these kind of bastions when there are huge attempts at suppression. Things have been fairly quiet on the reddit front but I do often see people say that they wonder what happened to all the conversation. Everyone with a different point of view either got banned or left. Insane how people were acting during the epidemic, damn shameful.
Saidit is being spammed by bad actors and has been for a while, theres the bad actors here as well, many. The one trying to spread his pedo nonsense is spamming kotakuinaction ever night with a new account lmao. Then all the nonsense about jews and flat earth.
I dont help bitching about the government spying on me even though it turned out I was retarded and wrong LMAO. Im sure we are all being spied on, but they wouldnt make it so easy to figure out haha. Man the low phosphorous was giving me some crazy thoughts, easier to manage now that I know why, but ive always been a passionate person about what I believe in. That everyone is equals and we can create a society that everyone can benefit from, not the just the rich/elite.
Someone on freecanada mentioned recently about how I took my ball and went home. Shit man I figured everyone just hates me anyway, I dont do this to be liked.I do this because I just wanted to read different opinions from other minded people. But thats not what we do here, all we do is point fingers and bitch about each other.
Thats the same shit I had to leave freecanada over. I dont know why the native indian thing gets me fired up, but it does. The mass graves were overblown for sure, but its just crazy how they look at natives.
They even get a couple indian members and what do they do? Just rip into them about how their race is a piece of shit, lmao we are not going to win this game with hate.
Nothing would make the canadian government shit their pants more than if canadians actually started looking at native indians as equals and not degenerate pieces of shit. As an appalachian I feel that sterotype all the fucking time. I do miss the odd conversation over there, but what is the point.
Its damn near the same here now too.
You cant even post shit about aliens or anything or you get half a dozen users calling you retarded ^^.
Also the mute function has been broken for years, if it ever worked at all, you could trying posting in c/meta but there have been lots of posts about it before.
There was a mute button?
I don'i really can't figure out free will. I've talked to him on various accounts for years. These days he is easier to understand. Sometimes though....it's so much that it feels like a strangly trained GPT, lately I don't see that as much
I just got banned from TD again. It happens to anyone legit. So, when you see all these accounts on patriots...be warned.
You tend to make some long comments, but they are thoughtful enough to read. Please stick around and continue to comment because you're obviously one of the real people around here. I do think the number of legitimate accounts with real people are few. I get a good read on what is happening in Canada from your comments. I'm in the Denver Colorado area BTW and I travel to South/central states fairly often. I try to give honest and unbiased observations as I can in the hopes of providing legitimate information from this region. I pay special attention to several users around here because they appear to provide legitimate information from the areas they are in. Lots of disinformation to parse through for sure. Have a nice day
Does sound have a beginning and end?
Do you think in definitions? Who defined the words you use to think? If to define implies to AFFIX, then how could thinking SOLVE any problems?
a) How is "not; nothing" a truth?
b) What about "I AM" is true? If one doesn't suggest "I AM" to another, then is one true or false?
c) “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am” ~John 8:58
What came before...WAS or IS?
If nature moves; then those who follow are being washed out...
What if it's the opposite? What if each one is different from one another, hence each having a different point of view...unless ignored by following the same line of thinking?
Does free-will-of-choice do that?
a) Can you show me an algorithm or language model that can adapt to perceivable inspiration over suggested information? What if only ones free will of choice can do that?
b) If FREE WILL OF CHOICE depends on who is in control, then...?
a) How does all perceivable deceive (mislead by false appearance or statement) ones perception?
b) How does nature generate a false appearance or suggest a statement?
Maybe sometimes, you respond and you are just on a different level. Some of it just rambles and doesn't make sense. I guess I can't show you any language model that would talk so wierd, but who knows what's possible.
A. the All Precievable cannot be deceived, but my perception can be. I am not all Precievable.
B. Nature doesn't. Mans interpretation and observation search for what nature might tell us, but it's not nature's fault for making a false statement.
Still world of deception. Massively and to almost no end, practically everything most people believe is science is actually programing.
a) "the all" contradicts itself, because THE implies a specification like for example "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly". ALL implies whole for each particular/species/specific within.
Few suggest THE-ism to distract many from discerning self within all perceivable.
b) "cannot be" implies suggested NOT (nihil-ism; nihilo; nothing) tempting one to ignore CAN (to be able) BE (being), hence ones perception being enabled by all perceivable.
One cannot discern self as long as NOT contradicts CAN...others suggest NOT to corrupt what one CAN do.
c) "my perception" implies one claiming self as MY, while being moved within all perceivable. Motion cannot be held onto...those within can be tricked to hold onto self (my) and each other (ours), while ignoring motion.
Being implies temporary unit (life) during ongoing procession (inception towards death) aka a current to draw from, not a currency to hold onto...
d) "i am" implies to define/diffinire/finis (bind) ones FREE will of choice by trying to affix a solid unit (life) during liquid procession (inception towards death).
Doing that implies ones lack of self discernment, while ignoring that all moves each one.
Few suggest definitions (deaf phoneticians) to tempt many to hold onto affix brands/idols/beliefs/information/words etc. while ignoring perceivable sound (phonic).
Suggested words (spell-craft) contradict perceivable sound IF one chooses to hold onto them.
a) Just (balance) generates odds (choice). Consenting to the suggested choices by others tempts ones choice at odds against others.
b) Same (all perceivable) generates differences (ones perception)...consenting to suggested tempts many on a level under few. It's called a "pyramid scheme"...
Nature DOES (action); each one within RE-DOES (reaction). Few suggest NOT to tempt consenting many into a conflict of reason (does vs doesn't) against each other, while ignoring everything natural (perception) for artificial nothing (suggestion).
a) Nature doesn't TELL; verb - "speak, talk, say; count, reckon"...nature moves sound. Few within tempt many with spell-craft; talk shows; soothsaying; accountability and estimations/accounting/reckoning to ignore nature.
b) Nature differentiates all (whole) into each one (partial)...few suggest pluralism (us) to tempt many together, which in return permits few to remain apart.
For example "e pluribus unum" (out of many;one) aka United States aka US...few suggest US to equalize differences among many.
c) Nature implies an ongoing flow of perceivable inspiration for each ones formed perception to draw from. Few within nature utilize suggested information to tempt many to hold onto artificial form, while ignoring natural flow.
If you say that I'm on a different level, then that implies me drawing from perceivable inspiration, while you hold onto suggested information....that's a burden upon you, that I don't carry.
Fault implies fall...being implies rising (life) during fall (inception towards death) of nature.
Few distract many from FALLING with FAILING...the former implies status quo of being enabled to rise, while the latter tempts being to blame self or each other for faults.
Ones ignorance becomes the foundation for finding faults among others...
Reason (true vs false) implies a state of mind (statement) in perpetual conflict/imbalance/ignorance...
Nature generates implication (if/then) aka balance for choice to draw from.
STILL; adjective - "motionless, stable, fixed, stationary" contradicts nature (inception towards death) moving beings (life).
Ones consent to HOLD onto any suggestion implies stillness within self aka self deception.
a) Only one (life) can experience beginning (inception) and end (death)....all implies foundation (motion) for beginning and end (momentum) of each one (matter).
Few suggest CONTINUE aka CON (together) TENET (to hold) to trick many to hold onto anything suggested as to escape everything perceivable moving towards death.
b) The deception isn't massive...the masses deceive each other to view all perceivable through the narrow lens of suggestions by few.
In "They Live" a fight breaks out about putting on the glasses to see. In reality...the glasses (suggested information) establish the conflict (reason/logic) which prevents one from seeing (perceivable inspiration).
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable. Suggested scientism tempts ones consent to hold onto the suggestions by another, while ignoring perceivable.
I cannot suggest what IS without tempting you to ignore what WAS perceivable...it's on you to discern self within WAS by resisting the temptation of IS aka adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resting the temptation to hold onto suggested information.
Sound was before word is...the former cannot be held onto; while the latter is perpetuated by mercantilism aka selling (suggestion) and buying (consent) aka a binding contract.
Tldnr, but, I think, in writing and English sentence, the subject, All, in this case should have a nessesary preposition or the word All could he misunderstood in the context.
I think you read into stuff too much.
What could ALL be subject to? What if all implies auxiliary cause for each subjected effect within?
How is encasing/confining/restricting something a necessity? How could ALL be encased/confined/restricted by anyone within?
What if all implies sound...within which one can shape words? What if few suggest the word "all" to distract many from the implication of being within all sound?
Who put the word "all" into a case or a context? How could ALL be put into anything?
a) If one exists within all of nature, then one can handle all offered...
b) What if few tempt many into a conflict of reason (too little vs too much) to distract from ones potential within all offered?
c) Could your choice to think in CASES and CONTEXTS restrict your thinking capacity?
d) To read implies ones consent to suggested writing, while ignoring that all perceivable doesn't write anything for ones perception.
Nature doesn't shape words by putting letters together...it moves sound by setting waves apart from one another.
I think they're a pos tactically cluttering up the comment section with garbage; forum sliding by filling it with junk which deters new readers.
See a new post and open it to find a few insightful comments buried under free will's four paragraphs of fucking etymological nonsense that has nothing to do with the post itself.
and WHY DO I STILL SEE THEIR COMMENTS AFTER BLOCKING THEM FFS? Why can't they be muted?
Wait, he is NOT a bot? Always assumed he was, he adds nothing to discussion, just inserts himself with definitions
Every once in a while he posts a prosaic comment that shows it’s not… always running others’ comments through chatGPT and posting the linguistic deconstruction answer it spits out.
Take any comment I responded to and try to get a response from any AI tool that resembles what I wrote...ain't gonna work. AI can't adapt to inspiration, only parse information.
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
See, this is the kind of thing that makes you a valid addition to boards. Lateral thinking is desperately needed. It doesn’t have to go anywhere on its own; it gets the reader thinking in a direction that he can then apply elsewhere.
It's definitely AI bot.
I trolled it with pages from the Bible that never connected to the conversation. The AI bot doesn't follow the conversation, it only produces these etymological vague statements. But it's learning, as you can see the bot's comments in here.
If the mods don't recognize an actual bot with no actual contribution, but only spamming in the comments useless stuff... this forum is hopeless.
And look at the downvotes of the post - so many shills are running free, no moderation whatsoever to stop that.
It's a honeypot for conspiracy researchers.
It has no actual discussions because the shills attack anyone going against the narrative.
It is not a community, people in here are isolated to the point that they only post their own stuff, and upvote only the stuff they agree with.
My solution is to create your own place, where you can immediately remove the bots and shills, instead of hoping that someone else would do that. I reported this AI chatbot twice recently because he spammed my posts... again... And there's no action from the mods... as usual...
I am just sorry for the real people, who post in here, hoping for the truth to reach someone else...
FWOC is a mentally ill troll who posts word salad. Such types need to fuck off and die.
So?
I don’t mind him because, despite being weird, he understand the importance of using correct words in the correct manner to convey concepts. One trick pony? Sure. But so is Ducktales with his baked beans and his safety camps. He serves a purpose, too.
Also, free will names the jew (when pressed), so he at least has his head on straight.
I don't agree with everything you write, but I damn well like your style of saying exactly what's on your mind. It's rare to find someone with principles and not afraid to speak up.
He should stop changing personas depending on the sub. And you need to post content, so that we can pin down your values, and more easily trust you.
That’s what comments are for.
3 years and counting without a single post. What's the real issue here...me needing to post, or you wanting me to post?
a) Trust contradicts free because trust tempts one to hold onto it.
b) Why is it called a "bank & trust"? If a jew banks and gentiles hold onto trust, then who is gaining and who is losing?
Sometimes your comments (such as this one) are better than golden.
That's not gold. He's pissing on you.
I'm not Jewish, he's not pissing on me