Take any comment I responded to and try to get a response from any AI tool that resembles what I wrote...ain't gonna work. AI can't adapt to inspiration, only parse information.
linguistic deconstruction
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
See, this is the kind of thing that makes you a valid addition to boards. Lateral thinking is desperately needed. It doesn’t have to go anywhere on its own; it gets the reader thinking in a direction that he can then apply elsewhere.
Take any comment I responded to and try to get a response from any AI tool that resembles what I wrote...ain't gonna work. AI can't adapt to inspiration, only parse information.
How does ones lingua (tongue) shape a definition (definite; affixed) when it implies a fluid instrument?
See, this is the kind of thing that makes you a valid addition to boards. Lateral thinking is desperately needed. It doesn’t have to go anywhere on its own; it gets the reader thinking in a direction that he can then apply elsewhere.