Very good question in the end, I think I've seen someone compare water blessing with water memory, and the parallels are strong.
The scientific side of water memory, which of course has been overshadowed by grandiose attached claims that hide the basic science, is that water's unique shape lends itself to potential persistent organizational properties. Scientists agree this happens in the case of freezing, where H2O ice expands unlike most other frozen solids, due to a crystallization in the organization. Water memory is the idea that the same thing happens above freezing temperatures, and that this is achieved by music or other vibrations. I'm not competent to judge it in either direction, so I leave it open in my theory file; happy to hear that this source conducted repeatable inquiries.
If we posit that holy water blessings do increase internal structure in the water, this may result in macro effects that explain some of the alleged acidic properties when applied to e.g. vampires.
Note that this is not the same, though closely related, to holy water in the tabernacle and temples. That water included ashes of the red heifer (of which nine have been slaughtered in history), and any process of blessing with music has been lost to history. However, if the red heifer slaughter makes the news cycle (it could happen any time Israel is sufficiently at peace to allow the ritual without any risk of interruption), we might see a universal holy water blessing explained in all the details Jews are interested in. The Christian details for the allied ritual are well-covered in your material.
Hey, it's in the Christian Bible, Numbers 19. I haven't seen evidence of any changes since then.
Add: If it wasn't clear, there has been no Jewish holy water since the first century, and there is no historical connection whatsoever between holy water and blood libel.
Yet when you wrote that comment you wrote it as if so called "Israel" has something to do with Jews in the Biblical sense. These "Jews" of so called Israel are not Jews they are the Synagogue of Satan. This guy gets it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/RlcNcYJU7SBL/
Do you or do you not know that Jews do not follow the old testament but rather the Talmud? The Talmud which was written after Jesus' time and which curses and slanders Jesus and says he is boiling in a pit of excrement? Do you even know what the Talmud is or what Jews think of you?
You may not have seen my detailed explanation of these things and you may not be satisfied with it. First, the red heifers historically entrusted to Biblical "Jews" or Biblical "Israel" are indeed part of Christian heritage. If another red heifer is slain, it will not contradict anything in the Old Testament even though it will have much Talmudic context added, which is why I said it will also include all the details (modern) "Jews" are interested in. So they do have something to do with each other, namely that moderns believe they are honoring the same Old Testament that we believe we are.
I'm not listening to four hours of a face who doesn't have a transcript or an outline; you may wish to summarize. You may be consistent in your definition of "synagogue of satan", but it's not Jesus's definition, which was limited to non-Jews in two cities. Your theory probably relies on the fact that Ashkenazis are thoroughly genetically mixed with Khazars, but that does not make "Jews" the synagogue, nor does it make all Ashkenazis the synagogue, because this mixing does not erase the genetics from Israel and Judah that the Bible teaches were original. The same applies if you argue the Edomite infiltration. It's the height of racism to define another race differently from the way it defines itself, and is no longer a legitimate demographic discrimination but becomes an indictment against innocent Homo sapiens alongside the guilty.
Next, all Talmud interpretation is required to be consistent with the Old Testament; the ancient statement that Jews should follow the words of the sages "more" than the Old Testament does not allow the words to contradict the Old Testament but instead emphasizes that individual local rulings are more applicable than general principles. If you find a Jewish statement that the Talmud contradicts or overrules the Old Testament on any point of law, I'd be very interested to hear it.
My article on boiling excrement gives way too much detail on the context of that one sarcastic passage. I always say it's been misquoted here more often than rightly quoted, about a dozen times more; for instance, there is no pit, and the "Yeshu" character does not say he is present in the boiling. This is important because people who say they want to criticize the Talmud must quote it correctly or else they will appear to be shills using reverse psychology to create favor for the Talmud via easily debunked arguments. Note also that the Talmud criticized three or more people who could be nicknamed "Yeshu" from three different centuries, so "Yeshu" is actually a composite stock character anyway. There are other caricatures of "Yeshu" present, but the only passage in which Jesus of Nazareth is identified clearly is the one that says he was hanged up on the day of Passover by order of the Sanhedrin but he had many disciples who continued to propagate his teachings.
In general virtually all attempted quotes from the Talmud fail to go to the source in its context and find out the reason. To criticize the Talmud rightly on its superstition, insularity, or eschatology requires accuracy. Yes, the Jews believe that those not brought into their covenant are missing out on what it means to be human: just as we Christians believe. Yes, they have pretty antagonistic statements about their political enemies: just as we have in the Christian patristics of the same period. And, they also have the theoretical hope that any outsider can come into the covenant by Scripture study and God's work, just as we do. Differences are of course admitted. But if you posit that certain Jews are so racist as to consider other Homo sapiens as less than themselves, you need to ensure you are not taking that racist view of others yourself.
I've found that when I present these facts they are routinely answered with an ad hominem argument, so I need to advertise in advance that I will not be answering those. If you don't agree with the facts and logic I present, then give your own organized facts and logic so that it can be discussed. However, all your statements are off-topic for OP, so it'd be better if you made a separate Conspiracies post so they can be reviewed by the community on their merits.
The TALMUD has nothing to do with the old testament. Sorry to say this brother, but your words come out as someone who attends a cuckold of a pastor receiving Jewish money to fool his congregation.
The JEW absolutely despises you. He even despises you much more than he despises the Muslims yet so many fall for Jewish lies. No wonder Christians have been dying for their Jewish master for so long.
Great Christian men have died trying to spread the truth about the Talmud and here you are defending it.
I'm a Christian who has learned the Hebrew-cultural roots of the covenants of the Bible and who insists on facts and logic. I've always said I'm publicly accountable to Scott Lively and First Century Bible Church, and that has only gotten people to imagine that Scott has some secret Jewish tie. However, thank you for stepping up and joining the conversation.
"The JEW" is not a term that refers to any cognizable entity. If you said "Jews" you'd be closer because you'd refer to a cognizable group of people, some of whom despise me, but not all. Overall, the methodology of group characterization is fatally flawed.
Who died trying to spread the truth about the Talmud? Donin didn't. There are lots of failed attempts to spread mixtures of truth and error about the Talmud, which is why I (face persecution from your likes to) post accurate quotes and analysis. But the failed attempts to describe the Talmud didn't get martyrdoms either. (It amazes me how both Jews and Christians fail to get the Talmud placed in a proper, stable cultural perspective, like the patristics have achieved. Nobody objects that the Christians have crazy church fathers, nobody gets obsessed with proving the Christians false by their confessors, all religions pretty well accept that the patristics are just there and are part of history and need not be read as anything more than that.)
I appreciate your links, I didn't get around to them while compiling my own research collection earlier so I'll be happy to comment there. However, it appears you're looking for guidance to one writer's summary opinion without remembering that, for Jewish protection, there are always many opinions in Judaism. What counts is actual practice as documented in primary sources and/or rabbinical organizations.
So for now, for OP's sake let's defer conversation to your three excellent older threads on the subject, a little bit later, thanks.
Being implies different from one another...consenting to suggested theism (theo) and logism (logical) tempts many ones to respond alike.
They're saying it's fringe
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...consenting to anything suggested tempts one off-center, hence towards fringe/border/edge/margin etc.
Being within sound implies centered; consenting to what others are "saying" implies inclination towards "fringe".
emotional "energies" and "vibrations"
a) There's only one energy and it moves/motion...those within can choose to ignore being moved, which implies emotion/emotio/ emoveo - "to move from".
b) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" implies internal generation of action (motion) and reactions (matter) in balance (momentum) with each other. Center of balance implies choice aka oscillation aka vibration.
Being implies choice within balance (need/want)...instead of oscillating between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information), many choose dullness for self and friction (want vs not want) against others.
how this holy water retains that holyness even if it just sits there
There implies a differentiation from here...and differentiation can only exist within motion. Holy/whole moves; while each partial within wields the free will of choice to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death) by for example suggesting to each other that "it just sits there".
As for just..."JUST balances, just weights, a just ephah and a just hin shall ye have." ~Leviticus 19:36.
Balance can only exist within motion...it's the choice within motion that is free to choose to ignore that, hence imbalancing self, which others exploit by tricking ones choice to choose chosen ones suggestion.
Everything that happened in England after 1066 is abomination. The world will continue to weep until the Crown is returned to its rightful heirs. Karma is unavoidable.
Very good question in the end, I think I've seen someone compare water blessing with water memory, and the parallels are strong.
The scientific side of water memory, which of course has been overshadowed by grandiose attached claims that hide the basic science, is that water's unique shape lends itself to potential persistent organizational properties. Scientists agree this happens in the case of freezing, where H2O ice expands unlike most other frozen solids, due to a crystallization in the organization. Water memory is the idea that the same thing happens above freezing temperatures, and that this is achieved by music or other vibrations. I'm not competent to judge it in either direction, so I leave it open in my theory file; happy to hear that this source conducted repeatable inquiries.
If we posit that holy water blessings do increase internal structure in the water, this may result in macro effects that explain some of the alleged acidic properties when applied to e.g. vampires.
Note that this is not the same, though closely related, to holy water in the tabernacle and temples. That water included ashes of the red heifer (of which nine have been slaughtered in history), and any process of blessing with music has been lost to history. However, if the red heifer slaughter makes the news cycle (it could happen any time Israel is sufficiently at peace to allow the ritual without any risk of interruption), we might see a universal holy water blessing explained in all the details Jews are interested in. The Christian details for the allied ritual are well-covered in your material.
So basically Jewish "holy" water is demonic? Containing the remains of slaughtered animals or perhaps slaughtered Christian children?
Hey, it's in the Christian Bible, Numbers 19. I haven't seen evidence of any changes since then.
Add: If it wasn't clear, there has been no Jewish holy water since the first century, and there is no historical connection whatsoever between holy water and blood libel.
Yet when you wrote that comment you wrote it as if so called "Israel" has something to do with Jews in the Biblical sense. These "Jews" of so called Israel are not Jews they are the Synagogue of Satan. This guy gets it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/RlcNcYJU7SBL/
Do you or do you not know that Jews do not follow the old testament but rather the Talmud? The Talmud which was written after Jesus' time and which curses and slanders Jesus and says he is boiling in a pit of excrement? Do you even know what the Talmud is or what Jews think of you?
You may not have seen my detailed explanation of these things and you may not be satisfied with it. First, the red heifers historically entrusted to Biblical "Jews" or Biblical "Israel" are indeed part of Christian heritage. If another red heifer is slain, it will not contradict anything in the Old Testament even though it will have much Talmudic context added, which is why I said it will also include all the details (modern) "Jews" are interested in. So they do have something to do with each other, namely that moderns believe they are honoring the same Old Testament that we believe we are.
I'm not listening to four hours of a face who doesn't have a transcript or an outline; you may wish to summarize. You may be consistent in your definition of "synagogue of satan", but it's not Jesus's definition, which was limited to non-Jews in two cities. Your theory probably relies on the fact that Ashkenazis are thoroughly genetically mixed with Khazars, but that does not make "Jews" the synagogue, nor does it make all Ashkenazis the synagogue, because this mixing does not erase the genetics from Israel and Judah that the Bible teaches were original. The same applies if you argue the Edomite infiltration. It's the height of racism to define another race differently from the way it defines itself, and is no longer a legitimate demographic discrimination but becomes an indictment against innocent Homo sapiens alongside the guilty.
Next, all Talmud interpretation is required to be consistent with the Old Testament; the ancient statement that Jews should follow the words of the sages "more" than the Old Testament does not allow the words to contradict the Old Testament but instead emphasizes that individual local rulings are more applicable than general principles. If you find a Jewish statement that the Talmud contradicts or overrules the Old Testament on any point of law, I'd be very interested to hear it.
My article on boiling excrement gives way too much detail on the context of that one sarcastic passage. I always say it's been misquoted here more often than rightly quoted, about a dozen times more; for instance, there is no pit, and the "Yeshu" character does not say he is present in the boiling. This is important because people who say they want to criticize the Talmud must quote it correctly or else they will appear to be shills using reverse psychology to create favor for the Talmud via easily debunked arguments. Note also that the Talmud criticized three or more people who could be nicknamed "Yeshu" from three different centuries, so "Yeshu" is actually a composite stock character anyway. There are other caricatures of "Yeshu" present, but the only passage in which Jesus of Nazareth is identified clearly is the one that says he was hanged up on the day of Passover by order of the Sanhedrin but he had many disciples who continued to propagate his teachings.
In general virtually all attempted quotes from the Talmud fail to go to the source in its context and find out the reason. To criticize the Talmud rightly on its superstition, insularity, or eschatology requires accuracy. Yes, the Jews believe that those not brought into their covenant are missing out on what it means to be human: just as we Christians believe. Yes, they have pretty antagonistic statements about their political enemies: just as we have in the Christian patristics of the same period. And, they also have the theoretical hope that any outsider can come into the covenant by Scripture study and God's work, just as we do. Differences are of course admitted. But if you posit that certain Jews are so racist as to consider other Homo sapiens as less than themselves, you need to ensure you are not taking that racist view of others yourself.
I've found that when I present these facts they are routinely answered with an ad hominem argument, so I need to advertise in advance that I will not be answering those. If you don't agree with the facts and logic I present, then give your own organized facts and logic so that it can be discussed. However, all your statements are off-topic for OP, so it'd be better if you made a separate Conspiracies post so they can be reviewed by the community on their merits.
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSy6ENVAJlY
The TALMUD has nothing to do with the old testament. Sorry to say this brother, but your words come out as someone who attends a cuckold of a pastor receiving Jewish money to fool his congregation.
The JEW absolutely despises you. He even despises you much more than he despises the Muslims yet so many fall for Jewish lies. No wonder Christians have been dying for their Jewish master for so long.
Great Christian men have died trying to spread the truth about the Talmud and here you are defending it.
I have already done a lot of research on the Talmud. You can look up some of it here: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zfvWer8H/know-thy-talmud-1-the-talmud-con/
I'm a Christian who has learned the Hebrew-cultural roots of the covenants of the Bible and who insists on facts and logic. I've always said I'm publicly accountable to Scott Lively and First Century Bible Church, and that has only gotten people to imagine that Scott has some secret Jewish tie. However, thank you for stepping up and joining the conversation.
"The JEW" is not a term that refers to any cognizable entity. If you said "Jews" you'd be closer because you'd refer to a cognizable group of people, some of whom despise me, but not all. Overall, the methodology of group characterization is fatally flawed.
Who died trying to spread the truth about the Talmud? Donin didn't. There are lots of failed attempts to spread mixtures of truth and error about the Talmud, which is why I (face persecution from your likes to) post accurate quotes and analysis. But the failed attempts to describe the Talmud didn't get martyrdoms either. (It amazes me how both Jews and Christians fail to get the Talmud placed in a proper, stable cultural perspective, like the patristics have achieved. Nobody objects that the Christians have crazy church fathers, nobody gets obsessed with proving the Christians false by their confessors, all religions pretty well accept that the patristics are just there and are part of history and need not be read as anything more than that.)
I appreciate your links, I didn't get around to them while compiling my own research collection earlier so I'll be happy to comment there. However, it appears you're looking for guidance to one writer's summary opinion without remembering that, for Jewish protection, there are always many opinions in Judaism. What counts is actual practice as documented in primary sources and/or rabbinical organizations.
So for now, for OP's sake let's defer conversation to your three excellent older threads on the subject, a little bit later, thanks.
Being implies different from one another...consenting to suggested theism (theo) and logism (logical) tempts many ones to respond alike.
Being implies center (perception) within circumference (perceivable)...consenting to anything suggested tempts one off-center, hence towards fringe/border/edge/margin etc.
Being within sound implies centered; consenting to what others are "saying" implies inclination towards "fringe".
a) There's only one energy and it moves/motion...those within can choose to ignore being moved, which implies emotion/emotio/ emoveo - "to move from".
b) EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power" implies internal generation of action (motion) and reactions (matter) in balance (momentum) with each other. Center of balance implies choice aka oscillation aka vibration.
Being implies choice within balance (need/want)...instead of oscillating between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information), many choose dullness for self and friction (want vs not want) against others.
There implies a differentiation from here...and differentiation can only exist within motion. Holy/whole moves; while each partial within wields the free will of choice to ignore being (life) moved (inception towards death) by for example suggesting to each other that "it just sits there".
As for just..."JUST balances, just weights, a just ephah and a just hin shall ye have." ~Leviticus 19:36.
Balance can only exist within motion...it's the choice within motion that is free to choose to ignore that, hence imbalancing self, which others exploit by tricking ones choice to choose chosen ones suggestion.
AC'ID, adjective (Latin acidus) - "edge"...as in knowledge aka all perceivable aka whole/holy for each divided/divine partial within.
The flow of perceivable inspiration, it burns suggested information like knowledge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqvNmSz9W04
Watch the Water
Some insightful information about the spiritual energy, thought, intent, sound & vibrational effect on water and other matter:
https://www.alivewater.ca/dr-masaru-emoto/
https://www.highexistence.com/water-experiment/
https://bornastheearth.com/dr-masaru-emoto/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1qQUFvufXp4
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vmUk-gDfZA0
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn73Pgk8GGc
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=su4agrdtoWk
Everything that happened in England after 1066 is abomination. The world will continue to weep until the Crown is returned to its rightful heirs. Karma is unavoidable.